420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
Subject
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
So about that wall... by William Dimmledidge - Thu, 03 Aug 2017 17:15:57 EST ID:2fJQ/aQA No.160332 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1501794957366.png -(45730B / 44.66KB, 590x288) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 45730
Looks like Grumpy Trumpy is literally an idiot at making deals...


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-idUSKBN1AJ20F

>"I have to have Mexico pay for the wall – I have to. I have been talking about it for a two-year period," Trump said.

>He suggested that the two men avoid the issue of paying for the wall when asked.

>"They are going to say, 'Who is going to pay for the wall, Mr. President?' to both of us, and we should both say, 'We will work it out,'" Trump said. "It will work out in the formula somehow. As opposed to you saying, 'We will not pay' and me saying, 'We will not pay,'" the U.S. president said.

Let us look at this LOGICALLY.

For two years Trump screamed that Mexico was going to pay for the wall, and that Mexico was "sending," the US "murderers and rapists."
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
3 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Matilda Pullermen - Sat, 05 Aug 2017 23:26:43 EST ID:2fJQ/aQA No.160370 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1501990003689.jpg -(242214B / 236.54KB, 640x427) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>160369
Mexicans do seem to have a sense of humor about this.
>>
Reuben Backletick - Sun, 06 Aug 2017 01:16:17 EST ID:bbdq2zsn No.160372 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160369

WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON WITH THAT REFLECTION IN THE MIRROR?
HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE??? GOD HELP US
>>
Sophie Binderspear - Mon, 07 Aug 2017 07:58:22 EST ID:+tVhWYRc No.160379 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160372

She's just bifacial, chill out, don't be a bigot
>>
Charles Pockbanks - Mon, 07 Aug 2017 10:46:26 EST ID:lWlEy1EO No.160381 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1502117186654.jpg -(139754B / 136.48KB, 610x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>160372
Never heard of Janus bro?
Get educated you pleb
>>
Lillian Cleffinglug - Tue, 08 Aug 2017 19:05:39 EST ID:1w6RWfJG No.160394 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1502233539782.webm [mp4] -(1561661B / 1.49MB, 480x360) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Finally I can post something Gymkata related on /n/.


Bipartisan Bill To Make Boycotting Israel A Felony by Phyllis Pammerforth - Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:05:05 EST ID:mIHuuhk5 No.160126 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1500555905717.jpg -(66367B / 64.81KB, 632x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 66367
The Israel lobby has taken off its gloves. No longer dancing around the pesky problem of Constitutionally protected free speech, they will soon make it literally illegal for private citizens to participate in or support any boycott of Israeli businesses, with ridiculous punishments for doing so. Congressmen across the spectrum, from the anti-authoritarian liberal "#Resistence" to freedom-loving America-first conservatives, have dutifully fallen in line in bipartisan support for restricting your rights to free expression and free association. When questioned about the anti-Constitutionality of the bill, most Congressmen admit that they didn't even read the AIPAC-sponsored bill before reflexively supporting it:

https://theintercept.com/2017/07/19/u-s-lawmakers-seek-to-criminally-outlaw-support-for-boycott-campaign-against-israel/
>But now, a group of 43 senators — 29 Republicans and 14 Democrats — wants to implement a law that would make it a felony for Americans to support the international boycott against Israel, which was launched in protest of that country’s decades-old occupation of Palestine. The two primary sponsors of the bill are Democrat Ben Cardin of Maryland and Republican Rob Portman of Ohio. Perhaps the most shocking aspect is the punishment: Anyone guilty of violating the prohibitions will face a minimum civil penalty of $250,000 and a maximum criminal penalty of $1 million and 20 years in prison.
>A similar measure was introduced in the House on the same date by two Republicans and one Democrat. It has already amassed 234 co-sponsors: 63 Democrats and 174 Republicans. As in the Senate, AIPAC has assembled an impressive ideological diversity among supporters, predictably including many of the most right-wing House members — Jason Chaffetz, Liz Cheney, Peter King — along with the second-ranking Democrat in the House, Steny Hoyer.
>Thus far, not a single member of Congress has joined the ACLU in denouncing this bill.

