420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
Subject
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
unsecure business network by Frederick Wucklestock - Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:26:12 EST ID:f6JeFXbN No.45449 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1469489172296.jpg -(1113559B / 1.06MB, 2560x1600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1113559
sup coles/law/

i worked on a network for a loan processing company that has roughly 300 high credit clients on files that are just lying in stacks on an open bookshelf. Wait it gets worse: their office is on ground floor with huge 8x8 foot windows on the two front facing walls that can see client information just left out in the open and theres no curtains, just the promise of future curtains. Said file bookshelf is in that same room.
Reason i worked on the network is because client data was stored on 5 individual pc's connected to wifi (wpa2) and was shared back and forth over email. I did my best taking them all off the wifi and set up a central file server for sharing that all the client information is supposed to be stored on in the back room. I find out today that not only have they taken pcs off the ethernet and are using wifi again, but they've added another storebought pc. All of the computers are logged into 'personal' accounts (meaning their personal info is on it).

We're talking millions and millions of dollars of client information from social security to tax returns to full color scans of very sensitive documents and they are relying on storebought wifi /default firewall.

Will i be liable if /when they get investigated? I even invoiced 'em and stuff. This is in texas. Roger Dean artowrk unrelated.
>>
Samuel Sodgekitch - Wed, 27 Jul 2016 04:15:02 EST ID:AfZS3+MB No.45450 Ignore Report Quick Reply
document document document

write emails, logs, take pics, video, hell fuckin audo record conversations if need be

obtain solid PROOF you did your shit and they were dumb monkeys, otherwise you look fraudulent. prove that shit beyond any doubt
>>
Wesley Honeyson - Mon, 01 Aug 2016 01:19:13 EST ID:ri/uIG9H No.45460 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45450
cool. i've got two emails and skype convo as well as a 'services rendered' sheet (like an invoice but without charges, its mostly for them to keep to show any IT people they might hire in the future to help 'em out) that shows reccomendations for changes in security.
I think i'm good. Guy isn't showing any inclination toward doing anything other than getting offended. Do you think i have to report him or can i just leave it like this and keep my records? I'd rather just drop the whole thing and not associate with 'em anymore.
>>
Charles Bridgewater - Tue, 09 Aug 2016 22:06:27 EST ID:He2A3Qii No.45473 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45460

do what you feel is right, i am no expert in your field, but i would definitely recommend keeping a nice fat pile of records and documentation, the more the better


s it legal for a company to charge your debit/credit card without you signature by Fuck Drankinkudge - Sun, 31 Jul 2016 18:12:09 EST ID:U+qdMmD3 No.45454 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1470003129781.jpg -(1170534B / 1.12MB, 2560x1440) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1170534
Last Night I had a friend over and we ordered a pizza with my card.

The driver never called never rang the bell, or anything . W assumed that the order didn't go through or we ordered too close to clpsong.

This morning we found the pizzas just sitting down on the door step in lime 80 degree weather. They were like warm and soggy.

Now...here's the thing. Nobody ever signed the receipt accepting payment for the pizza. The driver just left it there with an empty receipt and drove off.

It says clearly on the receipt "I accept payment of this transaction with my signature"

So how can they charge me if nobody signed it?

I called the manager and he claims payment goes through once you place an online order.

I checked online and nowhere does it say that. It also says "Our Guarantee, if you are unhappy with your order, we will replace it or refund you in full.
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
1 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Martin Sinkinsit - Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:25:46 EST ID:Nx0pJM6s No.45456 Ignore Report Quick Reply
same thing happened to my friend because he got too drunk and fell asleep after he ordered a pizza. its more so your fault not even checking outside your door or whatever knowing you ordered a pizza

you can charge back since you didn't sign anything
>>
Edward Gittingwell - Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:57:06 EST ID:a/qH4zj+ No.45457 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45456

Charge back? You mean calling the bank and such? I've never done that. What would I say?
>>
Fucking Fibberridge - Sun, 31 Jul 2016 22:23:22 EST ID:bHvPwjnR No.45458 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45456
They would or should have brought the pizzas back to the store it there was no recipient.
>>
Fucking Fibberridge - Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:19:08 EST ID:bHvPwjnR No.45459 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45454
Considering services were not followed through do call your bank and they should' credit your account. No harm no foul. No services rendered though.

