420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
Subject
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
Is matriarchy a better way? by Ian Sucklesere - Fri, 22 Apr 2016 17:26:24 EST ID:i3QzAXqS No.205759 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1461360384746.jpg -(6776B / 6.62KB, 275x184) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 6776
Bonobos
>ruled by females
>peaceful
>all bisexual and thus more progressive.

While chimps are violent and ignorent. As both species are close to us genetically I think this supports my argument that women are better leaders than men.
3 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Bombastus !RZEwn1AX62!!xXxJO70U - Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:37:38 EST ID:i6Id+/bH No.205803 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205788
Bonobos are a type of chimpanzee.

>>205795
Just let the thread die. He's clearly not open to discourse right now

However, in case he is, i'll this C&P post from the feminism containment thread:

[spoiler]
Bonobos
>ruled by females
>peaceful
>all bisexual and thus more progressive.
They don't have a notion of progressivism. They're fucking chimps (literally). However, I will grant that their peaceful society revolves around them releasing their built up rage on shit like rampant sex.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
James Pettingforth - Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:23:46 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205806 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205803
nb because this thread needs to die quickly,
but Bombastus, Bonobos are not Chimps. Bonobos are pygmy Chimps, an entirely different species than Chimp whom share a common ancestor. As I was saying, Chimps and Bonobos do not communicate because they're bisected by a major river. Chimps are a warrior species of ape and they often murder other Chimps, where as the Bonobos do no such thing, at least not nearly to the extent of Chimps.

Bonobos also face a sexual crisis other apes don't; they're over 66% female. Such a wide gap between sexes is pretty much unheard of in Primatology outside the Bonobos, as far as I can tell.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/07/3/l_073_03.html
>>
James Pettingforth - Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:06:23 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205807 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Yes, you see, the Zaire river has controlled primate immigration in the Chimp/Bonobo area. I guess 2.5 million years ago the river dried up and the larger primates bailed on the area as a whole whilst the Chimp predecessor remained in the area, and then the Zaire river started flowing again and their population was split in half, leading to the formation of the Northern Zaire Chimps and the Southern Zaire Bonobos. The Bonobos got it good, but that's because the apes they should be afraid of, the Chimps and Gorillas, are not able to reach them.

I mean, I guess from a social standpoint you could call Bonobos a little more progressive than Chimps since their culture is so peaceful, but at the same time you've got to understand that that's a stroke of good luck. Very rarely does nature allow for 'peaceful' animals to take it as easy as the Bonobos have been doing these past million years. But if the Zaire were to suddenly dry up, I have no doubt in my mind that the Chimps would probably forage south and end up commandeering the Bonobo's land, pushing Bonobos out of their home and toward extinction, so I could hardly call Bonobo's advanced seeing as they have such glaring flaws that nature has allowed them to overlook.

I love Primatology. Primates and humans are almost identical, psychologically, and I often find it fascinating the way in which most simple humans operate no different from an ape, hell they even look like apes, some of them.
>>
Betsy Braddlebere - Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:17:34 EST ID:K7HlIj+R No.205811 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Bonobos are all pretty inbred I reckon.
>>
Shit Sabberpit - Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:43:27 EST ID:/3eoXSbg No.205814 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1461685407063.gif -(2097140B / 2.00MB, 286x186) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>205806
>>205803

Yep. Besides, comparisons between humans and other great apes aren't very reliable as chimps and bonobos represent contemporary relatives and not the 'natural' state or primitive examples of Man. They are just as evolved as we are, having followed a different evolutionary path than ours. Naturally they will evolve different behaviors that suits their particular environment.

Humans are warlike because that's the nature of the tribes/groups who survived to the modern age, and as such war and struggle is evidently a hard necessity for survival in the competitive human world.

nb shit thread


kant and you!! by The Fool !oj3475yHBQ - Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:43:54 EST ID:G2LMnx/t No.205746 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1461289434921.jpg -(34114B / 33.31KB, 506x278) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 34114
Write what you think the main point of his Critique was, because I keep hearing him in reference to establishing the non-reality of things, that everything is subjective, and in general confirming deterministic materialism.

But what I'm finding in re-reading his work is that he actually seems to establish the soul as a real object, that we have no choice to accept that sensible objects are objective, and all around seems to confirm the majority of ancient mystical explanation of the universe.