Can anything be done?
34 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Cornelius Homblestot - Sun, 06 Aug 2017 16:18:00 EST ID:AaqRkLOm No.160376 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Meanwhile at DSA con 2017

https://twitter.com/kid_mao/status/893858157205893120
>>
Cornelius Homblestot - Sun, 06 Aug 2017 16:29:55 EST ID:AaqRkLOm No.160377 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1502051395699.webm [mp4] -(2486244B / 2.37MB, 320x240) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>160376
>>
Sophie Nicklelock - Sun, 06 Aug 2017 17:35:16 EST ID:Rk/DVpk5 No.160378 Ignore Report Quick Reply
So what does this mean, i have to buy Jew made stuff now? Cuz I much prefer halal hummus just sayin >.>

Can I still buy my halal hummus OP?
>>
Jenny Dattingson - Tue, 08 Aug 2017 02:33:50 EST ID:YtToCPVo No.160384 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1502174030010.jpg -(103462B / 101.04KB, 933x445) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>160180
>I dunno what news you're watching but there hasn't been a terrorist attack in Europe in quite a while.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Hamburg_attack
>28 July 2017
wew

and in April, 3 months before your post Norway, Sweden and France each had one
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_April_2017

Did you just get rekt? I think so.
>>
Jenny Dattingson - Tue, 08 Aug 2017 02:37:01 EST ID:YtToCPVo No.160385 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1502174221010.jpg -(49990B / 48.82KB, 599x753) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>160180
a bit more than a month before your post
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/June_2017_London_Bridge_attack
On 3 June 2017, an attack took place in the Southwark district of London, England, when a van mounted the pavement of London Bridge and was driven into pedestrians. The van crashed, and the three male occupants ran to the nearby Borough Market pub and restaurant area, where they stabbed people with long knives. Amber Rudd, the Home Secretary, stated that the attackers were "probably" Islamist terrorists.

Eight people were killed and 48 were injured, including four unarmed police officers who attempted to stop the assailants. The three attackers, who wore fake explosive vests, were all shot dead by police.

It was the third terrorist attack in Great Britain in just over two months, following a similar attack in Westminster in March and a bombing in Manchester in May.


Trump wants to stop LEGAL immigration by Oliver Waddlekock - Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:15:49 EST ID:BK6nJXrT No.160317 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1501704949301.jpg -(223433B / 218.20KB, 1024x683) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 223433
http://www.wsj.com/video/trump-backs-plan-to-curb-legal-immigration/234D11EE-1D65-465A-901C-EEA4B05D901D.html
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/trump-immigration-congress/534951/

Not that anybody didn't see this coming, but at least the the whole spiel about his stance on immigration was only that he wanted to stop illegal[/b] immigration now officially has to be thrown out the window.

It was always about stopping foreigners from entering the country as much as possible, period. Not about stopping illegal immigrants from committing crimes, or getting hired for illegally low wages, or being a burden on our system, or them not paying taxes, or any of the other tired excuses.

Nah, but at least you guys are being honest now. It's simply about hating foreigners.

meanwhile, in the mar-a-lago kitchen...
>HOLA!
5 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Barnaby Driddlesutch - Thu, 03 Aug 2017 06:10:01 EST ID:QYpjCH3+ No.160326 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160325

