420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
Why do white people push whiteness on Egyptians? by Ernest Hacklefield - Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:37:26 EST ID:e0P84R0i No.391056 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1492627046914.jpg -(106813B / 104.31KB, 547x808) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 106813
Augustus Cracklenat - Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:21:02 EST ID:U19RSd5a No.391057 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1492629662940.jpg -(37440B / 36.56KB, 493x495) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
why do the worst posters think their threads need to be on multiple boards?
Ian Crezzlemore - Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:11:19 EST ID:NGFmh1BL No.391058 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Yes, I can say without even watching your video as a white male aged 25-40 I definitely push my "white" agenda on every single Egyptian fucker there is. Is it really that obvious?
Hamilton Sezzleman - Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:45:30 EST ID:T43ZgZvA No.391073 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Because they get the least attention?

Democrat meeting "spy footage" shows them mocking white suicide rates by Sophie Bardshit - Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:37:41 EST ID:Tv4hiPhL No.390881 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1492274261873.jpg -(377423B / 368.58KB, 1200x630) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 377423

I don't think the guy speaking is a big name by any means. Rather a local goon. But apparently several newspapers have outright refused to report on the story and of course there's no condemnation from the Democratic party, neither the Maine faction.
12 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Charlotte Snodspear - Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:59:55 EST ID:i1eo8CqX No.391018 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>so it's okay to make fun of suicide as long as it's a specific group's suicide rates?
Something something snowflakes something something no safe spaces in real life something just a joke
Ian Dunkinford - Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:29:47 EST ID:nznRLzc6 No.391019 Ignore Report Quick Reply
And this is what ghe argument comes down to on your side. Its a sad world.
Simon Cemblebanks - Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:48:31 EST ID:FqtcG9EC No.391022 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1492555711906.jpg -(34493B / 33.68KB, 623x286) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>so it's okay to make fun of suicide as long as it's a specific group's suicide rates?
Ernest Wevinghood - Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:43:24 EST ID:Vwoc9qnJ No.391049 Ignore Report Quick Reply
lol this.

all of this comes off as so disingenuous after all the whining and crying they did about safe spaces this and trigger warnings that.
Alice Greenworth - Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:31:53 EST ID:Njbz9dGW No.391055 Report Quick Reply
wehhhh i hate being white because whites have so much privilege and literally hold back every other race.

CANADA by Eugene Tootstock - Fri, 24 Mar 2017 03:34:53 EST ID:cBPyNYtq No.389780 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1490340893434.png -(63229B / 61.75KB, 619x360) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 63229
71 posts and 15 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Graham Lightwell - Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:11:36 EST ID:Nla6yjir No.390987 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Oh BOO-HOO, you can't murder unborn babies any more. How is that religious oppression, again?
Clara Nicklebury - Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:40:42 EST ID:wCbmVqz0 No.390988 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Describing a fetus as an 'unborn baby' and attempting to legislate what women can do with their bodies based on that religious propaganda is how it is religious oppression.
Rebecca Fillerstin - Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:27:40 EST ID:EwpW+fQ3 No.390992 Ignore Report Quick Reply

A million times this guy.

To deny that these ways of thinking exist and to deny the difference between the ultra-strict socially on the right and the ultra-loose to the point of being tyrannical about it on the left, the people who want to appease god by preventing women from getting even first trimester abortions and the people who want to force people to be accepting of other cultures (like in OP) are both extremes that need to be acknowledged.
Esther Billingbury - Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:35:10 EST ID:sMjBd+5i No.390997 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Simon Wurringchere - Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:51:48 EST ID:WQQ+NOb5 No.391002 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>ultra-loose to the point of being tyrannical about it
can you qualify this? like, with real world examples, and not just point to sensational tweets from right wing shock jocks?

>the people who want to force people to be accepting of other cultures (like in OP) are both extremes
it's not extreme to condemn violence against a person, especially violence perpetrated just because of that person's religion. That's what the motion in the tweet was about. "Acceptance" also falls way short of this.

educate yourself on what a non binding resolution is in general and this motion specifically.

Russia invading Lithuania by William Dannerhood - Mon, 03 Apr 2017 16:17:03 EST ID:NY3ouz89 No.390338 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1491250623940.jpg -(10086B / 9.85KB, 480x360) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 10086
Lithuania fears a Russian invasion. Now, it wants to build a border fence.

