420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
E=MC^2 question by Martin Crepperfuck - Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:08:21 EST ID:E5ztys4h No.78408 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1482426501194.jpg -(953131B / 930.79KB, 1600x780) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 953131
So I was randomly thinking about Einsteins most popular contribution to physics, and I have a problem with it:

If E=MC^2, then how is it possible that a mass-less photon can carry any energy?

I expect there's probably a well established answer to this, but in trying to track it down I'm realizing a lot of this stuff is well above my reading level.
12 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Bombastus !uYErosQbLM!!Mybq1UbK - Sun, 08 Jan 2017 01:04:56 EST ID:zRXgL70Z No.78460 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Good thread.

Also a good question by OP.

nb for answered question
Charles Huvinggold - Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:00:39 EST ID:rybJ4K29 No.78462 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Hi babe, I just wonder if phen and trypt synth threads are still alive?

Also come visit us on psy every once in a while, you are a good man..
Bombastus !uYErosQbLM!!Mybq1UbK - Thu, 12 Jan 2017 02:03:23 EST ID:8NEuSnNe No.78465 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Thanks! Those threads have more or less died at this point. My experiences with psychedelics is on hiatus since I my consecutive ego deaths on like 750 LSD, 35mg 2-CE, 125mg 4-AcO-DMT, and other doses similar.

That shit actually scares me to the point where weed gives me intense spiritual flashbacks and really need to take a break. Times a changed, I guess. I'll be back soon, though.

Keep grooving in the meantime and ask any question whatsoever.
Rebecca Wemmerwot - Sun, 22 Jan 2017 09:04:53 EST ID:6+KMGshk No.78492 Ignore Report Quick Reply

lol oops
Bombastus !uYErosQbLM!!Mybq1UbK - Sun, 22 Jan 2017 23:00:43 EST ID:iygy/n6D No.78494 Ignore Report Quick Reply
damn where'd that response go to this post. i was gonna response to it too

Guy who wanted to mix two solids for X-Ray analysis by Bombastus !uYErosQbLM!!Mybq1UbK - Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:52:25 EST ID:jTCURNhV No.78483 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484941945945.jpg -(137980B / 134.75KB, 809x656) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 137980
I guess because of a certain news article, we can't discuss specific molecules like that here............ I suppose the molecule in question is attracting too much media attention so even on a small board such as this, it is unwise to do so?

Sorry anon for killing your thread for asking for specifics.

Where are the fucking units by breakabond !!D0XjIgKF - Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:55:34 EST ID:zsw9I8fO No.78467 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484322934943.jpg -(11152B / 10.89KB, 257x136) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 11152
Can someone tell me what the units here are?
(<-- image)

source: http://www.pharmpress.com/files/docs/Excipients7e_samplemonos(1).pdf
trypto - Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:17:46 EST ID:ltcKYWSL No.78468 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Mass percent.

trypto - Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:20:10 EST ID:ltcKYWSL No.78469 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Whoops. Actually, not mass percent since it's not multiplied by 100. Mass ratio?
Bombastus !uYErosQbLM!!Mybq1UbK - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 00:36:57 EST ID:YTE4hsRA No.78470 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I looked this shit up and it's g in ml. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/D-mannitol#section=2D-Structure

Strictly speaking, if I saw this in a research paper, I would think that it said 1 molecule of mannitol dissolves in x molecules of the solvent. This is very lazy of the people who made this.
breakabond !!D0XjIgKF - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 05:57:36 EST ID:zsw9I8fO No.78471 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1484391456037.jpg -(20090B / 19.62KB, 500x375) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Denatured alcohol by Martha Brookdale - Mon, 26 Dec 2016 15:26:13 EST ID:H7AhQjrZ No.78423 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1482783973025.png -(231824B / 226.39KB, 331x522) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 231824
I have this product (see image), and I evaporated a few drops on a clean mirror and it left a noticeable residue.