Nah, it's Haitians traveling through the U.S. to Canada.
>>
James Hurringwill - Thu, 03 Aug 2017 09:24:11 EST ID:mvx5AAOh No.160327 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I've seen the point system they are trying to integrate. I dont think this bill will get passed, I can almost guarantei Tech companies are going to lobby the shit out of this not too, and the US H-1B visa for specialty workers is highly needed. That is why the US is ahead of the game.
>>
Priscilla Bellyfoot - Sat, 05 Aug 2017 12:23:16 EST ID:w4G8ki2H No.160363 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Good, every country has the right to control who enters their country legally and illegally. Every other country does it and at times are even more strict than the US, yet the US is held to unreasonable standards because of its past of allowing anyone in at one time. It's becoming unsustainable.
>>
Frederick Febblekerk - Sat, 05 Aug 2017 12:50:22 EST ID:BNxHrPI/ No.160364 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160363
u like watching america fuck up the world? not that there's anything terribly wrong with .025% of germany being syrian out of nowhere, but it definitely wasn't germany's responsibility to pick up murica's slack
>>
Frederick Gudgeshaw - Sat, 05 Aug 2017 15:07:07 EST ID:Uy/29Ghl No.160365 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1501960027484.jpg -(110046B / 107.47KB, 598x800) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>160364
>.025%
>MUH PURE WHITE BLOOD


Like SOPA, but more of a moral panic thing by Nathaniel Fuckinghood - Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:39:10 EST ID:C9gVbIZu No.160302 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1501605550341.jpg -(15632B / 15.27KB, 480x360) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 15632
tl;dr: The only Internet you've ever known was one where websites in general couldn't be charged/sued for things their users were doing. There have always been limits, but Alabama couldn't make a law and then use it to sue Facebook for something people in Alabama were doing on Facebook. As of today, it looks like this is going to be the future.

>A bill that would carve a significant chunk out of Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act — decades-old regulations that function as the internet’s liability shield — has been introduced in the Senate, with six co-sponsors from across the aisle. The Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017 would potentially expand criminal liability for websites like Backpage, a classifieds site that allegedly hosted ads from sex traffickers alongside ads from sex workers in its adult services section.

>Put in place in 1996, Section 230 provides websites with legal immunity for the posts of their users. For example, Twitter, Inc. cannot be sued if one of its users defames another user. It is generally assumed that without this liability shield, most of the web as we know it would not exist. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has called CDA 230 “one of the most valuable tools for protecting freedom of expression and innovation on the Internet.”

>...

>The bill’s stated goals are broad: the regulation would allow victims of sex trafficking to seek recompense from website that “knowingly and recklessly” enabled their victimization; criminalize any commercial conduct that “assists, supports, or facilitates a violation of federal sex trafficking laws”; and let state law enforcement officials prosecute against companies engaged in conduct that breaks federal sex trafficking laws.

>Eric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University, writes that “this law potentially implicates every online service that deals with user-generated content.” He suggests that the unclear wording of the bill could hit websites hard. In addition to widening liability for user-generated content, a state could piggyback off the legislation to create a new law that would impose liability for all posts promoting the sex trafficking of children unless a site pr…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
1 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Phyllis Magglehin - Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:07:32 EST ID:Zi/ZMs1f No.160308 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160306
http://globalnews.ca/news/3394952/police-arrest-104-men-find-85-child-prostitutes-in-multi-year-investigation-in-ontario/
>“We essentially put up advertisements online when men were looking to purchase sex they were told that they were communicating with a child, with a prostituted child,” Truong told reporters during a press conference Friday.

>“We used undercover operators for this investigation and once they were told that they were speaking with children for the most part the men would stop and we were OK with that, we really didn’t want to identify any of the men that were not looking to purchase and to buy prostituted children.”

People are fucking dumb and craven; bro
>>
Ebenezer Blytheson - Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:19:42 EST ID:3/U6wD8z No.160309 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160308
No doubt. I would be pretty cautious about anything cops put out in a press release though.
>>
Barnaby Driddlesutch - Wed, 02 Aug 2017 21:20:21 EST ID:QYpjCH3+ No.160323 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160302

Speaking of SOPA, wasn't that idiotic Indian guy that took over the FCC supposed to ruin the Internet? Haven't really heard anything about that for months now.
>>
Reuben Bunningbury - Thu, 03 Aug 2017 16:50:34 EST ID:NFEkUgh0 No.160329 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1501793434687.jpg -(84683B / 82.70KB, 721x438) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>160323
The FCC is a bureaucratic body. There was period for public comments that were summarily ignored and they'll vote on regulatory rule changes soon. Then your ISP will once again be free to do whatever it thinks it can get away with.
>>
Reuben Bunningbury - Thu, 03 Aug 2017 18:46:30 EST ID:NFEkUgh0 No.160337 Ignore Report Quick Reply
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/08/internet-censorship-bill-would-spell-disaster-speech-and-innovation

