420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
Trump disclosure of Cohen payment raises new legal questions by Eugene Billinglock - Wed, 16 May 2018 18:34:27 EST ID:qetGCKL9 No.168512 Report Quick Reply
File: 1526510067117.gif -(509684B / 497.74KB, 300x165) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 509684
https://apnews.com/939e86340bfe42f38c722103a6ec8ebf/Trump-disclosure-of-Cohen-payment-raises-new-legal-questions

>NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump noted in his financial disclosure Wednesday that he “fully reimbursed” personal attorney Michael Cohen as much as $250,000 for unspecified “expenses,” with no mention of a $130,000 payment to porn actress Stormy Daniels to keep quiet about a sexual tryst she said they had.

>The head of the nation’s ethics office questioned why Trump didn’t include this in his previous year’s disclosure and passed along his concerns to federal prosecutors.

>“I am providing both reports to you because you may find the disclosure relevant to any inquiry you may be pursuing,” David Apol, acting director of the Office of Government Ethics, wrote to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

>Apol wrote that he considers Trump’s payment to Cohen to be a repayment on a loan and that it was required to be included in Trump’s June 2017 disclosure. Ethics experts says that if that payment was knowingly and willfully left out, Trump could be in violation of federal ethics laws.
>>
Eugene Crobbleville - Wed, 16 May 2018 20:34:06 EST ID:o4BwxZhq No.168518 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168512
I like how his defense is "So, yeah, I paid the chick, but honest, I didn't fuck her, I just wanted her to go away."

And the Evangelicals are still with him....
>>
Frederick Hozzlesture - Thu, 17 May 2018 11:44:35 EST ID:jajGWUvR No.168544 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Why don't we just have a Trump scandal megathread? There's new news for this endless stream of stupidity every day.
>>
Albert Crirryspear - Fri, 18 May 2018 16:31:57 EST ID:Dn+Cznwi No.168590 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168544
It already exists, i cant turn on a tv without hearing about a tweet, russians, a porn star (does no one feel weird prying into the sex life of two consenting people? Like yeah if it came from campaign funds ding him but what happens in someones bedroom is there own business assuming there is consent), some sex tracher in thailand, more tweets etc etc.
>>
Eliza Fammlefuck - Fri, 18 May 2018 19:21:32 EST ID:o4BwxZhq No.168600 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168590
It kinda matters when that same person who diddled a porn star wanted Clinton impeached for a consensual BJ. Once a hypocrite...etc etc.

Again, the fact that Evangelicals are still onboard with this shows how fucked those guys are.
>>
Nell Drablingpot - Fri, 18 May 2018 19:49:52 EST ID:09gGnqp0 No.168601 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168600
Yeah I'm a liberal, don't care what evangelicals do particularly. Im not American either and dislike "team" politics where because x demographic opposes x I can give up value y.

Like I dint believe going after any individual for their private sex life can be justified, politics or no. Its that attitude thats kept LGBT individuals out for so long.

He molested a porn star? I was under the impression they had some sort of contractual sex (cant say i follow this)

Im not american but wasn't clinton's issue lying under oath about his blowjob ?

I wasnt aware he sexually assaulted her though, link to charges?
>>
Nell Drablingpot - Fri, 18 May 2018 19:55:51 EST ID:09gGnqp0 No.168602 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168600
And to clarify my poijt here i dont believe anyone should have a public eye judging their sex life (assuming consent).

I do not personally like Trump and think he's made a mockery of the position, but i cant really judge. my own country's leader is grossly less qualified. I mean you guys and your binary system can really lead to some shitty candidates lol
>>
Ebenezer Dibbletut - Fri, 18 May 2018 19:58:33 EST ID:qetGCKL9 No.168603 Report Quick Reply
>>168601

It more than the fact he had an affair with a porn star. It's the fact he used campaign money to pay her off which is illegal.
>>
Shit Cherrywater - Fri, 18 May 2018 20:01:50 EST ID:Dn+Cznwi No.168606 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168603
Yeah i mentioned that in the first post I made.....
>Like yeah if it came from campaign funds ding him but what happens in someones bedroom is there own business assuming there is consent
>>
Shit Cherrywater - Fri, 18 May 2018 20:05:21 EST ID:Dn+Cznwi No.168607 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168603
Its the dragging out someones sex life based on what is (as of the moment) unproven allegation.

