420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
Subject
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
/THREAD. by Tycho Brahe - Thu, 21 May 2015 16:45:28 EST ID:eJc7PJV5 No.55333 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1432241128199.png -(2032459B / 1.94MB, 1350x1350) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 2032459
DICKS EVERYWHERE
>>
Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:51:05 EST ID:Y+TLwE2a No.55813 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55333
bumping to see no one respond to this gay thread
>>
Thomas Gold - Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:13:52 EST ID:Z2XGH5kJ No.55831 Ignore Report Quick Reply
praise the great comet~
comets be praised and comet us some comets sowe cancomet more comets.
also,idig comets and you should too,praise comets!


Relativistic Quandary by Isaac Newton - Mon, 27 Apr 2015 22:50:40 EST ID:4px0o/Io No.55260 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1430189440737.gif -(6064B / 5.92KB, 100x100) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 6064
A field force propagates at the speed of light forever. Suppose this field force causes a quantum reaction when it encounters certain particles. This reaction releases a gamma ray burst in all directions.

Now suppose an observer is sitting in the direction perpendicular to the asymptote of the gamma producing event. {pardon the unwieldiness here is a visual representation: )-> }

Does he notice an increment between detecting the gamma ray, and detecting the field force? Or does he experience it all at once, as an event horizon?
>>
Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:00:52 EST ID:Y+TLwE2a No.55814 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55260
PLEASE GIVE ME (ZACHARY) A THEORY OR YOUR 2 CENTS ON HOW THIS SCHIZO-AFFECTIVE DISORDER MAKES TELEPATHY POSSIBLE///////////////

Thanks in advanced.
>>
Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:04:30 EST ID:Y+TLwE2a No.55815 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55814
You can't deny satanic magic either.
>>
Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:44:12 EST ID:Y+TLwE2a No.55816 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55260
i believe gamma radiation made Bruce Banner into the hulk. So to answer your question to the best of my ability i'd have to say "Rev up those dicks 'cause i sure am a huge faggot!"


Let us not forget... by Pierre-Simon Laplace - Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:53:43 EST ID:Z0dqdxc5 No.55789 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1446584023256.jpg -(149151B / 145.66KB, 630x900) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 149151
... who started it all.
>>
William Huggins - Tue, 03 Nov 2015 23:01:23 EST ID:tQX5ylFX No.55790 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55789
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np-yQBK5GKk

Come home Laika.
>>
George Airy - Fri, 06 Nov 2015 12:33:32 EST ID:PH3oCvC7 No.55793 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1446831212081.png -(419043B / 409.22KB, 848x480) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHp5mKArr9w
>>
Pierre-Simon Laplace - Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:49:07 EST ID:gmBbIyqN No.55802 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1447163347544.jpg -(246280B / 240.51KB, 600x900) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
http://www.mediafire.com/download/4i7b76tb8d37sgh/Laika+%28GN%29+%282007%29.cbr

Fictionalized comic account of the story of Laika and Sergei Korolev
spasibo tovarish Laika


Star showing signs that could be (probably aren't) alien constructions. by Giuseppe Piazzi - Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:00:07 EST ID:ruKNVqHw No.55749 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1444842007788.jpg -(1059519B / 1.01MB, 1400x788) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1059519
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/10/14/weird_star_strange_dips_in_brightness_are_a_bit_baffling.html

> “Aliens should always be the very last hypothesis you consider," Penn State astronomer Jason Wright told The Atlantic, "but this looked like something you would expect an alien civilization to build.”

Basically Kepler has observed a star with dips in it's luminosity exponentially larger than any planet would cause. Even a Jupiter-sized planet would only account for a 1% drop. But the object or objects observed by Kepler cause a drop of up to 22%, indicating an object or cluster of objects roughly half the width of the star itself.
17 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Kip Thorne - Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:49:44 EST ID:jod01xxr No.55775 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55759
The planetary collision is a bit unlikely. As it says in the paper the chances of it happening in just 3 years of data would require every star to undergo 40 such collisions, unlikely. It also lacks an infrared excess.