In the SDS (https://www.korellis.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Alcohol-Denatured.pdf) it only lists methanol and ethanol as components, so what is the residue left behind, and how harmful would it be to consume?
4 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
Phoebe Sirrydock - Mon, 02 Jan 2017 17:58:01 EST ID:6+KMGshk No.78434 Ignore Report Quick Reply
very, there is typically benzene in these products (generally not listed). Benzene is incredibly cancerous. Go save up your allowance and buy some actual booze.
Oliver Blatherson - Tue, 03 Jan 2017 19:02:38 EST ID:RKOZdJ0v No.78442 Ignore Report Quick Reply
nobody was talking about drinking it haha
Shitting Mimmlefirk - Thu, 05 Jan 2017 12:57:20 EST ID:kquaKHd6 No.78445 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Looking @ page 3, subsection 3 of that msds:

Ethanol concentration is 30-50%
Methanol concentrate is 40-60%

So, the ethanol/methanol mixture will make up between 110% and 70% of what's in that can. The other 30%? Prolly shit from wood when they made this 'wood alcohol'
Shitting Mimmlefirk - Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:07:13 EST ID:kquaKHd6 No.78446 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Honestly, it's probably exactly the sort of thing that you don't want to go into your body. As in, Exactly. Polyaromatic hydrocarbons, heavy metals, sulfur and nitrogen compounds. Everything that's bad except for biologically derived venoms.
Martha Nicklewill - Thu, 12 Jan 2017 23:07:52 EST ID:DZQn4yU5 No.78466 Ignore Report Quick Reply
They do this on purpose to make money from alcohol tax.

Pretty sure it's not listed on the MSDS and it distills over at similair temps.

DIY Batteries by Nicholas Wibbleson - Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:48:31 EST ID:32cXOz64 No.78461 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484066911864.png -(1801389B / 1.72MB, 863x1343) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1801389
sup /chem/,

Looking for some decent DIY battery ideas. Doesn't have to be too compact, but I would like for it to fit on a desk perhaps and be able to shit out roughly 1.5-3.5V and maybe max ~25mA.

I've tried my had at a few types (pic related: quick dirty Earth battery with copper and zinc cathode/anodes) including earth (using several combos of cath/anodes), zinc-air, Al-air, and am setting up to create a MnO2+Alum/graphite cell just to test.

Question: What are some decent DIY battery builds? I'm not asking for any steps, simply just metal combos and whatever medium suites said combo. The charge density isn't all that important as it's to be expected to need to be recharged/reloaded. I'm certain with another cathode/anode in the Earth Battery pictured and a simple joule thief, I could squeeze out around 1.5V (haven't checked the amps yet). The idea here is just to get more ideas for DIY batteries and perhaps ideas for better performance. I'm aware of galvanic series and electrical potential, so I believe this thread is best suited for discussion and possibly personal experience.

trypto - Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:28:31 EST ID:ltcKYWSL No.78463 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I think some type of lead-acid battery would be best. I don't have any experience with it, but it sounds like a cool project.

Solubility by Nell Dannerworth - Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:29:11 EST ID:2qfcsxJx No.78437 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1483464551616.jpg -(8271B / 8.08KB, 250x250) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 8271
I recently did some undergraduate research with a professor in organic synthesis and was curious about what the factors for solubility are. I was under the impression that it was all about size and polarity, but i'm getting conflicting results. I had synthesized several molecules which had phenyl groups. Since this was some discovery chemistry, I made "copies" of these molecules but with substitutions at the para positions of the aromatic ring in order to increase reactivity through electron withdrawing effects (para-nitro substitution) or decrease reactivity through electron donating effects (para-methoxy substitution).

What I noticed was that my molecule which had two phenyl rings with para-substituted nitro groups was more polar than the same molecule with no substitution (least polar) and that with the para-methoxy (middle polarity), but it had the worst solubility of the three.

In fact, the one with the unsubstituted aromatic rings was the most soluble in methanol, despite being the least polar.

