420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
Liberal Activist Pleads Guilty To 14 Counts Of Voter Fraud by Eugene Fimmerman - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:54:09 EST ID:wOlUl8B5 No.389157 Locked Banned Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1489200849064.png -(206889B / 202.04KB, 392x224) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 206889

That thing the left says doesn't happen happened again. Despite the persistent claim by those on the left that voter fraud doesn't exist, a liberal activist from Ohio pleaded guilty to 14 counts of voter fraud on Monday. Rebecca A. Hammonds, who was originally charged with 35 counts, was sentenced to six months in prison.
User was banned for this post
User was banned by: Spunky
Reason: N9ce try, but no dice. Get the fuck out.
Thread has been locked
Thread was locked by: Spunky
Reason: Story is BS. Doesn't show up in any of the local news outlets.
Betsy Fuckingham - Sat, 11 Mar 2017 01:37:12 EST ID:ocfgTAf6 No.389166 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I dont think anyone ever said that it never happens.

Polling data actually showed a more than 3 point difference difference which can indicate fraud. The numbers were only funky for Trump.

The idea of zillions of illegals voting is insubstantiated. When it happens, its usually the errorof tge polling place.
Lillian Soblingcocke - Sat, 11 Mar 2017 01:48:05 EST ID:bwGcrEHm No.389167 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1489214885228.jpg -(5663B / 5.53KB, 276x183) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Eh, bet no fed prison time in the end.

I can fully assure you the left (if you will) does somewhat-to-fully understand voter 'fraud.'

It happens today. The US in not the only country with this issue, it could be worse. I guess.
machete elections, Chop a hand off if you weren't in the right party.

BTW, these government issued machetes are dirt cheap as of now.
Not want.
I believe in many states, women were not allowed to vote at a time. Right?.

The woman you mention, I do believe fraud was there. Just being fail.
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Martin Clishdare - Sat, 11 Mar 2017 03:30:57 EST ID:nRqtFjIG No.389168 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Looks like a *totally reliable* new source.
Walter Smallbury - Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:37:11 EST ID:vpU+FwPA No.389171 Ignore Report Quick Reply
One fat lady =/= the liberal left
Jack Chibblegold - Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:40:20 EST ID:NGFmh1BL No.389172 Ignore Report Quick Reply
baha, give or take.

/pol/ under ACADEMIA by George Duckville - Thu, 09 Mar 2017 19:56:10 EST ID:kIbnOYWZ No.389059 Locked Banned Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1489107370383.png -(382229B / 373.27KB, 607x388) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 382229
Anyone else find this hilarious? This is the most opinion-driven and nonacademic board on the whole site, shit even /other/ or /psy/ is more grounded in reality than the raging pissing matches of this board. Not tryin' to be a hater, though I guess I sound like one. IMO this should be under media or miscellanea.
User was banned for this post
User was banned by: Spunky
Reason: Nice b8, m8.
Thread has been locked
Thread was locked by: Spunky
Reason: Nope
1 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
Priscilla Mishwater - Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:33:30 EST ID:VLZSAHSu No.389071 Ignore Report Quick Reply
We can do better guys.
Phyllis Goodman - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 01:07:45 EST ID:QKxTKVa1 No.389082 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Heare, heare! I do ſay, you all trubble your-ſelves verily with ſuche partiſan hullaballoo about current Events, when what we oughte to be diſcuſsing is the ſeparatione of Powers, yea, and the intrinſic Tenſions of the ſocial Contracte, on Hobbes' Accounte.
Polly Brookshit - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 01:51:17 EST ID:i1eo8CqX No.389087 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I have nothing to add to this thread but I do applaud you for using the old-timey long-s properly.

Edward Cidgesodge - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:59:22 EST ID:D3IZqUk/ No.389145 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I was just thinking about this, and I like it. It gives a different priming for the kind of discussion we hope to have. It's much better than putting it in the porn section under politically incorrect. People should at least try to act like they're discussing politics here, not just spewing hatred and putting it under the academia tab seems fitting for that.
Barnaby Brookforth - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 20:05:14 EST ID:cBPyNYtq No.389155 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Do you even browse the other academia boards? Those guys get as ass wipey as here. Especially sagan a few years ago when we had actual educated astronomy guys posting. Those guys were ass holes.

Sessions going down by Lillian Hepperdale - Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:35:26 EST ID:FZwyp5B6 No.388655 Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1488476126392.jpg -(232574B / 227.12KB, 608x768) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 232574

>Several congressional Republicans called on Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Thursday to recuse himself from investigations into alleged Russian meddling in the U.S. presidential election after it emerged he met last year with Russia's ambassador but did not disclose the contacts in Senate testimony.