Anyway, I've resolved to write a commentary on it, and it would help me greatly if y'all would input your opinion of his work here, with an explanation as to why you think the way you do...
>>
Hannah Hannergold - Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:54:50 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205749 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205746
The Fool, are you familiar with the term Qualia or the philosophy behind it?

I honestly think that Qualia is a real trait and that humans have always known about it but deemed it different things, using words like 'soul' and whatnot to describe it. Before I studied philosophy I referred to Qualia as 'conscious experiencers' when I would try to talk about the way in which beings consciously experience the things around them with feelings.
>>
Bombastus !RZEwn1AX62!!xXxJO70U - Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:36:40 EST ID:i6Id+/bH No.205762 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205746
I've never really read his Critique of Pure Reason and am slowly building up to it by reading the antitheses to Kant like Hume, Sartre, etc and fully understanding them before I even touch Kantian metaphysics.

Have you started from there, foolio? I personally think you'd get a lot out of Kant's Critique if you fully understand what he is really critiquing.
>>
Bombastus !RZEwn1AX62!!xXxJO70U - Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:47:12 EST ID:i6Id+/bH No.205765 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205749
>54PBc
you are a good poster

nb for sucking Hannah's dick
>>
The Fool !oj3475yHBQ - Fri, 22 Apr 2016 19:45:24 EST ID:G2LMnx/t No.205766 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1461368724640.gif -(454266B / 443.62KB, 500x381) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>205749
I am familiar with the term but forget where it came from, my gut wants to say Descartes? speaking in relation to "the knower"?

Words like Qualia, Soul, Ego, are ultimately describing the same function, but their philosophical semantics are different.

Qualia, as I know it, is the concept of "the knower" but with an emphasis on awareness of sensory input. Ego, can either inspire the concepts of Id-Ego-Superego.. or the eastern interpretation of the illusory self. Soul is often associated with "spirit", possessing western connotations, and the implication of the self existing a priori to this reality.

I noticed from your last posts that you seem to have a particular liking for the term Qualia, is there a reason for this? I myself am picky about words and prefer Ego or Soul, though I think it is also a good I idea to use Qualia from the perspective of using a descriptor that doesn't have the psychological impact of religious connotations. I would use it for this reason, but I also think the aesthetic of a word is important... and I think Qualia sounds ugly... I think it might be because it has too many syllables to describe something that is paradoxically simple.


Sartre by Ernest Fuddleset - Sat, 02 Apr 2016 12:10:35 EST ID:LdHLS4vG No.205522 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1459613435630.jpg -(237110B / 231.55KB, 541x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 237110
Hi all,
A bookstore near me has several works by Sartre, and I was wondering if any are worth picking up for the amateur/hobbyist philosopher. In particular, they have 'Critique of Dialectical Reasoning Vol 1' and 'Being and Nothingness'. Do you find his ideas useful? What are your critiques? I think it's important to add that I'm basically a Marxist who understands Sartre as trying to move past Marxism, and wonder if I could find some insights from him. French mid-twentieth century general thread maybe?
18 posts and 7 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Frederick Blussledack - Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:44:13 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205723 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205722
Osho is a lot of fun. He's a bit dogmatic, but he's also got many wise points. Like, his whole 'if you love a flower, don't pick it, let it be,' thing really helped me affirm my belief that true love is selfless where as selfishness, wanting to pick the flower, is not love but is really just instinctual greed.

