Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists


Ferguson activist's son found hanging from tree, police refuse to investigate by Jack Breblingpit - Thu, 01 Nov 2018 13:14:49 EST ID:9YB0+HFv No.172333 Ignore Report Quick Reply
File: 1541092489571.jpg -(38732B / 37.82KB, 320x216) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 38732
Black protesters and their families continue to die in mysterious circumstances; mainstream media continues to ignore it:
>Earlier this month, on Oct. 17. Ferguson activist Melissa McKinnies found her 24-year-old son Danye Jones dead, hanging from a tree.

>McKinnies, well known in her community, having participated in numerous protests in Ferguson since the Aug. 2014 death of Michael Brown, believes that her son was lynched. In a Facebook post that has since been deleted, McKinnies shared graphic images of her son under the caption, “They lynched my baby.”

>Jones’ death has once again stirred conversation around various other activists in Ferguson who have died since 2014 under seemingly suspicious circumstances.

>In 2014, Deandre Joshua, 20, was found shot once in the head, and then set on fire inside his car the same day a grand jury refused to indict Darren Wilson in the shooting death of Michael Brown. Prominent Ferguson activist Darren Seals was also found dead inside of a burning car back in 2016. He had also been shot. And then there was the 2017 death of Edward Crawford, the activist captured in the iconic photo tossing a canister of tear gas away from those protesting Brown’s death. Police claimed that he died of a “self-inflicted” wound while in the back seat of his own car.
Nicholas Murddock - Thu, 01 Nov 2018 14:20:36 EST ID:8c32w9KN No.172336 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Same story as Bland. Pretty brazen display, but the cops have their marching orders and it's not surprising that all levels of Midori like Missouri government are controlled by Republicans...

> In a Facebook post that has since been deleted,
Other reports are saying that Facebook deleted the post themselves. Why would they take it down? What skin in the game do they have?

I know people like to claim social media has a built in liberal bias, but it's pretty clear that's not the case at all...
Thomas Tillingwell - Sun, 04 Nov 2018 07:35:07 EST ID:M/Ws53KS No.172376 Report Quick Reply

>"Why would they take it down?"

Probably because it violates facebook ToS.. Nothing more and nothing less.
Caroline Pullydan - Thu, 08 Nov 2018 09:03:13 EST ID:mvsBph3Q No.172410 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>Why would they take it down? What skin in the game do they have?
Preserving the status quo. Allowing the smallfolk to think too much outside of the approved range of Allowable Political Discussion Topics (immigrant caravans, Soros, Russia, abortion, trannies in bathrooms, football man not standing, It's Her Turn, etc) risks disrupting the system that made Zux so rich.
Phyllis Favingchod - Thu, 08 Nov 2018 15:26:23 EST ID:ALl8uw09 No.172463 Ignore Report Quick Reply
it showed her son's dead body hanging. Like >>172376 it was a violation of ToS. Whether or not you think the ToS is designed to filter "Allowable Political Discussion" is a whole different matter but it's pretty clear cut as far as showing corpses and gore.
John Pickstone - Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:31:35 EST ID:m8NTKyNU No.172569 Ignore Report Quick Reply
More police-related bad feels:
>Drunk bar patrons open fire on a bar.

>Bar’s black male security guard (Good Guy With A Gun™) saves the day by returning fire and apprehending one of the men.

>Cops show up, see security guard holding a gun

>Cops murder him on the spot.
David Suvingstone - Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:12:51 EST ID:ALl8uw09 No.172571 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1542057171913.jpg -(34199B / 33.40KB, 800x450) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
yeah I saw this the other day. The second amendment is only for white people, which is exactly the reason that neoliberal attempts at gun control or bans are a terrible idea: they will disproportionally (and violently) affect marginalized groups. Libs love to ignorantly blab about the mentally ill and gun control as well, no shit that they are also targeted with extreme prejudice by police.

This is one of those Worst Person You Know Has A Good Point situations. I tend to agree more with conservatives on gun ownership policy just for completely different reasons.

Anyway, fuck cops.
Phineas Bluzzleson - Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:43:36 EST ID:8c32w9KN No.172573 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>neoliberal attempts at gun control or bans
In your words, what is neoliberalism?
Archie Perrydale - Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:15:59 EST ID:ALl8uw09 No.172577 Ignore Report Quick Reply
12.jpg -(80085B / 78.21KB, 666x69) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
I was pretty drunk when I wrote that and if I were to do it again I would just type "liberal" instead.

Basically, people who support laissez faire economics, deregulation*, and imperialism with the caveat of *some regulatory measures begrudgingly granted for a perceived social good, like gun control, environmental and food protections, healthcare, etc.I would generally group the Global North together as neoliberal
Charlotte Snodforth - Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:14:27 EST ID:uY8mphwG No.172578 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Don't use big boy words if you don't understand what they mean. Neoliberalism is a set of economic principals. It has nothing to do with gun control. Read a book, not a fake news blog.
Archie Perrydale - Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:33:34 EST ID:ALl8uw09 No.172579 Ignore Report Quick Reply
you didn't even read my post, and if you did you're a fuckin moron, fuck off
Simon Simmerfuck - Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:44:28 EST ID:SeJsi9Be No.172584 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I read two of your posts where you said gun control is a tenant of neoliberalism. Both of those posts are wrong. You're wrong. You don't fully understand what neoliberalism is.
Hannah Sundlelock - Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:04:43 EST ID:ALl8uw09 No.172586 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1542225883319.jpg -(25123B / 24.53KB, 500x281) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Then you didn't understand what I posted. I backtracked on the first post to just say calls to gun control are liberal, and in my second post I definitely didn't say that gun control is a tenant of neoliberalism. I said that neoliberals have a tendency to begrudgingly grant some regulatory measures, emphasis on "begrudgingly". I honestly don't know how you could read both of those posts and and still get "you said gun control is a tenant of neoliberalism" out of that, unless you choose to ignore my second post entirely, but then why even mention it? Your post is wrong. You're wrong.

