420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
Subject
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
BattleBoat by Charlotte Davinghood - Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:53:12 EST ID:j6+cNLCc No.45154 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1456501992228.jpg -(114921B / 112.23KB, 1280x960) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 114921
Would it be legally possible to avoid legal responsibility for death at sea by making people sign some papers accepting the risk of being part of a boat cruise where people are pitted against each other in massive brawls?
>>
Thomas Chellershaw - Fri, 26 Feb 2016 19:40:24 EST ID:mZ2odBd3 No.45164 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I'm not an expert on the law of the sea by any means, but I have taken a look at some of the relevant UN documents, and it makes me think that there is probably something there that could be used to stop this kind of thing from happening.

Even if there isn't any specific provision that prohibits this, I seriously doubt any state would be okay with people killing each other in the middle of the ocean, and would probably take some sort of unilateral or even multilateral action to put a stop to it. The only way you could MAYBE have some protection would be if you were back by a decently powerful and influential state, or a coalition of smaller states.
>>
David Niggerford - Sat, 27 Feb 2016 00:07:10 EST ID:uLJPOHRz No.45165 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I don't know maritime law either, it's an incredibly complex and nuanced area I have no reason to know anything about.

But I can tell you that there is both criminal penalties and tort liability available for those injured out "on the high seas." See, e.g. 18 USC 7; 42 USC 303. So in general, no you can't do this.
>>
Hedda Senkinson - Sat, 05 Mar 2016 01:30:48 EST ID:CbY8XCvi No.45193 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45154
Such papers would must probably be signed within some state's legal system which would forbid it.


IRS by Thomas Worthinggold - Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:04:17 EST ID:pXcjR5iA No.45152 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1456434257917.png -(2716B / 2.65KB, 105x36) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 2716
If I claimed myself as a dependent, and my mom also did, then how long will it take the IRS to catch us?
>>
Fucking Brazzleforth - Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:45:17 EST ID:JgrhRLWY No.45153 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45152
You could be audited on the first year, especially if your mom is claiming an EITC. The services loves catching people claiming those when they can't.


false residency on civil job applications by Hugh Blopperfield - Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:32:39 EST ID:R9Y/jwsq No.44869 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1448940759585.jpg -(193288B / 188.76KB, 1240x827) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 193288
chances of being caught and charged

go
>>
Emma Goodridge - Tue, 05 Jan 2016 23:56:46 EST ID:ORTlGTgk No.44962 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>44869
Your fucked
>>
Sidney Wongermut - Mon, 11 Jan 2016 20:31:54 EST ID:aYpMpqpy No.45036 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>44869
what picture is that of op....
>>
Charles Durringhood - Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:14:08 EST ID:aYpMpqpy No.45140 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>44869
where is this pic from? what place is that
>>
Caroline Bloffinglock - Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:08:09 EST ID:/F3JoGGQ No.45141 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45140
It's from China. Stop bumping this fucking thread.


Criminal Record Application Advice by Angus Crendlestore - Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:45:47 EST ID:8Irkql7o No.45072 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1453398347208.jpg -(11349B / 11.08KB, 225x225) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 11349
I have an issue I'd love to receive some advice on and I decided to post it here because I figured the lurkers of /law/ may be able to give me the most logical advice.

Basically, I have an adult record of 4 misdemeanor charges in a certain county, which isn't the one I currently live in. However, I actually intend on attending University and getting a job in that particular county. The thing is, a year or so has gone by since the arrest and I've since been trying to get the record expunged, as I don't consider myself a career criminal and I'd like for the record to not follow me around for the rest of my professional life.

Of course the process is very difficult and involves mundane fees and paperwork, however, I am still persistently trying to get it all done. After the arrest, I successfully completed a "PTI," like a mini-probation, as I'm sure you're familiar with, being that I had a small amount of required community service hours, drug tests and fees, which was completed in three months. I did receive paperwork stating the program was completed, but there's one form in particular the county told me I needed to continue with the expunction application process: a sealed certified disposition. Apparently, a certain person in a certain department has to get in touch with me in order for it to be printed and sent to me, and this person is saying the case was sealed to their access. The case is closed, yes, after I finished the program, but the charges are not sealed because they are still accessible to the public. The fact that they are still accessible to the public means that I am eligible to apply for expunction, in order to make them not accessible to the public.

