Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists


We're recovering from a major server loss and are restoring backups as we gain access to them. Don't mind the odd time warp. Warn us in the future.

What school of historiography do you find most compelling? by Lydia Werringwater - Sat, 12 Sep 2015 19:06:31 EST ID:K3k4dOuf No.56122 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1442099191080.gif -(18308B / 17.88KB, 120x120) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 18308
Are you into classic 19th century great-man historicism, annales school total histories, American modernization theory, or neo-Marxist (post 1950s) thought? Or are you a postmodern nihilist?

Should historians embrace political bias, or do our best to avoid it? Do you believe materialism is the driving force of history or are you a fan of Hegel and believe in the primacy of ideas as the driving force in history?

I used to be a pretty hardcore Marxist but as I've started my history master's education I've increasingly felt like Marxism is just too myopic and orthodox to account for the complexity of the modern world, and it's focus on industrial production feels increasingly irrelevant to the post-industrial West. Modernization theory is garbage in that it's predicated entirely on an "end-of-history" style perception of the West as a standard against which other nations are measured. Annales style history is nice but "total history" seems optimistic and prone to reductionism. Relativistic post modernism also seems to suck, since of course there are some genuine, non-contextual truths in historical studies.

I guess I would say I'm increasingly an adherent of a sort of mixture of Marxism, Modernization theory, and relativism, even though in a broad sense those aren't reconciliable.

Sorry about the rambling, I'm nodding over here and thinking about historiography and just thought I'd see what you people think.
Lydia Werringwater - Sat, 12 Sep 2015 19:10:46 EST ID:K3k4dOuf No.56123 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Or to put it in the form of a simple question: Do you think any one system can account for all of history's nuance or is that a flawed premise from the get go?
Shit Clammlestone - Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:12:22 EST ID:WBy4CtY7 No.56124 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Took a course in Chinese Historiography in college. Goddamn those fuckers rewrote and rewrote that shit to serve their Emperor's version of events.

Flawed premise though, but the idea is to be able to code-switch between different types of historiography when you're talking about different scales of history.

I've heard the term describing our present era as the next step beyond post modernism: Pre futurism. I think this is an incredibly important distinction, and may be a reason you find many existent schools of History unfulfilling. It is characterized by the proliferation of information access that will ultimately reach every corner of the human population. It is also characterized by the rise of "big data" and the ability to crunch those numbers.

I think that the Marxist idea that "society determines consciousness" is an important thing to remember in terms of politics in history. That the course of historical events is driven by mass change in the consciousness of the people, reflective of the material conditions of their era.
Archie Pucklehare - Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:43:12 EST ID:b0Z6XbnQ No.56129 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Yes, it's called Linguistics.
Hugh Craffingstock - Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:26:09 EST ID:yFQ4Ty4G No.56130 Ignore Report Quick Reply
These "historiographies" are...already history.

Was the nuke justified? by Jenny Maffingstone - Sat, 30 May 2015 00:08:19 EST ID:fvUsPHn8 No.55539 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1432958899972.jpg -(240149B / 234.52KB, 2116x1170) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 240149
So, whenever this thread comes up i hear some people talking about how the emperor wanted to sue for peace before the nukes were even dropped. Now, i don't have any sources on that so i'm not sure that its true. Does anybody have some?
114 posts and 26 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Edwin Dibbernutch - Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:23:44 EST ID:EYQ6O056 No.56039 Ignore Report Quick Reply
those fucking japs spread anime across the world and now we got sissy otaku's ruining society

my great grandpap didn't fought those nips on iwo jima so they could spread those stupid cartoons
Pimp C-Higgy !lfsExjBfzE - Fri, 04 Sep 2015 23:21:00 EST ID:XB9W9h+B No.56088 Report Quick Reply
Killing innocent civilians? Yeah that's unjustified. A pre-emptive strike from losing more lives if Operation Downfall happen and ending the war quickly? That's justified. It's like dropping the bomb's got its good and bad.
Matilda Goodhood - Sat, 05 Sep 2015 00:09:39 EST ID:b0Z6XbnQ No.56090 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Don't forget that nuking them kept them out of the hands of the soviets. Ask anyone in eastern europe about how much shittier that would've been.