Do contact public relations and they should, (demand) they go beyond a replacement pizzas. They have bad public relations for like the past ten years to begin with.

Consider that they 'supposedly' just left the pizzas there. Made no real effort to knock ring the bell, and or didn't wait a simple minute or so. They should have tried to call plain and simple, they ask for a # always. Either the driver or from the store they should have tried to call. If management was indifferent note that, saying call 'corporate' is the wrong response. (public relations.) The "I accept payment of this transaction with my signature" is notable.


The "Our Guarantee, if you are unhappy with your order, we will replace it or refund you in full" should apply to a
pizza that was dumped, sideways, cold, soggy, inferior. This goes beyond that. Seek public relations and get
more than a replacement, explain this was important for whatever reason beyond just hanging out.
>>
James Pirryridge - Mon, 01 Aug 2016 13:02:55 EST ID:ZDwSyL5h No.45461 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45454
Did you use a credit card or debit card? Your title makes that unclear. The only time I've used debit-on-delivery I still had to give my PIN to their mobile thingy to finish the purchase and get the food.

If it's a credit card, call the company and say you dispute the charge. If they ask, tell them why. The lack of a signature on the receipt is all the proof you need. I worked pizza delivery for ten years and nobody with half a brain leaves a pizza on a doorstep, credit card or not. Until you have cash or a signature the driver is paying for the food. Your driver probably fucked off because he knew the manager wouldn't give a shit about the signature missing. Or maybe the driver faked one on his copy of the receipt. Either way, you're covered as long as you have your signature-less copy and if they did sign it, their sig doesn't match yours. This will all be for the credit card company to sniff out after you report it.

>>I called the manager and he claims payment goes through once you place an online order.

For a credit card, yes. But that's where purchase protection comes in to save your ass from thieves and jerks.


Bartending acting by George Worthingham - Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:42:04 EST ID:OmyXdLKz No.45376 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1466005324569.jpg -(71745B / 70.06KB, 717x857) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 71745
I work at a bar that sells cheap alcohol. We get a lot of dick heads that disrespect the staff, security & patrons.

Security is very patient but sometimes they let people step over the boundary, a boundary which old school bouncers would of grabbed the fucker by the collar and left his drunk arse on the pavement. The managers actually let these idiot's back in which is annoying for the bartenders & the security.

On a busy night like tonight there were only 2 guards in a busy bar, and even though I don't have a security license. Would I be allowed to physically apprehend a customer & under what circumstances would I be allowed to without getting myself in deep shit.

I know for certain that I'm going to have to back my boys up sometime in the future, because they're not going to be able to handle it and things could get very ugly before the cops arrive. I just don't know in what capacity. That "just let security handle it" mentality just isn't going to work, because after tonight these guys had their fucking hands full.


Our venue is decked out with CCTV so everything is recorded.

Thanks in advance
4 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Esther Hackleville - Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:59:09 EST ID:MEy1p9iE No.45384 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45376
The only logical thing to do is shuffle them out of the place. As it has always been.
If somebody assaults somebody call the police. Holding them is sketchy which could cause one to be charged.
>>
Phineas Murdfield - Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:07:08 EST ID:tkXpbpIw No.45390 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45376
I've got my vic/nsw security license.
If somebody is threatening you, or your co-workers, you can use any force you deem necessary to protect yourself or them.
Security or not, you have the right to defend yourself and your coworkers. Nobody deserves to get assaulted or hurt at work, regardless of industry.
>>
Fanny Dimblebury - Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:43:31 EST ID:JgrhRLWY No.45394 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45390
>If somebody is threatening you, or your co-workers, you can use any force you deem necessary to protect yourself or them.