>While SESTA's purpose may be only to fight sex trafficking, it brings a deeper threat to many types of free expression online. The bill would create an exception to Section 230 for enforcement of any state criminal law targeting sex trafficking activities. It would also add an exemption for federal civil law relating to sex trafficking (as it stands now, Section 230 already doesn’t apply to federal criminal law, including laws against trafficking and receiving money from child sex trafficking).

>Let’s unpack that. Under SESTA, states would be able to enact laws that censor the Internet in broad ways. As long as those laws claim to target sex traffickers, states could argue that they’re exempt from Section 230 protections. As Eric Goldman points out in his excellent analysis of SESTA, Congress should demand an inventory of existing state laws that would fall into this new loophole before even thinking about opening it.

>There’s a long history of states passing extremely broad censorship laws in the name of combatting trafficking. Just this year, legislators in numerous states introduced the Human Trafficking Prevention Act, a bill that has nothing to do with human trafficking and everything to do with censoring sexual expression. Imagine all of the ways in which state lawmakers would attempt to take advantage of SESTA to curb online speech in their states. If they can convince a judge that the state law targets sex trafficking, then SESTA applies. That would create a ton of uncertainty for Internet intermediaries.


Mulch the Mooch by Shitting Punderford - Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:50:37 EST ID:2fJQ/aQA No.160283 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1501527037346.png -(505027B / 493.19KB, 800x430) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 505027
Well, this has to be a fucking record of some kind...the guy had the job for like a fucking week...

http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2017/07/31/anthony-scaramucci-reportedly-fired-from-trump-administration/ZsjIEgzD6KkxGOjYKnnvWN/story.html

TL;DR - Jersey Shore wannabe and Spicer replacement Anthony "The Mooch," Scaramucci has been fired by Trump.

Is it just me, or is this shit show accelerating in its shittiness?
16 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
John Blythewill - Wed, 02 Aug 2017 14:31:13 EST ID:knFhJQjN No.160314 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160307

He won fair and square. If Hillary had lost the popular vote and won the state count, you wouldn't be bitching about it.
>>
Jenny Tootbury - Wed, 02 Aug 2017 15:38:00 EST ID:nxGrMKs+ No.160315 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160314
Nobody is 'bitching' about anything, it just doesn't make sense to call a guy who got fewer votes than his opponent 'the person America wanted'. Why do guys like you keep showing up, misunderstanding the meaning of words?
>>
Nigel Shittingworth - Wed, 02 Aug 2017 15:47:26 EST ID:2fJQ/aQA No.160316 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160315
Because the future and circlejerk....
>>
Oliver Waddlekock - Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:19:41 EST ID:BK6nJXrT No.160318 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160314
>He won fair and square.
No one is disputing this, or "bitching about it". If you think people are, please point out where.

Doesn't matter, the fact is still that he is not the person America wanted. Merely the person who happened to become president.

If Hillary had lost the popular vote and won the state count, you would be bitching non-stop, don't lie. It would have been non-stop "SEE! IT WAS RIGGED!!".
>>
Nigel Shittingworth - Wed, 02 Aug 2017 17:47:50 EST ID:2fJQ/aQA No.160321 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160318
Hell, they are doing that anyway...

"So why did Don Jr have that meeting with Russ..."

"OMG! SO HILLARY AND OBAMA GAVE PUTIN AN ATOMIC BLOWJOB AND TOTALLY FUCKED AMERICA IN THE ANUS WITH A FIST! WHY AREN'T YOU TALKING ABOUT THAT? HUH? HUH? HUH? KEKEKEKEKEKEKEK!!!!"