Now, my situation is this: being that I want to attend University in this particular county, I recently began the application process for the school and it clearly asks for any CHARGES of a criminal history. Unlike most job applications which ask about convictions, the way this application question was worded clearly is asking for misdemeanor charges and arrests, even if the case has since been closed. However, I know that if I am successful in getting the charges expunged this informat…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
15 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Edwin Diddlestock - Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:14:54 EST ID:U23++ADK No.45123 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45117
Don't listen to these few useless morons, expunging your records they will be sealed from public access. Noting few exceptions. If you missed court and had a bench warrant for arrest theses could 'possibly' be accessed. If a restraining order had been issued by another party. Domestic disputes possible.

Nothing more I can think of from what I see would affect what you are working on.

I see in this you want records to be simply expunged, so you can omit these in furthering yourself
in future choices in employment education, etc. Anybody who wants to further themselves without
unneeded scrutiny following them around should do the same.

As in "have you ever been arrested or charged with a crime." If you feel this will not be accessible by public then by all means you have the option to say no and be safe and leave these infractions behind you. Hence, expunging your records.

So keep on. Good luck in your future goals.
>>
Albert Chusslebanks - Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:56:26 EST ID:JgrhRLWY No.45125 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45123

This man has no idea what he's talking about.
>>
Fuck Turveyman - Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:10:55 EST ID:U23++ADK No.45126 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45118
>> what am i not understanding about that?


>>Core concepts about what expungement does. It's not a clean slate. Even after it's been expunged, you >>have been arrested.

Explain the core concept of what expungement is intended for. It is essentially a clean slate in the public view. It is even often explained essentially as that in law, clean slate. Say drug courts may allow an expungment, a clean slate if one goes through a program, so it will not interfere with future
endeavors.
>>
Hedda Duckridge - Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:14:28 EST ID:JgrhRLWY No.45127 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45126
Expungement seals a conviction from public record. If you are asked if you have a conviction, in most circumstances you can answer that you haven't.

However, it doesn't change the fact you've been arrested. think of it this way: People get arrested and not charged. People get charged and found not guilty. People get found guilty but have their verdict suspended as part of some first offender statute. All of these people have lower levels of culpability than someone who's getting their record expunged, and would all have to admit they have had an arrest. So why would expungement magically erase an arrest too?

Also, more things to consider. In NCIC when you pull records you can see arrests even if they are followed by an expungement. You can generally tell that something was done, it's not clear a conviction followed. I don't remember the exact wording because it's been a year since I've seen one. Do you want someone doing a background check to see an arrest on the background check after you've told them you didn't have one? I know if it was me you'd be rejected instantly, even if it was to work at a car wash.

Also consider, I know this is at a university, i'm assuming public, so the above analysis controls, but private places use private records clearinghouses. These paid services do not generally update their records to reflect expungement. So if you're ever getting a background check by a private entity, not only are they going to see your arrest, they are probably going to see the resulting conviction.

Negative interactions with police interfere with future endeavors. Lying to people and relying on the fact "oh well it was expunged" fucks with future endeavors more. It's simple: unless they specifically say "even if expunged tell us about all convictions," which many background checks do, you can omit an expunged conviction. If they ask if you've been arrested, it's in your best interest to be upfront about it.
>>
Fuck Chummerbury - Thu, 18 Feb 2016 03:31:53 EST ID:U23++ADK No.45139 Ignore Report Quick Reply
It's really a decision that can affect ones future.
http://www.kable.com/hr/application/appMain.asp?cp=1

Saying yes is possibly offering your clearinghouses' info that one really does not want to be shared.

What would one really want, denial because of a background check and or being less than informative or, "If yes, describe in full" following them around.