>Leading Democrats separately demanded the resignation of Sessions, the top law enforcement official in Republican President Donald Trump's administration and a close adviser to Trump's 2016 election campaign.

>The two meetings with the ambassador, first reported by The Washington Post on Wednesday evening, were confirmed by the Justice Department, which said there was nothing untoward in the encounters.

>During sworn testimony at his Senate confirmation hearing in January, Sessions responded to a question from Democratic Senator Al Franken that he did not "have communications with the Russians" during the course of the presidential campaign.

So not only did he lie under oath, which is perjury and could land him in jail as well as losing his position, he's being told by Republicans to remove himself from the investigations. Seems like Trump's cabinet is packed with Russian patsies. How long until they nail Trump himself and hang him for treason?
33 posts and 9 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Priscilla Fengerbuck - Sun, 05 Mar 2017 22:49:38 EST ID:sMjBd+5i No.388860 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Boy, you sure showed him.
Caroline Fanhood - Sun, 05 Mar 2017 22:59:05 EST ID:07rTgJdU No.388861 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Fucking Brocklechun - Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:26:44 EST ID:NEFFIYTz No.388885 Ignore Report Quick Reply

And post added Fluoride. And also various remnants of chemicals untargeted by our water treatment process.
Hannah Dapperford - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:59:51 EST ID:g4aWVtYZ No.389105 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>Attorney General Jeff Sessions, accused of misleading a Senate committee on talks with the Russian ambassador, once recommended then-President Bill Clinton be impeached for lying under oath during the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

>Sessions called for Clinton’s prosecution during his impeachment trial in 1999, saying the president’s lies about his sexual relationship with the White House intern were tantamount to an “attack” on the law.

>“It has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty that President William Jefferson Clinton perjured himself before a federal grand jury,” said the then-senator from Alabama.

>“Under our Constitution, equal justice requires that he forfeit his office. For these reasons, I felt compelled to vote to convict and remove the president from office.”
Edward Cidgesodge - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:04:42 EST ID:D3IZqUk/ No.389147 Ignore Report Quick Reply
pleasepleaseplease let sessions go down. He can't just rescind the order that stopped the federal use of private prisons and then go around and order your prosecutors to seek maximum sentences in drug related cases and to up the ante on the drug war across the board. This is legal slavery, slave labor in prison is in the constitution after all.

The Enemy of the People by Jack Blonkinwater - Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:27:28 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.388600 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1488400048409.jpg -(16971B / 16.57KB, 380x287) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 16971
So, Trump has been calling the press The Enemy of the People. Pretty fucking harsh and scary language.

How much are people buying this? I live in a blue state, so nobody seems to listen to anything President Cheeto Face says.

Are people actually buying this shit?

Legit question.
53 posts and 9 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Phyllis Goodman - Thu, 09 Mar 2017 23:12:54 EST ID:QKxTKVa1 No.389075 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>If an old WSJ editor tries to label the rag as radial than maybe radical is becoming a good word again?

Nah, that was written by the then-current editor in 1951. I don't think 'radical' has ever been on the whole a 'good word'; usually what it calls to mind is terrorism.
Priscilla Mishwater - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:30:51 EST ID:VLZSAHSu No.389078 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1489123851291.png -(744685B / 727.23KB, 646x479) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Oh well nevermind then. From my perspective I viewed radical in a positive light (and sometimes still do), associating it with outlier actions that were renewing. At least until 9/11 and radical Islamists. Was hoping that wide-spread fixation was dislodging. Subjectivity, I suppose, and my own disconnection from pop culture.
Angus Dammerson - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:21:42 EST ID:X8esPtoC No.389113 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>Don't know shit
>Have no intention of letting reality affect your views
Fight me with sources, faggot, not opinions.
You can't claim someone is wrong when you've provided no proof there-of.
Polly Shittinghood - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:50:36 EST ID:9k6SLa8o No.389144 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Go look at any thread you've ever posted in and chances are good you'll find someone proving you wrong. Scroll down the first page and there's a thread where someone proves you wrong, using your own sources.

Just because you ignore it and run away whenever it happens doesn't mean you're never proven wrong. It means you're an intellectual coward and a goddamn moron.
Fuck Cammlepitch - Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:04:40 EST ID:X8esPtoC No.389218 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I said, fight me with sources, faggot.
I have no interest in reading my old conversations. Do it for me and pull up some quotes if you've got the balls, you coward.