So basically... by Cyril Fanderchick - Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:30:52 EST ID:JBl4ISNu No.159987 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1499981452253.jpg -(71309B / 69.64KB, 620x388) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 71309
...the only nations that best!Korea can hit are their own allies, third world island nations, the Japs, Tech-supportland, and a frozen waste. Somehow I feel slightly better for some reason.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/9962585/Graphic-how-far-can-North-Koreas-missiles-reach.html

This is like when a retarded kid finds the key to daddy's gun cabinet and brags to the cool kids about how they could "totally kill you, like, for real dude. don't mess with me."

Kinda pitiable in a way...
But not that pitiable. Dude's a megalomaniacal arsehole who's actions on the world stage fuck shit up for the people he supposedly leads...
56 posts and 8 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Simon Nickleman - Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:31:22 EST ID:YqxoHHBZ No.160305 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160304
gah, no its not. ignore me i'm a hot mess at the moment. if someone can find another source that is not as partisan as the beeb, plz post.
>>
Isabella Grandfuck - Wed, 02 Aug 2017 12:06:31 EST ID:zCslYGII No.160310 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160305
Looks like someone forgot to get the latest script from his defense industry think tank bosses.
>>
Emma Mocklespear - Wed, 02 Aug 2017 12:39:50 EST ID:YqxoHHBZ No.160313 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160310
shit, i've been found out...
>>
Sidney Pickfuck - Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:49:50 EST ID:IqeGJT6/ No.160447 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>159995
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36385839
>>
Sidney Pickfuck - Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:55:32 EST ID:IqeGJT6/ No.160448 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1502391332273.jpg -(357253B / 348.88KB, 1038x539) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>160014
Home by Christmas? I don't think so Tim.


God-emperor Drumpf claims he has the "power to pardon"... by Fucking Serringshit - Sun, 23 Jul 2017 00:14:01 EST ID:JBl4ISNu No.160197 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1500783241037.jpg -(88294B / 86.22KB, 646x720) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 88294
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-pardon-complete-power-president-tweet-russia-investigation-impeach-latest-a7854561.html

...and get's immediately btfo by legal experts. Looks like President Fart is on his way out!

"Some legal experts say no, citing an opinion issued by the Justice Department days before Richard Nixon's resignation that he could not pardon himself "under the fundamental rule that no one may be a judge in his own case".

"A self-pardon might well be outrageously improper... but the response the Constitution creates for such misconduct is impeachment, a political rather than criminal remedy," Mark Tushnet, a law professor at Harvard University told Vox.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40693249
11 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Cedric Gickleson - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:18:51 EST ID:3X/Zgz1t No.160230 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160229
It isn't. They thought they were gonna get Hillary, but Trump got in instead. They were geared for obstruction and now that they have the power, they're in the hot seat. Any legislation that passes has THEIR rubber stamp on it. THEY own it. So if it's unpopular and backfires, they take all the blame. It could mean they lose seats in the next election and quite possibly spell the end of the GOP.
>>
Jack Duzzlehere - Tue, 25 Jul 2017 23:21:36 EST ID:2fJQ/aQA No.160238 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160230
Naw, the Dems have such a weak game now, that the GOP is assured 20-40 year dominance at this point. Especially when you throw in gerrymandering and voter suppression laws.

Literally they are only winning because the other guy is so inept.
>>
Cedric Goodgold - Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:08:56 EST ID:WFhKRqSz No.160245 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160238
lol this too is something the dems were saying about the GOP until trump's election.
>>
Simon Clashfet - Sun, 30 Jul 2017 09:48:35 EST ID:hEow1tjI No.160278 Ignore Report Quick Reply
jesus christ is this trash all there is on /n/?

too lazy to make a thread about the ever increasing deportations and how great that is
>>
Basil Bimmerchutch - Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:20:25 EST ID:mM9fZu54 No.160285 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160278
> jesus christ is this trash all there is on /n/?

Of course not.

It's all there is on /pol/ too.