I'm an American attorney so I only know American law, but I seriously doubt Australian law says this (unless mad max was actually just another day in Australia). You might want to actually find out what the Australian law is on point before you go getting yourself in a jackpot.
>>
[name redacted] !h55/E7mIo6 - Thu, 28 Jul 2016 05:52:35 EST ID:qwclhYqI No.45451 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45390
>>45394
As far as I remember self-defence as a defense I think that's the right spelling, I always get them mixed up applies to people around you as well but you then you'd have to prove that it was reasonable force and all that shit and that gets messy. Protection of property is also included in self-defence too so if they're smashing shit up you can "defend" you property.

I know they're probably friends with you but you have no reponsibility to protect anything as a normal person. Security guards do have an obligation to protect the people around I think because of that doctor case that happened in SA or something if they're dressed or presenting themselves as security guards, but I'm not exactly sure. I don't know if it's different because you're a bartender and you might've signed something but you're not legally obligated to help out at all, and if you get hurt by a drunk person then it's the fault of the bar/security company/security guards as long as you didn't involve yourself first because then it's, so you can just get out of dodge if shit goes down if you want.

Also you gotta be real careful with "apprehending" them if you mean hold them down or restrict their ability to leave or anything like that because I can't remember exactly what wording they used on the Crimes Act for 'holding someone against their will' or whatever that crime is called so I can't find the section it's referred to but Victoria is REALLY fucking strict with that shit, so if someone you're "apprehending" wants to leave after doing something shitty at your bar, I'd let them leave ASAP and let the police find them after you call them.
>>
Ebenezer Fanford - Sat, 30 Jul 2016 01:11:04 EST ID:UjnrkuRo No.45453 Ignore Report Quick Reply
You can hold a violent person down until the cops arrive that's all you can do, no arrests or handcuffs or anything else because you'll get a kidnapping/forcible confinement charge in pretty much every commonwealth country (Straya).

You can also punch them out if they're swinging at you or violent generally it's fine if you always respond 'to the same amount of force' so if they pull a knife and you decide to spear buddy through the neck with a broken bottle top then you walk. If you glass buddy on the head, it starts a fight, then you end up stabbing each other you go to jail because you started the fight that led to the manslaughter.

tl;dr just phone the cops until they remove the idiots, our laws are such shit only cops can get away with anything so why even bother trying yourself you'll just end up sued by them or jailed by the cops, let them handle it.


So how fucked am I? by James Brookford - Fri, 24 Jun 2016 01:23:05 EST ID:NlKAmwMD No.45396 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1466745785557.jpg -(15706B / 15.34KB, 480x270) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 15706
I'm scared and confused and frustrated. Buckle up, because it's a hell of a ride, but I'll try to keep it short...

>be at my home roughly two weeks ago
>friend tripping on 300mg acid
>tells me AFTER HE DROPS that he hasn't been taking meds for three days
>welp.jpg
>guy has violent psychotic break
>literally blood on our walls
>shit yall if I was religious I would've called it demonic possession
>ends up unconscious on couch, then has three seizures
>ohhhhfuck.jpg
>call EMTS, honest about him being on acid
>cops show up too
>fuckfuckfuck.gif
>we only put our shit out of plain sight
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
5 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Walter Pockshaw - Fri, 01 Jul 2016 21:33:25 EST ID:qvtooD8+ No.45413 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45404
> no you call a fucking lawyer and retain one. you hope the da drops it and doesnt look into it and forgets about all this shit.

seconded.
>>
Shitting Packlenudge - Mon, 04 Jul 2016 02:27:31 EST ID:ENSvWpSx No.45419 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45403
>We didn't expect the cops to show up for a medical emergency.

Generally they do not. Drugs or otherwise.

>he person who called 911 may have let them in, but she doesn't live here.

They went in regardless. A case of, they went in regardless.

The violent episode was, if explained, is why the police assisted. My opinion would be the cops should have been focused on the dose issue, nothing more. The possible violence issue.

Generally cops do not show up for overdoses, let alone ODs in hospitals, even if patients have modest amounts of drugs on their person. They would set aside drugs to toss them at worst,
blood test to see what the issue is.

