420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
Milo by Henry Creckleville - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 21:53:33 EST ID:FHPWXqpx No.396846 Ignore Report Quick Reply
File: 1504662813720.jpg -(37095B / 36.23KB, 512x512) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 37095
Fellow comrades, how do we feel about milo? He's homosexual so hes opressed so hes one of ours but he hates the left and uses that unpleasent and toxic f word constantly. Why cant he just be a dangerous homosexual? I'm finding him really problematic.
Eugene Passlewill - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 21:56:18 EST ID:6POwg5Ik No.396847 Ignore Report Quick Reply
He was alright at first, now he's just full blown retarded.
Charles Bunshaw - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 22:16:47 EST ID:IIsxRMZh No.396848 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Right cunt, that one.
Edwin Gosslewell - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 22:30:45 EST ID:kZUMXybj No.396849 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I know you're trolling but the far right has plenty of homosexuals in their ranks and always has. Ernst Rohm was openly gay, Douglas P. of Death in June is gay (and I love Di6 but Dougie's politics are ass tier) and so was Yukio Mishima. Dude's so rich the only oppression he faces is the right-wingers he tries to accommodate being mean to him. It's not like he lives in Saudi Barbaria, where they execute homosexuals, and it's not like he meaningfully opposes Saudi Barbaria given his support for conservative causes which directly support the Saudi monarchy.
Cornelius Nicklelock - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 22:32:05 EST ID:kosw8Fl2 No.396850 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504665125447.jpg -(95454B / 93.22KB, 1280x720) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
He has a space dandy/johnny bravo pompadour.

If there is anything I've learned watching television over the years, it is that anyone with a space dandy/johnny bravo pompadour is stupid by default.
William Fenkinwell - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 22:58:47 EST ID:7vXpw3uu No.396851 Ignore Report Quick Reply
not deserving of cognitive processing
Matilda Fuzzlelet - Tue, 05 Sep 2017 23:26:51 EST ID:INfwgHzv No.396854 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504668411600.png -(466395B / 455.46KB, 680x681) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>He's homosexual so hes opressed so hes one of ours
lol you're not even trying.
Caroline Clayway - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:52:33 EST ID:9vCwpOq2 No.396866 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I imagine somewhere on stormfront some troll is asking "fellow troglodytes, how do we feel about Bibi Netanyahu? He's a fascist so he's one of us but he is a jew too! I'm not sure what is natural?"
Ernest Momblenit - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:24:08 EST ID:QhJ7/JcW No.396878 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504740248312.jpg -(148035B / 144.57KB, 960x640) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Where talking about the problematicness of saying mean words which is like the opressed biting the hand that feeds them not cognitive processing watever that is. Like, why cant this be made illegal? Anitifa needs to go beat fuck out of this obnoxsios capitalist ASSHOLE! Can we at least get mroe women and their numales to go righteously screech at him? Or maybe order a fuckton of vegan pizza to his house?
Henry Greenforth - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 21:53:02 EST ID:7vXpw3uu No.396885 Ignore Report Quick Reply

uh, i dont think you have taken enough trolling classes to start submitting your work for peer review. what are you in trollology 152? get real
Simon Snodgold - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 22:47:12 EST ID:FFCCdD4I No.396889 Ignore Report Quick Reply
so, how recently did you find out about 420chan? you from 4chinz or cripplechan?

gotta say, your trolling really just isn't up to par, friend. but practice makes perfect, i guess.
Cyril Tillingville - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 23:09:59 EST ID:ocfgTAf6 No.396892 Ignore Report Quick Reply
He's the alt-rights token gay boy that they pulled around on a leash until it started humping children's... or at least word of it spreading around that he has. As soon as that happened, they dropped him once he lost his value to them.

He was always the shock jock trying to get rich quick. This isn't about him being gay and oppressed. It's about a guy using the opportunity to make himself some cash by being "that gay that other gay guys would never say or admit!". It's tabloid fodder and fantasy for those on the alt-right.

"I knew it! I knew that's how the gay community REALLY was like! God damn queers!"
Charlotte Nivingstune - Wed, 06 Sep 2017 23:38:07 EST ID:MJrckolz No.396893 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504755487940.jpg -(67020B / 65.45KB, 520x305) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Nell Monkindale - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:20:05 EST ID:nppI2w1T No.396894 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504758005894.jpg -(182637B / 178.36KB, 1280x330) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
If you learn about something exclusively from people who don't like that thing and want you to hate it, you're going to have some bizarre parody entirely divorced from reality.