Based stickman by Phoebe Seffinglock - Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:06:49 EST ID:RGhXuVh/ No.389010 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1489021609802.jpg -(128981B / 125.96KB, 743x1024) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 128981
Based stickman appreciation thread
26 posts and 11 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Angus Dammerson - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:32:34 EST ID:X8esPtoC No.389115 Ignore Report Quick Reply
A good American is an American who respects the freedoms of their fellow Americans. But good luck trying to hurt every 'fascist' you come across; the laws of the USA are on their side, not yours, because silencing people and authoritarianism are not American ideologies.
William Saggleduck - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:04:24 EST ID:wPIzNzTk No.389119 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Antifa are not a unified group and dont have an official website you fucking dipshit. If you had looked into it or paid any attention at all to the responses to that post you would know this.

In any case, you make the point that this is just self defense. Okay fine, then admit that violent black bloc tactics are self defense against fascism. You wont do it because you dont hold your allies to the same standards as the opposition.
Hannah Dapperford - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:58:12 EST ID:g4aWVtYZ No.389125 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Strapping yourself up to go get into a premeditated brawl is not self-defense. This is why gang fights and shootouts don't end with everyone off the hook by claiming self-defense. The Crips don't get carte blanche to do whatever just by claiming that the Bloods started it, or vice-versa.

If it did work like that, you guys would be crying up a storm about how lenient the system is to these violent thugs with no respect for the law. But since this guy happens to be in your particular gang? DINDU NUFFIN DINDU NUFFIN
Angus Dammerson - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:36:12 EST ID:X8esPtoC No.389126 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>self-defense against fascism.
It's not self-defense if it's pre-emptive, ex-President Bush. Words are not violence. If fascists started attacking people, then attacking them (at said time and place) would be perfectly legal and American. I have no problem with self-defense, but claiming self-defense against words is just called 'assault'. My only point is that you cannot respond to words with violence.
And I know what you guys think of this; 'Well, you're just letting them grow, then.'
De facto, an ideology does not grow simply because it exists. You could be arguing that fascism is growing literally while it's shrinking and not be aware.

>Strapping yourself up to go get into a premeditated brawl is not self-defense.
Yes it is. Arming yourself in order to protect yourself from bodily harm, especially if you suspect it coming, is in no way illegal. If you carry around a gun because you're afraid of where you live, and then one day someone jumps you and you shoot them, you're not a murderer, you're just smart. And if violence didn't occur at Berkeley, all of the weapons on-site would have never been brandished and shield-and-stick-man wouldn't be a culturally significant icon right now.

Look, I'm completely opposed to fascism and authoritarianism, but I'm also completely opposed to meeting words with violence. You can't defeat words with violence, but you can defeat words with words. In my opinion, all this anti-fascism stuff is the stuff of paranoid individuals who don't think their fellow Americans will refrain from becoming fascist, which is just insane.
Wesley Tillingdale - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:55:19 EST ID:i6GYBq5n No.389133 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Could someone please post the source for how they knew that antifa were the ones that started the violence?


hey guys i have a great idea by William Fonningpitch - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:41:32 EST ID:YPXyZD9K No.389117 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1489164092897.jpg -(197563B / 192.93KB, 1100x564) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 197563
lets completely fucking hate each other like people in northern ireland!

William Fonningpitch - Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:00:52 EST ID:YPXyZD9K No.389118 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1489165252897.jpg -(61662B / 60.22KB, 624x415) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
come on, fellas, lets weld some plumbing apparatus together and start murdering our neighbors!

Trump Strategy by Frederick Greenbanks - Fri, 03 Mar 2017 19:15:57 EST ID:8M5/jUvE No.388761 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1488586557573.jpg -(77642B / 75.82KB, 728x820) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 77642
In the past Trump could make the insane claims and ignore the attacks on his staff with his supporters holding the ground for him. I am getting the feeling that it has either become too hard to defend him or Supporters aren't rallying as fast as they have in the past.

Am I imagining the slow down in Trump supporter push back?
29 posts and 3 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Phyllis Goodman - Wed, 08 Mar 2017 23:25:44 EST ID:QKxTKVa1 No.389020 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>But also, there's no proof that Assange, an Australian journalist, has anything to do with the Russian government.

