Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the format Name#Password
Subject
Comment
[i]Italic Text[/i]
[b]Bold Text[/b]
[spoiler]Spoiler Text[/spoiler]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace Text[/pre]
[super]Superset Text[/super]
[sub]Subset Text[/sub]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich

^ YOUR AD COULD BE HERE! ADVERTISE ON 420CHAN FOR ONLY $100 A MONTH! ^

Discrete Maths: Video Courses by Betsy Pubberchadge - Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:57:44 EST ID:Y+QSKjuy No.14700 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1429837064194.jpg -(205184B / 200.38KB, 640x480) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 205184
Hey guys,

I'd really like to learn discrete maths, preferably starting with some video series. Ones that would cover the subjects well in depth, rather than giving brief overviews. I will turn to books after that, it's just that having an actual teacher on such media is for me way more stimulating and makes me feel more involved.

Could anyone be kind enough to recommend such video serie(s) that go well in depth for each subject?

That would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
>>
Nigger Sungerforth - Thu, 30 Apr 2015 05:00:01 EST ID:i84x+n57 No.14713 Ignore Report Quick Reply
A while back, I torrented a lecture series by Arthur T. Benjamin in order to teach myself discrete math. I found them pretty helpful. Give 'em a try; they shouldn't be too hard to find.
>>
Nigger Sungerforth - Thu, 30 Apr 2015 06:55:06 EST ID:i84x+n57 No.14714 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1430391306245.png -(116171B / 113.45KB, 300x200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>14713
Here:

http://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/discrete-mathematics.html

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:fb04ab6c9e6072cbb26cc810a599c906672d3774&dn=TTC+Video+-+Discrete+Mathematics&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.leechers-paradise.org%3A6969&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969


finalss by Martin Sovingcocke - Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:24:22 EST ID:eI+mFgPX No.14708 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1430195062832.jpg -(1885217B / 1.80MB, 3264x1836) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1885217
I have my analysis final Wednesday. I'm redoing past tests and I cannot figure out number 4 part a! Some kind soul please help!
>>
Thomas Sommerville - Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:39:31 EST ID:qz3c7Bt+ No.14709 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1430195971688.gif -(1338B / 1.31KB, 318x52) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
DICKS EVERYWHERE


HALP. by Lydia Fancocke - Sun, 26 Apr 2015 03:31:01 EST ID:6wsrD9dK No.14701 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1430033461840.jpg -(77327B / 75.51KB, 1150x143) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 77327
I'm allowed to ask for help here?

I haven't done maths since high school and I cannot work out why my final projection total is different if you work it out as a row (As in with the totals of the year) or if you work it out as a column (as in the totals revenues of each market).

This is obviously a pretty newby question but if its any community consolation I help out newbies on boards I know shit about. Thanks /math/
>>
Hamilton Fellerbuck - Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:40:31 EST ID:qz3c7Bt+ No.14702 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I don't know what the hell you're talking about but the "Residential Services Total" for 2008 is not equal to the sum of the first three rows in "2008 Projection". This disagrees with the way 2005, 2006, and 2007 "Residential Services Total" are being computed. Are you doing this by hand?


Have mercy on my undeserving soul // Pass Calc Exam by Albert Blackstock - Mon, 02 Mar 2015 01:53:56 EST ID:oIF65CiW No.14625 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1425279236506.jpg -(136105B / 132.92KB, 460x345) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 136105
Look, I'll get right to the point.

I'm smart, but I put no effort into school. It's fucked up, and I'm sorry.

I need to pass my 2nd Calc 1 exam, which covers limits, differentiation, implicit differentiation... basically all of Chapter 2 in the standard Stewart Calculus book, and that exam is on Wednesday around 6pm.

How can I best prepare for this exam? I am able to grasp concepts, I understand math up until Calc, and limits/differentiation fairly intuitively, but I fail in the details. I really haven't kept up to speed with this class because, as previously stated, I'm a jackass.