#Australianlivesmtter by Lydia Senkinwater - Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:59:09 EST ID:iTeksKaa No.160049 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1500296349590.png -(1000758B / 977.30KB, 1438x1116) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1000758
What the actual fuck USA?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-17/australian-woman-justine-damond-shooting-sparks-tears-confusion/8716414
34 posts and 6 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Fucking Dabberwit - Sat, 29 Jul 2017 02:16:54 EST ID:tlilhxRg No.160263 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160260
That's some Wild West "Sherriff harrassing the stranger with the iron on his hip" spaghetti western level bullshit.
>>
Basil Menderwill - Sat, 29 Jul 2017 06:51:39 EST ID:+5q0zMgm No.160265 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160257
That just goes to show the kind of power that the unions have, when the president was eating out their assholes that hard. And yeah I saw it too.
I'm not trying to go tinfoil here, but there are a lot of people more powerful than the president, and they're mostly involved in executive branch stuff. And they have interests in being a police state. Him eating out the police unions goes to show who he's really working for. And if he's working for the police state, he's working directly against the American people, as recent actions by cops goes to show.
>>
Clara Mepperstod - Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:59:34 EST ID:EjpLjyX4 No.160267 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160265

They're also just fuckin dumb as hell. Hillary would work for them too but also be there to appease people, keep them at bay, tell them what they want to hear. The crowd wouldn't understand this and would assume she is a Marxist laying siege to their careers lmfao
>>
Lillian Shittingworth - Sat, 29 Jul 2017 20:57:45 EST ID:2fJQ/aQA No.160271 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160267
Well, this fucking happened....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/07/29/u-s-police-chiefs-blast-trump-for-endorsing-police-brutality/?utm_term=.8a2f776ca73b

tl;dr - After Trump said "don't be gentle with suspects," a national police chiefs organization said, "Fuck that noise."

This is...Ummm...well shit...

Just look at this week...the BOY SCOUTS had to apologize for what Trump said...the police chiefs have had to negate what he said....and he hired a press secretary who talks like he is in a Tarantino gangster film.

What the actual fuck is going on here?
>>
Augustus Hoddlefield - Sat, 29 Jul 2017 23:44:00 EST ID:3R0t4sM0 No.160276 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160271

Simple. The police and the 'empire' if you will realized a long time ago that being intelligent and using covert means of control is more desirable than brute force. Why? It works and does so more quietly. That's why if a cop killed someone in the 1920s they'd straight up say "well he had a dangerous idealogy and wouldn't stop threatening prosperity" meanwhile flash to now and they have entire PR campaigns, image building, they are taught to use better words like politicians. Trump is representing a revert to the old society in where the baton is used more than the mouth. Another example would be in the 60s if you held up a sign that was considered anti america you'd be beat to a pulp. Now they just find ways of giving people non threatening protest outlets and they only get the baton if they find a way outside of these bounds. Trump doesn't want to appease peoples desires for a less brutal society he wants to brutalize ane isolate them but is having a hard time because he's presented by obstacles from those who either think this is an ineffective way to rule or wrong. Mostly the former.


Trump upset Sessions won't break the law for him. by Esther Chishdale - Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:24:01 EST ID:aH24pX5g No.160114 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1500524641741.jpg -(170422B / 166.43KB, 1300x918) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 170422
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-sessions-hiring-regret-mueller-warn-new-york-times-1.4213439

Fucking hilarious how Trump keeps expecting people to throw their ass on the fires he keeps starting, and its fucking blown away when they don't.
20 posts and 6 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Basil Menderwill - Sat, 29 Jul 2017 06:54:49 EST ID:+5q0zMgm No.160266 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160240
Nah it's fair. CNN publishes a lot of dumb shit. All MSM deserves any bad wrap that they get. It's not like CNN is the only one, they're just the biggest lying liberal media outlet. There are worse conservative outlets. But they're all garbage. Liberals ignore that CNN is total garbage, conservatives ignore that their outlets are total garbage.
>>
Basil Menderwill - Sat, 29 Jul 2017 17:22:18 EST ID:+5q0zMgm No.160269 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160268
Basically. It's a powerful tool in a duopoly. Considering that it is fact that it is a duopoly, would it not make complete, logical and strategic sense for it to be this way?
>>
Lillian Shittingworth - Sat, 29 Jul 2017 22:30:59 EST ID:2fJQ/aQA No.160272 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1501381859681.jpg -(43630B / 42.61KB, 768x384) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>160270
Getting a bit into the weeds there buddy...
>>
Augustus Hoddlefield - Sat, 29 Jul 2017 23:35:00 EST ID:3R0t4sM0 No.160274 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160272