In 2010, an anonymous Kremlin official pitched Assange's name for Nobel nomination. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/dec/09/julian-assange-nobel-peace-prize
In 2012, they gave him a show on RT. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/arts/television/julian-assange-starts-talk-show-on-russian-tv.html

There's circumstantial evidence:
At the Ecuadorian embassy, Assange has requested a security detail from the Russian FSB, the successor service to the KGB. Even RT refers to the FSB as a "secret police." https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikileaks-forum.com%2F-wikileaks-related-news%2F23%2Fassange-espiado-por-la-inteligencia-de-ecuador%2F34255%2F&edit-text=&act=url
Out of the "Syria Files" WikiLeaks published in summer 2012, they apparently excised emails showing a €2 billion deposit. https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/wikileaks-syria-files-syria-russia-bank-2-billion/ When asked for comment, WikiLeaks denied the story, called the Daily Dot journalists Hillary supporters (with "neo-McCarthyist conspiracy theories"), and nonspecifically threatened them ("Go right ahead [and publish], but you can be sure we will return the favour one day").

Not to mention that they haven't published anything about the Russian government since, like, 2010, and the WikiLeaks Twitter account went to bat for Putin when he was implicated in the Panama Papers. https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/717458064324964352 (Three cheers for transparency!) But hey, you know, maybe there's just no dirt to report on Putin's government. Maybe all those vanished journalists are enjoying extended vacations on Crimea's scenic southern coast.

It's so funny that anyone still regards Assange as some kind of libertarian icon. Not that you can't be an activist on top of being a sniveling coward and a probable rapist—although, again, not being butt buddies with the head of the most corrupt and repressive government in the developed wor…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Phoebe Mublingwell - Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:03:50 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.389044 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1489097030904.gif -(1864617B / 1.78MB, 375x208) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
People also forget he has lived in a fucking closet for like, what? Two - three years now? I mean, he is extremely isolated in that embassy. And he does seem to be getting a bit batty.
Phoebe Secklelock - Thu, 09 Mar 2017 19:35:45 EST ID:J3Ro6eh8 No.389058 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1489106145388.png -(729937B / 712.83KB, 750x1334) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Which old cod title am I thinking of?
Edward Cidgesodge - Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:02:28 EST ID:D3IZqUk/ No.389066 Ignore Report Quick Reply
What would it take to get congress to make Trump disclose his business dealings with Russians in full? Can they subpoena every financial document he's got if they want to? Could they just make him tell them under oath? I want to believe it will happen and Trump will either stupidly lie his ass off and perjure himself in easily disprovable ways or finally all the lies he's told will be proven to be false by the only person Trumptards will listen to and believe. The evidence is mounting that he's only survived as a businessman by making shady deals with mob-backed Russian oligarchs. Deutsche Bank got caught laundering russian mob money. They also loaned Donald money back in the day which he defaulted on and then he sued them claiming they owed him millions because they caused the economic downturn and despite all this, they went along and loaned Trump millions and millions again. Trump has business dealings with Bayrock and FLG that were facilitated by Russian criminal Felix Slater. There's more and more shit coming out every day.
Nicholas Dridgedale - Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:58:01 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.389074 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>What would it take to get congress to make Trump disclose his business dealings with Russians in full?

A fucking miracle....

American Health Care Act by Martin Crucklefuck - Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:09:25 EST ID:pgFVJfQ4 No.388920 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1488863365872.jpg -(85811B / 83.80KB, 1046x779) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 85811

Well here it is, and its exactly as promised.

What do ya thimk?
18 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
Hedda Bunman - Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:19:57 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.388995 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Hush! The private sector always acts in the most moral and ethical way possible! How dare you!
Lydia Pondlewore - Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:35:38 EST ID:dLEmLgPY No.388997 Ignore Report Quick Reply

I still don't get it though. Insurance plans already decide autism isn't worthy of care. ABA coverage still isn't universal. Or if your CEO hates junkies, addictions recovery programs may not be covered. How is this different?
Clara Clizzlewater - Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:43:49 EST ID:kMHRWa3R No.388998 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1489009429411.jpg -(19307B / 18.85KB, 320x240) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Ssshhhh, you might elucidate the plebs.
Charlotte Shittinglock - Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:50:17 EST ID:WQQ+NOb5 No.388999 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Health insurance is a contract. If you subscribe to a plan that says "we won't give you chemo if you have cancer", then you know you aren't getting chemo if you have cancer. If your plan says chemo is covered, then you are entitled to it. There isn't a person or group of people that decides whether or not you get chemo, it's the terms of your contract.

Palin was positing something different, in her fantasy world, even if your plan covered chemo & it would save your life, a select group of people in the government would be able to block you from receiving it because they think you're too old to deserve it or whatever.

It's hard to understand because it makes no sense & this was used as a scare tactic.
Lydia Pondlewore - Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:54:12 EST ID:dLEmLgPY No.389000 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Oh ok. I get it now. Thanks for explaining. How silly, insurance is fucked up enough without having to make up stuff about it.

<<Last Pages
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Report Post
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.