Just... have mercy on my soul, /math/ friends. I am trying to clean my act up.
4 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Sidney Suzzleson - Fri, 27 Mar 2015 21:47:51 EST ID:FF4db3LF No.14671 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14634
Seconding this. I'm in Cal 3 right now, and it's nothing to worry about. Cal 2 can be rough the first time around, though.
>>
Beatrice Claywater - Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:32:07 EST ID:uBbxSpMx No.14674 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14626
I'd say look over the past papers right away so that you have an idea of what kind of questions you may be asked. Practice those questions over an over again, do them looking at your notes so you get how to do the questions. Then do all that other stuff.
>>
Phineas Suffinglock - Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:25:59 EST ID:xwcXgACR No.14698 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1429212359575.jpg -(110438B / 107.85KB, 1280x800) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>14625
Myself and my group of friends consider ourselves, "smart" but my friend and I went through an enormous shift during our first encounter with calculus. Part of it was realizing that our algebra skills, as developed by the education system, were sub-par and we had to take the reigns to make sure our mathematical life was in order. The second thing was that we went through our first mathematical "growing pains", alluding to the idea of mathematical maturity.

Besides doing practice problems, you might want to soak up and wonder about what you're actually seeing. The feeling you get when you realize another level of generalization can be pretty dramatic. For example, realizing that you can construct mathematical objects from thin air and apply calculus tools to them, as long as you do this properly. It's the first time you're asked to be creative mathematically instead of just remembering things. This leads me to my next point.

When you're studying math the best thing you can do is collect and understand the hard facts relating to what you're studying. Theorems, differentiation rules, etc. The facts you know will determine what moves you can confidently make when you don't have any references around you. The depth of your imagination, as I referred to earlier, will determine what moves will occur to you. It doesn't matter if you have all the facts if you can't use them. My impression is people generally feel insecure when they do math, because it seems like a very authoritative subject. You might try something, "your way" only to be told that's not right. The only way to get fluent in math is by making creative decisions motivated by facts and then being reassured when you find out you're right.

Do the homework, but don't be afraid to sling dick and do every problem you can get your hands on. The problems that take an entire day to solve can be the most rewarding because it's likely not computationally difficult, it's conceptually difficult. If you have all the facts and still can't do the problem quickly, then you're probably going to experience the kind of mind expansion required to get to the next l…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.


what is the two consecutive number? by Phineas Punningsedging - Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:35:58 EST ID:iHlPHeD4 No.14692 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1429108558063.png -(115227B / 112.53KB, 400x636) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 115227
found this puzzle on the internet, and it drives me crazy. say, you got a number that we call "A", "A" is divisible with all the numbers between 1 and 10 001. excluding two consecutive numbers in that range. We dont care about "A", we want to know the two consecutive number. How should i start this?
1 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Phyllis Drocklewore - Thu, 16 Apr 2015 05:03:44 EST ID:qz3c7Bt+ No.14694 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14693
Oops. Let the least common multiple be 'x'. Your 'a' is then x /((p)(p+1)).
>>
Doris Clupperstock - Thu, 16 Apr 2015 05:11:36 EST ID:TG1mst7r No.14695 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14692
You know it has to be the largest power of some prime factor of lcm(2,3,...,10001) and ±1 of it being a prime. If ±1 is even then you already have the factors in A so the prime^n had to be 2^n. Log_2(10001)≈13 so we need 2^13±1 to be prime. Since 2^m≠13 for any integer m by some number theory theorem 2^13+1 can't be prime. Thus if it's possible at all, 2^13-1 must be prime and wolfram alpha says it is.
>>
Phyllis Drocklewore - Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:20:25 EST ID:qz3c7Bt+ No.14697 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14695
The theorem you're describing is Mersenne's conjecture-- it turned out to be false.