Either way, should've dropped it on their emperor, then just blockaded until they gave up.
Hamilton Fuckingridge - Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:09:33 EST ID:46Ivwr3B No.56119 Ignore Report Quick Reply

>Ask anyone in eastern europe

Yeah, and not someone in East Asia. The Soviets had little direct control over their proxies in Asia, not in the least part due to demographic fears and racism. They also wished to avoid a large overseas occupation of a notoriously (or so it was thought) restive population.

>kept them out of the hands of the soviets

The Soviets got Sakhalin, which was a fifth of Japan's land mass. This placed them within short range of US military assets. This rendered the entire US occupation force a hostage to short range nuclear strikes.

They also turned China communist, which is exponentially larger than Japan.

It seems these arguments are little more than face saving maneuvers to cover up blunder after blunder.
Archie Pucklehare - Wed, 16 Sep 2015 05:03:25 EST ID:b0Z6XbnQ No.56128 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Fifth of land mass... Dude, they took the equivalent of fucking Alaska or the Yukon. The people who lived there were hardly even japs.

The only blunder was not letting king Arthur blow up china.

Rosemary Kennedy by Hugh Pupperchudge - Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:56:26 EST ID:bj95Mkkf No.55916 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1436903786536.jpg -(86658B / 84.63KB, 368x280) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 86658
her parents literally had surgeons mutilate her brain because she was mildly retarded.

ended up making her severely retarded.


#20th century logic

ps: she died in an institution for the insane 'cause she was completely unable to function after being lobotomized.
19 posts and 5 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Whitey Wattingstone - Sun, 09 Aug 2015 03:55:16 EST ID:OE1PGRtd No.55975 Ignore Report Quick Reply
soviet psychiatry basically only had that going for it. dissidents were very frequently diagnosed with 'sluggish schizophrenia': poor social adaptation, pessimism, problems with authority. in cases where dissidence could not be blamed on relics of the past or imperialistic meddling, a class conscious worker in a socialist state expressing dissatisfaction could only be mentally ill.

russians still do that, by the way. some activist got locked in an institution and given daily shots of haloperidol for six weeks for protesting some thing or another putin did. happens with some frequency as a matter of fact.

Hamilton Gallyset - Sun, 09 Aug 2015 18:02:12 EST ID:46Ivwr3B No.55976 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Yeah, but even they were utilitarian enough to realize lobotomy victims don't make good gulag slaves. Only the decadent west would intentionally create a sub class of dependent mouth breathers, when there was perfectly fine labor potential.
Jenny Fommlechore - Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:52:22 EST ID:xxkfkN+v No.56002 Ignore Report Quick Reply

When having a problem with authority is classified as a symptom of mental illness, that country done fucked up.
Emma Finnerfield - Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:09:17 EST ID:LahsLyXj No.56022 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>What happened
From wiki:
> In 1933, the Soviet government, under the leadership of Joseph Stalin, recriminalised homosexual activity with punishments of up to five years' hard labor
Pimp C-Higgy !lfsExjBfzE - Fri, 04 Sep 2015 23:24:51 EST ID:XB9W9h+B No.56089 Report Quick Reply
Well the eugenics movement was pretty popular back then so I can't really blame em for doing that to her.

Least Represented History in Academia by Edward Billerpet - Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:20:16 EST ID:+SMg0bNM No.55314 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1430256016104.jpg -(1945561B / 1.86MB, 2240x1260) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1945561
So I don't know what I'm talking about, and maybe this is totally the wrong question to ask.

But are there any parts of history or nations/civilizations that are underrepresented in contemporary academia?

