420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
Why does C-Higgy defend pedophiles? by Archie Cleshworth - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 04:43:16 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239000 Ignore Report Quick Reply
File: 1504600996136.png -(2303B / 2.25KB, 258x258) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 2303
Okay, I took it to /420/ like you asked. Now answer the question:

What do you gain by defending pedophiles?
>>
James Nennerwedge - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 06:43:33 EST ID:beRtnftP No.239002 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504608213947.jpg -(50437B / 49.25KB, 500x515) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Leave C-Higgins alone
>>
Archie Cleshworth - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 07:01:10 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239004 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239002

All he's gotta do is explain the fucking weird hangup he has with known pedophiles on here. Why he defends them, why he plays dumb when multiple people point it out to him, why he removes posts shining a light on said pedophiles, All I'm asking, then he can merrily go on his way to watching 94 hours of television a week.
>>
Cornelius Bropperspear - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 08:53:07 EST ID:zF6GxLAS No.239006 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239004
What in the fuck are you even talking about?
>>
C-Higgy !lfsExjBfzE - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:16:25 EST ID:eFFOsMKq No.239007 Report Quick Reply
>>239004
I don't defend them and I even banned russonomics for that but at least there was evidence that he was because of that news article about him possessing child porn came out. I already discussed this with Celt before so unless you guys have a some sort of concrete proof like a screencap or something that name redacted actually is one and is ban evading as DarkDeathDestroyer or whatever, we can't do anything.
>>
Rebecca Wollykatch - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 12:20:31 EST ID:Bmq2qufX No.239009 Ignore Report Quick Reply
It's all part of the Pyramid Reuben HIFFWE Big Hentai conspiracy.

WAKE UP SHEEPLE!
>>
Nathaniel Clommerstone - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 22:24:12 EST ID:eVSM4UIT No.239021 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239019
he also was the same poster that obsessively talked about the girls from johnny test on mtv. for like, an entire thread. others on the board reacted with digust but he was never banned or even warned.

often times well-known posters on here rankle the userbase (a la StimLion) cause their personalities and frequency of posting/post quality annoys some folks, and I get that decisions on bans shouldn't be made based on such reactions. but redacted goes beyond that. he's not just an active nuisance on the boards he posts on - his pedophilia was readily apparent on his posts on /b/ and /mtv/, and is remembered by users. I don't have any screencaps of his creepy obsessions cause, well, why the fuck would I read that shit and think "I have to save this?" but if anyone does have any harder proof to provide Higgs then please come forward.

Until then, I don't think it's rash or baseless to say that this user has posted enough pedophilic shit, even if not in the form of illegal images, and enough users corroborate being made uncomfortable by it, that banning the new alias should have happened long ago.
>>
Reuben Gimmerham - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 23:37:46 EST ID:0zJYAR2Z No.239023 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504669066386.gif -(1712386B / 1.63MB, 360x203) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239019
sorry hig but he's right, get it together
>>
George Dassleshaw - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 23:55:34 EST ID:hfwowfMy No.239025 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239019
>dat rebuttal..
>>
Nathaniel Clommerstone - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:26:21 EST ID:eVSM4UIT No.239026 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239024
the post about the sister's friends was made on /b/. the posts on /mtv/ i did report.
>>
Augustus Crodgefuck - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 01:55:03 EST ID:xNxyE66R No.239029 Ignore Report Quick Reply
the fuck?
>>
Barnaby Daffingwene - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:44:42 EST ID:poL0ILAb No.239035 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239019
here, here!
>>
Esther Billingham - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 11:53:11 EST ID:5rRKE1wD No.239037 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504713191026.png -(8566B / 8.37KB, 71x100) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239019
>Why can't you draw a hard line on pedophiles like the rest of us normal people?
>>
Hugh Gimmledone - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:07:49 EST ID:Vp0XktGc No.239038 Ignore Report Quick Reply
People are banned over completely mundane things. Pedophilia is a serious issue that leave scores of people scarred. If I were a mod, any hint of being a pedo, including loli hentai, would warrant a ban.
>>
Frederick Punnerfuck - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:28:54 EST ID:gScEu62I No.239040 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239019
>post his disgusting 6000 calorie meals on /nom/ and his worthless "contributions" that you can't seem to live without on /wooo/, /mtv/, /mma/ and elsewhere
I'm getting the feeling that all this righteous anger is less about pedophilia than it is some unresolved frustration with Chiggy and/or other people's diets.
>>
Doris Picklebury - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 17:25:49 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239044 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239040