Might by Fanny Crorryman - Wed, 18 Dec 2013 07:58:21 EST ID:CGJx9sbH No.13496 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1387371501271.jpg -(457945B / 447.21KB, 1080x1920) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 457945
I did some math right now overly blazed. I hope I did good, mathgods.
I really hope I did well.
10 posts and 3 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Nigger Dubberdet - Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:12:27 EST ID:OlFjx/Q0 No.14573 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Copypasta from wiki on Paul Erdős:

>After 1971 he also took amphetamines, despite the concern of his friends, one of whom (Ron Graham) bet him $500 that he could not stop taking the drug for a month.[17] Erdős won the bet, but complained that during his abstinence, mathematics had been set back by a month: "Before, when I looked at a piece of blank paper my mind was filled with ideas. Now all I see is a blank piece of paper." After he won the bet, he promptly resumed his amphetamine use.
>>
Priscilla Crallerfidging - Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:35:06 EST ID:jEbtLayo No.14575 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>13512
That's bullshit. When I'm tripping I can't do math worth shit. The major problem is short term memory impairment and lack of focus. I'm sure you could do a very low dose of lsd and force yourself to do some work but there really isn't any reason to.
>>
hybridgrace - Thu, 09 Apr 2015 19:26:45 EST ID:A1LnfKBL No.14688 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1428622005863.jpg -(23028B / 22.49KB, 410x369) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
LSD is ideal for finding novel solutions and perspectives to problems that you're already familiar with, I assume this applies to mathematics as well


Cryptography where to start by Nigger Ganningfoot - Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:01:37 EST ID:ZkV6uFpl No.14663 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1427191297762.jpg -(6693B / 6.54KB, 550x275) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 6693
I need recommendations for books that teach a solid theoretical base of cryptography, and also what previous knowledge i need?
>>
Reuben Bardfield - Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:06:15 EST ID:UqThtfYr No.14676 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Lot's of linear algebra and number theory. Here's a sample paper this cryptographer uses Lattice reduction to do analysis https://www1.lip6.fr/~joux/pages/papers/ToolBox.pdf

You need "mathematical maturity" which means you can read and write proofs, and you can figure out mathematical notation if given a key for what the symbols mean. Spivak's Calclulus is a good book to get said maturity, so is "How to Solve it" or "How to prove it" (look them up on Amazon).

There's some intro cryptography courses around http://bryanpendleton.blogspot.ca/2012/05/comparing-coursera-and-udacity.html
they usually use this book: https://books.google.ca/books?id=1YwIcpDtQPEC (Schneier's first book is too outdated, this version with Ferguson is good).

Or just go through various university calendars and see what kind of information you can find, like lecture notes, recommended reading to look up yourself, ect http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/wi10/cse206a/

Universities consider advanced crypto courses their specialist shit so almost always make them expensive and not open to the public. You should look up whoever was a finalist at the SHA-3 competition and read through the papers (or public comments to NIST) of their analysis http://www.groestl.info/analysis.html where you'll learn how modern cryptographers break each other's shit and thus learn a solid theoretical base.
>>
Doris Clupperstock - Thu, 16 Apr 2015 05:22:05 EST ID:TG1mst7r No.14696 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14663
>I need recommendations for books that teach a solid theoretical base of cryptography

What do you mean by theoretical base? Provable security or the mathematical basis of underlying operations (elliptic curves, algebra, etc)...

"Introduction to Modern Cryptography" by Katz and Lindell for the former
"An Introduction to Mathematical Cryptography" by Hoffstein, Pipher, and Silverman for the latter


Mathematical induction by Mr.TickleDicks - Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:11:07 EST ID:fghQwkMe No.14672 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1427584267069.png -(3736B / 3.65KB, 303x333) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 3736
Hello /math/ can you guys help me?
I need to prove that these propositions are true for every whole positive N.
does any one know how to solve it ? pls explain how did he arrive at the solution.