It can be assembled and disassembled in ways that are fully irrational by some, or looked at in a rational manner by others in regards of judging peoples integrity.

Non-disclosure may support integrity if ones intentions and short and long term goals are realistic.


"I talk like this when I'm sober" by Ox - Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:05:00 EST ID:WfOLZKTz No.45131 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1455746700342.jpg -(513918B / 501.87KB, 1482x1482) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 513918
Charges filed against me (State of Pennsylvania)

75 1786 F - Operation of Vehicle Without Required Financial Responsibility
75 3714 A - Careless Driving
75 3802 A1* - DUI: General Impairment/Incapability of Driving Safely, 1st Offense
75 3802 D2* - DUI: Controlled Substance - Impaired Ability, 1st Offense

A little background first. When the title of my car was transferred into my name, the regisration retained my old address which is on my license (despite my providing my correction to my license that I received from Penndot at the time of the title transfer). Back in the early fall of 2015, I changed insurance providers from Liberty Mutual, to Geico, and then to Travellers in the span of two weeks or so. Insurance providers are not required by law to notify Penndot of when insurance is gained by a policy holder, only when a policy holder is dropped from coverage. Apparently, Geico immediately sends this notification of a drop to Penndot. When I dropped Geico, I picked up insurance with Travellers on the same day. Because of the aforementioned address confusion, Penndot's form they send out to clarify that an individual is maintaining insurance on their operatable vehicle was never received by me. So, I was ignorant to the fact that I needed to fill out any such form, thinking everything was okay, knowing that I was insured and had the proof for it myself.

Fast forward to January 1st, I am pulled over by a local police officer due to a headlight being out. He gives me a warning on that headlight, and alerts me to the fact that there is an "F-stop" on my registration, i.e. I am not currently insured. However, I explain to him how I am, producing my insurance card and neccessary documents, and he gives me ten days to show that i have attempted to rectify the problems. So, I fix my headlight, have my Insurance provider contact penndot, and I report back to him. He understands that im getting it fixed and the matter is resolved to him. Good Guy. Apparently, penndot is incapable of receiving correspondence that is not in the fashion of a form, so despite my having my insurance agent contact penndot via email and fax with an official declaration of me never lapsing in coverage from the t…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
1 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Ox - Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:06:18 EST ID:WfOLZKTz No.45133 Ignore Report Quick Reply
She then asks me, "Are you responsible for everything in that vehicle?"

I pause.

"are you responsible for everything in that vehicle?"

I look back, then look at her, "Uhh, yes?"

then she asks me "Do you give us consent to search your vehicle?" in this really convoluted tone that is a half rhetorical question half statement, and i ask her, "Is there a penalty if I say no? Will I be treated differently if I say no?" She then alludes to dogs blah blah blah, have your car towed blah blah blah, and I reluctantly say "yes" and she goes and puts me on the curb and proceeds to pull my friends out of the car and question them, then searches them, cuffs my friend in the passenger seat, sit him next to me (he had nothing on him) and then my two friends in the back have their shit taken, weed, paraphernalia. The lieutenant than asks me where my shit is, i tell her. she asks me if i have a scale (LOL) she takes my bowl and weed.

She then gives me a field sobriety test, does the pen test: I follow it with my eyes, not my head, pass it with flying colors, no problem with that one. She then wants me to do the walk-the-line part, and begins stumbling over her own words, starting over with her instructions, telling me to stop at one point, making it sound like i should stop at a different point, tells me to "reverse direction," not "turn around" I ask questions to clarify, blah blah blah. im shaking because its freezing and i had been sitting on the curb in 20 degree with for 15 minutes so my balance isnt the best and theres just so many things that are fucked up with this exposition. i walk the line and am counting but she doesnt tell me to stop. i stop anyway becaues if i didnt i would have walked into her cruiser. I then start walking backwards along the line. it's just stupid. I also heard later that field sobriety tests werent admissable in court.