What factors are at play here? the nitro compound basically only dissolved decently in DCM, which made working with it incredibly frustrating. Yet slightly more or less polar solvents didn't or barely worked to dissolve it. I'd like to know what factors to consider for the next time I work in a lab so I can more easily predict some of the properties of the molecules I'll be synthesizing.
trypto - Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:07:49 EST ID:ltcKYWSL No.78438 Ignore Report Quick Reply
The Nitro-substituted molecules probably have more lattice energy (solute-solute interactions), making it more difficult for the methanol to get in there. Think about how the molecules could potentially crystalize.

If you just have phenyl groups on something else uninteresting, there's not much opportunity. Maybe some pi-stacking. Wheras with the nitro group, you might have some strong H-Bonding going on.


>I'd like to know what factors to consider for the next time I work in a lab so I can more easily predict some of the properties of the molecules I'll be synthesizing.

Most of the time, just go off polarity and like-attracts-like. Then try out different solvents. Unless you're doing QM simulations, this is the best way. And even then, your empirical results will come in faster.
Shitting Mimmlefirk - Thu, 05 Jan 2017 12:50:10 EST ID:kquaKHd6 No.78444 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1483638610851.gif -(1785B / 1.74KB, 314x187) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


Solubility is a function of associative energy. If you can keep the different types of energies straight, you can think of them as vectors (I think), and if two compounds wind up next to each other on the plot then they're miscible/soluble.

Hansen is newer and more sophisticated than Hildebrand I believe
Esther Sarringlane - Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:36:53 EST ID:zsw9I8fO No.78449 Ignore Report Quick Reply
So if we have all these equations for solubility, how hard is it to throw it all into a program where you draw any molecule and find out what it's soluble in (and how soluble).
trypto - Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:04:32 EST ID:ltcKYWSL No.78457 Ignore Report Quick Reply
It's faster to simply use a rule of thumb, and try 3-6 of the common lab solvents before you find the best solvent (and how soluble it is).

If you really wanted to do it computationally, then you'd need a great graphics card, and a workflow for DFT calculations. There's a handful of programs used for this, and they all have a high learning curve. Spartan is probably the easiest, though it's closed source and expensive. I don't know the exact steps needed.

In general, it's pretty hard.
trypto - Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:09:24 EST ID:ltcKYWSL No.78458 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Actually, Amazon ec2 would be better than a good graphics card. But you'd still want a decent card for when you're leanring.

Climate Metric by Jack Sopperham - Sun, 01 Jan 2017 23:14:21 EST ID:VjvGmScF No.78431 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1483330461439.jpg -(18218B / 17.79KB, 529x163) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 18218
Imagine you have a big list of cities and wanted to concisely get an idea of what the weather is like over there.
If conciseness and speed wasn't a problem, you could look at a graph like that for each city, but that's not feasible.

So what metrics would you need to accurately capture the climate of that area? Less is better, so all I can think of is: average lowest temp, average highest temp.
Any other ideas?
7 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
Ernest Gagglehood - Fri, 06 Jan 2017 20:13:59 EST ID:sGpcPJT1 No.78452 Ignore Report Quick Reply
This is mostly me signalling my relevant degrees, but climates is long-term af weather be short-term. People already measure dat shit mane.
Angus Billingbury - Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:28:18 EST ID:zsw9I8fO No.78454 Ignore Report Quick Reply
If you were to go about building a "climate score" for every city such that you could simply compare based on temperature alone, how would you do it?!?!?>
Edward Blussledon - Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:36:23 EST ID:zsw9I8fO No.78459 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Barnaby Samblewell - Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:52:43 EST ID:Q+12w2DB No.78464 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>how do i climate

breakabond !!D0XjIgKF - Sat, 21 Jan 2017 01:20:39 EST ID:zsw9I8fO No.78485 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1484979639371.jpg -(136536B / 133.34KB, 1024x765) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
tada: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%B6ppen_climate_classification

lifespan by Priscilla Drucklemidge - Sat, 24 Dec 2016 05:44:01 EST ID:RKOZdJ0v No.78416 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1482576241169.png -(23568B / 23.02KB, 365x619) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 23568
sorry for the stupid question, chemistry is def my weakest area

a search tells me that PG USP/EP has a shelf life of two years when stored below 40°C (104°F) in closed containers away from sources of ultraviolet (UV) light.
should i only make enough solution to last a couple years? how long can refrigeration extend this?
Walter Bullermit - Sun, 25 Dec 2016 11:46:47 EST ID:Hzvahzwj No.78420 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1482684407733.jpg -(11497B / 11.23KB, 256x192) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
im assuming that youre using food grade proplyglycol

the shelf life is a legal thing. in my country carbonated water has a declared shelf life.
as long as you store the PG in a somewhat airtight bottle away from heat and intense sunlight, itll be fine.