How realistic is a war between NATO and Russia? Is Russia really crazy enough to provoke NATO by invading Lithuania or some other state? How would nuclear warheads fit into a hypothetical war between Russia and NATO?

109 posts and 23 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Fuck Honeylock - Fri, 14 Apr 2017 08:59:33 EST ID:YPXyZD9K No.390855 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1492174773858.jpg -(60759B / 59.33KB, 634x357) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>So what's your reason for continually repeating this bullshit?
does it really matter why russia wants to take over illegitimately with the use of force? russia is a corrupt wasteland where the mob does the government's dirty work. the way that ppl in charge of russia have to subvert its population to stay in power means that it is NOT a legit government in the post-enlightenment sense of the phrase legit government.

plus the entire place looks like it got hit by a nuclear bomb.
Simon Blackstock - Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:20:01 EST ID:i1eo8CqX No.390862 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1492197601770.jpg -(32528B / 31.77KB, 470x400) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>Is this any better than the Monroe doctrine though? Shouldn't they get to choose?
Yeah, because if Russia announced that Mexico was joining their anti-US alliance and started hosting wargames with Russian troops right across your border, you would totally react in a measured, sober, non-violent way that totally accords with international law, right? The US would be totally fine with letting them choose and definitely wouldn't try to regime change them or sanction them into famine or try to assassinate their leader a few hundred times, right? To say nothing about aiding and funding actual terrorists and protecting them from international law, right? It's not like the US has a record of half a century of increasingly unhinged and underhanded behavior towards nearby countries who make friends with the wrong people, right?

The notion that US would somehow be the bigger man and turn the other cheek if put into this exact situation is ridiculous to the point of insulting. Bringing up the Monroe Doctrine only highlights how hypocritical you Junior Cold Warriors are.
Hedda Trotham - Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:06:38 EST ID:T43ZgZvA No.390873 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1492218398432.png -(14042B / 13.71KB, 604x618) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
No, I'm not American and you missed the point entirely. The general idea is that Russia doesn't get a free pass on their bullshit because the Americans have done a similar shitty thing. Hypocrisy and imperialism doesn't taste much better with Russian dressing.
Archie Chinnernene - Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:17:18 EST ID:y7Ex8Y6O No.390877 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>The general idea is that Russia doesn't get a free pass on their bullshit because the Americans have done a similar shitty thing.
Yet the only time people like you demand retribution is when Russia does it. Convenient how nobody wants to escalate tensions and reignite the Cold War and get into dick-swinging contests about who's a "coward" when America does shitty things.
Hedda Trotham - Sat, 15 Apr 2017 09:10:11 EST ID:T43ZgZvA No.390879 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>Yet the only time people like you demand retribution
You assume much. If anything complaining about the newest American fuck-up is a global pastime.

The google state strengthens by Molly Merryforth - Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:00:41 EST ID:/29zZoFT No.390520 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1491570041401.png -(27841B / 27.19KB, 480x480) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 27841
>“As announced, we’ve begun an extensive review of our advertising policies and have made a public commitment to put in place changes that give brands more control over where their ads appear,” the representative said. “We’re also raising the bar for our ads policies to further safeguard our advertisers’ brands.”

So long story short, Youtube has decided to start demonetizing/pulling videos that are associated with religious topics, swear words, weapons/firearms, racism, far right political content, anti-government sentiment and conspiracy theories. In addition, they will no longer monetize channels with less than 10k subscribers.

In effect however, this is targeting channels associated with freedom of speech and those who don't agree with the corporate opinion of Google and associates. They will paint it as removing all the gun toting redneck Jew hunters from youtube but in reality, this is just silencing dissent from anyone that opposes the corporate run capitalist state. This has actually been going on for about a year now but the latest wave came last week with even tighter restrictions that are sweeping tons of channels.