What'd I move on to? Hmmmm. Well, I was never a student of philosophy, more of a philosopher, like a mathematician that never picked up a book on math. I was always sitting around thinking, never really paying attention to others' ideas or reading philosophy. But then when I was binging on Absurdism and Existentialism (I had no idea those were their names at the time) I had the bright idea to just type my ideas into Google, and then that's how I found Descartes and Camus. So I read a lot about them and their ideas to begin with, and I found that I agreed with them most of the time. Then I really didn't read anymore philosophy until freshman year of college when I suddenly became way into Buddhism. I read a lot of Koans at the time. Koans are good; they're very deep, very thought-provoking. I really just wanted to figure out how not to be miserable, but then I realized Buddhism, like any other popular school of thought, was full of bullshit. But then I started reading about Siddhartha and his philosophy, and that was pretty epic. The original Buddha really was quite a genius in philosophy, psychology and science (at the time). Then I took an Eastern Religion class one day and I ended up become a big fan of Confucius and the Taoists. Confucius understood humanity's innate need for social hierarchies and philosophized about it a lot, about how to take advantage of it, while the Taoists were writing about how good and evil are subjective. I really learned a lot from Confucius and Taoism. Then I got into the ancient greeks like Aristotle, Socrates, Pyrho, the Stoics and the Cynics. Today, I would say that even though I am my own philosopher, my philosophy very much lines up with Taoism and Cynicism, but that doesn't help much when trying to describe myself since nobody around here knows what a Taoist or a Cynic are, especially…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Frederick Blussledack - Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:50:03 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205724 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Philosophy has changed me, from an angry, hate-filled, miserable youth into a calm, relaxed, perpetually-happy young adult. That being said, I don't think it would have happened if not for that entire year I spent in bed internally bleeding. I lived in a world of hell where things like dreams and aspirations didn't exist, and I realized during this time that happiness is a way of life, not something you can obtain. It's about accepting everything that's wrong and then just trying to be happy anyway. I'll never forget this one time I had to clean out my colon with salt water, but my colon was covered in cuts, so the salt water burned like fuck. I couldn't do it at first, but then I got blazed and watched Steve Brule and I was just laying there trying to do this thing right shouting, 'FOR YOUR HEALTH!' and then I had a nice laugh even though I was experiencing hellish pain.
>>
Hamilton Smallcocke - Tue, 19 Apr 2016 21:25:48 EST ID:LdHLS4vG No.205729 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205723
First off I am heartened and impressed that you've found solace. I'm still having trouble but you are inspiring.

I was unconsciously thinking that as time went on philosophy would just get better and more complex but that's funny. I recently read Tao Te Ching myself. I am very conflicted about it. On the one hand it FEELS right but I feel like it's ultimately a reactionary system that normalizes feudal relations (I understand Confucius is also this way but I've never read). On the other hand, he is so right about keeping people living simply, because what has capitalist progress brought us but further degradation and misery? Sometimes it's very hard to believe that socialism is a possibility.

So far I like Osho, he is a little dogmatic maybe but he still tries to emphasize how Buddha's teachings weren't dogmatic or doctrinaire but rather emphasized consciousness as opposed to obedience. Osho is at least better than Theravada. But Osho maybe trends towards the "Buddhism" I like which is Zen. I have a lovely volume called "The Zen Teachings of Bodhidharma", and Osho sings his praises.
>>
Phoebe Gopperbodging - Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:10:25 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205736 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205729
Haha eh I wouldn't call it solace, I'd use the word balanced, maybe even wisened. I like to think anyone who's miserable can get to a perpetual state of happiness, they just have to learn appreciation for what they do possess in this life, which sadly I think is a quality not innate in humans due to our primal urges, our primal need to constantly advance and accomplish and win, never being content with what we have. I'm content with what I have even though I'm actively trying to gain more, and I think because of it I can appreciate the things I've got and the things I'm going to get in a much richer, more fulfilling way than people who gain the things they want but then can't help but want more almost immediately. I think that whether I lose everything I have or gain innumerable riches, I'll be happy either way. But, at the same time, happiness requires mental stability, and that is something I'm sure I will lose if my brain becomes old and brittle, which is sad but inevitable, and I don't believe in fearing the inevitable. I undergo existential crisises once in a blue moon, but they never actually make me budge because I know that would only make things worse rather than better.

Yeah, Taoism does feel right, but I guess one thing to consider is that what feels right is how animals make decisions, where as humans have the gift of critical thinking, which can persuade us along toward other decisions we'd never feel are right. Like say for instance some meat you had smelled awesome but you knew it was well past it's expiration date; if you were an animal you'd just eat it, but due to critical thinking you can take factors into consideration that go beyond the scope of our senses, like microbial shit. I've never seen a germ, but I know what they can do and I fear them for it, where as I assume no other animal knows what a germ is. Luckily for them, their mouths and stomachs are way better at killing germs than ours.