She then puts me in the cruiser and she and her partner are talking to my friends, and my friend who was in the passenger seat, who admitted to smoking weed, is told he can drive my car and my other friends home (which was alright, cool), but now he's a sober witness to al…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Ox - Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:07:15 EST ID:WfOLZKTz No.45134 Ignore Report Quick Reply
So we depart and my friends get off clean. Im in the cruiser and we are speeding toward the local hospital to have my blood drawn since I agreed to have it drawn for a reduced sentencing program. We are literally doing double the speed limit, doing 75-90 miles and hour all the way there. We speed up behind this car and who else is it but my other uninvolved friend, and we ride his ass to the next town. (i see him the next day and he explains how this cop was on his ass) I am told that i cannot speak to an attorney before the blood is drawn, i am told i need to sign this sheet of paper that i felt rushed to sign, i sign it anyway, i get the blood drawn, cuffs go back on, no water or even saltines, i wanted some saltines dammit, and we speed again at outrageous speeds to the police station, where I am proccessed and the whole shebang. ( was never read my rights, i dont know how much that means anymore) My friend picks me up and i drive home after i drop him off at his car.

I asked the lieutenant when i was waiting for my friend to pick me up, if i was driving bad at all, i said i may have fluttered my brakes a little bit. she responded, "youre not the worst ive seen"

once we got into the cruiser after the hospital, She also made a joke about her oaf of a partner enjoying ripping people out of cars, and that if i moved my front-cuffed hands up or around or above the restraints, he would rip me out of the car and throw me on the ground. just minor intimidation, i know it's nothing to get your panties in a wad about, but still.

also, if theyre asking an individual, who is believed by them to be intoxicated, to sign a piece of paper, isn't that a logical catch-22? isn't that fucked up? if you cant allegedly operate a motor vehicle, how can one make legal decisions for themself? it's a fucking sham.

I just want to know what im looking at here and if there is any chance of fighting it.

I have some resources I read up on a little.

http://www.ncids.org/Defender%20Training/Drug%20Case%20Training/Stops_Warr_Searches.pdf

I was stopped not due to reckless driving, but to an unrelated investigation related to the F-stop, which I mentioned to the officer and showed proof of insurance. She could have even gone so far as to look at the date of determinancy of a loss of insurance. but she didnt. she wanted that cheap dui and associated drug bust.
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
George Fedgedock - Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:49:01 EST ID:Kd+sUt8p No.45135 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45134
Signing that you've received a ticket isn't a "legal decision."
>>
Ox - Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:13:22 EST ID:WfOLZKTz No.45136 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45135
I wasn't signing anything about receiving a ticket. It was signing off on having my blood drawn in accordance with a program I could enter.

I actually didnt walk away with a singe piece of paper from the police, and i still havent received anything.

I'm expecting a hospital bill for the "voluntary" bloodwork.

Funny enough, I received some mail from three law offices today soliciting me for their assistance, yet I havent seen any mail from the judge's office.

The pa court website says the case was filed on February 9th.
>>
Ox - Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:15:55 EST ID:WfOLZKTz No.45137 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45135
additionally, when reading aloud the sheet of paper, the officer said that I waive my rights to plead any other way than guilty by signing it, but I didn't see too much of a choice at the time.

I just don't know what the fuck is happening.

nb


Allstate's Hit and Run Policy by Shitting Clenningman - Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:44:25 EST ID:jopQWrH8 No.45128 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1455687865606.jpg -(561506B / 548.35KB, 2048x2048) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 561506
Had a person in a van sideswipe me trying to merge over into the left lane I was in, fucking bounces off my car and goes back into the lane they were in originally then fucking guns it up this hill trying to evade me, weaving between both lanes to get as far ahead as they possibly could from me. I immediately called 911 and pulled over, officer cap, filed a police report, yada yada. So what I need to know from ya'll is:

  1. Should I get an estimate on the damage before filing an insurance claim, or should I just go ahead and file an insurance claim? Because I have collision repair with Allstate and I know they cover hit and run accidents but ONLY if the damage costs more than the deductible, or something like that. Pic is my car, passenger's side. Anyone from /vroom/ know off the top of their heads how much $$$ we're talking here?
>>
Shitting Clenningman - Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:47:12 EST ID:jopQWrH8 No.45129 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45128
Also question 2 was supposed to be if anyone knew off the top of their heads a rough e$timate of the damage, just accidentally combined it with question1
>>
Phyllis Fedgebury - Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:13:38 EST ID:baf/Tz9j No.45130 Ignore Report Quick Reply
lol what kind of car is that

you're looking at thousands of dollars man

whats your deductible? mines only 500. I'm sure this is over that

I mean it looks you'll need a new fender. I hope that door damage can be fixed. They might be able to fix the quarterpanel but even that looks shitty.

Thousands.
>>
Reuben Fosslefield - Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:38:41 EST ID:jopQWrH8 No.45138 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45130
Yeah the deductible is $500 and it's an 04 toyota celica.


Chicago inmates that have beaten by Basil Wibbersun - Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:50:54 EST ID:ftFh0pA3 No.44771 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1446054654338.png -(272111B / 265.73KB, 490x326) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 272111
Anyone from Chicago that has actually been beaten after arrest without resisting? Chicago is known for being corrupt but after an arrest and simply staying silent not even talking to an officer is considered attitude. They smacked me in the face 2x for not speaking with the bottom open palm to not leave a mark. I was then hit in the stomach with a flashlight by his weaker partner for not offering my information when arrested after remaining silent. What's wrong with you, can't you talk? FUCK NO especially hearing about a cubs game they were going to before I was I-BONDED out...released on my own recognize. Please tell me someone from Chicago has been beaten up after an arrest? To have slammed a flashlight into my stomach at a station bench that might as well been a fucking closet. An example of Chicago cops covering themselves on a junkie that was literally nodded out on a bench which they claimed he tried to "escape" that's a classic heroin junkie. There was no escape, that a picture after they beat his ass up in a fucking super high nod. Who has that capability to "escape" that high?
18 posts and 3 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Wesley Febbleshaw - Fri, 20 Nov 2015 22:09:55 EST ID:ftFh0pA3 No.44844 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1448075395831.jpg -(64494B / 62.98KB, 540x404) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
LMFAO WOW i'm laughing so hard, found the cop that beat me up with the two slaps to the face while handcuffed in the back seat (no separate glass, it's a narcotics car) in a rap video. I seriously thought he resigned but I guess not. He's like a rough Steven Segal, tallest guy in the courtroom. His partner was the one that hit me in the stomach with the flashlight, that didn't hurt.
>>
Alice Pankinnet - Tue, 02 Feb 2016 21:45:28 EST ID:aYpMpqpy No.45103 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>44773
>>they went in my ass crack (typical Chicago stash spot

typical police or narcs?
>>
Doris Bellerstone - Thu, 04 Feb 2016 13:22:53 EST ID:6d1j1iAg No.45104 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45103
whyed you bump a thread from 4 months ago
>>
Basil Guddlehall - Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:28:56 EST ID:t8dRDXLN No.45113 Ignore Report Quick Reply
This happens everywhere, Chicago cops just celebrate/are celebrated for being so flagrantly corrupt, the only other police department in the US with a similar rep is New Orleans.
Cops are like this everywhere pretty much. If you think a bunch of fat irish slobs that call negros hambones and take their loose cash after smacking them up was bad you should see some of the shitty cops whose cartel family members encouraged them to pursue the career over on the west coast, or the cops that are actual card carrying members of shit like the kkk down south.
Just avoid that situation again I guess.
I can't even get a job at walmart because a police officer twisted his wrist beating the shit out of me when I was 16 and I got a resisting arrest and assault on an officer charge. It's like this all over the country. In az they will put you on the hood of a hot car in the 120 degree heat and hold you there til you blister, and if you happen to get dark while they sun bake you and don't have a birth certificate and 2 forms of government id get ready for a 72 hour hold while they double check your citizen status.
The world is shitty and people in power often abuse it, I would think someone that comes from around one of the most well known collections of hoods called a city in the US would know this. Maybe stay in the suburbs if this shit shell shocks you that much, it's just another day that ends in y for everyone else.
>>
Edwin Diddlestock - Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:45:04 EST ID:U23++ADK No.45124 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>44791
OP you might need to smoke LESS and chill out, and maybe see a mental health professional, based on the two rambling threads you've posted in the past couple weeks.

