>>37901
Prison is different than jail. They won't even be the same person when they're out. Your friends as you know them are likely gone. I sound like a movie but it's true. And unless they're lucky, they'll be in for a long while.

I wanna know how monumentally stupid you have to be to say, "Hey, let's go shoot at cars while I am totally high and have drugs on me! What could go wrong?"

>>37913

Judging from the mugshot of em posted above, very very very stupid. Put mind-bending drugs and guns into the mix and you get exactly what's happened here.

>>37902
Yeah I meant butts-in-the-air prison, I just forget there's a difference

Your friends are fucked op, simpy fucked.

I knew a kid who tried to help get some kids weed, and the people he took them too ran off with their money so he went to help get it back. They started fighting with a large group and he just pulled out his gun and fired into the crowd. He's been sentenced to double digits as a minor, not recalling the exact number.

They are completely and utterly fucked up. Sorry but your friends are history. I don't see how they could get a plea deal when its so obvious they could be tried for all counts easily.

>>37340

>What is your sexuality: Gay, Straight etc?

It would be illegal for them to ask this.

>>37278
I'm a former police officer becoming a drug user. my way is more fun

>>37349

>Implying the police follow the law

>>37349

Isn't the interview completed with by a psychiatrists under controlled circumstances? You do not have to answer any question and you can get asked any question, but it is not the same as you filling out a form regarding your sexuality. I know it would be illegal if they ask you to disclose on a form, but I did not know it was illegal for them to ask you while undergoing a polygraph?

>>37351 tell me your life story bro

>>37717
Now I want to randomly call up people and ask that....

>>37717
Had a jock ask me for smoke, he was somebody I would consider a neighborhood, umm, well would give him my last dollar if he needed it.

He asked if I could get him weed. Trust/not trust. I said, I am pretty sure
you could find some from your friends. Which the athletic elite generally
do pretty well for themselves. He did say he wanted it to keep on the low
side though in a very casual way. No some dumbfuck sounding, hey man
got some weed, I wanna score, ya know!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Association_of_Exorcists

your friend should troll the cops without saying anything to incriminate himself, and don't sell drugs for a little while

>>37800
Wait a minute, I posted this in the wrong thread, lol. I don't know why I posted this here. Derp a derp.

>>37915
Hold up here....hold the fuck UP!

1 - Where are you?
2 - Did the cops catch you with some shit or just show up at your door going, "Your GF called us so pee in this!"???
3 - Or has NOTHING happened except some stupid cum dumpster TOLD YOU she called the cops?

I am betting 3. In which case nobody will give a fuck and she is a cunt you are better off without.

If you were not found with anything, STAND THE FUCK UP, no offense but, stand the fuck up. Call yourself a boy named sue<, restore your standing. -

>>37915
copfag here. op confirmed as a liar. (unless he lives in some tyrannical police state.) cops don't care about what you've done. its all about possession

never snitch unless somebody does the same, one should be allowed to see the evidence against them, the confidential informant thing, look around that.

Public defenders aren't great, some are, one can likely possibly seek another one. As well as a conflict of interest if one could show that may be a possibility. There are no real drug prosecuting attorneys, in this scenario, just defense attorneys and prosecuting attorneys.

if you didn't sign shit deny you were ever there and accuse them off lying, wait until they send you to court over it, which they probably won't, and fight them there.

tldr just ignore it

I'm an EMT and in my state we are supposed to offer a refusal form UNLESS the person is out of their normal state of mind. This means they are mentally disabled, in a mental state where they would choose to go with us if they were normal, or are intoxicated.

A kid OD'd in our region though and they let him sign a refusal for some reason, but they gave him narcan and had him and about 10 cops sign witness to the refusal, so it can happen but is very rare.

So the ambulatory bill is basically going to need to be paid, you can thank your state legislature for that. I'm not certain about the hospital though, I would think that they would require you to sign consent forms for treatment if you were in a right state of mind. You might want to consider talking to a lawyer who deals with health cases. If you can find one who says you have a case then it might be worth the $1000-$2000 in legal fees when taken to civil court if it means you save a grand or two. You should also ask the hospital for a billed receipt that details each cost. If there's any bullshit on there then I think the whole thing could potentially be discarded. Like I said though, I'm an EMT, not a lawyer.

I wouldn't keep your hopes too high though OP.

If you don't have a lot of money don't bother paying it. Your best bet to argue against the charges is in a courtroom. Just don't pay and wait for them to sue you.