but depending on what kind of solution youre talking about it might be a good idea to only make it depending on your on usage. nicotine does oxidize a bit, eventhough that in my experience the slight oxidation improves taste of e cig juice.

refrigeration would extend the time period theoretically if the solution is stored in an air tight bottle. besides the legal bullshit this might give a rough estimate of extrapolated shelf life https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q10_(temperature_coefficient)
but that shit quite often fails in practical application as far as ive seen.
Emma Fanbanks - Sun, 25 Dec 2016 12:53:48 EST ID:G2GUCRy9 No.78421 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Why would you need more than a couple of years worth of any kind of solution?
John Semmerforth - Mon, 26 Dec 2016 04:09:20 EST ID:RKOZdJ0v No.78422 Ignore Report Quick Reply

i'm getting a quantity of a research chemical large enough to outlive its legal status (presumably)
i know i can just... keep them not mixed, but i wanted to know if mixing would make the situation worse or not
David Noblingchene - Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:56:04 EST ID:Fe+cUsBQ No.78426 Ignore Report Quick Reply
You will not regret keeping your entire stash out of solution. Isn't that enough?
Clara Dablingmick - Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:26:59 EST ID:RKOZdJ0v No.78428 Ignore Report Quick Reply
it is! just curious!

Mescaline Creation by Bombastus !!HToBa9dh - Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:13:58 EST ID:4ppVjZXo No.76958 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1440191638629.jpg -(42448B / 41.45KB, 460x422) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 42448
I just proposed this on /psy/ so let's see what you people think.

I do have an add-on, though. L-Tyrosine can be decarboxylated to Tyramine so you don't have to get a shitload of cheese to extract. From there, you can just brominate it selectively in basic conditions to brominate the carbons meta to the hydroxide. A simple LG > Hydroxide reaction later, you'll have 2,3,4 tri-hydroxyl(aminoethyl)benzene.

One simple reflux with 4eq of Methyliodide should yield mescaline in 95%+ yields. What do you think, /chem/?
76 posts and 16 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Alice Fuckinggold - Sat, 28 May 2016 09:46:02 EST ID:FN2WDMDT No.77921 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>There has been a misunderstanding of hydrolysis to lysergic acid that I just discovered myself last night. I was looking at a joint paper by Opava and Galena published in 2000 that does an enzymatic hydrolysis using microbes, but as I read the paper they proceeded to perform the hydrolysis by normal KOH means. I noticed that the hydrolysis was very mild and low yielding and did not use microbes so I was wondering what was going on. But then I saw that what they were doing was performing hydrolysis on ergotamine to lysergamide (ergine) and then stop and continue the rest of the hydrolysis by enzymatic means. So I went and revisited all the prior ergot hydrolysis' and it occurred to me that hydrolysis of ergopeptines is actually a 2-step process. When you perform a hydrolysis you are actually performing a hydrolysis of the ergopeptine to a lysergic amide (LSA) and then after you have LSA you perform a hydrolysis to lysergic acid. This has never really been pointed out because it is all the same procedure, but it is actually important to note when researching different hydrolysis'. For example, an hydrolysis on LSA's extracted straight from HBWR seeds does not have to be as harsh as one performed on ergotamine which has to first undergo hydrolysis to LSA and THEN to lysergic acid. That is why some hydrolysis' you come across can be weaker or stronger. For example, the Galena/Opava hydrolysis was performed at %4 KOH in ethanol for 2 hours (only acid hydrolysis actually requires water as a solvent). This is in contradiction to Smith and Tinnis in the 1930's who declared that lysergic acid cannot be achieved below a %7 KOH content as it is too mild. But Galena/Opava was just performing hydrolysis on ergotamine to LSA, not fully to lysergic acid, so they could do it under milder conditions. And also what wasn't known in the 1930's with regards to hydrolysis of ergopeptines is that heat and time can make up for milder basic conditions. Hence Shulgin's very mild hydrolysis performed just in water at 75c with a mere %6.7 KOH content but done over 4 hours. So basically hydrolysis of ergopeptines is a 2-step process and depending on how many of those 2-steps you need to ac…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Sophie Honeyfoot - Sat, 09 Jul 2016 03:59:45 EST ID:UX5Tgvrg No.78075 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I take 1mg doses like yearly lol
Nell Gecklecocke - Fri, 23 Dec 2016 23:17:17 EST ID:DPjhXpIm No.78415 Ignore Report Quick Reply
A good old methylamination with benzaldehyde then a reduction for some trimethoxyamphetamine, a 1000 percent increse in potentcy.
Schepperschop - Sat, 24 Dec 2016 13:33:31 EST ID:xTIigKo1 No.78417 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Find the cactus>>Eat the cactus
press - Sun, 25 Dec 2016 11:24:27 EST ID:Hzvahzwj No.78419 Ignore Report Quick Reply
i think you mean a henry condensation with a following reduction?