I suspect you're trying to tell us what we believe and why it's wrong, but most of what you've said is unparsable to anyone outside your community, having so many references of references of interpretations/cherry-picked examples that don't actually exist outside your community, and I'm sure what you mean is irrelevant as you'd have to understand what you're attacking to make an effective argument.
Walter Blackdale - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:20:19 EST ID:E0iKQ/s8 No.396895 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Boy you sure got them! I bet they're so mad right now!
Phineas Drundlefuck - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 02:01:50 EST ID:Vwoc9qnJ No.396897 Ignore Report Quick Reply
it's like, even actually kinda cute, iono.
Albert Purrywat - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:06:49 EST ID:9hrURYkb No.396905 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I hope he gets eaten by bears
Archie Donkinworth - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 17:54:19 EST ID:VRgE+OpN No.396926 Ignore Report Quick Reply
So the authoritarian left's war on white males and free speech is a creation of the right? Good luck with that in 2020.
Albert Turveyspear - Thu, 07 Sep 2017 20:53:19 EST ID:XqOr0TAj No.396949 Ignore Report Quick Reply
He's a self aggrandizing grifter of incel gamer gaters who clearly disgust him by deliberately being inflammatory at universities. He has nothing of value to say and doesn't actually care about anything he actually preaches. The only response is to just ignore him so he can't make money and will find some other grift.

Phineas Blibberdock - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 02:00:49 EST ID:kZUMXybj No.396966 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504850449925.jpg -(53216B / 51.97KB, 458x507) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
If you really think the "authoritarian left" is waging a "war on white males" then it's pretty hard to explain why political power in this country is almost exclusively controlled by white males. Maybe the authoritarian left is just really, really, bad at waging this war, in which case, why worry?
Shitting Seddlegold - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 05:49:50 EST ID:319yShZN No.396970 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>Maybe the authoritarian left is just really, really, bad at waging this war
Hillary's loss proved that. And it's a worry because I want more viable alternatives to the right, not less. Affirmative action and opposition to free speech has to go for that to happen imo.
Betsy Brudgesat - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 06:12:51 EST ID:fpVtrpHx No.396971 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Hillary is hardly left-wing. She's centre-right, as the Democrats have been for decades or more.

nb for nitpicking
Charles Naggleletch - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:47:50 EST ID:/xEbt2bm No.396977 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>She's centre-right, as the Democrats have been for decades or more.

anyway, Phineas is right. if the current left is truly so incompetent, they will just fail on their own. then someone will take their place. nothing to worry about.

if they do actually manage to oppress and corral straight white males then... they're successful and you're (Seddlegold) wrong about them failing. so... it's one or the other.
William Goddleshit - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 12:03:08 EST ID:zwExrbu5 No.396982 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>Hillary's loss proved that. And it's a worry because I want more viable alternatives to the right, not less. Affirmative action and opposition to free speech has to go for that to happen imo.

fucksake just call yourself a nazi and get it over with
Eugene Worthingfoot - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 12:31:32 EST ID:yqRogU5f No.396984 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504888292848.png -(623474B / 608.86KB, 640x928) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Those who make it impossible for rightists to express peacefully are basically doing the Nazis recriuiting for them, some of these folks are just cosplayers and your desire to exclude all non left options but Nazism resigns then to there. If whites had their own coethnic activism, they not have to go to the idoeologic black market for their fix.
Fucking Blytheson - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 13:31:01 EST ID:dGw4dHyr No.396987 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>some of these folks are just cosplayers
If you dress up like a Nazi, don't be surprised when people call you a Nazi
Hamilton Pittfield - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 13:56:01 EST ID:IIsxRMZh No.396988 Ignore Report Quick Reply
No, see you dress like a NAZI to TROLL people into calling you a NAZI. Because, obviously if you look, and act like a NAZI, it is totally unreasonable to think you are a NAZI....