I don't think capitalism has brought us misery. I think capitalism has brought us all a great deal of happiness, and I think that is a big part of why people are so miserable. Ever seen that episode of S…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Phoebe Gopperbodging - Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:12:13 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205737 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I mean, I guess I think that regular people love looking up to geniuses like Siddhartha, but these normal people sadly can never do what he did, intellectually, so they just emulate him in hopes of at least tasting what his life was about, found a whole religion and way of life in his honor in hopes to maybe even produce more of people like him. That's genetic diversity for you, none of us are the same.


Polytheism and Duotheism by Simon Dinnershaw - Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:47:30 EST ID:Y/XbV/Gq No.205361 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1458136050252.jpg -(291929B / 285.09KB, 1200x927) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 291929
Why is believing in more than one god so bastardized and held less credible than monotheism or pantheism? Why is not thought as much as a possibility as one god is? One would think ANY theism is as credible as the other in such a supernaturalistic society! Yet this is not the case. Is it the books of yhe abrhamic religions that gives it more credibility? Why have do many people turned away from the idea of more than one god/godess? Is this simply due to an advancement in science? I think not. If this were the case doubting the existenxe of any number of gods would be way more common! My idea is that it has to do with the development of our psychology. Is it possible this is due to the loss of the hypothesized bicameral mind? I think so.
13 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Jack Niggergold - Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:05:15 EST ID:SxS3NBjy No.205442 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205439
what i meant is that the writers use a specific methodology which might ignore certain information and contradict alot of what we regard as common knowledge. It is also doubtful that they will ever have conclusive proof. However one of the writers has answered many of the criticisms and maybe filled alot of those holes that can be poked in the thesis.
>>
Nathaniel Dankinforth - Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:02:38 EST ID:oGmfq4CI No.205651 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1460584958641.png -(106564B / 104.07KB, 665x598) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>205361
To answer your first question, it's simply because in early western society polytheistic religions were very dour whereas christianity and islam offered hope for a better world: heaven. That's it. Aside from that your post is rife with fallacies, such as the statement that polytheism is "bastardised". This is onky true in western societies for aforementioned reasons. In eastern cultures the idea of polytheism is very much accepted by religious folk, Hinduism being the biggest of the eastern polytheistic religions. Nb for not knowing qhat you're talking about
>>
Bombastus !RZEwn1AX62!!xXxJO70U - Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:30:11 EST ID:2BUykYck No.205680 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205361
>how does wind work?
>a god, duh
>how does sun work?
>a god, duh
>how does water work?
>a god, duh
*SCIENTIFIC ENLIGHTMENT
We learn about the great things like:
Convection currents, chemistry/nuclear physics, lunar tides and space, etc.

Oh. Well we don't need those Gods anymore. I guess we'll still keep Allah, Buddha, some Hindu Gods, representations of Ra, Kinich Ahau, Quetzalcoatl, etc because we still don't know how LIFE works.
Having multiple Gods in this modern day is a bit less "logical" than just having one creator. Mainly out of history but also because: what would multiple Gods accomplish now that science has killed magic?

I personally hope we never will figure out how life "works". It's more fun that way.
>>
Cedric Lightway - Sat, 16 Apr 2016 22:53:47 EST ID:yKPN7ShC No.205693 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I've heard there's a long tradition of logical and mathematical arguments proving the existence of god, like, one god.
>>
Albert Chagglehatch - Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:46:32 EST ID:1iJ/Y3fp No.205703 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205693
Sounds like some nonsense STEM autists would get up to.


Debating and Emotions by Fucking Fucklenore - Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:09:21 EST ID:cceXWbXx No.205111 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1456211361862.gif -(1924957B / 1.84MB, 320x240) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1924957
I want to become an improved debater but I often find that my emotions tend to get the better of me and causes me to make silly claims.

What are some methods to improve ones detachment from the discussion? What are some ways to improve debating in general? I wish to be objective as possible.

Is passion always a negative in debating? Sometimes passion can bring an argument together in a very nuanced way. If you feel very strongly about something, you can come up with great comments yet sometimes slip up with that same passion; or is it the same passion?
2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Doris Cropperman - Sun, 28 Feb 2016 01:59:46 EST ID:2a0IcN4f No.205142 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205111
Argue cases you don't believe in. Even though you don't believe in the conclusion, it's still a worthwhile act as it tests and help improve those you argue against, i.e. those who argue for things you believe in, or will weed out those less committed.