No, it is 100% about [name redacted]/xXxDarkDeathDestroyerxXx being a creepy pedo fuck. I think Chiggins does a good job modding on here, and he has a largely inoffensive history of posting abotu TV shows and whatnot on /wooo/, /mtv/, /vg/, and /nom/. This is why it's completely fucking baffling and maddening that he acts completely oblivious to multiple user concerns of a goddamned pedo or worse, sides with the pedo and says we have to supply him "evidence" as if we were trying to support a court case.

It's just fucking weird that staff is apparently afraid to ban a pedophile from the board, like the pedo has some sort of sword of Damocles hanging over Kirt or the site that will drop the instant they ban him for being a pedo fuck nuisance. I mean for Christ's sake, /420/ has a monthly "Spunky banned me for being an obnoxious faggot on /pol/" thread and they always circle back with everyone laughing at OP for being a pathetic loser. Say you ban this pedo and he comes on here to ban evade and whines about his ban, do you think that people will get sympathetic and decide to stage a mutiny on the rest of the site or something?
>>
Martha Duckworth - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 22:30:47 EST ID:xNxyE66R No.239047 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504751447350.jpg -(367366B / 358.76KB, 1990x1326) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
I don't think just being a pedophile should be a bannable offense, as long as they're not posting anything against the rules.

Fucking thought police.
>>
Simon Dengerdark - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 01:05:19 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239049 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239045

It's not evasion because Chiggy apparently needs DNA evidence to justify his bans.

>>239047

K, go on /b/ right now and ask people with a straight face for advice on how to film underage girls without getting caught so you can beat off to it afterward.

Don't worry, I'll keep the thought police out of this one.
>>
Esther Brinnerville - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 10:53:50 EST ID:mXTj3VFi No.239055 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239047
Pedophile detected
>>
Simon Dengerdark - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 13:57:16 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239058 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239051

Keep on digging, you arrogant piece of shit pedo fuck. Eventually the rest of the staff will catch on and see what you're doing.
>>
Fuck Gandlefuck - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:00:17 EST ID:49r4bnNN No.239059 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239051
It's pretty obvious when a tripfag changes his handle on a board as slow as /nom/ man. "[name redacted]"? How retarded do you think people are?
>>
Martha Duckworth - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:02:39 EST ID:xNxyE66R No.239062 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239049
Ok I did
http://boards.420chan.org/b/res/4606399.php
I'm not sure where you're going with this
>>
Hedda Brookworth - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:41:18 EST ID:WDenzLBr No.239064 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239062
I hope they ban u, fag
>>
Betsy Gossleville - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:48:00 EST ID:d5rvymgR No.239065 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239062
AHA! So you confess to being a ban evader?
>>
Eugene Giffingmetch - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:50:40 EST ID:ZmkAZicY No.239067 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504817440502.jpg -(22260B / 21.74KB, 320x320) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239062
lmao
>>
Lydia Wonningmutch - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:13:52 EST ID:xNxyE66R No.239181 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239180
who the fuck are you talking about and what did he do?
you realize to someone who's not involved in whatever weird bit of drama you're going off about this thread looks insane? you just keep going on about The Pedophile and how EVERYONE knows what HE did and chiggy is shielding him for some nefarious purpose and I'm pretty sure I'm not the only person who has no clue what you're even talking about.
It feeds his ego? he's gloating about it?
Are you feeling ok Ernest?
>>
C-Higgy !lfsExjBfzE - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 01:14:02 EST ID:f6cFrfhG No.239182 Report Quick Reply
>>239180
We've banned them before and as I already said, I had banned russonomics for that when someone had posted the news article about him possessing child porn came to light after he threatened to kill himself on Twitter. While I believe what you're saying is plausible and you've certainly provided substantial testimony, >>239179 is correct that I'm just simply looking for screencaps or something to corroborate what everyone else has said and what Celt and I had already previously discussed.