Rome and Medieval Europe seem to have the most research done into them, are there any areas of history that you would like to learn more about but there simply aren't the resources?
51 posts and 8 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Jenny Bunway - Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:32:08 EST ID:IBzanJxJ No.56052 Ignore Report Quick Reply

I'm not that guy, but I'm not sure what you mean. I imagine an example of what he was talking about would be the Ainu. How are the Ainu not a minority or not underrepresented in Japanese history?
Polly Brerringchune - Sun, 30 Aug 2015 05:21:31 EST ID:K1xqWmOS No.56056 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>But are there any parts of history or nations/civilizations that are underrepresented in contemporary academia?

Bryzantine empire. Because they effectively dealt with Jews. Khazarian empire. Because modern Jews descend from them, and their human sacrificing shitheads way back then (that's why the Rus destroyed their empire).
Phoebe Mabbleforth - Sun, 30 Aug 2015 07:32:26 EST ID:IBzanJxJ No.56057 Ignore Report Quick Reply

that narrative you just spewed is underrepresented because it's made up
Whitey Blenderstock - Sun, 30 Aug 2015 17:43:37 EST ID:/wHIWU2y No.56058 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Genetic tests show Ashkenazai Jews are descendent from Khazars.

>More from his Haaretz interview, “The various groups of Jews in the world today do not share a common genetic origin. We are talking here about groups that are very heterogeneous and which are connected solely by religion…[the] genome of European Jews is a mosaic of ancient peoples and its origin is largely Khazar.”

>Now onto some of the science highlights. Dr. Elhaik’s research shows that the dominant element in the genetic makeup of European Jews is Khazar. For Central European Jews it is 38%, while for East Europeans it is 30

>On December 14, 2012, Dr. Eran Elhaik turned almost two generations of Jewish genome research upside down.

>But he went even further. The young Israeli-American geneticist has charged former researchers with academic fraud, and he has the research to back it up.
jo - Wed, 02 Sep 2015 18:00:18 EST ID:NFLi5hTP No.56070 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Japan and Korea VS the rest of Asia (modern day) by William Sadgebanks - Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:47:44 EST ID:dYxeYsZ8 No.55216 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1429058864514.jpg -(144426B / 141.04KB, 500x300) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 144426
So basically looking at Japan and South Korea, they are doing pretty well. They are extremely westernized, have post-industrial economies and successful business that deal all over the world - their electronics are respected everywhere. They have extremely high standards of living comparable and education to the most developed parts of the West.

The rest of Asia doesn't, though. Even China which is usually grouped with these 2 in terms of "Oriental" or having high culture worthy of respect... it's a shithole full of slaves who make cheap replaceable plastic crap and live in toxic slums. India, SEA and the Stans of course are totally fucked, full of desperate poverty and constant war. Even eastern Russia which is more or less "European" seems like an awful place to live.

So what the fuck? How and why did Japan and Korea survive to become "honorary westerners" and thrive while the entire rest of the continent sank into shit?
74 posts and 18 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Clara Hammlelidge - Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:16:41 EST ID:HI6SkGj2 No.55983 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Don't you mean vs china, and not vs rest of asia? The rest of asia just doesn't want to be a part of china, like always.

You want a better asian continent? Fracture china into it's parts, and then they will all be better off.
Edwin Boffingstudge - Sun, 16 Aug 2015 19:15:12 EST ID:lHJlVH3d No.55997 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Didn't they teach you in high school?

A spiderweb.
Esther Pockway - Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:32:28 EST ID:PvJtbXIx No.55998 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I must have skipped the day they taught civil engineering.
Matilda Duckstone - Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:36:38 EST ID:Hiw+Y3Xc No.55999 Ignore Report Quick Reply
that's basic urban geography
Ghengis Dong - Sat, 29 Aug 2015 12:12:04 EST ID:2egVTEgC No.56049 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I attended a shit school in the U.S. but my friends from money that attended expensive/prestigious schools never heard anything about urban planning. Assuming you're not talking about uni.