Police should only use a reasonable level of force in a given situation.
Otherwise they are a liability to themselves, the public, the integrity
of law and justice. I believe in Denver police have to get their own
insurance instead of the city/taxpayers paying the bill for misconduct.

Doesn't matter who is perceived to deserve to be mistreated. If a department
as practice routinely uses excessive force and tactics that are unreasonable
it should be everybody's concern. Uh, unless some people who favor these
practices gets a speeding ticket, or parking meter violation they somehow
feel betrayed just like that. Thinking or saying the same ol, why don't you
do your job and catch rapists and robbers.


This happened in BC by James Femblestudge - Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:47:35 EST ID:baf/Tz9j No.45120 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1455425255444.jpg -(469167B / 458.17KB, 1920x1080) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 469167
It was literally the middle of the night and me and a friend went to a local park to try out a new vape. I brought all my weed because I was lazy.

We were stupid and didn't keep and eye out when we went to the park. Cops saw us and caught us getting high.

They get our names, joke about how the thing reeks, asks me how it works, etc. I responded with idk and one word answers for most of it. Then the other cop said we are under arrest for possession and then said she was going to search our bags, which is legal since we are under arrest.

A few more words and trying to make us feel bad smoking weed and then they let us go after confiscating our shit.

I didn't have any ID, they I only gave them my name and address.

We weren't taken to the police station, we weren't fingerprinted, we weren't told to show up anywhere or given any instructions about what we needed to do next, they just let us go without our shit. But the cops did say we were under arrest during the incident.

it's been 6 months and I haven't received any letters that tell me to show up to court to defend against charges.

I'm worried because the company I work for has business in the states and I'm lined up to take a bigger role potentially in american markets a few years from now. I really don't want this to have an adverse effect on my career.
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Clara Blytheworth - Sun, 14 Feb 2016 02:25:06 EST ID:d9L4L80t No.45121 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45120
call the pd you were "Arrested" in and ask. give them your name and shit and then just go idk, i thought i was getting tickets. they will run your shit. from the sounds of it you got let off. how it goes in the states is you get a summons ticket then RoRed. as far as how quick shit comes from the courts. you will get papers within a month typically.
>>
Edwin Diddlestock - Sun, 14 Feb 2016 14:23:37 EST ID:U23++ADK No.45122 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45120
You likely would have gotten a ticket or summons to appear in court. well in the US anyway. I would imagine they were just messing with you. Chances are they just made a report about a 'contact' ran your names and nothing more. Nothing that would be readily and easily searchable in my opinion.

But could contact the police department and see if there could be a warrant for an arrest
if you failed to appear, if they were being scum and didn't offer you a summons to appear or ticket to pay a petty fine or dispute the fine in court.


Tax Fraud by Basil Guddlehall - Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:15:27 EST ID:t8dRDXLN No.45112 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1455128127292.gif -(50545B / 49.36KB, 767x300) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 50545
I worked for a piece of shit a few months back that quit answering my phone on payday so I quit going.
Last week I got a W-2 reporting about a weeks worth of wages I never received.
I tried to call the number back and they said it's not them anymore but when I mentioned reporting it they got all buck so I know it's them.
How do I go about reporting this, I'm usually not one to tell, but fuck em.
The IRS website is confusing and I don't want to hire an attorney over $200 they never paid but I do think it would be pretty sweet to send this sleaze bag to federal pound me in the ass prison.
Are there any streamlined avenues to get this done or is it going to be a lengthy process filled with headaches?
>>
Jack Wallyworth - Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:46:16 EST ID:M8D6syjY No.45114 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Like everything with the IRS there's a form for you to fill out. In this case it's a Form 3949 A.