A) 2 + 4+ 6 + ...+(4n-2)=2n^2

C)1 + 3 + 6 + .... ( n(n+1) )/2 = ( n(n+1)(n+2) )/6

D) 1/1.2 + 1/2.3 + 1/3,4+ . . . + 1/n(n+1) = n/(n+1)
>>
Beatrice Claywater - Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:28:32 EST ID:uBbxSpMx No.14673 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14672
A) Test the case where n =1: LHS: 2, RHS 2*(1)^2=2
It works!
Assume it works for k.
Want: works for k+1.
sum to k+1: 2 + 4 +6 + ... + (4k-2) + (4(k+1)-2)
Write the sum up to k as 2k^2. (we're assuming it works)
we get: 2k^2 +4k-2
what does 2(k+1)^2 equal?
...
It works for k+1!
Now by principle of induction ... ... ...V-allz n in the o'naturelle we just proved blah blah blah

I'm not sure what the homework rules are on this bored. If it says "no homework threads" please delete this thread and take it to http://mathoverflow.net/, I'm sure they'll be more than happy to help
>>
Caroline Hubblechetch - Sun, 29 Mar 2015 02:27:13 EST ID:qz3c7Bt+ No.14675 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1427610433362.gif -(11312B / 11.05KB, 654x366) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
I like these


Quadratic Reciprocity by Wesley Middlewudging - Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:52:14 EST ID:iRDOjfyp No.14607 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1423835534426.jpg -(42733B / 41.73KB, 301x431) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 42733
Hey /math/, I've been reading a lot of maths in the last year because I always enjoyed it at school. I'm comfortable with all the maths one might do in high school and bits and pieces of other areas.
I'm told that some proofs for quadratic reciprocity are very beautiful, although I just can't get my head around what it actually IS
Can anyone enlighten me?
Thanks
2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Phoebe Bonnerbetch - Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:22:53 EST ID:HZ1lfOQk No.14666 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14665
(a/b) is real bad notation, if I'm wrong I'd love to hear an argument in favor of it.

Fucking sloppy shit imo.

Way too much gets forgiven by "I'm familiar with it so it's okay"
>>
Whitey Mangerbare - Wed, 25 Mar 2015 16:10:23 EST ID:RzF3HHjt No.14667 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14666
I'm sorry, I was pretty tired last night when I typed it up.

Replace the (d/p) with [d/p], (p/q) with [p/q] and anything else involving (x/p) where x is anything by [x/p].

If you're talking about just in general then I personally don't see it as that much of a problem.
>>
Oliver Sobberchetch - Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:10:05 EST ID:IaC61I0h No.14668 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14666
i wrote this in another thread on /math/ like a year ago but yeah (a/b) sucks ass and i prefer to do L_b (a) for legendre symbol


1/0 = ∞ by Archie Claybanks - Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:34:01 EST ID:iL1ckGCn No.14588 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1422585241954.jpg -(68549B / 66.94KB, 590x750) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 68549
1/ ∞ = 1 - .9(repeating) = 0

If 1/ ∞= 0 then 1/0 = ∞
9 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Cuntfuck - Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:04:33 EST ID:xgdLZpNp No.14655 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14601

That's not math.
>>
Matilda Crillerwotch - Sat, 21 Mar 2015 11:07:23 EST ID:Jz+dW0dw No.14660 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14655
>related rates aren't math

Wait till you start taking calculus?
>>
Samuel Gebblestet - Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:00:25 EST ID:Dk8yywxc No.14664 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>14588

This is not true in the real line. In the hyperreals, where arbitrarily large and small quantities are included unlike the "standard" reals, 1/0.000...1 with infinitely many zeroes is indeed infinity. However 1/0 is just undefined and there is nothing more to it than that.

In short, the formal system you're taught in calculus can't handle it but there are systems that can.


^ YOUR AD COULD BE HERE! ADVERTISE ON 420CHAN FOR ONLY $100 A MONTH! ^
<<Last Pages Next>>
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.