Powder Monkeys during the Age of Sail by Basil Honeystock - Sat, 24 Jan 2015 19:26:07 EST ID:cElAQBHK No.54670 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1422145567453.jpg -(971890B / 949.11KB, 1200x1334) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 971890
A powder monkey manned naval artillery guns as a member of a warship's crew, primarily during the Age of Sail. His chief role was to ferry gunpowder from the powder magazine in the ship's hold to the artillery pieces. The function was fulfilled by boy seamen 12 to 14 years of age.

This is as much as our wikipedia-education tells us of history.

But, intuitively... you and I both know... these kids were orphan sex slaves for sailors on long voyages. Amiright or amiright?

Some sad shit.
19 posts and 5 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Emma Sadgeville - Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:32:25 EST ID:SiTO/Mv7 No.55986 Ignore Report Quick Reply
You can mos def tell that they got a good dicking

Phineas Sossleshaw - Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:28:46 EST ID:HMkb07Fi No.55987 Ignore Report Quick Reply
On a slightly related note... Do you guys think it possible that disentery epidemics among soldiers were in part due to anal and oral sex among the troops ?
Frederick Domblebed - Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:47:37 EST ID:DKRT+FGT No.55988 Ignore Report Quick Reply

No lol, it's due to contaminated food, new (to them) diseases, etc.
Phineas Dottingwater - Sat, 15 Aug 2015 02:34:49 EST ID:HI6SkGj2 No.55991 Ignore Report Quick Reply

And lack of sewage and shower facilities.
William Clipperfork - Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:09:22 EST ID:b0Z6XbnQ No.56023 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Is this thread made by a pedo hoping for wankbait or something? Fucking perverts.

Who they got? by Beatrice Callybick - Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:25:21 EST ID:o6keS00K No.55783 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1434763521580.gif -(1019393B / 995.50KB, 263x310) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1019393
So in WWI after Russia started going Commie the rest of the allied nations sent forces to help out the Tsar, which makes sense Tsarist Russia was an allied nation.

But what if instead of Russia the socialist revolution had started in Germany as I've heard some say there was a legit possibility of happening? Do you think the allies would still have backed the Imperial faction or since they were an enemy would the allies have tried to help the socialists take down the Kaiser? Or would they have just sat it out and let the Germans fight themselves?
22 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Lydia Turveywill - Sun, 09 Aug 2015 19:22:26 EST ID:x8x6J2hH No.55977 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Prussia was involved in less wars than France or Britain and although there was no German state there was a German cultural sphere that most German speaking people (except the Swiss) felt as a part of.
Clara Hammlelidge - Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:06:42 EST ID:HI6SkGj2 No.55981 Ignore Report Quick Reply

because as GerMANs they are all part of the kin of Mannaz. Even the dutch, through ingvie.
Graham Fovingstet - Thu, 20 Aug 2015 02:01:00 EST ID:OE1PGRtd No.56004 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1440050460679.png -(802606B / 783.79KB, 1024x682) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
could you please stop doing that
Whitey Borringridge - Mon, 24 Aug 2015 02:04:05 EST ID:HI6SkGj2 No.56020 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Telling the truth with real words, through the use of linguistics? Fuck off, that is what language is for. Samefagger
Phyllis Claycocke - Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:18:47 EST ID:OE1PGRtd No.56036 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1440677927968.jpg -(839408B / 819.73KB, 4558x4542) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
ok friendo, defend your position. give me sources that proof "MANNAZ" means anything at all. because from where I'm sitting, it's an old root word and the name of a rune. oh, and some silly neopagans use it to read fortunes.
now I'm challenging you to find an instance of samefagging, because I do not think that word means what you think it means.