Don't worry about these police people. It's over. Although the pad will be 'hot' so-to-speak. So keep a low profile. Also, check the acid, to make sure it is correct. Ask casually others if they got it and if it seemed off.
>>
Shitting Packlenudge - Mon, 04 Jul 2016 02:30:27 EST ID:ENSvWpSx No.45420 Ignore Report Quick Reply
key, haha
>>
Lillian Brupperfuck - Tue, 05 Jul 2016 07:02:01 EST ID:xpMdweAa No.45424 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45419
dont listen to this person, unless your state has good Samaritan laws the cops can and certainly will charge you for the drugs in your possession during a drug over dose.
>>
[name redacted] !h55/E7mIo6 - Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:16:58 EST ID:qwclhYqI No.45452 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>Ohio extended it's Good Samaritan Law to include hard drug cases, but it won't take effect until mid September. In theory, it would protect people who call 911 for drug-related medical emergencies from misdemeanor charges. Legal precedent or no?

I know in Australia it goes by what the laws were at the time of the incident, and I think we got that from the British system too, so if America grabbed some of their laws and stuff from Britian when they left then it wouldn't have an effect.

Someone know this because I'm actually interested to see if there's a difference?


background check by Thomas Buzzlock - Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:04:36 EST ID:8Zh7spf+ No.45436 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1469149476107.png -(72007B / 70.32KB, 404x238) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 72007
Pic unrelated. Background check question.
ALRIGHT: last year my dumb roommate was stealing and selling things online for rent money because she got fired. I'm all for it, but the law is not. I was with her and got the same charge because guilty by association. I'm sure my record states that I actually in fact did NOT have anything on my person and she did, but I'm worried.
I recently got accepted for a position at a college that's full time and would give me free education, thus changing my life. This job means the world to me, and other than inaccurate job dates because I have PTSD and am forgetful, that dang court record is the only thing that could fuck me over.
So I'm asking anyone with a criminal background or any knowledge on the matter: Do you think a college would reject me AFTER hiring me, upon discovery of a criminal history based on guilty by association? It's a low level customer service job, not like security or anything. (and luckily I have a huge security background and great references)
I'm just desperate for an opinion, as it's day 10 and the check should be complete any day now, I'm anxious as all hell! I don't want to go back to serving food....
2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Fucking Pingerlug - Thu, 21 Jul 2016 23:36:05 EST ID:JgrhRLWY No.45439 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45438
It's really going to be up to them then based on what the charge is. Have you not gone to court yet? Have you had any court appearances?
>>
Archie Bucklefoot - Fri, 22 Jul 2016 06:30:36 EST ID:xpMdweAa No.45440 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45438
usually some where in that paper work there is a bit that goes something along the lines of "have you ever been convicted for a felony" sometimes it might just ask for misdomeners

>I'm sure my record states that I actually in fact did NOT have anything on my person and she did, but I'm worried.
and im sure your record has a very brief entry of what you were convicted of and no supporting details.
>>
Ebenezer Pittfoot - Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:45:18 EST ID:uLJPOHRz No.45441 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45440
>and im sure your record has a very brief entry of what you were convicted of and no supporting details.

This is the credited response. it gives a date, a charge, and a dispostion, and that's basically it. There is no substantiation in government background checks, and i've never seen a private search that had any.
>>
Martin Fummerridge - Sun, 24 Jul 2016 18:12:44 EST ID:8Zh7spf+ No.45447 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45441
>>45440
that's nuts. So even though my roommate stole it and I had nothing on me, we have the same charge? no wonder people kill themselves after convictions when they're innocent. thanks to whoever wasn't a rude POS to me. :)
>>
Charlotte Blackridge - Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:06:47 EST ID:xpMdweAa No.45448 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45447
> So even though my roommate stole it and I had nothing on me, we have the same charge?
seems that way, this is why you hire lawyers.
>no wonder people kill themselves after convictions when they're innocent.
what? bro you haven't even told us what the charge was. you dont even seem to know your self. for all we know you are accessory after the fact, receiving of stolen goods or some other crime that goes along with the theft. if you drove her to the store with the knowledge that she was going to rob said store, you are guilty of some crime. with out any supporting details tho its very hard to say anything. either way it seems like you plead and went through court with out a lawyer.
>thanks to whoever wasn't a rude POS to me. :)
you have 4 responses in this thread, none of which seem rude to me. if you think the /law/ bored is going to coddle you and say everything is going to be alright go to /qq/ we give the best advice we can here and its not always nice.