Mail it in and you'll be fine.


Went to court today by Cedric Shittingfield - Wed, 03 Dec 2014 16:42:20 EST ID:CFR/zaxX No.43691 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1417642940649.jpg -(147092B / 143.64KB, 800x540) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 147092
The last 2 months have been rough, I got caught in a club with drugs and got the whole doorman/police/cell shakedown. After no comment during interview I eventually ended up and court today.
The dumb idiots tested a crushed up pill as coke and the actual pills somehow didnt make the trial. So one false count of a class A possession instead of 2, even though it was the wrong drug.
My solicitor was smart and instead of letting me explain the bullshit confusion, which would had lead to more bullshit and another court date for ultimately the same charge, made my case simple. I had nothing to say throughout the whole thing except guilty and got a fine.
The police are incompetent as fuck and have no idea what drugs are. Glad this crap is over but really fuck them and this whole drug war. However Im glad it happened in some ways cause I dont wanna do drugs anymore and remembering this whole fiasco will keep me in check.
2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Edwin Blozzlenick - Sat, 06 Dec 2014 03:19:31 EST ID:DZFVkP15 No.43710 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>43703
Reality is designer or rather unscheduled drugs, takes years to make them a scheduled class drug.

Marijuana as per the FDA in the US has no valid uses in medicine
So it is a class schedule 1, no medical usages, like LSD.

In reality, (OP) person should not have plead guilty to anything, as the prosecution would have had to show cause to pursue the case.

As for RC drugs, the average police, FBI, DEA, it is a comfusing state of affairs regarding
these issues. So is the ability to expedite scheduling of drugs.

It is a battle, not much so, but the solid established medical community and the federal government.
>>
Ernest Blubblelock - Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:59:18 EST ID:5VoyghiA No.43726 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>43710
LSD is pretty much the only cure for cluster headaches, bro.
>>
Priscilla Trotham - Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:17:25 EST ID:CFR/zaxX No.43744 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>43710
I shouldnt have pleaded guilty perhaps, but then a retest would have found that it was MDMA which is still class A..then they might have wanted me to explain why I had three bags of MDMA (powder and pills), then it gets complicated, they just want a simple story.. it wud all points towards ITS which in all honesty, is what it was...I cudnt have it hanging over my head any longer so the story was I went to a club, got drunk, bought coke and went to the toilet to do some. It was very stupid and I wont do it again, the end. Pigs still have my phone, lying scumbags
>>
Cornelius Sonnerville - Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:56:08 EST ID:viBz2K2h No.43751 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Dear lord, all this bitching over a fine?
My clients get heavy duty probation for the same type of plea and possibly prison time if they have priors. And even with probation, they're backing up years over their heads and have judges crazy enough to give them the full back-up if they fuck up probation in even the slightest.

So quit your "war on drugs" shit. The UK is paradise.

Also, your solicitor may have fucked up. What were you actually charged with, possessing the pills or cocaine? I would've gotten you acquitted.
>>
Ernest Pickhall - Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:55:52 EST ID:VmW9tMgl No.45106 Ignore Report Quick Reply
gr8 b8 m8


I have this friend who got permanent nerve damage from a teflon pan by Rebecca Blamblechene - Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:50:20 EST ID:o/Ek/m4G No.45042 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1452635420897.jpg -(75377B / 73.61KB, 1500x998) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 75377
Is there anything this friend can do to be compensated by the pan company? They got teflon flu by cooking on low heat with this pan and its been more than a month and they're still shaky when they move their body in certain ways.
Does a person with low income have any chance? Its also a Korean company


This is the pan: http://amzn.com/B00SPUDQBC
2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Fuck Pammerlure - Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:10:07 EST ID:Sa6sQJQx No.45047 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45042
  1. Prove it
  2. Prove it beyond a reasonable doubt
  3. If the company didn't know at the time it was dangerous then probably not
  4. Didn't the whole teflon panic turn out to kind of be bullshit?

