>>402254
Pretty cool stuff. Thanks for sharing

>>402283
I'll post a little more

Shit forgot to post
nb

I'm so high

Shiiiit this thread still here ?

Was searching for the term 'share.

Welp, bump I guess. Good stuff.

>>402023

As I see it grunge was just a softer version of sludge. Grunge gave disaffected white kids shows they could go to fucked up on drugs, but only have to associate with their 'own'. the same kids couldn't go to Eyehategod, Buzzoven or Despise You shows because being around legit addicts/scumbags/criminals made them uncomfortable

I don't believe grunge was a genre:
nirvana was a punk band
alice in chains was a post metal band
soundgarden was alternative rock
Jane's addiction were a few things; stadium rock, alternative rock, and others but they weren't grunge either.

None of these bands have that much in common...

Oh and fuck yeah nirvana. Very poetic in his words, singing and playing even if it isn't superbly technical or conforming to traditional beauty. I guess that's why some people say he modeled his sound of sonic youth's....

>>403030
You really hate something you consider an entire genre? Look beyond culture.

Mudhoney>Nirvana
But, I do owe them my musical journey entirely.

>>403049
Ur ful o shi limy twet

good track, like your sound alot and that beat. check my shit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2-hNk6UFuE

>>403056
damnit wrong link fuck my stonned ass... https://soundcloud.com/mentholslim/menthol-slim-serial-killer

25,000 songs and 110 GB

>>403023
Enjoy that shit sound in a couple years.

>>403040
Sound doesn't get worse over time. 128Kb is really iffy, with a good format it's hard to tell unless you're actively looking for compression and using decent speakers but if you want something to listen to on the treadmill at the gym, unless it's wma it's going to be more than up to task, and that will never change. 64k and 96 always sounded bad, 128 usually has a little bit of compression in some of the highs, 160-192 will cut it if you're not an audiophile. Same as it was 10 years ago. Of course I do most of my listening while at the gym or walking to places so high quality sound is entirely wasted if I'm trading off something like say.. more songs for it.

I've slowly upped the sound quality I've used over time but that's because storage has become cheaper. Music collections grow linearly while storage keeps growing geometrically. This means that the best sound quality for an individual will increase over time but none of this implies the sound will actually get worse.

Speakers haven't really changed in forever, at least not the speakers most people use. My headphones now are as hit and miss as the ones I would buy when I was 15. Of course thanks to inflation they're about twice as expensive but whatever.

7,446 files at 63.4gb.

Assorted qualities ranging from 126kb/s to FLAC @ 2742kb/s (that would be the Portishead vinyl rips)

bleh my music is so unorganised right now, have a new music folder that I never sorted into my normal music folder that's 16.7gb with ~3,000 files and my music folder is 178gb with 28,500 files
Really need to sort it out... I had a portable HD with 100gb of stuff I collected while travelling around but my last day while travellig I dropped it and now my computer doesn't recognise it, that made me pretty sad but oh well haha.
So many loose files on here I need to sift through my days... I've put it off too long

DICKS EVERYWHERE

My favorite album right now. Best hip-hop of 2013?

>>403027
hip hop AOTY imo

>>403041
Wu-tang is forever.

>>403020
Their music is very cinematic. There's an ongoing debate as to what film Tomorrow's Harvest goes best with.

Drop A / Drop B

>>402904

I can never find tabs on the bands I like, even bands that are pretty well known like Eyehategod have hardly ever got any tabs online, I can't find Xibalba or Drowning tabs

@samuel fuckingford thanks man

don't bother tuning, it'll sound like shit either way

>>402910
THEMS FIGHTIN' WORDS

>>402910

Oh look, an excessively strong and unsolicited opinion

>>403018

I like minimal techno, it's been awhile since I looked into it though, pretty much all I have is Emptyset (which is amazing), October, Extrawelt, Porter Ricks and SleepArchive. Also stuff like Pantha Du Prince, Marc Houle and Ripperton is nice. Could always use some more. I love really deep hypnotic music for when playing Yume Nikki and other odd games :) put me in a weird place

Have some Emptyset
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFpJK52wqys
meh the one I wanted to post isn't on youtube so I'll just upload

>>402942
Guess so, mang.

>>402912
Woops just read the rules. Baleeting.

hey op I have one of your eps. It's bad. How do you even get yourself banned from /mu/ it's a feel board

Ech fuck it no baleet for me.
>>402974
Because of reasons I can neither confirm nor deny.
And it's not a feel board: it's a terrifying board which overhypes mediocre music .
Also LOL which EP have you got?

subliminal messages dont really do anything until you discover them, and it freaks you out.
i can wait for my album, im going to murder will smith because BoC told me to.

>>402955

>Somebody analysed one of the tunes...

Ok, how about some sources for that?
I haven't listened to it yet, I'm waiting for the download code on release day, but I guess it will be laden with subliminality.

>>402999
Just torrent it or download a .zip

>>402999
IDK man, somewhere on /mu/ or Twoism.
Also, I reversed the sequence of the tracks, and the transitions are so much better. The whoosh of Collapse to the reverb of Sick Times is just perfect.
I also exploited the "mirror image" aspect of it further, and did something like 1-16-3-15-5-4 etc, and a reverse of that as well. All of these alternate listings flow just as well if not better than the originals.

DICKS EVERYWHERE

if this were 20 or more yrs ago then i pick stevie, all day

>>402985
KLONOPIN AND COCAINE!

>>402661
Paul McCartney

>>402661
Lil Debbie for sure

>>402920

they arent out performing them in terms of sound quality but isolation, and just generally having a more defined sound thats easier to hear when i got other tracks playing in the back ground at the same time. This might be just due to having in ear in general.
They are skull candy inkd, like I said cheap but gets the job done. Also they're the best for their price range


>>402874
Hmm your right Ill keep trying new stuff then switching my gear around more and will add high quality in ears down the line and even switch back to over ear till I find the sweet spot.

>>402927
dude u trollin? skullcandys are garbage, those will undoubtedly break on you in the next 2 months. also i could not imagine spinning a set with in ears...ear rape anyone?
nb this shit

>>402971

Skull candy in ears are actually quite good, the over ear cans for skull candy are absolute crap though yes just garbage. Only flaw with them would be the amount of time they last, so lol yeah they seem to have worn out on their own fairly quickly even when never played past 30% of their maximum out put.

>>402975
i have sony sony in ear earphones, i didnt even look at the model i just bought the most expensive ones (dumb i know) and they kick ass.

>>402976

definitely considering the sony in ear. Might be my next buy if not a shure in ear.

DICKS EVERYWHERE

https://mega.co.nz/#!Vx0inRBJ!Uo1FPh_Jy06_SOrhd_FDGUXAkqFxMAG54Kp5wBxDzrQ

DICKS EVERYWHERE

>>402959
hehe that probably works too I suppose

>>402960
Nigga I already posted a MEGA link =\
Unless OP can not MEGA, some people can not because it is either blocked in their country or they do not have Chrome.
OP, if you can't MEGA sorry.