36 posts and 5 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Phineas Gasslebanks - Fri, 14 Apr 2017 10:59:13 EST ID:9k6SLa8o No.390857 Ignore Report Quick Reply
What the fuck are you even on about?
Lydia Fonnergold - Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:12:58 EST ID:FqtcG9EC No.390859 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>Also, Jewish elites are responsible for the failings of "capitalism" in recent decades, US market hasn't been Laissez-faire for hundreds of years, if ever.
I seriously can't tell if trolling. You might want to read up on capitalism. User ignored either way
David Nucklelock - Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:41:11 EST ID:UDo4zJ7B No.390860 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Sounds to me like they are not just folding to advertisers to place ads everywhere
where at times often fit do not quite fit. ,

Google targeted peoples keywords in gmails did they not, and gave people unsurprising
ads because of this. Like retirement homes targeting people who are discussing family
arrangements for their passe lived ones. This sounds OK to me, people did not review
the email scraping for keywords to target people with ads. As well I would not want this
for YT videos. Like clean oil drilling ads after people lost their livelihoods, after spills,
accidents. Ads that do not remotely fit what people are viewing in the first place.
Simon Blackstock - Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:00:47 EST ID:i1eo8CqX No.390861 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1492196447770.jpg -(82136B / 80.21KB, 492x559) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
You sure do get confused easily, don't you?

Sophie Blatherman - Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:48:12 EST ID:rs2wMhS3 No.390878 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1492228092118.jpg -(1963767B / 1.87MB, 2736x3648) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
sometimes I watch azad islamic call to prayer videos.
Other times i'll comment 420praiseit.
I hope i dontget b&

Bipartisan support for marijuana legalization by Lydia Weblingway - Sun, 26 Mar 2017 22:43:36 EST ID:NY3ouz89 No.389970 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1490582616166.gif -(281016B / 274.43KB, 400x347) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 281016
Can it be achieved? Can we, in fact, demonstrate that marijuana prohibition is just as stupid alcohol prohibition? Do we have critical mass and public support?

Some Republicans support medical marijuana:

Democratic support for recreational marijuana is growing:

The far right and the WH seem to be the two biggest obstacles to ending prohibition countrywide. There are many obvious economic benefits to Marijuana that any businessman could see. Many still, however, see it as a "milder form of heroin" (like Sessions). How do we remove this stigma and get them to support legally taxed marijuana as a means of stimulating the economy as well as reducing drug-related crime?
46 posts and 15 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Matilda Figgletet - Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:14:00 EST ID:MBZ+rwoO No.390822 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Not happening, because Sessions and Trump are total corporate whores who want to provide a need for private prison facilities to open.

Soviet Psychonaut - Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:26:30 EST ID:2TfYxlWB No.390823 Ignore Report Quick Reply
How many more raids has the Obama administration conducted than Trump's?
Hamilton Blubberlock - Thu, 13 Apr 2017 01:33:48 EST ID:sMjBd+5i No.390824 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Cool false equivalency, bro!
Nell Dunkinwater - Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:34:57 EST ID:X8esPtoC No.390833 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Obama is guilty of a lot of the things Trump stands for. The only difference being Obama tried to hide the fact that he was doing it. Obama never took pride in his raids, his attacks against other countries, his deportations, his keeping Guantanamo open, his TPP stance, his pro-Saudi-Arabia and anti-Israel stances, his willingness to spy on the entire country, and so on.
Ebenezer Blackforth - Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:21:01 EST ID:vCCS1XNB No.390837 Ignore Report Quick Reply
None of that has anything to do with the assertion that Trump and Sessions are total corporate whores for private prisons. This is a non-sequitor.

#DaddySessions and #BabyTrump?
#SheriffSessions and #DeputyTrump?
#SirSessions and #SquireTrump?

When WW3 comes by Charlotte Goodfuck - Fri, 07 Apr 2017 02:00:56 EST ID:B4hpXDXR No.390513 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1491544856653.jpg -(15388B / 15.03KB, 278x182) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 15388
Will you be ready?
Whats your country and do you want it be part of the coalition it will probably be part of? if not, who would you want it to side with?
What do you plan to do if it happens? will you accept the draft, will you abstain, will you revolt?
Have any of you started organising with your friends in case it happens?
How do you think it will happen?
When do you think it's gonna happen??
9 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Thomas Bardgold - Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:19:51 EST ID:EwpW+fQ3 No.390747 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Only if the US actually built up more NATO operations in Ukraine would Russia actually go full ret... ahem WWIII. It might bring back some more Cold War type stuff but it's not gonna end in nukes.
Alice Fenderson - Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:15:12 EST ID:T43ZgZvA No.390789 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Possibly if the EU got invaded or something but in general we are still too traumatized by what we did last time to build large armies anytime soon.
For the record the EU (even without the UK) and Russia are basically evenly matched in conventional forces and that is with Europe relatively disarmed.
>It can be as simple as providing ports or airfields.
Which would then become targets. It really depends on who is the aggressor and what the fight is about. Most of Europe is quite opposed to any form of military adventurism and would strive to sit out any major conflict.
>And if your country has no military worth mentioning, it's not like they'd be useful in a fight anyway.
Most of Europe has the ability to increase military power by an order of magnitude given enough time. Plenty could also build and deploy nukes.
Frederick Puvingson - Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:35:16 EST ID:K88V7Wb3 No.390825 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1492068916845.jpg -(270155B / 263.82KB, 900x393) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>Will you be ready?
As of today no.