I'm not trying to be the bad cop and I've never tried to outright defend any poster including name redacted as I try to treat all posters here with respect. I understand if that notion of defense is there when I was trying to defuse a situation between him posting in the recent meals threads and other posters not liking the kinds of foods he was posting, which in my defense it shouldn't matter what people post in those bump when threads on any board as long as it doesn't break any rules and the discussion stays civil and on topic. I know me and the other mods would want to at least get to the bottom of this but there's only so much we can do with what's been already provided.
>>
Ernest Gembleman - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 02:58:17 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239184 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239181

>who the fuck are you talking about and what did he do?

You were mouthing off earlier >>239047 and >>239062, we can see your ID you fucking retard. It's pretty clear that you're just shitposting, either on behalf of your fellow pedophile or you're xXxDarkDeathDestroyer/[name redacted] shitposting on his VPN. Go fuck yourself, you piece of shit.

>>239182

You're asking for screenshots of threads from over a year ago. You're also skirting the original issue: ignoring the reports back when the fucking posts were still on the board.

I'll ask again, since you've never answered this: What do you gain by not banning a ban-evading pedophile? What catastrophic event do you foresee happening when you ban [name redacted] on his current proxy?

Man up, Chiggins. Answer the fucking question for once.
>>
Lydia Wonningmutch - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:16:50 EST ID:xNxyE66R No.239185 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239184
yeah I was mouthing off cause I didn't fucking get it, I still don't fucking get it, and everytime I come to this board I see this thread and wonder what got up your ass so I finally just outright asked
>>
Lydia Wonningmutch - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:23:13 EST ID:xNxyE66R No.239186 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239185
Like seriously, you're holding an autistic grudge at a mod who didn't ban a user you don't like A YEAR AGO?
fucking let it go, if someone posts something banworthy get em banned, don't fucking witch hunt users for thought crimes and posts that no longer exist.

what the fuck is wrong with you.
>>
Simon Smallway - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:35:50 EST ID:gXVDtRcL No.239194 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239186
when you mix tisms and schizophrenia you get some amazing miracles, like AntiCrack-kun
>>
Matilda Sirringdale - Wed, 13 Sep 2017 01:31:17 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239215 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239186

Go fuck yourself, pedophile apologist. The fucking pedophile has more integrity than you, you piece of fucking shit.

Go fuck off back to /pol/ or whatever asshole you crawled out.
>>
Jarvis Boffingfadge - Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:03:11 EST ID:/K0knng9 No.239232 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239215
Methinks the lady doth protest to much.

Either this is really about some weird grudge against Chigs, or it's some weird /nom/-related powerplay drama gone too far, or you're doing some hardcore projecting.

Whatever it is, you're coming across like a twat.
>>
Matilda Sirringdale - Wed, 13 Sep 2017 19:31:13 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239246 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239232

No, you know what? Go fuck yourself. This is /420/, it's sole purpose is to allow a line of communication to staff when you don't want to deal with the shenanigans in IRC. I opened that line of communication to C-Higgy and he still acts like a nonce and ignores answering simple goddamned questions.