Also, if you study much philosophy, you may become suspicious of One Truth viewpoints. All we've got is models, and things can often be explained in different ways. Models are just tools, and being able to swap or use multiple tools is a useful skill. Try https://www.coursera.org/learn/model-thinking, it's a great course, and while not directly related to this thread, it'll help develop your fundamental thinking abilities.

I agree with Cedric - focus on learning, not on winning, and respect your opponent - a good opponent really helps develop your skills and your case. Passion is great and keeps you working towards the goal, but keep in mind that an emotional argument will look desperate and likely won't serve your cause. Passion combined with control makes for a much more convincing debater.
>>
Reuben Blennerfud - Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:00:01 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205224 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205191
That's a damn good point. I also want to say, if someone personally attacks you in a debate, you shouldn't attack them back. Every on-looker respects the least-aggressive debater, unless they're like Ben Carson-level timid and can't make any points but instead just kind of sit there looking weak.
>>
Matilda Clunkinworth - Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:23:40 EST ID:ilqQHcFL No.205655 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Passion isn't always a problem in debate. One time when I was in high school, I was debating against a team from another school and when they ran a plan that contridicted their socialism critique of my argument (I believe it was a conservative "balance the budget" plan) I rather angrily took a swipe at them in my closing statments that they didn't understand what socialism was. The judge heard that and let me win the round due to their fuck up. It's all well and good to be impartial when debating, but sonetimes using anger or other emotions to make your arguments more understandable is a good way to win the round.
>>
Basil Mendledan - Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:36:48 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205670 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Hey, I'd like to bring up an example of passion and emotions not working well in a debate. Just go check out the Feminism thread. It's a riot.
>>
Bombastus !RZEwn1AX62!!xXxJO70U - Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:10:27 EST ID:rh6Cues6 No.205677 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205670
good post.


Philosophical Movies by Phoebe Cennerkare - Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:52:20 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205629 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1460389940291.jpg -(231394B / 225.97KB, 500x650) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 231394
Hey! So since movies are a bit more popular than anime, how about a philosophical movie thread!? I love a good movie that makes you think.
Let's share our philosophical favorites.
2 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
> Lucas - Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:06:50 EST ID:7dPbsx8Z No.205633 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205629

THX-1138, the movie George Lucas made before the original Star Wars. Robert Duvall plays a drone human being in a factory run by heartless corporate psychiatrists that use humans as medicated slaves to produce fissile devices, probably nuclear weapons or reactors, from the implications. Robert Duvall's dorm mate (who he is banned from having sex with, he only gets a masturbation tube) plays with his mandatory medication to shack up with her coworker on the psychiatric security monitoring panel (they even watch in your home), and he loses his mind and gets charged with drug evasion, which none of the psychiatrists figure out, despite agonizing tests.

The highlight of the movie is a holo-television channel that's just a cop (all robots) beating a guy over and over again, and Robert Duvall watching it off his meds.
>>
Polly Dubberdale - Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:38:27 EST ID:Xsq09IUl No.205638 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205629
honestly, a lot of films can be philosophical.
Check out Zizek's A pervert's Guide to Cinema/ideology.
And this youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nerdwriter1?nohtml5=False
>>
Nigel Pushwat - Tue, 12 Apr 2016 21:21:58 EST ID:A2cqqF/n No.205642 Ignore Report Quick Reply
A Clockwork Orange is philosophical.

But I disagree completely with the message.

The idea that it's wrong to deny a sociopath a "choice" as to whether he does good or evil[%]

Never in fact have I disagreed so strongly with a message in a movie that I simultaneously enjoyed.
>>
John Crinderbanks - Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:13:01 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205647 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205642
The more I watch that movie, the more it makes me want to actually attempt something like the Ludivico technique. I have no qualms with robbing criminals of their freedom.
>>
John Crinderbanks - Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:25:53 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205648 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205647
>Rubber
>Wrong Cops
>Reality

Quentin Dupieux makes great films. He's clearly a French director/musician that loves absurdism. At the end of his first film, Rubber, he points out that movies don't make sense and that things just happen for seemingly no reason since you never know the full background. Rubber is literally just about a man trying to watch a tire go on a killing spree and get killed by the cops. It's a movie about a man watching a live movie, but it's filled with totally absurd events.