>Whats your country and do you want it be part of the coalition it will probably be part of? if not, who would you want it to side with?
I live in the US so the alternative coalition doesn't appeal to me.
If we're going by your map.

>What do you plan to do if it happens? will you accept the draft, will you abstain, will you revolt?
Probably get drafted. I wouldn't mind.

>Have any of you started organising with your friends in case it happens?
No, nor do I plan on it.

>How do you think it will happen?
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Nathaniel Hevingchotch - Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:53:50 EST ID:MyuDzBUL No.390827 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Because India has its owns problems without worrying about about geopolitics. The only way India would ever enter the fray is if their borders were threatened.

Regarding Libya, I don't think it'd be a organized military effort. I think Libya would be the stomping ground for Islamic terrorists who would go on to attack Israel and other Western actors in the Mediterranean, Italy and Greece for example. Same with Egypt.

The only organized military force in the Middle East that isn't sucking the American tit are Syria and Iran. So, it's them VS everyone else. IDK which way Turkey would swing, if we're being honest. Turkey don't like Syria or Iran, but Turkey is warming up to Russia, so it could be a "friend of a friend" situation. Tho, truly, in a WW2 scenario, Turkey is going to be one of the countries whose too busy waging a civil war as opposed to a foreign war.
Nell Dunkinwater - Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:47:15 EST ID:X8esPtoC No.390829 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Let's not also forget that Indians and Pakistanis most likely despise each other.
The Hindus do NOT like the Muslims. Religion is the most significant factor in these alliances out in places like India and Pakistan. You wonder why Iran and Saudi Arabia have been enemies for so long; their respective religions have been at war for the last 750 years.

Besides, why would Pakistan and India fight? Shit, why would most countries fight? Every country is suffering from some massive bullshit or another these days. All these Asian countries with their economic crisises left and right, and all these Middle Eastern countries that are poor as shit and experiencing major food shortages, why would they want to fight in a World War?

Libya already is a stomping ground for Islamic terrorism. Idk if you heard, but things haven't been going smooth over there. There's terrorists everywhere and 2 separate competing governments trying to take over. I won't be surprised if Libya falls apart, especially seeing as the strongest sector of Libya has always been on the fence about being a part of Libya (Tripoli).

Israel is already holding off terrorists on a daily basis. They're definitely ready for war whenever it comes, but they are fucked if the surrounding countries all unified against them. Luckily for the Jews the Muslims of different sects sure as shit hate each other almost as much as they hate Jews.

Turkey is the lap dog of Saudi Arabia. Turkey does whatever Saudi Arabia does. Saudi Arabia is our ally, Iran is our enemy who does not speak with us, and god knows Russia considers themselves the counter-weight to the USA.

At the end of the day, the only two countries who seem to wanna fight is the USA and Russia. I don't think any other country would join in the fight. I think we'd have Vietnam all over again, and that'd be that.

What's so bad about liberalism? by Graham Blythestone - Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:22:28 EST ID:IdLkrNaQ No.390242 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1490980948993.jpg -(41756B / 40.78KB, 260x270) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 41756
Serious note.

What exactly is wrong with liberalism?

Last I checked liberalism means that everyone is free to live how they please, and the government have no right to interfere with our lives. So they would usually disagree with the government banning gay people from marrying.

When/how/ and why/ did people start using 'liberal' as an insult?
36 posts and 7 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Jarvis Dribbernudging - Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:05:42 EST ID:nMDrW1Dn No.390757 Ignore Report Quick Reply
If you just split the welfare money and sent it to people they could get by on working for 5 dollars an hour, they could do anything they wanted, almost anybody could afford to hire them at that wage. They would have so much more freedom and opportunity when they know they don't HAVE to work!
Jarvis Dribbernudging - Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:10:00 EST ID:nMDrW1Dn No.390758 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Right now, we are spending 5000 dollars a person per year on just grade F federal welfare, those four programs I talked about. I think we should double that. If you're a senior, I think you should double that number again.