Eugene Worthingfoot - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 13:58:22 EST ID:yqRogU5f No.396989 Ignore Report Quick Reply
But apply this logic to sluts and you're a bigot, Nazis are allowed the same concessions as a marginalized group.
Name - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 13:58:53 EST ID:+E5Hl7MH No.396990 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>If whites had their own coethnic activism
Hasnt that just been life on earth of like 400 years?
Name - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:01:55 EST ID:ZSIfMWPK No.396991 Ignore Report Quick Reply
GR8 B8 M8
Eugene Worthingfoot - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:22:32 EST ID:yqRogU5f No.396992 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Not at college campuses or in the workforce.
Hamilton Hungerbick - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:33:23 EST ID:9k6SLa8o No.396993 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Actually yes, absolutely when we're talking the past 400 years or so and not just liberal American college campuses for the past coupole of decades. Did you know that?
Eugene Worthingfoot - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 15:36:21 EST ID:yqRogU5f No.396994 Ignore Report Quick Reply
It is contemporary truth and the alt right is a contemporary emergence. What it is in CY+2 matters.
Phineas Blibberdock - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 16:08:49 EST ID:kZUMXybj No.396996 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504901329925.jpg -(70552B / 68.90KB, 960x612) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Sluts just want to fuck people. There's nothing wrong with that. Nazis actively pursued genocide and plunged Europe into the second world war, killing tens of millions in the process. There's some, uh, really qualitative differences there.

You're thinking in terms of whiteness, not in terms of your individual material interests, and that's the source of your problems. No one is seriously advocating passing laws that deprive white people of rights. "White pride" is not the equivalent of "black pride" because whites, in this country, have never faced oppression as white people. White identity did not emerge in response to oppression, as black identity has, but it emerges in order to bolster the oppression of minority groups. That's exactly what happened in the South in the 19th and 20th centuries. A reactionary white identity emerged in order to justify, protect, and extend the privileges of the Southern planter aristocracy (read: not even all white people). And the areas in which "white identity" is most entrenched are the areas where white workers are paid the least.

That's not a paradox. It's the result of white workers being divided from black workers. It eliminates the possibility of either from meaningfully banding together and fighting for their interests as workers - and not in favor of a "workers' identity", but in favor of real material gains that emerge from the real material social relations which actually shape us as individuals.

Snapping out of "whiteness" is necessary if you want to fight for your own individual liberation. Not being scared of black identity, but understanding that it emerges in response to oppression and will only be abolished through the abolition of that oppression, is paramount here. Until then, you're fucked, and you're stuck in that 4ch/pol/ mindset of "well I might not be paid well but at least I'm not black!"
Cornelius Dullyworth - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 20:08:31 EST ID:8QUREhQS No.396999 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Thanks for the chuckle... it was meant to be a shitpost, wasn't it? I can't tell for sure on this board.
Alice Gummerpot - Fri, 08 Sep 2017 21:24:15 EST ID:/NJ9yzrK No.397000 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504920255869.gif -(989184B / 966.00KB, 250x178) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Passive aggressive victimhood is very profitable.
Archie Brobblesit - Sat, 09 Sep 2017 02:18:40 EST ID:nppI2w1T No.397002 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1504937920436.png -(190440B / 185.98KB, 500x672) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
People who say they're "just free speech advocates" when it's only relevant to defending revisionist history glorifying racism and nazi rallies are just crypto-fascists.

Where were these people when Trump proposed imprisonment for burning the American flag?
When occupiers were having literature and technology seized on bullshit grounds or charged with "inciting a riot", getting dispersed despite being peaceful, etc?

If their advocacy for free speech extended to anyone except themselves, you wouldn't see them shut down opposing views whenever it's within their power, they'd be trying to dismantle the same tools that are used to shut down leftists.
Ernest Bobbersutch - Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:39:50 EST ID:1LYQDTec No.397020 Ignore Report Quick Reply
So only nazis want free speech, gotcha. Meanwhile, using racism and sexism via affirmative action to achieve your version of "equality" is perfectly ok? I prefer funny shitposting myself but whatever floats your boat.
Henry Seffingspear - Sun, 10 Sep 2017 01:32:19 EST ID:GmdgEHro No.397037 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505021539051.jpg -(80030B / 78.15KB, 611x936) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
I think Archie's sayin' they're hypocrites because they only support/defend free speech when its their speech, or someone closely aligned. Since they're talking about dismantling "the same tools that are used to shut down leftists", hopefuly its safe to assume that they oppose coercive and authoritarian means.