Also, I want to give a shout-out to Reality for having a scene where a man gets a phone call while watching a movie, and then in the movie he's watching a little girl starts watching a movie, and in that movie within a movie is the man talking on the phone in real time with the man watching the movie of the little girl watching a movie. It was a really good scene.

And a shout-out to Wrong Cops for having Marilyn Manson play an edgy little boy that gets kidnapped and forced to listen to techno music.

If you're a stoner, do yourself a favor, get high and turn on a Quentin Dupieux movie.


Why some relationshits don't work out by Fish Raping - Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:09:28 EST ID:woBdV4w1 No.205566 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1460016568472.jpg -(92136B / 89.98KB, 600x450) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 92136
Ok, we all know the guy who is super nice to girls
behaves a littlebit like a little male gay mermaid
and wonders why he gets "friendzoned" all the time.

Is it maybe because This guy just looks for sluts or princesses?

I am not saying it is easy to find the right one...
but how about looking at least for a women with the same interetst as you?
And not beeing creepy at the same time...

I've experienced rejection a lot, had some broken relationships because bitches cheated on me
or just left without explaining why.
Took a while
until I realized - or rather stumbled by luck - over a very cool and "nerdy" girl
who like videogames, comics and has a dirty mind and goes to some cool concerts with me.
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
16 posts and 5 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Albert Gettingludge - Fri, 08 Apr 2016 16:27:25 EST ID:7sJ/68Ak No.205598 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205593

>There is a feminism thread started by Bombastus just stating

>World women's day. Take over, faggot queers. Fight on.

No philosphy at all for the entire first half of the thread, just an excuse to invite more shitorms regarding feminism.

I posted the first response to that thread questioning why it was even made in the first place. The other thread wasn't even worth responding to but those dumb feminism threads are a dead horse that people won't stop beating.

>yeah, this is toootally philosophy, but where the fuck is the neck beard outcry against that shit?

You would have seen it if you read the damn thread. But no, just continue to shitpost and try to read way too deeply into this because you have once again overestimated your own brilliance.

>In context to all these threads, how can you even try to assert that OP should fuck off, for it is obvious that his thread is more philosophical in nature than many others on this board.
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Charles Pickfield - Fri, 08 Apr 2016 16:54:46 EST ID:Xsq09IUl No.205599 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205598
>Why even have the board in the first place then?
>just let the board be awful
its a shithole assplug of 420chan, i have no idea why its still here, its such a disgrace to actual philosophical discussion it might as well be aborted, no matter how much id like to see interesting philosophical discussion.
>>
Charles Pickfield - Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:17:26 EST ID:Xsq09IUl No.205601 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1460150246668.png -(28922B / 28.24KB, 186x208) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>205600
>>
Albert Gettingludge - Fri, 08 Apr 2016 17:17:57 EST ID:7sJ/68Ak No.205602 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205599

Sadly agreed
>>
Hannah Tillingham - Fri, 08 Apr 2016 19:55:27 EST ID:Soe7ybKu No.205608 Ignore Report Quick Reply
You have to find someone you don't other, and someone who doesn't other you.

Friendzone-nice-guys and PUA share the fact that they see women as something other and alien. Whether they put women on a pedestal or see them as the enemy, it's the same problem.

It's not enough to overcome it yourself, you have to find someone else who has overcome it. However it does become easier to find people who've opted out of that mode of of thinking once you've overcome it yourself. Once it's clear you've opted out, people who've been avoiding you because of your immaturity will stop ignoring you.


Psychology 100 by Fucking Bengerpatch - Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:19:16 EST ID:7dPbsx8Z No.205559 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1459891156718.jpg -(43516B / 42.50KB, 605x454) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 43516
It's everyone else, not me!
>>
Graham Sibblewit - Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:35:14 EST ID:JI+mBg/O No.205563 Ignore Report Quick Reply
There is no "you" independent from your genetics, environment, and possibly the effects of probablistic quantum phenomena.
>>
Dick - Thu, 07 Apr 2016 08:54:40 EST ID:54PBc7Id No.205573 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Couldn't have said it any better myself.
But regardless, they are they, I am I and you are you, so naturally they focus on themselves, you focus on yourself, and I focus on myself.