Patton, McArthur, Nuclear Weapons, and the Soviet Union by Phyllis Pickson - Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:45:52 EST ID:OE1PGRtd No.55931 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1437363952294.png -(271059B / 264.71KB, 553x413) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 271059
Forgive me /his/torians, I'm a little drunk.

Forgive me again, because I'm going to open Pandora's Box of AltHis.

The war in Europe is drawing to a close, the American atom bomb is nearing completion, or it's already finished and we're waiting until August to drop them on Japan. Everybody is poised to make a deal with the devil and cut Europe up into Allied/Soviet spheres of influence, except Patton, who wants to rearm the Germans and drive the Russians back to Moscow. He's ignored, the Iron Curtain is drawn, and the Cold War begins. But what if he wasn't and the Allies charge into Slavic lands?

Next scenario: September, 1950. UN troops push the North Koreans all the way up to the No-No line at the Chinese border near Dandong on the Yalu River. Mao says, "YOU FUKN DONE IT NOW!" and a million Chinese pour over the border and start knocking Yankees and Commonwealth troops back south. Hero of the Pacific Theater in WWII and Commander of US Forces in the Far East Douglas McArthur clenches his corncob pipe in his teeth and begs Truman to drop atomic bombs on Chinese cities to get the Chinks out of his war with the Shovelheads. Truman snaps that he's trying to avoid another World War (remember, the Soviets had had nuclear capabilities for over a year now), not start one. But what if he'd agreed with McArthur and Beijing had gone up in an atomic firestorm?
7 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
William Bullyhood - Fri, 31 Jul 2015 06:33:55 EST ID:RjY0R6D0 No.55960 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>On December 2nd, acting under the authority Truman had delegated, MacArthur ordered the United States Air Force to drop five Hiroshima-sized atomic bombs on Chinese columns advancing from the Korean peninsula. Although not as effective as they had been against Japanese cities at the end of World War II, the resulting blasts and firestorms did stop the offensive. Some 150,000 Chinese troops were killed in the attacks, along with an unknown number of American and South-Korean prisoners of war. NATO allies were quick to condemn MacArthur's action, which he had taken without consulting them, and only an American veto prevented the United Nations Security Council from immediately reversing that body's decision, made six months earlier, to authorize military action in defense of South Korea. The Soviet Union, under immense pressure from its Chinese ally to retaliate with its own atomic weapons, gave the United States a fortyeight-hour ultimatum to halt all military operations on the Korean peninsula or face "the most severe of consequences".

>When, on December 4th, that deadline passed, two Soviet bombers took off from Vladivostok, each equipped with a primitive but fully operational atomic bomb. Their targets were the South Korean cities of Pusan and Inchon, both of them critical ports supplying United Nations forces. Little was left after the bombs fell. Faced with twice the number of casualties inflicted in the attacks he had ordered against the Chinese together with an almost complete severing of his logistical chain, MacArthur ordered bombers based in Japan to drop atomic bombs on Vladivostok, as well as the Chinese cities of Shenyang and Harbin. The news of these strikes caused anti-American riots to break out all over Japan - itself withing range of Soviet bombers - just as Great Britain, France, and the Benelux countries were announcing their formal withdrawal from the NATO alliance. Not, however, before mushroom clouds were reported over the West German cities of Frankfurt and Hamburg - and so, to paraphrase Kurt Vonnegut, it might have gone.