Then there's fags like you and xNxyE66R that come into this thread acting like total fucking pieces of shit, contributing nothing of note, and trying to derail this convo with your faggotry. Go fuck yourself, you piece of shit. If you so badly need to be a contrarian dicknose fucking faggot then go on /pol/

Fuck off.
>>
Sidney Dapperbanks - Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:07:40 EST ID:rt/eU/9G No.239248 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239246
god damn

I think you got it backwards though. This is a containment board for nutjobs like you and occasionally it's a good place for them to scroll through and find a legitimate complaint.
>>
Albert Clebberforth - Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:44:44 EST ID:ZPd1x9Y9 No.239250 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239249
Meals are the only eventful thing that happens to some of those shut ins. It's why they post every shitty rice casserole and cold cut sandwich they eat.
>>
Simon Honeystone - Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:29:03 EST ID:DUP7V1Xw No.239252 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505356143370.png -(32027B / 31.28KB, 180x245) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239246
>Then there's fags like you and xNxyE66R that come into this thread and don't agree with me. Go fuck yourself, you piece of shit.
ftfy
>>
Thomas Facklesan - Wed, 13 Sep 2017 23:14:54 EST ID:0zJYAR2Z No.239253 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505358894480.png -(126468B / 123.50KB, 297x299) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239246

damn son you might be the most triggered poster i've seen in 2017
>>
Thomas Facklesan - Thu, 14 Sep 2017 01:43:34 EST ID:0zJYAR2Z No.239255 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505367814480.jpg -(93864B / 91.66KB, 331x436) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239254
>>
Betsy Hadgemadge - Thu, 14 Sep 2017 01:56:36 EST ID:luiBMJMn No.239256 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505368596885.jpg -(267675B / 261.40KB, 756x519) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239255
>>
David Lightdock - Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:14:48 EST ID:nHF6YH2W No.239269 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239268

You stick it to em', higs.

Look, I won't pretend that moderation around here has been a little lax lately, for the last 2-9 months, but I love you guys. Thanks for being mods on my favorite and only non-porn website I visit.
>>
Hugh Seggleman - Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:06:44 EST ID:5rRKE1wD No.239272 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239268
I'm not kissing your nuts or anything but I have to admit you guys have put up with a lot of shit over the past few years. That's pretty respectable in my eyes, especially considering that this website exists primarily for entertainment. so thanks for that
>>
Fanny Mallerbury - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 07:57:55 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239309 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239268

I appreciate the response, even if it's not a satisfactory conclusion. As for "no need to take it out on others here", I've been on 420chan for I guess 10 years now (I can't remember exactly when I first posted on here other than it was somewhere around mid-2007), so for better or worse I can see when people are being fags and aren't trying to actually contribute to a thread topic and instead are just shitposting. Those guys? Fuck em. I get that they do it for kicks, but I'm not gonna go "Aw shucks", I'm gonna tell em to fuck off. You can check my post history, I'm on the level when it comes to the actual 420bros on here that aren't shitposting: I don't lash out irrationally. Same with my beef with you, Chiggins. Like I said above, I think you're a good mod and do a good job, that's why this nebulous relationship you have with xXxDarkDeathDestroyerxXx, a user on here that multiple 420bros that have been around for awhile still remember (because he's a fucking creepy pedo weirdo), bugs me, and your deleting my posts calling him out for ban evading his pedo ban while ignoring my responses to you on other boards bugged the hell out of me. It just doesn't make sense why you coddle the guy when you said yourself you guys dropped the hammer on the other pedo guy that was a mod in /wooo/tube or whatever because he actually made the goddamned daily news, but also because I remember how you guys dropped the hammer on that other pedophile "Anderson" for being an undesirable element on the board.

But whatever, you like xXxDarkDeathDestroyerxXx because he posts his disgusting 6000 calorie meals on /nom/ and because he posts pirated pro wrestling podcasts for you and others on /wooo/. I'm not as lenient on pedos, though, so I can't guarantee that I won't stop pointing out how he's a ban evading pedo fuck face whenever I see him on here. Whatever, I guess this thread has run its course, there appears to be no way to get this specific ban-evading pedophile banned on here. Feel free to lock this thread since I'm guessing those fags above with nothing better to comment on will just keep shitposting otherwise.
>>
Augustus Grimfield - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:26:19 EST ID:knXu4Kpv No.239311 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239268
Please go clean /sa/ one bot posts some horse shit and suddenly they all thing its fair game.
>>
Alice Wonkinkock - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:04:13 EST ID:gXVDtRcL No.239335 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239309
damn, son you mad triggered
>>
Wesley Fusslewater - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:08:40 EST ID:L8EnByA3 No.239336 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239309
Lol oh my god dude you are so mad this is hilarious
>>
Graham Dartwell - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:19:48 EST ID:/K0knng9 No.239337 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505517588805.jpg -(10956B / 10.70KB, 350x452) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239309
>But whatever, you like xXxDarkDeathDestroyerxXx because he posts his disgusting 6000 calorie meals on /nom/
Oh damn this really is /nom/ drama isn't it? Man it will never stop being funny to me just how seriously people take that board.
>>
Nigel Shittingspear - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:58:10 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239344 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239337