Drug test for expungement? by Hannah Fuckinghood - Mon, 04 Jul 2016 02:14:31 EST ID:mVLF81Ci No.45418 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1467612871880.jpg -(76203B / 74.42KB, 525x350) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 76203
So long story short, a few years ago (3 to be exact) I was arrested for possession of some molly. Fortunately they never followed up on my case so I technically never got convicted of anything. I didn't even have to step in court a single time for an arraignment or anything. My lawyer says that at this point it's safe to say I'm in the clear and that we should begin the expungement process relatively soon to get rid of my arrest record.

So the question is: Will I have to take a drug test during the expungement process since my arrest was drug related?
>>
Lillian Brumblewutch - Wed, 06 Jul 2016 14:56:51 EST ID:+k3lKt6I No.45425 Ignore Report Quick Reply
It's likely that the court can set whatever stipulation it wants. Probably not, but since you have a lawyer, ask.
>>
Fuck Hurrychore - Thu, 07 Jul 2016 21:18:03 EST ID:8Irkql7o No.45427 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45418
as well as asking your lawyer, your county clerk of court website will have all of the basic information on the expungement process as well as required documents, probably printable, to begin the process. mostly it's a few more fees to pay and lots and lots of paperwork. i am still undergoing the expungement application of some drug related charges, but it is after i successfully completed a pti program that involved drug tests, but no mention has been made of a one last final drug test for the sake of the expungement.
>>
Shit Hengerneck - Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:09:01 EST ID:jDU1yOXn No.45430 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Not likely in any way, it is irrelevant. Your court clerk is general you friend.

Expenses, you should be able to do this on your own. I would call it $120 tops to do this.

Ok there is NCIC criminal database, a cop could see this. If it it there you best intests would get this removed. However, .gov agencies can see this, even though you made the motiobs to delete the mishap. Employers would not see this, however, .gov jobs can see this. In your best interests you can do this, if one suspects a nark,, you could reveal the identity.

See, as if this did not go through, possibly you have no record.
>>
Augustus Murdbanks - Sat, 23 Jul 2016 08:28:43 EST ID:ZBt7N0X/ No.45443 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45418
Expungement laws are very, very State-specific. You'd have to talk to someone familiar with expungements in your State.
In most jurisdictions, you need to have a certain disposition in order to expunge. It's not really clear what happened in your case. Were you actually charged or just arrested? If you were charged and you never went to court, what happened in court? You said you didn't appear in court, but did an attorney appear on your behalf? If not, there may not be a final disposition in your matter. That means it's unlikely you'll be able to expunge anything. You may even have a bench warrant if you didn't show up to court.

I have never heard of anyone anywhere having to take a drug test in order to expunge your record. You're usually just entitled to an expungement as a matter of law. Sometimes, if you're not entitled, you may petition the court to consider expunging it anyway.


Is it legal to offer nonsexual cuddling in exchange for money on craigslist? by Archie Gerrydotch - Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:54:32 EST ID:1J45w1uH No.45433 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1468943672960.jpg -(746975B / 729.47KB, 580x2975) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 746975
I figure there's got to be someone in my city willing to pay $20 for an hour of cuddling.

Will asshole cops try to "bust" me?
>>
Albert Bocklepedge - Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:23:09 EST ID:aAHWgRbL No.45434 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>Will asshole cops try to "bust" me?

For prostitution? Probably, but if you make it unambiguously clear from the outset that inappropriate touching is not allowed I think you would be fine. It's very likely that there are other laws you could run afoul of though such as business license requirements, massage ordinances, things like that. Millions of people operate illegal businesses every day without incident and only get busted when someone complains to the right person so asking yourself what are people going to see and who is going to care is the pragmatic way forward.
>>
Phyllis Nettinglock - Wed, 20 Jul 2016 05:33:57 EST ID:1J45w1uH No.45435 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45434
Thanks for the advice. I hit another roadblock though.