From "The Cold War" by John Lewis Gaddis, very good book, highly recommended.
Cornelius Lightcocke - Mon, 03 Aug 2015 04:52:06 EST ID:LXIsvz6Z No.55966 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1438591926965.jpg -(3936B / 3.84KB, 349x144) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
I'm high enough to properly ramble a decent answer to scenario two-
If Truman doesn't talk down MacArthur then the world gets introduced to tactical nuclear strike theory twenty to thirty years earlier, when it comes to practical application and not solely theoretically, and this allows also for the complete understanding of the detriment to the world nuclear explosions and also noncontainable fallout from nuclear disaster earlier than Three Mile, Chernobyl, etc.
There is also a coining of the intended phrase 'military-industrial-congressional complex' in which political lobbying comes into the public thirty or so years earlier as well, which allows for ethics and policy shifts to occur more rapidly and under the same scrutiny as the McCarthy red and black balling trials and may have even supplanted those in the public's eye. This could lead to a different level and caliber of politicians, which may have saved us from Nixon and to an extent LBJ's in fucking sanity that we got dragged through, as well as a portion of the Bush Dynasty and the Clinton family. It could have pushed the world to be a better, albeit colder and more clinical, world in which civil and social issues are given as much attention as military and defense issues as well as shedding a different ideology to attack/defend against theocratic zealotry. Then again, that level of speculation is limitless, that far into the innumerable differences that that kind of timeline effect could cause.
Examples- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bqr5DVx3dw Eisenhower's Farewell Speech, coining of the phrase 'military-industrial complex'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_warfare#1980s Section of (I know, it's not a credible source for proper academia) Wikipedia's nuclear war entry on 1980s strategic and tactical, localized nuclear strike capabilities of Cold War nations in the 1980s.
Ghengis Dong - Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:01:12 EST ID:2egVTEgC No.56007 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Not relevant to OP, but you should be aware that three-mile never went critical and leaked negligible radiation. It did scare everyone shitless, but it actually wasn't an environmental disaster. Fukushima would be a better example. I lived just a couple miles from the 3-mile island plant most of my life. Otherwise neat, if speculative, post.

Whitey Borringridge - Mon, 24 Aug 2015 01:58:57 EST ID:HI6SkGj2 No.56019 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Worked for the nazis.
Faggy Brookman - Sun, 30 Aug 2015 03:44:27 EST ID:2f9U+23F No.56053 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I used Three Mile as the example over Fukushima because of the era that it occurred, not the non-meltdown or any thing like that.

Islam in South East Asia by Molly Drondledale - Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:54:46 EST ID:QonWQzR9 No.55860 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1435751686546.jpg -(267284B / 261.02KB, 1600x1063) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 267284
This always struck me as kind of odd. How did Islam spread to South East Asia. When you look at it on a map it doesn't really seem to make much sense. I have absolutely no idea what I am talking about here but surely Hinduism was in a much better position to spread from India rather than Islam?

Again, totally clueless, but it just seems to be a bit of an anomaly to me.

Pic related, the Crystal Mosque in Malaysia.
10 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Doris Blinnerfare - Thu, 06 Aug 2015 01:29:30 EST ID:5YewQAW6 No.55970 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Simple answer: everyobe traveled by boat back then. Overland travel took forever.
Jenny Sommleford - Fri, 07 Aug 2015 21:54:27 EST ID:HI6SkGj2 No.55972 Ignore Report Quick Reply

You're not talking about Muslims specifically though, except that they do not tip and suck to wait on.

Islam is a culture that is applied before nationality. In fact, it demands to be considered as if it were a nationality, if you read the pig-shit that is.
Whitey Wattingstone - Sun, 09 Aug 2015 03:49:24 EST ID:OE1PGRtd No.55974 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1439106564125.png -(472357B / 461.29KB, 640x372) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
america is pretty good at making muslims not muslims. all the muslim kids i grew up with drink and smoke weed and fuck and do blow when they can get it.
a good time: lay around with a couple of egyptians smoking hash and playing vidya. drink a shit load of tea and grab some mcdonalds' on the way over.
a bad time: interacting with their bizarre muslim parents
Isabella Heddleway - Mon, 10 Aug 2015 07:07:12 EST ID:mQgoZBfT No.55978 Ignore Report Quick Reply
that feel when no Arab gf with a big ass to smoke with.
no bump.
Esther Demmerford - Sat, 15 Aug 2015 22:54:30 EST ID:HTithbbp No.55995 Ignore Report Quick Reply

the difference between muslims and normal typical immigrants is that they go to an Islamic school and pray 5 times a day, so they are very versed in the islamic culture regardless of where they live.