>>37900 id love to hear the transcript of him reasoning with the judge

Judge: so tell me what happened anon
anon: well i was at house with my friend when he called the cops because i was unresponsibe because i was fadded i didnt wa...
Judge: you we're what?
anon: fadded, you know high on herion, anyways i didnt want an
judge: you were high on her

im sure you guys can figgure out the rest of the convo

>>37849

>can afford heroin
>I'm a broke ass college student

Just ignore that shit and get off heroin. If stupid shit like this isn't enough of a wake up call then you might as well just expect more stuff like this to happen.

>high school
>due process
>just turned 18
>not fooling anyone

>>37896
fuck off, I'm actually 18 asshole

If you're interested in cases about free speech in a school setting, Tinker v Des Moines Independent School District is the landmark. The cite is 393 US 503.

could get a hearing with the board of education.

Depending on what you seek in the future, a GED would be fairly easy enough to accomplish. But graduation from a high school would be much better.

>>37903 what was the joke is my question

Oh yea, and I live in Illinois

>>37906

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K11-1414

Subsection (f) deals with the punishment:

>the Secretary of State shall suspend for a period of 3 months the driving privileges of any person convicted of a violation of subsection (a) of this Section or a similar provision of a local ordinance
>In addition to the suspensions authorized by this Section, any person convicted of violating this Section or a similar provision of a local ordinance shall be subject to a mandatory fine of $150 or, upon a second or subsequent violation, $500. The Secretary may also grant, for the duration of any suspension issued under this subsection, a restricted driving permit granting the privilege of driving a motor vehicle between the driver's residence and place of employment or within other proper limits that the Secretary of State shall find necessary to avoid any undue hardship.
>The Secretary of State may, as a condition to the issuance of a restricted driving permit, require the applicant to participate in a designated driver remedial or rehabilitative program.

Basically, you'll have your licence suspended for 3 months, a fine of $150, and may have to go to re-education classes.

>How fucked am I?

You're about 0.3 fucked.

>>37907
why does no one ever take into account 90% of our cases get settled outa of coarse for a plea to a lower crime

>>37839
Stealing posessions from individuals isn't cool...

That feel when you're a kid and your ipod/bicycle/whatever gets stolen...

If you've got a car and the ability to get to a rich neighborhood which might actually have some worthwhile shit where nobody will recognize you, you have the means to make money without being a piece of shit thief.

or you're seventeen and don't know no better

lol I didn't know there was a term for this but yeah I've done it a lot a few years ago. Usually at night when I was walking home from wherever I'd spend the evening. I was amazed at how many idiots leave their cars unlocked. Never scored anything worthy though. A few bucks and cigarettes usually.

What does that have to do with /law/? Honestly, I know it can pay out a lot and there is less risk than a burglary but you are still a shit person. One day you might get into the wrong person's shit. If you're doing it for fun I hope you get caught by somebody that thinks Mark Zimmerman was justified.

>>37852

>that thinks Mark Zimmerman was justified.

it's almost like you are implying he wasn't

Are you fucking stupid?

>>37893

hey thanks. that helps a lot. you might be right. not sure though. thanks though.

The "tribunal" is one Canadian dude who isn't a lawyer.

>>37866
basically i mean the police report

>>37866
You were caught fucking a dog weren't you?

in the US there is NCIC https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ncic
Generally the info is pretty much limited. If it has said to have
been expunged it 'should' have been sealed.

Anyway if anybody is interested seems most if not all states allow juvenile convictions to be sealed (expunged.) Just have to go through the motions
to do so.

>>37890
Yea, details should not be shown to law enforcement through the database, just
arrest dates times agencies, etc, warrants this and that, not convictions and other detailed info.

>>37868
Since you appear to have been charged, what does the CHARGE say you are CHARGED with?

I apologize for banning you and deleting your post, as I hadn't seen your mention that 21 is considered underage for weed.

Here's his post:

>>37870 Just gonna copy what it says onto here. (This is after my vehicle
information and etc.) >DID THEN AND THERE COMMIT EACH OF THE FOLLOWING OFFENSE(S) 69.50.4014-Possesion of
marijuan...

(Sorry, thats all I have stored)

>>37877
It's fine, that's basically all of it. The end being Possesion of marijuana 40g or less (under age 21.) Haven't check this post most of the day so no jimmies were rustled, don't worry.

NORML is your best friend people...

http://norml.org/laws/penalties/item/washington-penalties-2

>>37882
Thanks, Lydia. NB