OK you fucking shill poster. Keep drinking that fluoride
>>
Ernest Fadgeham - Sat, 29 Jul 2017 23:41:10 EST ID:Oo7fxVKU No.160275 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160274
literal pop bellied vampiric goblins


We Have Always Been At War With Kekistan! by Nathaniel Blagglenudging - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 18:56:28 EST ID:2fJQ/aQA No.160224 Locked Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1500936988690.jpg -(97701B / 95.41KB, 480x415) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 97701
So, one thing Trump has is devout followers.
He also has no ability to keep a lid on his high crimes and misdemeanors.

Let us suppose that Trump is, in some way, finally removed from office. In some manner that is controversial.

Would his supporters rise up to restore him to power?

Legit question here. Let us just assume some vague situation where Trump is claiming he was removed illegally, and the other side saying it was legit and legal.

Do his followers have the fortitude to go to the mat for him. To take to the streets in violent protest, or will they just grumble on the Internet?

For the life of me, I have no idea.

Thoughts?
Locked
Thread has been locked
Thread was locked by: Spunky
Reason: This is a /pol/ post, not news.
1 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Nathaniel Blagglenudging - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:34:20 EST ID:2fJQ/aQA No.160227 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160225
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!

Forgot my link!
Shit...bad post. I suck.
>>
Doris Suzzlefedge - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:19:43 EST ID:xdmTIq9E No.160231 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160227
No worries, I totally fucked up my own post on /pol/. Let's trade places and it'll be our little secret
>>
Hamilton Dumbleway - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:48:15 EST ID:1iOkmONh No.160232 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Considering a fifth of America believed and continues to believe that Obama was born outside the US, and (this is conjecture) many of those are strong Trump supporters, I doubt there'd be much in the way of protests, let alone violent ones.
>>
Phyllis Bibberville - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 23:01:29 EST ID:aH24pX5g No.160233 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Given that he came in third in a two person race, I really think his supporter numbers are greatly inflated.
>>
Wesley Drammerham - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 23:25:00 EST ID:aUBwpL4e No.160234 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160233
this. there's also the fact that they're mostly poor and have no power themselves (the very reason why they love trump in the first place - he has everything they don't and thinks he can/will give it to them).

the rich ain't comin' to trump's defense in that case either. it's not like whoever the next president is won't be easy to take advantage of too.


Here we go again V 2.0 by Hannah Mubbledale - Sat, 03 Jun 2017 18:27:44 EST ID:N0GOwIpy No.158920 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1496528864931.jpg -(108276B / 105.74KB, 400x400) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 108276
>A van mowed down pedestrians as it sped down London Bridge on Saturday night, leaving bodies lying in the roadway
>Mark Roberts said the van was traveling south across the River Thames at a high rate of speed and was swerving as it struck several people, knocking one person "about 20 feet into the air."
>Roberts said he heard what sounded like gunshots about 10 minutes later.
>young brit described live one of the suspects getting taken out by police and laughed his ass off
>pic related


http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/03/europe/london-bridge-incident/index.html
233 posts and 48 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Jarvis Drenkinkock - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 03:19:06 EST ID:tlilhxRg No.160212 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160210
That other book with the stoner hippy telling mothers to abandon their children was so much better.
>>
Phoebe Dromblenag - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 08:31:30 EST ID:Zi/ZMs1f No.160213 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>158920
http://abcnews.go.com/International/chainsaw-attack-switzerland-injures/story?id=48812648&cid=social_fb_abcn
>The incident, which occurred in Schaffhausen near the German border, was not a terror attack, police told ABC News.