Nah, it's not /nom/ drama, I'm just rationalizing what Chiggins perceives as the positives the pedo food goblin offers to the site, and thus won't ban, not even to show as a gesture of goodwill to the other users that ban evading pedo's will get their shit slapped.

That being said, there are some legit funny arguments on /nom/ over food.
>>
Clara Dropperbury - Sat, 16 Sep 2017 10:21:02 EST ID:Go0pL1tN No.239355 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239337
You legit don't get /nom/

And that is okay. But you don't.

No one wants a pedo goblin and I would not use the creep and his treatment as a way of judging the attitude of the board in any other situation. He is the exceptional circumstance not the rule.
>>
Isabella Pockford - Sat, 16 Sep 2017 10:40:20 EST ID:9gd4Wnsp No.239356 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505572820511.gif -(3440924B / 3.28MB, 525x601) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239337
>xXxDarkDeathDestroyerxXx
Oh jesus I thought that fag got shamed off the site a couple years ago.
>>
Rebecca Chosslebin - Sat, 16 Sep 2017 11:54:01 EST ID:49r4bnNN No.239357 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505577241823.webm [mp4] -(3345602B / 3.19MB, 350x197) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239337
A bunch of people believed that I dumped boiling water into a brita pitcher, I think you're another one of those goons that takes everything on that board at face value.
>>
Hugh Fanman - Sat, 16 Sep 2017 13:52:33 EST ID:Uq7yChjA No.239358 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239356
he just came back as [name redacted], because people made fun of his former name for obvious reasons.
>>
William Pickson - Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:10:32 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239369 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239357

Oh man, I remember a friend linking me to this guy's videos on youtube so many years ago, Thanks for reminding me of him, I wonder if he kept making his weird food videos.
>>
Jenny Burrydodge - Sun, 17 Sep 2017 01:19:50 EST ID:49r4bnNN No.239376 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505625590488.webm [mp4] -(4202820B / 4.01MB, 480x270) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239369
I listened to some podcast where the guy that filmed it was talking about him tossing out the food after every session and how he was trying to aim for the dorm room crowd.
>>
Matilda Boggletodge - Mon, 18 Sep 2017 05:11:01 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239396 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239389

>You're not going to like hearing this, but the mods would rather keep a suspected ban evader around who is behaving than risk banning an innocent person.

This makes absolutely no sense. This is 420chan, ya big dumb faggot, it's not a court of law. Ban's aren't permanent, either. They've banned many people temporarily or on accident and it gets sorted out in #IRC. You're a fucking moron at best, and some sort of contrarian dicknose trying to stick up for pedophiles at worst. Eat shit.
>>
Basil Daffingtut - Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:12:48 EST ID:gXVDtRcL No.239399 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>two weeks later
loooooooooool
>>
Jarvis Sengerladging - Mon, 18 Sep 2017 10:20:38 EST ID:CYfXlxYS No.239400 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239396
Ugh just shut up already. You're being more disruptive than the person you're accusing of being that tripfag. If this is a ban suggestion thread I vote we ban you and "sort it out" later.
Belligerent asshole. Don't you have a picture of eggs to critique or some shit?
>>
Phineas Clillyville - Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:38:55 EST ID:pS6YfOkm No.239402 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239396
>This is 420chan, ya big dumb faggot, it's not a court of law.
Sure, but that naturally begs the question of why you're taking this so seriously.
>>
Matilda Boggletodge - Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:15:25 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239405 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239400

Go fuck yourself. I'm responding to faggots shitposting. They could ignore this thread and not post in it, but they decide to shitpost in it instead. Like you, you fucking baby. "Disruptive", lol. Fuck off, you're the one going into a thread trying to derail it.