Netjester Discussion by Fuck Herryfuck - Fri, 01 Apr 2016 17:25:19 EST ID:1EFZ7rI0 No.205512 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1459545919044.jpg -(24046B / 23.48KB, 460x276) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 24046
Who is Netjester?
>>
Netjester !AI.skYnEt - Fri, 01 Apr 2016 17:25:21 EST ID: iLikEToleARn No.205513 Report Quick Reply
1459545928380.jpg -(438551B / 428.27KB, 920x1024) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>205512
Os is windows 7 easily pirated or am I stuck with it forever, tehn eventually every now and then? This is not like WWE are saying, certainly girls who flash anybody that asks are relatively slutty. And i don't want you to receive my message and not run again.
>>
Jack Niddleshit - Fri, 01 Apr 2016 17:30:58 EST ID:jYnY0gcA No.205514 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205513
Reserve your free copy of Windows 10 Today!


Free Will and Causality by Claus Cunt - Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:08:20 EST ID:jd2LNh4u No.205449 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1458850100447.jpg -(76484B / 74.69KB, 936x636) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 76484
Pickup something small and drop it on the floor, or don't. Now that you've made a choice, at the moment of decision, could you have made the opposite choice from the one you made?

[Forgive if bump when metaphysics thread already exists or whatever. I'm new to /pss/.]
7 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Hedda Brirrypurk - Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:41:36 EST ID:/3eoXSbg No.205492 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205491

Then that would mean you're defining free will differently than the Abrahamic concept, don't you think? Remember that it is originally a religious idea where God gave man the ability to be his like in spirit, meaning that God would not have control over persons in their choices.

The 'illusion' might be nothing more than a cultural invention. Our brains are a form of decision making machines, what we refer to as 'free will' is merely the experience of the process of estimating the better option. Our culture has arrived to the conclusion that our will is 'free' because people in ages past recognized that we have options to pick and decisions to make, yet blindsided the fact that 'only one' option is actually available to us thanks to circumstantial forces and effects, i.e. previous experience, state of mood, mental abilities, context, stochastic variations etc.

Psychology gives this line of thought some support, as countless studies have shown that people are in fact rather predictable. When you ask; "think of a tool and its color", the vast majority will think of a red hammer. Some studies have even showed that at least for quick or random decisions, the brain makes the choice before the subject is even conscious of it.
>>
Barnaby Fudgehick - Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:11:21 EST ID:jd2LNh4u No.205494 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205491
>Predeterminism
Mane, I already took 3 phil classes in college before I dropped the minor (though I got all the dank ones). What is predeterminism? Also /b/ doesn't have philosophy lol.

>>205492
>The 'illusion' might be nothing more than... context, stochastic variations etc.
Hedda, when you talk, my dick gets hard. So well said. If you're not a girl, don't tell me.
>>
Cornelius Sembletutch - Wed, 30 Mar 2016 03:52:50 EST ID:/3eoXSbg No.205499 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205494

>If you're not a girl, don't tell me.

I can be anything you want, hon ;)


>>205495

Would there be any difference? We're still in charge of making choices, no matter whether the "I" is free or not.

That said I cannot deny the utility of the concept. It makes things easier with regards to guilt and justice, personal responsibility etc.
>>
Jack Menkinwater - Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:01:42 EST ID:T8713H5j No.205500 Ignore Report Quick Reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frHGcQIYk2Q

Might be relevant to your interests OP.

Ortega is a hard determinist. Me, not so much.

But I agree with him that whether determinism is correct or not, there is no libertarian free will.
>>
Jack Menkinwater - Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:02:48 EST ID:T8713H5j No.205501 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205495

What's so good about democracy to begin with?

Note: I'm asking you a question; not making a statement.


Women's Studies by Beatrice Shittingridge - Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:08:32 EST ID:yGcx3rkn No.205366 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1458151712830.gif -(40747B / 39.79KB, 585x450) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 40747
What is this all about? Why would anyone major in it? What sort of jobs does it get you? I attempted to major in Art/Graphic Design and only finished a 2-year AA, so I'm not one to talk about useless degrees. It strikes me as even more useless than art and more popularly disliked, but am I missing something about the pro side of the issue?