I'm sorry my policeman but a motherfucker attacking people on the run with a chainsaw is the very fucking definition of terror.
>>
Jarvis Drenkinkock - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 11:19:57 EST ID:tlilhxRg No.160215 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160213
Some guy got mad at his insurance company.
>>
Phoebe Turveywater - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 13:48:50 EST ID:a+I//Kqg No.160218 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160213
Terror sure but I don't think it counts as terrorism unless it's political (which is admittedly a very broad definition).
>>
Phoebe Dromblenag - Mon, 24 Jul 2017 13:57:09 EST ID:Zi/ZMs1f No.160219 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160215
I don't blame him. I'd expect more from Allstate


USA stops aiding ISIS in Syria. by Eliza Sangerfetch - Thu, 20 Jul 2017 20:29:56 EST ID:y9qOEaL3 No.160143 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1500596996956.jpg -(70450B / 68.80KB, 933x445) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 70450
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/19/world/middleeast/cia-arming-syrian-rebels.html
Trump Ends Covert Aid to Syrian Rebels Trying to Topple Assad
The decision came more than a month ago, the officials said, by which time the effort to deliver the arms had slowed to a trickle.

It was never publicly announced, just as the beginnings of the program four years ago were officially a secret, authorized by President Barack Obama through a “finding” that permitted the C.I.A. to conduct a deniable program. News of the troublesome program soon leaked out.

Mr. Trump’s decision was first reported by The Washington Post. But it was foreshadowed as early as April, when the Trump administration said that ousting Mr. Assad, whose government has fought a civil war that has taken roughly half a million lives, was no longer a priority. Instead, the United States and Russia have been discussing cease-fire zones in the country, the first of which went into effect this month.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world-0/us-politics/trump-syria-rebel-funding-putin-russia-anti-assad-fighters-a7849971.html
Trump 'ends programme to arm anti-Assad rebels' in move sought by Russia

More good news!
12 posts and 8 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Ebenezer Dummerworth - Sat, 22 Jul 2017 19:22:36 EST ID:+hP45SMQ No.160188 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160182
There's a video link in the thread hillary, give up, you lost, people know.
>>
Samuel Fobbledore - Sat, 22 Jul 2017 20:10:17 EST ID:CgCM1jv+ No.160189 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160188
The entire speech was about what we were doing to fight ISIS.
In the context of the video, it's immediately clear that he misspoke.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?326940-3/president-obama-statement-us-strategy-isis&start=307

"We are training ISIL forces in anbar... they will be a new force against ISIL" makes no sense unless he misspoke.
>>
Rebecca Blenderstork - Sat, 22 Jul 2017 20:20:44 EST ID:1fIHantD No.160190 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1500769244658.gif -(1199854B / 1.14MB, 173x200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>160181

Go back you whatever hole you crawled out of.
>>
Frederick Turveyham - Sun, 23 Jul 2017 05:55:07 EST ID:+hP45SMQ No.160201 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1500803707597.png -(351314B / 343.08KB, 1340x758) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>160189
freudian slip, more like. Whatever, the info is out well documented look it up, in 15 years when it's made public to the average moron you'll remember this.
Those other "rebels" were just front orgs for ISIS and co, perhaps 1-2 were legit but they just got taken over by ISIS.

Look at wikileaks, factor in the US modern past, reports of ISIS soliders treated in hospitals in Israel, even meeting between Israelis and ISIS fighters at golan heights on and on. Israeli generals saying they like the conflict in syria and want to prolong it since it helps Israel... Look up ISIS toyota truck army.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mystery-of-isis-toyota-army-solved/5480921
>>
Frederick Turveyham - Sun, 23 Jul 2017 06:05:04 EST ID:+hP45SMQ No.160202 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>160201
https://www.pri.org/stories/2015-12-15/how-texas-plumbers-truck-wound-isis-hands


<<Last Pages Next>>
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.