Also, I actually asked to have this thread closed after I got a response from Chiggins above since the issue was closed for all intents and purposes and I figured only fags would shitpost in it if it remained open and (surprise!) the report was ignored and here you are, being a fucking fag shitposting in an old thread. Well done, Jarivs.

>>239402

lol, you think this is "taking things seriously"? Yeah, okay, buddy. Thanks for your concern. We'll get through this crisis together.
>>
Charlotte Sinningdodge - Mon, 18 Sep 2017 19:48:15 EST ID:5GFM0rBw No.239408 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Sounds like this goof is just salty because when he contacted xXxDingDongerxXX off site he couldn't get a hookup for pics
>>
Clara Sengermurk - Mon, 18 Sep 2017 20:41:27 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239409 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239408

Nah, but that would be a funny twist of irony I guess.
>>
Lillian Crenningkone - Mon, 18 Sep 2017 23:07:49 EST ID:xyAQp3/D No.239414 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505790469807.jpg -(51489B / 50.28KB, 250x250) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>Stevens ignores the pedothreads
>locks the anime thread
>"this thread has been nothing but trouble"

This place is fucked
>>
Charlotte Gocklefad - Mon, 18 Sep 2017 23:58:00 EST ID:9gd4Wnsp No.239415 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239414
>locks the furry anime thread once it devolves into pedo shit
FTFY
I guess pedo shit is okay as long as it's pedo shit you like?
>>
Albert Guckletack - Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:08:11 EST ID:6lC3uOmo No.239416 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239415
There was nothing pedo about that thread, unlike the threads that was discussing pedophilia.
>>
Wesley Bambleforth - Tue, 19 Sep 2017 01:04:32 EST ID:VD6fU0TW No.239418 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239414

not so much of an anime thread as one guy waifu posting
>>
George Funkinlock - Tue, 19 Sep 2017 02:06:47 EST ID:5rRKE1wD No.239420 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239416
dude. the anime thread was 1 of 5 made by the ban evading pedo spammer to fill the board with his shit. your argument is invalid
>>
Clara Huckleforth - Tue, 19 Sep 2017 03:18:46 EST ID:0zJYAR2Z No.239424 Ignore Report Quick Reply
another pedo image on /b/ has been up for 30+ mins despite at least 2 posters reporting
>>
Shit Mammerwan - Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:29:32 EST ID:YInZ/klo No.239428 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239396
And it makes no sense to ban someone because someone else thinks (I say thinks because you still can't provide any shred of justification for your emotional outbursts,) that they should be.

Speaking of justification, you've been so embarrassingly immature and quick to insult in this thread, I have a very hard time believing you've been on this site for nearly ten years and haven't been banned yourself. Maybe the mods should look into that.
>>
Augustus Tootford - Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:12:52 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239432 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239428

>And it makes no sense to ban someone because someone else thinks that they should be.

Except this is wrong because multiple users have pointed out how xXxDarkDeathDestroyerxXx was pedo-banned and has been evading as [name redacted] since then.

>I have a very hard time believing you've been on this site for nearly ten years and haven't been banned yourself. Maybe the mods should look into that.