This whole division of modern universities appears to be the whipping boy for anti-SJW mouthpieces on the internet. While I am perturbed by the excess of PC culture, I do acknowledge that systemic issues in the USA present disadvantages to certain groups of people. My brother, who is somewhat liberal but notoriously close-minded when it comes to personal taste, and bad with women, got a Facebook bitchslapping by our lesbian cousin, who works as an RN, for reposting some meme that dismissed Women's Studies as "a degree in professional whining."
52 posts and 6 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Edward Wicklemed - Sat, 26 Mar 2016 21:14:45 EST ID:7sJ/68Ak No.205479 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205478

This is supposed to be a philosophy discussion board, not an elementary school playground

P.S., my dad could beat up your dad, cocksucker
>>
Nigel Gobblewell - Sun, 27 Mar 2016 00:40:49 EST ID:GyagyXCK No.205480 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1459053649208.jpg -(18789B / 18.35KB, 640x483) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>205479
my mum could beat up your dad.
>>
Jenny Blarryfield - Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:36:09 EST ID:jd2LNh4u No.205488 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Feminism sucks because it's too contentious to discuss civilly. People major in women's studies so they can discuss it civilly. My mom is gangster as fuck, so fuck you nb
>>
Graham Nickleham - Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:47:12 EST ID:x1FW0Qkw No.205496 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205391
"Not giving someone a platform" isn't censoring them in any way.
>>
Graham Nickleham - Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:53:34 EST ID:x1FW0Qkw No.205497 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205475
>keep feeling inadequate and threatened, whitey.
>Thank you for that racism/sexism, please just keep proving your group is a hate group for me.

Way to miss his point entirely. The only person he's calling insecure here is you.


Scientology and Dianetics by Recently Clear - Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:50:49 EST ID:rbHojDsj No.205117 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1456437049442.jpg -(29699B / 29.00KB, 520x221) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 29699
Hey I was redirected here from /b/ even though I'm not sure why a thread is moved for being off topic in a board called random but alright.

Anyone else working their way up the Bridge to Total Freedom? I know Scientology gets a bad rap here but I recently went Clear and noticed a drastic improvement in my ability to communicate, my memory and overall happiness.
25 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Kocoayello !jxaL03vL/Q - Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:05:36 EST ID:gvdNptq8 No.205289 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205281
People defend it.
>>
Charlotte Bardson - Sat, 12 Mar 2016 02:48:37 EST ID:tkHbs9Y8 No.205291 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205289
People will defend any belief. Is the flat earth society a legitimate religion? Do E-prime speakers constitute a legitimate religion? When teenage girls argue about the correct way to apply eyeliner, are they defending legitimate religious beliefs? I think your definition needs a bit more definition.
>>
Kocoayello !jxaL03vL/Q - Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:28:22 EST ID:gvdNptq8 No.205292 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205291
Does it have an ontology or a history, a lore. Does it have spiritual practices and rituals? Icons or dieties to pray to and ask guidance from? Well, are these questions even applicable?

Look at Animism, or Panpsychism. The Earth's oldest religion. There are no real histories, lore, spiritual practices or rituals. It has an ontology,which basically sums up to a quote from Pocahontas:

"And I know every rock and tree and creature, has a life, has a spirit, has a name"

And those spirits would be the icons or dieties. Greater cosms of being make up greater beings, from atoms to chemicals to creatures to planets to galaxies and beyond, everything makes up a bit, a role, a subroutine, of the larger spirit it belongs too.

But look again, it has no real histories, lore, spiritual practices or rituals. No holy book of Animism. But it's the world's oldest religion.

That being said:
>Is the flat earth society a legitimate religion? Do E-prime speakers constitute a legitimate religion? When teenage girls argue about the correct way to apply eyeliner, are they defending legitimate religious beliefs?

All of those could become religions in their own right if enough people or even just one put enough time and effort into it. The Flat-earthers start wearing flat-earther robes and writing flat-earth psalms when they get together? Religion. Speakers of E-Prime begin charging disallowed words as sigils? Religion. A random girl in Iowa goes into her closet for application and has to do it in front of a Hey Arnold type of shrine made out of makeup tools while reciting incantations? Religion.
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Kocoayello !jxaL03vL/Q - Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:02:19 EST ID:gvdNptq8 No.205414 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205282
>Hows it any different to "if you believe in x book you shall go to x place and be saved!"?

Little do people know that this is how dying actually works. Or at least should.
>>
Walter Cubberbot - Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:08:53 EST ID:WC+NHKeH No.205415 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>205414
wat


<<Last Pages
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.