You only need to go back tot he crusades to see the attrocities muslims put other religious people living in the same society as them, they rode horses from europe to israel because muslims where castrating christians and jews.

So although normal immigrants will immerse themselves in their local culture and abide by normal government most muslims dont, they operate under sharia, they usually have no contact with local government and dont participate in local culture or education, they go to islamic school and depend on other muslims for welfare.
Although they live on the same land they dont recognise your government as being their government.

Muslims are very dangerous because they are like a swarm just spreading over the world right now all thanks to Bin Laden stirring up another war creating hundreds of thousands of refugees.

of course this is being very general, i do know some people who say they are muslim but partake in the eating of non halal food and have sex with the same sex, but they are very much a minority.
In Australia whole communities have been converted from working class/poor people to Moderatly wealthy muslims, all the stores are muslim, all the butchers are halal, they have a loud speaker to announce prayer and they have huge mosques all over the place.

anyone got any history on the jewish pograms by Cyril Fandlefedge - Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:40:48 EST ID:UzmJd1sp No.55248 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1429479648836.jpg -(101021B / 98.65KB, 800x559) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 101021
in czarist Russia? just good wiki artilces or something light reading, I also posted this same thing on tinfoil because the two things just have to be related to the Europeans weird haterd of the jewish people, I mean that must be why everyone accuses them "allegedly" of stuff

Bump While Delirious
!!HToBa9dh - Sat, 09 May 2015 23:51:26 EST ID:1HMVEmd+ No.55370 Ignore Report Quick Reply
/del/icatesser, I typed in "Jew Russia" into Google and got this:

It's also very interesting to find the history of Russians in Israel. Reportedly, when Israel materialised after World War the Second, the ☭ just let everyone who wanted to go to Israel leave. There's a chick I used to know and she was fucking hot as hell. She celebrated all that superstition with the candles and shit while speaking Russian, lol it was awesome.

/blog off
Rebecca Crillerstodge - Fri, 22 May 2015 20:03:04 EST ID:xyhipsCc No.55435 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Looks like you're in luck, OP. You might be able to witness a pogrom unfold live in Moldova, due to a Jewish banker stealing 1/8th of that country's money:
Caroline Tootwater - Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:00:33 EST ID:vcnj2VmM No.55890 Ignore Report Quick Reply
it's everyone who comes into contact with them. Of course, this is weird and everybody else in the world is the problem.
Albert Worthingshit - Mon, 06 Jul 2015 21:42:56 EST ID:hT3/Evlt No.55891 Ignore Report Quick Reply
The only reason people don't like them is because of their desire to not fully integrate with local populations and retain their own customs. It's one of the reasons they have flourished in the USA, because we were founded (partly) by people who came here to practice their own customs unmolested. Obviously that's not always been true, but that's the predominating culture anyway.
Eugene Porringman - Sat, 11 Jul 2015 11:55:02 EST ID:UYQy1eqM No.55911 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>if somebody picks on you, it's your fault

List of important historical events by Faggy Chennerworth - Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:20:43 EST ID:p5WQwFa3 No.55764 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1434583243641.jpg -(963978B / 941.38KB, 1220x782) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 963978
So /his/tory I'm in a bit of a bad position here.

I love history and I always was among the top of my classes, however I do not know historical dates at all.