Eat a dick. Straight up. From shaft to tip. If you're going to be a fucking faggot with nothing worthwhile to add to the topic then you don't command any respect. You deserve ridicule and scorn because you're a worthless piece of shit. If you see a topic about a pedophile ban-evading, see people shit-posting in it, and come to the conclusion of "Ackshually, the OP is being mean to the shitposters derailing the thread so I don't believe him" then you're a fucking faggot. Hide the thread and move on with your life, shit head.
>>
Samuel Fattingshaw - Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:26:01 EST ID:gXVDtRcL No.239463 Ignore Report Quick Reply
omg somebody on nom said he likes pizza and crackers which is secret satan pedo code for being a pedo and some other guy who isn't me on my phone said so too so you should pretty much ban this other guy who might be that guy for life because all these people say so or else youre a pedo pass the meth
>>
Basil Bummerbire - Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:34:54 EST ID:9gd4Wnsp No.239467 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239463
u sound like a dumdum
>>
Beatrice Crettingburk - Wed, 20 Sep 2017 23:14:06 EST ID:QUBg14FP No.239469 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239463
anyone defending [name redacted] is obviously not a /nom/ user

the goblin must be vanquised!
>>
Matilda Sabblehet - Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:02:36 EST ID:N2lBTYtC No.239483 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239432
Schizophrenia is a hell of a drug.
>>
Clara Songercocke - Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:05:47 EST ID:rxcfGCIl No.239484 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>and then I argued with random people for two weeks to show how calm and collected I was
>>
Nell Pongerlutch - Thu, 21 Sep 2017 19:33:45 EST ID:hfwowfMy No.239485 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239469
yeah, no shit. have you seen his latest meal.. fuck sakes man, that dude needs to crucifix and set on fire.
>>
James Chiffingtack - Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:13:43 EST ID:Xkf4NniX No.239489 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239484

I have nothing to gain from you since you'll just keep acting like a faggot.
>>
Nell Mengerkadge - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 03:12:49 EST ID:pQpqhxdL No.239513 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239038
What do you consider pedophilia? Do you mean being attracted to anyone below 18 years old? Because if that's what you mean you want to ban everybody. If you aren't attracted to hot 13-17 year olds you are robotically blocking your natural attraction because of cultural norms. That's very neurotic and robot like, like praying the gay away.
Now if it's below puberty, if it is attraction to prepubescent children then yeah, that's weird and fucked up. But as long as you don't act on it it's fine. Now talking about your sexual attractions all the time is bad. But not because the attractions are immoral but because it is annoying shitposting. If somebody went around posting big tits in every thread that would have been much more socially acceptable but still just as retarded and annoying. And this isn't limited to sex, posting your face or pictures from a cartoon in every thread is annoying and bad for the same reason. So people shouldn't be banned for their opinions, they should be banned for their actions if their actions are annoying and disruptive.
Banned
User was Guanjyn'd for this post
User was banned by: Spunky
Reason: Fucking pedo get out
>>
Rebecca Hocklefick - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 04:40:49 EST ID:Yz4igk2e No.239515 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239513
>13-17
shut the fuck up you scumfuck
>>
Angus Grandham - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 08:39:14 EST ID:6upAStKH No.239517 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239513
based spunky

meanwhile i don't see c-higgy banning any pedos lol
>>
Fanny Sindlestug - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:22:36 EST ID:W3p6SBsp No.239518 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239517
I've never seen you ban any pedos, either.

Very suspicious, Angus. Very suspicious indeed.
>>
Matilda Bavingtut - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:28:48 EST ID:SonJ1KMQ No.239519 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239518
New rule. All users who don't write negative nasty comments about paedos, are paedos. From now on whenever I see one of you posting and it's not a reply to a paedo telling them to kill themselfs I'm just going to assume it's because you're a paedo too.
>>
Ian Drashgold - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:58:55 EST ID:4WHP9U74 No.239520 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239513
Yeah, some teenagers are hot, but we as a society have been able to collectively ignore this successfully because unless you're a teenager yourself, you have no business taking advantage of children just to bust a nut. You're supposed to have sex with people you love and care about and intend to be with for the foreseeable future. Adults aren't going to be marrying teenagers, they aren't going to be forming deep intimate bonds of love with them because they don't have personalities that are developed enough for that kind of love because they haven't lived in the real world yet, they haven't made choices for themselves and they spend all their time in school with other kids so other kids are the only ones they could ever form that sort of a bond with.