We can pay for it by a 1% federal property tax on commercial and industrial real estate.
Jarvis Dribbernudging - Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:12:13 EST ID:nMDrW1Dn No.390759 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I don't know why I keep arguing this, I know its pointless, but I swear, I just want one working man out there who UNDERSTANDS this and agrees with me! I just want one person who feels about it the same way I do!
Jarvis Dribbernudging - Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:13:53 EST ID:nMDrW1Dn No.390760 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I know that they are not going to do it.
I know that they will never do it.
But I just want them to know that I KNOW its the right thing to do, and they aren't doing it.
Thomas Bardgold - Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:25:08 EST ID:EwpW+fQ3 No.390765 Ignore Report Quick Reply

>most who are sane support government upkeep of transportation such as roads
>most who are sane support the breaking up of monopolies
>most who are sane (and therefor in positions of power) support the existence of some amount of taxes, and don't compare it to theft when reasonable


Anarcho-capitalists are just more outspoken than libertarians who choose to lurk more.

Would You Vote for a Native American for Democrat? by Simon Wickleben - Sun, 09 Apr 2017 22:50:42 EST ID:nMDrW1Dn No.390669 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1491792642730.jpg -(28515B / 27.85KB, 420x449) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 28515
If the guy seemed really honest and sincere and cared about the environment?
3 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
Simon Wickleben - Sun, 09 Apr 2017 23:14:08 EST ID:nMDrW1Dn No.390673 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I am so fucking tired of Al Gore and his pod people. I mean who the hell IS this guy, really? What the flying FUCK is he talking about? Global warming? Get a clue, guy! We are dumping raw sewage off the coast of manhatten and immigrants are contracting polio from swimming in the water!

We've got people trying to press their way into the country getting permanantly assigned to refugee camps in the US!
Eugene Gullerwill - Sun, 09 Apr 2017 23:54:32 EST ID:8I3ViJfk No.390684 Ignore Report Quick Reply
So kind of like a political Columbo?
Doris Chunnerville - Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:31:33 EST ID:wCbmVqz0 No.390702 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1491856293374.gif -(14539B / 14.20KB, 500x398) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Yeah man fucking pod sheeple. It's like wake up, just because every single test you do determines that something is the case doesn't make it true. What we really should do is send a whole bunch of people out there to actually MEASURE what's happening, and then they could bring all their results together and we could find the truth. It's so obvious. Fuckin pod sheeple.
Ian Honnerdatch - Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:34:20 EST ID:OO4RKeUN No.390723 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Race has absolutely no bearing on a candidate I would support, however I would never vote for an environmentalist.
Jarvis Dribbernudging - Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:26:04 EST ID:nMDrW1Dn No.390748 Ignore Report Quick Reply
A) Why do you also know who columbo is
B) Why are you so brilliant at making apt analogies?

Trump retreats to his safe space, forgets to sign executive act by Frederick Cracklelock - Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:01:44 EST ID:6T2FD4LE No.390288 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1491087704188.jpg -(179091B / 174.89KB, 1600x900) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 179091

Bitch made.
44 posts and 8 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Hamilton Drisslepene - Thu, 06 Apr 2017 14:57:22 EST ID:ocfgTAf6 No.390460 Ignore Report Quick Reply
If only we didn't let the majority choose their federal representative then it'll finally be fair!
Fucking Gacklewug - Thu, 06 Apr 2017 16:23:12 EST ID:I3FnSNZB No.390465 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>Didn't work out so well. It usually does the opposite.

Right, because now it's just a rubber stamp and has been for a long time.

The original point of it was to keep people like Trump from winning. The Founders did not trust the masses, that's why it exists.
Phineas Herryman - Thu, 06 Apr 2017 20:00:24 EST ID:nN1rMW+T No.390474 Ignore Report Quick Reply

>The original point of it was to keep people like Trump from winning.

the original point was to give states with a lower population extra leverage so they felt like they actually had a say and wouldnt be so prone to attempting succession
Phineas Herryman - Thu, 06 Apr 2017 20:02:55 EST ID:nN1rMW+T No.390475 Ignore Report Quick Reply
it was far less about what was just and moral than it was about what comprimises would get a bunch of squabbling uneducated pieces of shit to not all kill each other
Cornelius Turveygold - Sun, 09 Apr 2017 20:45:02 EST ID:wPIzNzTk No.390668 Ignore Report Quick Reply
no no, you're thinking of the number of electors per state when the point is what electors themselves are supposed to do. You're right but in the wrong argument lol