The expense is "unspecified".

Obviously he paid for sex with campaign money. The man's a joke. Doesnt justify pulling out someones sex life without tbe same level of prppf expected to convict you or I etc.
>>
George Sobbertitch - Sat, 19 May 2018 09:47:44 EST ID:fD7QbJY8 No.168627 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I think y'all are missing the point. After "grab her by the pussy" was accepted, it was clear the nation gave 0 fucks about Orange Hitler's sexuality. This isn't about the morality of what he did so much as desperately searching for any and every reason to justify impeachment proceedings against this orangutan.
>>
John Smallcocke - Sat, 19 May 2018 11:06:35 EST ID:8c32w9KN No.168633 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168602
It's not about judging his sex life though. Republicans want you to think that, because you're right, who cares about his sex life (as it relates to his job performance)? Don't fall for such an easy trap.

This is about the legality of his campaign funds and possibly lying to Congress and the American people, which is dry to regular folks, but is actually very important to democracy.
>>
Fucking Hudgeleck - Sat, 19 May 2018 13:02:34 EST ID:vBsfcht4 No.168641 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168633
>This is about the legality of his campaign funds and possibly lying to Congress and the American people, which is dry to regular folks, but is actually very important to democracy.
This part i agree with whole heartedly. Idc what repubs want me to think. I wont be voting for them anyways lol.
>>
Fucking Hudgeleck - Sat, 19 May 2018 14:10:58 EST ID:vBsfcht4 No.168643 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168642
I care od they used campaign funds for their sex life. Use your own damn money for sex.

Even if its a candidate that i support, i still hold them to the same standard I would their opponents.

Not murrican though so its a lot less binary, for me, and dyansty politics are awful. Look at the clintons and Bush's, and people in the u.s actually want to continue the process.
Why not just restrict political activity to the close family of past presidents ffs. That way dems can have their Chelsea/Michelle ticket, and repubs can have a Trump jr/Jeb ticket.

Actually why even have elections, just alternate between dynasties from each side. It will remove that whole false dichotomy going on.
>>
Beatrice Dartfield - Sat, 19 May 2018 14:14:35 EST ID:T4JbmD3p No.168644 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1526753675666.gif -(5068733B / 4.83MB, 480x272) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>168642
>the Russian collision conspiracy
>>
Walter Wegglelock - Mon, 21 May 2018 15:11:32 EST ID:dbM7KxGC No.168698 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Remind me again why we haven't taken to the streets to demand his impeachment yet? The man is a traitor who stole the election with the help of our greatest enemy and now this. I guess we're all waiting for Mueller's report, but I mean, what's the point?
>>
Sophie Bardhall - Mon, 21 May 2018 15:18:28 EST ID:GZfjjRXG No.168699 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168698
>? The man is a traitor who stole the election with the help of our greatest enemy and now this. I
Who now, Israel is pretty traitorous but I'm not sure I'd call them our worst enemy.

Also every time I came here, there are literally half a dozen threads on Trump. You idiots seriously can't keep it to one thread? You are gossping like whores.
>>
Simon Brimmlecocke - Mon, 21 May 2018 15:24:32 EST ID:T4JbmD3p No.168700 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168698
>the help of our greatest enemy
Whatever weird ethnonationalist racebait thing you're about to go off on, please don't rope the rest of us in with you.
>>
Eliza Clullerton - Wed, 23 May 2018 00:18:59 EST ID:f56Z+lqk No.168768 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>168699
yeah I thought I could find somewhere without Trump cock sucking.
Ended up finding a place with Trump butt blasting.
It's almost like nothing else in this world is really happening.


Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.