420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
Go Real by Esther Pottingkack - Thu, 08 Feb 2018 10:02:50 EST ID:k7AMcD44 No.78992 Ignore Report Quick Reply
File: 1518102170395.jpg -(1437987B / 1.37MB, 3264x2448) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1437987
How feasible is molecular crafting? More specifically, can we negate global warming by vacuuming up greenhouse gasses and replacing them with nitrogen/oxygen, whatever would be needed to maintain current climate conditions?
>>
Shitting Blackfoot - Thu, 08 Feb 2018 11:09:56 EST ID:a9li1sY3 No.78993 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>78992
The problem with removing CO2 from the atmosphere is that it takes energy. And what do we use for most of our energy? Fossil fuels.
>>
Fuck Mumbleway - Thu, 08 Feb 2018 22:10:16 EST ID:pu7drik6 No.78994 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>78993
Ikr that's what I was thinking. What if we siphon the energy into space with a huge superconductor, or convert it to electricity and store it?
>>
James Dendlehut - Fri, 09 Feb 2018 05:02:41 EST ID:G0xOCZU/ No.78995 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>78994
it uses energy, it doesnt release it.

you know how when wood burns it kinda gets warm? thats the energy of carbon being oxidized to co2.
to get co2 to form oxygen and carbon again you have to put in energy


Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.