5. You probably won't be able to prove it and I doubt a lawyer will even bother with you after the initial phone call or consultation.
>>
Wesley Guvingpuck - Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:13:49 EST ID:Kd+sUt8p No.45050 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45047
>Prove it beyond a reasonable doubt
Assuming this would be a civil case, you wouldn't need to prove to "beyond a reasonable doubt," as that's just for criminal cases. Regardless, OP still doesn't have much of a chance of success.
>>
Reuben Cicklekore - Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:44:07 EST ID:U23++ADK No.45052 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45050
Reasonable doubt, not even close to par with daytime fake courtroom drama.
All the comments,duuumb.

Really DuPont has settled many times for it's damages caused by it's products and practices. This item I believe claims 5 Teflon coatings, could be a flaw in the manufacturing process, as well documentation of this.

Not sure how long it stays in ones system but if one saw a doctor and saw above accepted levels of the chemical(s) and could correlate the physical conditions
to the exposure(s) then a case may be fairly straightforward. Time resource consuming but as it is now teflon as nice of a product it is intended to be,
has issues.
>>
Curious - Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:40:59 EST ID:FaGbLTds No.45090 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45044

It might not have been caused by the teflon itself, but some kind of binding agent, or a paint, or a spray or something.
>>
Eliza Decklefock - Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:10:55 EST ID:Nhoj62He No.45105 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45090
you'll need to hire a doctor to examine the patent and makes the diagnosis that a PARTICULAR spray or chemical caused the issue or likely caused the issue. There are doctors out there that specialize in this sort of thing. However, if you're low income you probably won't be able to afford it.


Unwitting Antibiotic Treatment by Curious - Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:04:41 EST ID:FaGbLTds No.45091 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1453842281288.jpg -(461731B / 450.91KB, 1422x1101) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 461731
So, I know that there are various laws against administering drugs to people against their will. These laws usually are referring to roofies and GHB and the like, and some even specifically say that the substance has to be "poisonous, noxious, or toxic" i.e.; adding extra sugar/water/kool-aid mix to someone's drink isn't illegal (unless the person was diabetic or something i guess... but that's unrelated) and I imagine putting something like an OTC medication in a child's pudding to make them eat is when they won't is also not illegal. But what if you're trying to, say, give someone antibiotics (you know 100% for sure there are no allergy concerns) because you *might* have given them an STI (the clap) but you're not sure, they are not symptomatic, but you want to give them a prophylactic anyway, just to be certain. Now, I suppose this may fall under something like "prescription abuse", but antibiotics aren't scheduled substances, and you can even get them for something called Patient-Delivered-Partner Therapy, where you can get an extra dose of the drugs for your partner, without the doctor having to see them. Now, I know the idea of PDPT is to tell your partner what happened, and have them take the drugs, but... idk. I know that giving someone any sort of medication against their will is kinda a socially unacceptable thing to do, even with a hot highway's worth of good intentions, but is it actually illegal if it doesn't have any effect whatsoever, other than possibly curing the person?...
3 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Fanny Nammlechire - Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:33:41 EST ID:ZwixIBj1 No.45097 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45095

Maybe she'll learn not to suck at relationships if she has to face the consequences of her actions. You're doing your friend a disservice.
>>
Phoebe Draffingwune - Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:36:08 EST ID:9h0A8QkR No.45099 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45095 the real question is does the legality of this really matter in the long run. chances are shes doing it already.


but your "friend" is a cunt and is probably going to keep cheating on her husband just saying.
>>
Rebecca Sinningset - Thu, 28 Jan 2016 07:45:59 EST ID:JgrhRLWY No.45100 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45095
Fuck your friend and her beta husband. No advice to be found here.
>>
Curious - Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:51:53 EST ID:FaGbLTds No.45101 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45100

*shrug* fair enough. I thought this was /law/, not /moral/, my bad.
>>
Faggy Clipperspear - Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:44:40 EST ID:PFZnnXGH No.45102 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45101
Here's a /law/ answer: this is very illegal everywhere.


<<Last Pages Next>>
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.