I'm not gonna lie, its nice to see law enforcement intervene against fascists and white supremacists and their ilk. Just, it doesn't happen often and its nothing to support. I mean even if the law or ruling is against an ideology that I view as dangerous and problematic, not just against me, but against many, it will most certainly contort and be used against others, perhaps me, by setting precedents for authoritarian means such as censorship, violent repression, and cointelpro-like tactics. For example the expansion of the German Government's use of hate crime laws to target leftists there, or by the US Texas lawmakers defining of attacks against police and judges as hate crimes.
Isabella Clopperspear - Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:01:00 EST ID:Vwoc9qnJ No.397058 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>I've never seen a pro-free-speech'er try to silence anyone
Hugh Brarringnig - Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:09:06 EST ID:RECqzvsy No.397059 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Milo is just a libertine populist who hooked on to the alt-right to make money off being edgy. Token fags, nignogs and kikes are hard currency for most white nationalist groups.
Matilda Fobblewug - Mon, 11 Sep 2017 16:13:35 EST ID:IIsxRMZh No.397061 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Like I said, he is a cunt.
Augustus Chettingpore - Mon, 11 Sep 2017 18:42:49 EST ID:GmdgEHro No.397062 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505169769120.jpg -(221969B / 216.77KB, 800x1200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Aye those are good examples >>397058. Another one prevalent around the US is the demand by police and city officials to get a permit for protests. The thing is, its expensive to get a permit, so poor people or organizations can't afford to. Without a permit the police often storm into the crowd hurting people and making arrests, time and time again. Isn't that a violation of free speech?

There are other examples in the past of censorship of newspapers because of their anarchist and/or revolutionary leanings. Such as the Immigration act of 1918. Or more recently (2009) the arrest and prosecution of the SHAC-7 for reposting news concerning the campaign on the internet, under the Animal Enterprise Protection Act, now expanded into the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act.

I don't see the white male being exclusively targeted for their free speech argument as true. Its more because of their ideology and beliefs, profusely racist and fascist ones. And its from other people, not the government. The government seems to treat those people with kid gloves while clamping down hard on people on the left, who may also be white males, but not exclusively.
Edward Blatherville - Mon, 11 Sep 2017 23:35:58 EST ID:9hrURYkb No.397063 Ignore Report Quick Reply
lol this dipshit's house got wrecked by Irma, good riddance
David Brallerhall - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:54:19 EST ID:GmdgEHro No.397065 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Though I do agree with you about the corporate media being interested in ratings and views rather than what is right. They picked up the Trayvon story because there was already outrage fermenting. If it was because of concern the national news outlets would cover more important stuff than celebrity drama and unimportant distractions.
William Bluddlebury - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:20:34 EST ID:AoChzy/t No.397073 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I find it interesting that for all the talk of the left deplatforming it wasn't until the right disowned him because of his pedo comments that his public image actually diminished.
Priscilla Bloddleford - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:50:19 EST ID:uW9KWJtY No.397074 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>I honestly think a lot of the issues we're currently facing stem from the fact that paranoia has become profitable to the media. The way I see it, it's exponentially multiplied the perceived severity of certain subjects while also completely ignoring other subjects.
...and the right owns most of the media. this is not a coincidence.
Ernest Hunderwill - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:28:52 EST ID:KFfQ36Bm No.397076 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>The right owns the media
>This is not a coincidence

Nah man.
6 mega corporations own 90% of the US media.
5 of the 6 donated heavily to Hillary Clinton's campaign.
40% of the evening news in the USA is about the Trump administration.
91% of that news is negative in regards toward feelings toward Trump.
But also, the mass media openly champions leftist politics. It was hard enough just to get the media to stop being so supportive of ANTIFA, yet the media still obsessively reports right-wing rallies as 'supremacist' and 'Neo-nazi' galore even though the right side of the spectrum (that isn't radical) openly hates and denounces Neo-Nazis and supremacists.
Polly Pittspear - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:42:15 EST ID:kZUMXybj No.397077 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Hillary Clinton's not the left. She's not even center-left. Her campaign promises, commitment to neoconservative foreign policy, her tenure as a Senator, and her tenure as Secretary of State, put her firmly in the neoconservative camp. She was identical to George W. Bush on most issues. She even helped depose a left-wing leader in Honduras.