For anyone who cares, you have to pay $10 to sell "therapeutic" services on craigslist now. That pretty much destroys my whole business model lol


Is it legal to reprogram someone to make them gay for being hetero? by Sidney Dattingman - Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:40:40 EST ID:ghTpNazU No.45406 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1467229240212.png -(13898B / 13.57KB, 824x251) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 13898
I know it's not, I'm just debating the topic.

Also, is it legal to attempt to reprogram someone with soundwaves and to reprogram someone in general & to try to make someone stop existing via reprogramming?
6 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Albert Cindertet - Sun, 03 Jul 2016 20:41:10 EST ID:ghTpNazU No.45416 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45415
Is there any legal can I can file for being a subject of memory erasure without consent?
>>
Simon Gumblewell - Sun, 03 Jul 2016 20:50:41 EST ID:dsQ1y6oS No.45417 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45416
I'd consent to having my memory erased from reading this stupid thread. Y'all are retarded.
>>
Beatrice Nillyston - Fri, 08 Jul 2016 15:24:32 EST ID:A6a6WpgR No.45428 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45406
We're anonymous - we know this is real
>>
Cedric Fattingbare - Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:10:17 EST ID:jLmozDAS No.45431 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Read this
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/legality-of-torture-in-usa/

I would call a lawyer
>>
Hugh Decklewell - Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:12:12 EST ID:ghTpNazU No.45432 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Read this
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/legality-of-torture-in-usa/

I would call a lawyer


Apartment flip flop by Betsy Dallertodging - Thu, 30 Jun 2016 20:05:26 EST ID:j6cYZyBb No.45409 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1467331526278.jpg -(56935B / 55.60KB, 400x400) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 56935
2 Years ago our apartments explicitly allowed window unit air conditioners, and installed it for us. Out of nowhere (though in May, the cusp of summer transitioning) they've turned the tables and banned window units. It is now required to be the portable variety of ac unit if at all.

Is there anyway they can at least
1.)Reimburse the cost of the AC unit they initially approved
or
2.)Leave them in charge of selling the ac unit. etc. My roommates dont have time to jive with strange craigslist people
>>
Henry Buckleman - Thu, 07 Jul 2016 05:05:35 EST ID:XwdBa0wD No.45426 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Depends on your state. Most states they have to give notice of rule changes. You could always argue you need it for health reasons and the portable ones that would be safe for you ( large intake , exhaust vents ) are exorbitant. And the ada requires they make reasonable accommodation for you. That usually makes them behave.


Is it legal to force a polygraph without consent by Albert Cindertet - Mon, 04 Jul 2016 16:57:15 EST ID:ghTpNazU No.45421 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1467665835691.png -(1771B / 1.73KB, 168x77) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1771
DICKS EVERYWHERE
>>
Albert Cindertet - Mon, 04 Jul 2016 17:40:55 EST ID:ghTpNazU No.45422 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45421
Also, is drug induced amnesia legal without consent?
>>
Jack Blunnershit - Mon, 04 Jul 2016 18:01:35 EST ID:wsVd8Jmm No.45423 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Yes and they're coming to give you a polygraph RIGHT NOW.


GPS Monitoring Bracelet is not holding a charge - am I going to jail? by Henry Crandersut - Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:02:54 EST ID:zVxUE9HR No.45399 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1466805774768.png -(299228B / 292.21KB, 460x516) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 299228
So, I was released on parole in October. Part of my conditions of parole was wearing an ankle bracelet GPS monitor for one year. I have to keep it charged regularly, and I also have a curfew from 12 AM to 6 AM.

Anyways, I was issued a new bracelet about a month and a half ago. This one seems to be having trouble holding a charge. I went and saw my PO last Tuesday (I have to see him every week) and he made me stay for 3 hours in his office because I let my charge get "low" (it was at 66%) as 'punishment'. He then threatened to take me to jail if it ever happened again.

Well, I charged my bracelet for 1 hour last night, and one hour today around 12:00 PM. I left to run some errands for 3 hours and when I come back, the monitoring facility had called and said that my bracelet was low. Now, these things are only supposed to be charged for 2 hours in 24 hours maximum. So obviously, something is wrong.