>You don't fully understand what neoliberalism is.
Alright then why don't you enlighten me instead of misreading my posts and acting like a prick?
Hannah Sundlelock - Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:20:05 EST ID:ALl8uw09 No.172588 Ignore Report Quick Reply
fuckin ridiculous but not surprising at all. I can see people trying to justify this because getting SWAT involved is supposedly a huge escalation, but it's not like your every day patrol pigs wouldn't have also murdered him so it doesn't stand.
Clara Fishlin - Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:10:50 EST ID:M/Ws53KS No.172590 Report Quick Reply

To be honest the dude who called in the SWAT bears responsibility for this. However the responding officers also bear the blame for being a bunch of trigger-happy knuckle draggers.

They should be relegated to sorting trash in a city dump for the rest of their lives, after a 20 year term for murder.
Clara Bibblekog - Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:41:26 EST ID:M/Ws53KS No.172592 Report Quick Reply

Well, there's the state of the police in the US being extremely quick to use their guns, but there's also the fact that this dude called in the hit knowing full well they are like this and seemingly had no issue causing a situation in which someone was likely to get shot and killed. They knew exactly what might happen and did it anyways, which is just as fucked as what the police did.
Phoebe Sonkinwill - Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:51:23 EST ID:ALl8uw09 No.172593 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I don't think anybody is arguing that the guy is guiltless, just that it's insane that the police bear no culpability. Of course, US police are rarely held accountable for anything so it's not like this breaks precedent.
Jenny Wimmerchotch - Sat, 17 Nov 2018 16:22:53 EST ID:DzS+5jPR No.172613 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Were you drunk when you wrote that, Liberal is pretty general as well though but pretty defined.

Conservatism, hmm
Cyril Worthingridge - Sun, 18 Nov 2018 16:12:57 EST ID:a/P5Yqqh No.172619 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Are we talking American "liberal" or the actual definition?
Jarvis Fackleshaw - Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:32:12 EST ID:ALl8uw09 No.172717 Ignore Report Quick Reply
In my post I was very clearly referring to US liberals but a bunch of pedantic motherfuckers won't let it go
John Dedgewell - Wed, 05 Dec 2018 16:05:00 EST ID:oqEk0400 No.172854 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Martha Gillerbanks - Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:33:50 EST ID:nZRoEBBb No.173020 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1544711630188.png -(263934B / 257.75KB, 1200x850) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
New Citations Needed does a great takedown of copaganda and how it's used to distract from negative stories like this:
Caroline Canningwill - Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:13:06 EST ID:PkQvHvNj No.173092 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Well, there are some decent police. Our local news will post back to back a cop
who does whatever, with, on a lighter note as the next piece.

Some will support police no matter what. Rape, victims fault. When a cop is convicted. If they apologize to their family, Ok, I guess. But if they do not apologize for betraying the peoples trust, that is a bad cop.

Funny, cops who think a trial by judge will get them off, and it doesn't work, given the evidence. Where a trial by a jury of their peers would have been more sensible.
Hugh Pudgeham - Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:04:41 EST ID:M/Ws53KS No.173114 Report Quick Reply

At this point it's easier to say there are no decent cops in the US than try to come up with excuses for them. Nearly a thousand people have been put down like rabid dogs just this year, and last year.


There doesn't seem to be a good database for rapes, assaults, etc. committed by police in the US.
Hannah Gipperkodging - Fri, 21 Dec 2018 01:29:46 EST ID:PkQvHvNj No.173185 Ignore Report Quick Reply
You can look up copwatch. They should have stats they should be somewhat accurate, been around for a long time. For what it's worth, more cops commit suicide than are killed on the job. Those stats are easy enough to find. These are often under reported.

I believe police have a burden with corruption, it is taught, learned, reinforced. It is a self-burden. Which affects everybody concerned. Even those who would support the most senseless crimes by law enforcement, making, deflecting blame of officers that really have, had no business in law enforcement in any capacity to begin with.

There are police who do their jobs well. Generally just everyday people. They are burdened by corrupt actors.

It just takes one or two cops to create a fairly massive burden on many others. Many have no real way, it would seem to cope with this in a positive or realistic manner.

People deflect and may say, you hate the police (because you don't support corrupt ections.) No it's 100% quite the opposite. This support does not help police, help morale. Corrupt actions hurts morale.

People think they support all police, then become disenchanted if they get a traffic ticket, like bu bu bu, I support you guys
no matter what. Well, nobody's perfect I guess.

Report Post
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.