Trump is right-wing, but he's right-wing like Peron was. He's willing to make concessions to the left, as evidenced by the deal he made with Pelosi and Schumer.

>But also, the mass media openly champions leftist politics. It was hard enough just to get the media to stop being so supportive of ANTIFA

I have no idea what you're talking about with this. I've seen nothing but outpourings of disgust for antifa, claims that they're the "alt-left" in order to equivocate them with the neo-Nazis who make up the "alt-right", claims that they're making the Nazis' case for them. Even Noam Chomsky came out criticizing them. The "leftist politics" they tend to champion aren't even leftist, e.g., multiculturalism, that's not "leftist", that's the position of Frederick the fuckin' Great, who said he'd build Mosques for Muslims in Germany, it's the position of Enlightenment humanism. Unless you're just championing some Evola-style reactionary politics, you'll be hard pressed to even find neocons who oppose that.

>the media still obsessively reports right-wing rallies as 'supremacist' and 'Neo-nazi' galore

Probably because most of these rallies are organized by white supremacists and neo-Nazis. The Klan made an appearance at the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, which was organized by white supremacists to begin with. It wasn't Ted Cruz and Mitt Romney going to that event. It was the Daily Stormer.
Thomas Dugglegold - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:43:05 EST ID:15fhL5/p No.397078 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505245385154.jpg -(94717B / 92.50KB, 757x607) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>5 of the 6 donated heavily to Hillary Clinton's campaign.
And Hillary Clinton is center-right, so this fits perfectly with the narrative that the right owns the media.

>But also, the mass media openly champions leftist politics.
Bullshit, you just have no idea what leftist means.

>It was hard enough just to get the media to stop being so supportive of ANTIFA
Man, you can't just blatantly lie and not expect people to notice, get your shit together.
Ernest Hunderwill - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:58:25 EST ID:KFfQ36Bm No.397079 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Well, if you refuse to admit that the presidential nominee from the Democrats represents the left then we haven't got much to talk about.
Also, literally nobody talks about the alt-left yet everybody rails on the 'alt-right' and is constantly trying to expand the definition of 'alt-right' to include more and more conservatives in general.
Ernest Hunderwill - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:00:17 EST ID:KFfQ36Bm No.397080 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I fondly remember that Trevor Noah segment because it was the first instance of a major news outlet not supporting ANTIFA. It was glorious, and everyone was talking about it, ANTIFA included. 'Supremacist propaganda' they called it.
Polly Pittspear - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:07:56 EST ID:kZUMXybj No.397081 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I don't "refuse to admit" she represents the left, she just doesn't. "Left" and "right" aren't represented by the two major American political parties, and the only way can define Clinton as a leftist is if you say the political center is Andrew Breitbart. Clinton voted to authorize the invasion of Iraq, she defended the Defense of Marriage Act and refused to support the legalization of gay marriage until it became politically expedient to do so. She couldn't even get behind the Fight for 15 campaign, she pushed for a $12 minimum wage instead (Bush raised the minimum wage multiple times through the course of his administration, btw. Obama, to compare, only did so once). Even the term "alt-left" was first used against leftists by Clinton supporters on twitter, including MSNBC commentator Joy Ann Reid.

Everyone rails on the "alt-right" because the "alt-right" are actual Nazis and white supremacists. I haven't seen any attempts to include more conservatives in the alt-right, all the people that get labeled that way are either actual white supremacists, or they're deliberately associating themselves with the label (like Steve Bannon and Milo).
Graham Chegglekit - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:14:37 EST ID:nppI2w1T No.397082 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505247277267.jpg -(66927B / 65.36KB, 599x399) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
So if the DNC nominated a ticket of Adolph Hitler/Ayn Rand, you wouldn't talk to anyone who didn't define the left based on those people's views?