I can tell you about the cold war but can't say the year vietnam started and ended - same with Korea.
I can tell you that WW2 ended in May of 1945 but only because I can "reconstruct" the date based on my knowledge like:
> WW2 ended in 1945 > WW2 ended with the Soviets taking Berlin > the Soviets took Berlin in May because they wanted it in time for May-Day

So how do I tackle that issue? Is there a list of dates worth learning raging from Ancient to modern times (can be Euro-centric af I don't mind)?
18 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Nell Nillydock - Sat, 20 Jun 2015 21:10:52 EST ID:opaI++jW No.55806 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Huh? What's the difference?
Should, would....everyone knows it's all speculation either way

Faggy Pamblenog - Sat, 20 Jun 2015 23:36:16 EST ID:hT3/Evlt No.55807 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1434857776979.jpg -(95543B / 93.30KB, 960x937) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
I mean, if you're reading about an historical phenomenon, say the Protestant Reformation. You'll start seeing dates ranging from the early 1500s up until the 1650s. And if you know it begins with Martin Luther posting his 99 Theses and ends with the Peace of Westphalia after the Thirty Years War. Also, learn some key events like the formation of the Church of England in the mid 1500s, the French Wars of Religion in the mid-late 1500s and the Thirty Years War in the early-mid 1600s.

But yeah, study history in themes rather than just going chronologically. Date by date isn't going to help you get any better at History.

How about you tell us what particular periods or epochs or eras of history you're interested in and I'm sure someone will hook you up with the requisite chronological timelines. As of right now, your question is much too broad. You mention WW2 in your OP, while quite unoriginal of you, it is a very studied topic with many resources and timelines at your disposal all over the internet.

I might direct you to begin your study on WW2 not in 1939, not even in 1914, but rather alllllll the way back to 1871 and the Franco-Prussian War. And then move yourself forward so you can get all the nuance of the beautiful game of balance of power politics in Europe and the subsequent Age of Imperialism. All of this feeding directly into WW1 which feeds directly into WW2.
Nathaniel Beffingspear - Sun, 21 Jun 2015 01:41:03 EST ID:ZP5v6BrQ No.55808 Ignore Report Quick Reply
WW2 is a large topic as it is...I'd rather advice OP to study it by themes, like you said

like, read up Hitler's biography if that interests you...or read up about life in soviet Russia, or Annie Frank's diaries, or Japanese expansion into China, or the development of atomic bomb...
Augustus Shakewater - Sun, 21 Jun 2015 11:06:57 EST ID:46Ivwr3B No.55810 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Declarative v Speculative. nb
Cedric Dissleput - Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:12:16 EST ID:6BAckMvO No.55828 Ignore Report Quick Reply

If your desire is to not appear foolish, then don't actually study shit up with the idea of looking smart in class. Everyone will just think you're annoying since they didn't even bother and either already know it or are actually engaging in the process of learning not memorization.

Injuns by Sidney Claycocke - Mon, 02 Mar 2015 01:00:46 EST ID:fzS6BECQ No.54837 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1425276046973.jpg -(74025B / 72.29KB, 640x350) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 74025
What exactly made the caucasian. European settlers superior to the American natives in combat and diplomacy?
81 posts and 22 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Hedda Smallwater - Sat, 20 Jun 2015 12:04:58 EST ID:opaI++jW No.55796 Ignore Report Quick Reply
because Kazakhstan was already taken by the other guy. you could either fight for it or go further

sorta like them colonial settlers in New World
Hugh Worthingfield - Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:06:52 EST ID:46Ivwr3B No.55801 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Not to mention they had no way of knowing they had left the boundaries of the modern state of Kazakhstan.
Samuel Bonnerchack - Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:11:21 EST ID:J+AReqHU No.55802 Ignore Report Quick Reply
The abstract doesn't say this strain of TB caused widespread depopulation.
Samuel Bonnerchack - Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:12:15 EST ID:J+AReqHU No.55803 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>maybe you should so some research.
lmao, maybe you should read your own citations
Esther Cheggleman - Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:29:30 EST ID:FqRGTRMQ No.55927 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Some people on 420chan are so stupid, they should just be taken out back and be shot.

Cedric Clonderstag is one of these people.

<<Last Pages Next>>
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Report Post
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.