What I'm wondering is, do you think I will go to jail this Tuesday? I have reported every single week, on time, since October. I have never failed a drug test. And, I always pay my fees on time. I have no outstanding crimes and I have not been arrested since I was put on parole. I also have had steady employment and/or been enrolled in school. Do you guys know just how far his power is, legally, considering that I am otherwise a perfect parolee? I would like to think that I can't be violated completely since I have committed no crimes, but I want to know.

For the worse case scenario, I have informed my lawyer as well as a few upstanding people in my community in case this guy tries to be on some complete bullshit. He lets the black guys get away with breaking curfew, coming up hot on drug tests, and other stupid shit, but he's always bitching at the very few white guys in our group because of completely inane shit.

Thanks in advance.
>>
Charles Lightham - Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:16:12 EST ID:xpMdweAa No.45400 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45399
im on an ankle monitor as well but mind responds to a base station hooked up to the internet. home confinement is meh.

anyways, if my braclet was having issues id be contacting my PO and informing themi think the things broke and could you have someone look at it for me.
>>
Henry Crandersut - Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:44:44 EST ID:zVxUE9HR No.45402 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45400
Well, that's the NORMAL thing to do. Except, the problem is, to them, it is NEVER the equipment's fault. It's always "THERE AINT NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT BRACELET, YOU JUST GON' DO WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WANT, HUH? I GOT SOMETHING FOR YO ASS" or another variation thereof.

You, LITERALLY, cannot talk like a civilized human being with the POs in this county. They are some of the rudest, power-tripping assholes I have ever met. If my PO could act like a sensible, logical person without dehumanizing me every other word, then I'd simply call him and let him know the issue. I'm still going to, tomorrow morning, but it will be futile.


Drug Tests Without Consent by Matilda Clabberhood - Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:26:11 EST ID:2ZcpADGo No.45391 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1466601971514.jpg -(90465B / 88.34KB, 1120x830) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 90465
My dad's girlfriend has a terminal brain tumor. She went in to get some blood work done the other day, and they tested her without consent for the DEVIL'S LETTUCE. After it came back positive, she was harassed to the point of breaking down and crying by some Indian doctor who asserted that she is taking illegal medication for her cancer (she's also on some drugs that are believed to cure cancer, and are thus banned in most of the USA). The doctor called back the next day and apologized, presumably for being a brainwashed shill that would rather her pop benzos and opiates instead of vaping weed (no secret that pharma money rules medicine)

My question is, is there any recourse against what this clearly unethical violation of patient autonomy and our constitutional right against unwarranted searches? pic unrelated
>>
Sophie Worthingridge - Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:26:11 EST ID:dzfqUCZS No.45392 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>My question is, is there any recourse against what this clearly unethical violation of patient autonomy
It's very likely that she gave blanket consent for the doctor to do harmless things that he thinks might be medically justified, basically permission to do his job. If she complained of things that could be the side effect of recreational drug use or self-medication then he wouldn't necessarily be expected to tell her that a drug panel would be included as part of the blood test. Now where she could sue the shit out of him is if the results of that drug test were ever disclosed.

>and our constitutional right against unwarranted searches?
What's it like being this dumb?
>>
Fanny Dimblebury - Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:38:33 EST ID:JgrhRLWY No.45393 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45392
>she could sue the shit out of him is if the results of that drug test were ever disclosed.

Actually probably not. HIPAA does not contain a private right of action. The doctor can held over the coals by HHS, but you're not seeing a dime of it. There have been some examples lately of negligence cases or IIED cases actually working, but they are the exception, not the rule. In this case, with what the disclosures would be I don't see a colorable civil claim.

HHS-OCR would love to take the doctor's money though if there is a disclosure.
>>
Cyril Murdville - Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:28:08 EST ID:sq7MN2u4 No.45395 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>45391
>tested her without consent
Doubtful, there's a reason they have you sign a shit ton of paperwork before they start treating you for shit, it gives them the right to do their job without getting a signature for every individual thing. Did she retain a copy or even read the forms before signing?
>constitutional right against unwarranted searches
Lol wut? Is she being treated for cancer by a police officer? That would probably be inadvisable.


<<Last Pages Next>>
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.