tfw calmus oil is expenis as fuck and you cant just go via reductive amination for tma2

Solubility question by Ebenezer Hattingnack - Sat, 24 Dec 2016 18:26:32 EST ID:750GEpVs No.78418 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1482621992333.png -(491474B / 479.96KB, 500x484) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 491474
Is α-Methylfentanyl alcohol soluble, or is there something else you'd recommend?

TiCl4 by Nicholas Buzzson - Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:06:30 EST ID:2+q0LcOC No.78094 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1468555590148.jpg -(24503B / 23.93KB, 530x297) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 24503
If Ti has the follow electron config as a base config: (where ^ represents an e-)

^^ ^ ^
4s 3d 3d 3d 3d 3d

would it hybridise to the following (to accommodate (Cl-)4)?
^ ^ ^ ^
sp3d sp3d sp3d sp3d sp3d

leaving it with a final config of (with bonded (Cl-)4):
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
sp3d sp3d sp3d sp3d sp3d

thereby classifying it as a lewis acid because it can accept a lone pair?
i hope this makes sense
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Nicholas Buzzson - Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:09:30 EST ID:2+q0LcOC No.78095 Ignore Report Quick Reply
fuck that formatting did not work
to clarify
first example: essentially the 4 of the 5 sp3ds would have 1 electron in each
second example: 4 of 5 sp3ds filled due (Cl-)4 electrons and last orbital unfilled, allowing lone pair acceptance

is this right?
Bombastus !RZEwn1AX62!!xXxJO70U - Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:19:13 EST ID:vbS8CtHn No.78104 Ignore Report Quick Reply
okay this is some weird abstract visual gymnastics here
please redo this on MS paint and repost a picture.
Isabella Sullyshaw - Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:14:18 EST ID:R8K15vkj No.78110 Ignore Report Quick Reply
use pre tags for
m o n o s p a c e
levi - Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:54:13 EST ID:2kHGLnfS No.78406 Ignore Report Quick Reply
hey man not sure im following you exactly, but it would be much easier to think of this in terms of CFT/ligand field model, as in 4 M-L bonding interactions lying lower in energy than the metal based d-orbitals (e and t2 sets) which have an occupancy of 4. Electronically speaking TiCl4 has low-lying MO's, of primarly Ti character, so yeah it is fairly electrophilic and a decent lewis acid. evidenced in that it happily forms adducts with donor solvents such as THF
Schepperschop - Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:49:23 EST ID:xTIigKo1 No.78407 Ignore Report Quick Reply
It does not make sense.

Chem Career by Betsy Pickhall - Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:49:40 EST ID:BYwX2ie4 No.78355 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1479779380113.gif -(4391142B / 4.19MB, 480x304) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 4391142

Chem BS here. I formulate construction products. Pretty damn good at it. But I believe I've reached my salary cap and I'm only 3 years in.