That Feel When You Realize by Fucking Greenridge - Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:59:05 EST ID:mekXgJ5E No.390150 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1490839145576.jpg -(353389B / 345.11KB, 1400x1200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 353389
I just realized Ivanka Trump will be the president of the US one day. She already meets the age requirement.
22 posts and 4 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Jenny Snodville - Sat, 08 Apr 2017 14:33:35 EST ID:MqC/+Wc8 No.390622 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1491676415112.png -(18112B / 17.69KB, 142x105) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>illuminati confirmed
Shitting Greendock - Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:39:09 EST ID:QK8mfsjv No.390632 Ignore Report Quick Reply

why is that white american child playing with all that foreign shit
Sidney Bleffingkodging - Sat, 08 Apr 2017 18:29:38 EST ID:T43ZgZvA No.390638 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Because it's a New York liberal?
Polly Dinderchat - Sat, 08 Apr 2017 19:29:02 EST ID:Da+Sj2Q5 No.390642 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Why is that Global Elite using all that foreign shit as it's plaything?

Polly Foshlock - Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:41:30 EST ID:QK8mfsjv No.390655 Ignore Report Quick Reply


Vetting by Nicholas Shakehood - Wed, 05 Apr 2017 09:45:54 EST ID:X8esPtoC No.390405 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1491399954678.jpg -(64024B / 62.52KB, 485x700) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 64024

Thoughts on this? Should it happen?
On one hand, it puts legitimate limits on people who can even enter the USA.
On the other hand, it's aimed entirely at the most anti-USA countries.
3 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
Henry Dellerhall - Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:03:39 EST ID:NY3ouz89 No.390410 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1491404619073.jpg -(476982B / 465.80KB, 1180x742) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
So what? Terrorists from Saudi Arabia would just lie and hand them a blank android phone. I don't think this really makes anybody safer or does anything at all, except maybe annoy people away from tourism. Remember, the terrorists that actually *succeeded* were here on legitimate visas and made themselves appear perfectly legitimate up until the weeks before they enacted their plans.
William Wublingdock - Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:19:46 EST ID:Vwoc9qnJ No.390411 Ignore Report Quick Reply
anybody who's ever dealt with the immigration process in the US knows how "extreme" the vetting process already is, even if you're from a country that's generally not discriminated against.

we all know what you really want with this: less foreigners, especially brown ones.

meanwhile the government gets to further fuck over your freedoms and privacy in the name of security.
Phineas Bankinmut - Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:22:27 EST ID:rSCOCuPW No.390412 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>There was never a Muslim ban.
Yes there was, before it was shut down for being a muslim ban.

>Phineas, I'm going to re-word your entire statement to make it better.
don't put words in my mouth. is this how you read the news? you just disregard what people actually write and insert your own version of reality instead? that explains a lot...

>The information we can get from these people is significant; could literally give us enough intel to take down these terrorists at their cores.
No it won't. It'll accomplish two things:
  1. Anyone with intel will enter the country without a phone
  2. it gives law enforcement an excuse to arrest anyone they want for any reason they want. This is like one of those dress codes at the club: "no baggy jeans". Yeah, well, why do only black dudes get kicked out for wearing the same jeans as everyone else? hmm...
  3. folks taking vacations would just decide to skip going to the US so as to not deal with all of this, and we'll see our tourism dollars go to Toronto or Tokyo or Turin. The same goes for people doing business here.

>Personally, I think we just need to drastically improve relations with other countries.
Banning people from other countries or subjecting them to unreasonable searches and seizures is not the way to do that.
Lillian Clammletudge - Wed, 05 Apr 2017 13:39:43 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.390416 Ignore Report Quick Reply
As to #3, a "Trump slump," has been noticed in the tourism industry.
George Medgepet - Thu, 06 Apr 2017 10:36:56 EST ID:T43ZgZvA No.390444 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>I don't think this really makes anybody safer or does anything at all
A bunch of it is actually just to convince the population something is being done.
>except maybe annoy people away from tourism.
My father often travels for conferences internationally. He and his colleagues avoid the USA like the plague because there is always some complication. This is obviously anecdotal but hints at significant revenue loss.

<<Last Pages Next>>
0 1 2 3 4 5
Report Post
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.