For their sake, we shame anyone who dares to mention the taboo truth that their bodies aren't that different from slightly older girls so that older men don't just use them as fucktoys and discard them heartlessly which can be very traumatic for a girl. Young people all deserve the opportunity to experience a normal and real love with a peer who they fall in love with naturally through spending lots of time together living their normal teenage lives. Sometimes it's more important to preserve that at all costs than to be "technically correct" and incite the possibility of normalizing the idea of older men preying on younger women by talking about how hot some teenagers can be. Just ignore it, block out your attraction and deny it exists (which is perfectly healthy btw, not neurotic and robot like) and softly shame anyone who mentions it. It's both the normal, and the right thing to do.

I kind of think of this as a normal process most people go through as they hit their 20's. I'm hoping you're still young so you don't understand all this yet. I didn't really get it when I was 18-19 either. Once you actually become an adult you gain a new perspective and it will start to viscerally disgust and outrage you more to think about it and you will feel naturally less and less attracted to them as you get older and become more of an adult and less of a child.
>>
Fanny Greenfield - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:44:41 EST ID:pNic63KT No.239522 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1506188681286.jpg -(55883B / 54.57KB, 720x540) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239521
>What makes you think it's right for us, as a society, to start adding stipulations to that? This is a very sick and unhealthy mindset in the west and is left over from spiritually perverse victorianism
Here's the problem with your argument: shut the fuck up.

As soon as your stance becomes "who are you to decide what's right or wrong?" you've already lost because what you're really saying is that right and wrong don't really exist and are purely subjective, to which the obvious answer is "who are you to tell me that I can't decide what's right or wrong?".

It's an argument that destroys itself as soon as it's made because if everything is just a matter of perception, then there's no onus on anyone to even listen to what you're saying because you've already invalidated your own position.

>TL,DR: Society gets to decide what's okay in society because fuck you, that's why.
>>
Oliver Smallgold - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 14:08:11 EST ID:6S61iPd6 No.239523 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239522
Wrong, if society got to decide what was against the rules we'd have freedom. It's a minority that makes the rules though, but the worst part is the rules apply to everyone but them...and they laugh every day about it.
>>
Caroline Pickfield - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 15:33:42 EST ID:x3qeIdkb No.239525 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1506195222679.jpg -(12295B / 12.01KB, 277x182) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
If I am not mistaken, according to individuals like former F.B.I. director Ted Gunderson, many of the 'elite' in the West such as bankers, law enforcement and those in the military are pedophiles.. Especially those who are also involved in 'satanic cults'.
>>
Rebecca Hocklefick - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 16:18:44 EST ID:Yz4igk2e No.239526 Ignore Report Quick Reply
How many times have you retards had this pedo morality discussion?
>>
Jenny Blackworth - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 17:50:42 EST ID:gXVDtRcL No.239527 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239525
so being a pedo gives you super powers allowing one to become the champions of industry and government?
>>
Fanny Greenfield - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 18:45:08 EST ID:pNic63KT No.239529 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1506206708286.jpg -(26755B / 26.13KB, 480x387) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>239523
I didn't weigh in at all on whether or not society got to make the rules. The guy I was replying to posited that and for the sake of clarity and generally not fucking everything up I just used the framework he'd already constructed to make my point.

Take it up with >>239522 if you disagree with him.

nb
>>
Priscilla Bashmure - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 19:25:01 EST ID:0zJYAR2Z No.239531 Ignore Report Quick Reply
reported 4 pedo posts on /b/ including CGI child porn but they are still up. meanwhile some rando mod named bizzel is dropping hiffwe bans lol
>>
Fucking Blytheridge - Sat, 23 Sep 2017 19:40:18 EST ID:8YoDhOiR No.239533 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239531
bizzel is a fucking saint you cunt. Don't be mad at him for being busy with important work.
>>
James Blashway - Sun, 24 Sep 2017 00:24:32 EST ID:rt/eU/9G No.239545 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239531
lol i don't think he knows what he's doing
>>
James Blashway - Sun, 24 Sep 2017 05:10:05 EST ID:rt/eU/9G No.239548 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>239529
that pup drinks pbr...
poor little guy..


Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.