I want to switch fields to make some real money and not just the bread crumbs I currently get in exchange for my research and ideas, but don't know what to branch into. The only things that make sense to me is:

Chemical Engineering
Biomedical Engineering

or just saying fuck all and doing

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
7 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Charles Cloffingdud - Tue, 06 Dec 2016 20:07:31 EST ID:SGvEm69U No.78383 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Sure seems that way.

The path gets pretty confusing.

I just need to figure some shit out.
Bombastus !uYErosQbLM!!Mybq1UbK - Sat, 10 Dec 2016 17:06:27 EST ID:01P1ms0Q No.78391 Ignore Report Quick Reply
How have you been mulling about this, SGvEm69U?
Have you figured some stuff out or where do you stand with this? It's the current time to tell the high schoolies and first years where to direct their vocations and if even one's life is changed or helped by your experience and thoughts, I will have considered this thread an epic success.
Charlotte Doblingshit - Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:12:19 EST ID:SGvEm69U No.78401 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Well I was ready to reject chemistry outright, especially after Captain ChemE-Cunt showed up. But I dunno. You forced me to confront a truth about my path in life. I don't believe I'm any sort of gift to chemistry; there's no nobel prize in my future and I'm no genius. But I know I'm more than this.

It's a bit painful to see my creativity used for something as frivolous as the structural integrity of concrete surfaces. It's even more painful to see that frivolous innovation generate millions of dollars for someone else while I see the equivalent of bread crumbs for my efforts. I understand that there's sales, marketing, processing, and manufacture to consider as well, but it's my formula and my customized process that allowed the rewards to be reaped in the first place. Hell, I basically optimized their entire manufacturing process for these products; wrote all the batch tickets for them, all the pds sheets, all the sds sheets, I mean that product line is my fucking brain child. And oh yes, I feel the appreciation. I get so many pats on the back I have bruises. But monetary compensation? Ohh no, I'm at market value. Someone with A MASTERS (OMG) will accept my wages, and so I am pretty much at my peak value.

What a fucking joke.

They don't take into consideration that someone with a masters in chemistry may not have the talent to formulate their products. And even if they do, it would take years to even get to the understanding I have now. I'm confident that anyone with a higher level of insight into my field would request more than what they can offer me.

I guess all my woes may just stem from a shitty company; I got the job before I even graduated with my Bachelor's at a construction chemicals manufacturer and revamped a failing product line within 2 years. The knowledge I learned was from my own diligence and study. No one taught me anything about the science behind the products because there was no one there who understood the chemistry.

We took market leadership with first baby; it's quadrupled in sales volume since my revisions. After a few research successes, they divided my other duties among 2 other people and gave me a full time research position. And you know, creating shit is great, especially shit that people need and will use. I love that people need what I design and will choose it over other products in the market. I guess I just feel like I'm just trading my ideas away.. a part of me away, in exchange for a meager allowance. I know the financial impact of my designs because I design my products around their financial impact.

Basically I'm just disappointed in my experience with the chemical industry. And I understand that this small company may not be representative of the industry. I hope it's not.
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Charlotte Doblingshit - Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:19:35 EST ID:SGvEm69U No.78402 Ignore Report Quick Reply

I apologize, that was Vehk who dropped the troof bomb.

Credit to you sir.
Thomas Babberstetch - Sat, 17 Dec 2016 05:09:31 EST ID:ynqcZ6AY No.78405 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Ayy fam you gotta chill out. You're not making enough money? That's not a problem with chemistry, that's a problem with the company you're working for. You gotta shop around. You're talking all about how you improved their product line, that's some resume shit. Maybe your next step is staying with chemistry, maybe it isn't. But don't take one bad job as indicative of the field.

I'm a chemical engineer working in drug design. I make artificial peptides to target protein interactions. I really enjoy it, and it pays well. Just gotta find something that works for you.

<<Last Pages Next>>
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Report Post
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.