Political parties are human organizations that don't coherently fit into one place on a political spectrum. You've got to look at the actions and policies of the individual to evaluate whether they're left or right.
Priscilla Bloddleford - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:48:26 EST ID:uW9KWJtY No.397083 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>Also, literally nobody talks about the alt-left
because that's a figment of your imagination.
Matilda Snoddock - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:18:46 EST ID:xQbV1JEs No.397084 Ignore Report Quick Reply

HAHAHAHAHAH, fuck off back to the future. The Democrats are more rightwing than the Dutch libertarian party.
James Suvingfodge - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:50:55 EST ID:k1T4yVqN No.397085 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>it was the first instance of a major news outlet not supporting ANTIFA
You're not even a good liar. Major news outlets have been critically reporting on antifa, the black bloc, the "alt-left", et al., and their tactics from the very beginning.


This isn't counting all the coverage that merely mentions antifa in passing without going into detail or opinion, which obviously falls under the rubric of "not supporting".
James Suvingfodge - Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:18:05 EST ID:k1T4yVqN No.397087 Ignore Report Quick Reply
ignore that last one that obviously came out after nb
Cornelius Hovingwell - Wed, 13 Sep 2017 23:01:11 EST ID:LGbkirdI No.397104 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>and uses that unpleasent and toxic f word constantly
Fidget spinner?
Sophie Murdshaw - Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:31:26 EST ID:xQbV1JEs No.397105 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffucking uderaged boys.
Ernest Hubberfield - Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:19:38 EST ID:kMHRWa3R No.397110 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505427578629.jpg -(47229B / 46.12KB, 400x340) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Isn't Milo a persona non grata nowadays?
George Crellermodge - Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:46:01 EST ID:JS2STE3y No.397111 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505429161998.jpg -(115199B / 112.50KB, 1024x576) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
AFAIK, he said something about older men fucking young guys, and it got construed as him defending aggressive pedophiles or something.

Now he is blacklist.
Caroline Wushdere - Thu, 14 Sep 2017 20:59:04 EST ID:IIsxRMZh No.397112 Ignore Report Quick Reply
He said older guys fucking young boys was just spiffy for him.

That sort of thing sets people off. Even lunatic fringers....
George Paggletet - Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:48:48 EST ID:JS2STE3y No.397115 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505440128992.jpg -(23182B / 22.64KB, 395x395) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
I don't think that he literally said that it would be okay for older men to fuck young boys without any qualification, not that it matters at this point.

Just went back and watched the actual clip. I guess he's saying that a sexual relationship between a person in their late 20s and a person in their young teens can be consensual. Which is clearly not true in the strict legal definition, but I take his point that there are certainly young persons around the ages of pubescence ~12,13,14ish that are actively seeking to have sex with older adults.

I think Milo was getting too big of a head, he really started taking off in popularity during the election season. I guess he thought that his gay card would give him carte blanche to talk about anything regarding sex.
Eugene Fuckingford - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 05:21:01 EST ID:xQbV1JEs No.397116 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505467261234.gif -(1022562B / 998.60KB, 364x337) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
I bet Milo is that fucking faggot that keeps talking about pedophilia on /b/ and /sa/. We should fucking permaban him.... FROM LIFE!
George Brishpirk - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:14:12 EST ID:NxR1iOYW No.397120 Ignore Report Quick Reply
he literally said it was a good thing for his sexual development that a catholic priest sexually engaged with him when he was 13.

he just became too edgy for his own good, basically. i mean he literally refers to himself as "edgy", so...
Caroline Wushdere - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:52:22 EST ID:IIsxRMZh No.397123 Ignore Report Quick Reply

Also, Milo ain't the picture of mental health. One has to wonder...
Barnaby Pickworth - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:29:02 EST ID:kMHRWa3R No.397124 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1505503742745.jpg -(14749B / 14.40KB, 250x328) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Well it didn't surprise me. Well what he said did but not that the words came out of his mouth.

The guy is the ultimate troll, ok? A white, gay and goodlooking asshole saying shit that triggers the fuck out of the SJW crowd. No wonder he'd think he could pull it a bridge too far.
Caroline Wushdere - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:44:56 EST ID:IIsxRMZh No.397125 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Probably the most accurate analysis of him. The guy was literally shit out of 4Chins collective unconscious. Some sort of Jungian archetype made up of online awfulness. It was only natural he eventually find that "bridge too far." Because, he was looking for it.
Lillian Braddleshaw - Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:04:40 EST ID:n2QXqOEe No.397126 Ignore Report Quick Reply
The gay mafia is real and Milo was being to real about the bacha bazi.

Report Post
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.