The preferred explanation is a family of comets. Comet comas can get extremely large despite havering very little mass. They could also have elliptical orbits and so dodge the infrared observation from WISE. The nearby companion star could also disrupt the stars Oort Cloud.
>>
Jan Hendrik Oort - Sat, 24 Oct 2015 20:58:41 EST ID:ruKNVqHw No.55776 Ignore Report Quick Reply
SETI has aimed their equipment at the star in question and apparently detected something. Right now it's all under wraps and waiting for peer review, but SETI astronomers are allegedly very excited about whatever has been detected.

It's important to note that this doesn't mean aliens, just that they detected a signal they may not have expected to hear. Allegedly, planetary collision is still the theory being carted around scientific circles. We'll know more in the coming weeks.
>>
Alan Guth - Sun, 25 Oct 2015 08:37:11 EST ID:sky71Ye7 No.55777 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55776
Source?!

Man, if this turns out to be alien stellar engineering, it would be fucking nuts!
>>
Jan Hendrik Oort - Sun, 25 Oct 2015 09:09:54 EST ID:ruKNVqHw No.55778 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55777

Links below, but it's now moot. The statement from Gerald Harp of SETI about a repeated signal has been removed from the first link despite being present earlier yesterday. And the second link has another statement from Harp claiming his first statement wasn't accurate and there haven't been any signals at all. So we have two conflicting statements from the same man with the second statement confirming the first ones existence despite attempts to erase it.

Probably just crappy reporting, but backpedaling of this nature happens so often in regards to aliens that a little tinfoil may be permitted. It's up to you what to take from this.

http://www.universetoday.com/122971/seti-institute-undertakes-search-for-alien-signal-from-kepler-star-kic-8462852/
http://www.grenzwissenschaft-aktuell.de/seti-empfaengt-periodische-signale-von-kic-8462852-20151022/
>>
Alan Guth - Sun, 25 Oct 2015 09:32:39 EST ID:sky71Ye7 No.55780 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55778
>Awaiting more accurate information about the way the signal before, but from an interview by "UniverseToday.com" by Dr. Gerald Harp from the SETI Institute, shows that it is a "weird periodic signal", " which although potentially natural origin but there is clearly value to examine it more closely. " Besides the natural explanation, so stressed "Universe Today", prefer Harp but also "a distant intelligent source" into consideration.

Google translated it, so sorry for the weird wording. It's interesting though, but a bit surprising that they'd discover a "weird periodic signal" so easily from 1500 light years away just like that. I'm no astronomer or anything though, so what do I know?

About the back-pedaling: I work at a university communication department, and I'd say it's likely to be a journalistic citation error. The paper isn't peer-reviewed yet so there is probably an embargo on details from the SETI study results, which would explain Harp rescinding his earlier statements. As the comment came so early in the publishing cycle of the article they're likely to yet check for errors or anomalies in the study, so making a comment about a detected signal at this point would be very unwise.


Idea for launching small payloads to obrit. by James Mother Fucking Randi !lwriJ94kMg - Fri, 25 Sep 2015 22:33:15 EST ID:3KDKAApy No.55685 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1443234795649.jpg -(16847B / 16.45KB, 320x240) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 16847
I've always wanted to build a real rocket that could go to space, but it's far outside of my peasant like budget. So I've thought of what seems like a good idea for a cheap solution to launch vehicles to space.

Use a balloon to lift a small stabilized platform that has a rocket on it. The rocket launches from there into orbit.

And when I use the word platform I don't literally mean a flat launch pad but something that sort of looks like a missile launcher...idk what the technical term for that is...turret?

You could also scale this idea up for conceivably larger loads.
One problem I can see though is when the balloon goes up it would drifts away from the launch site and possibly fuck up your launch.
8 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Christiaan Huygens - Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:18:44 EST ID:fYWUR8OT No.55741 Ignore Report Quick Reply
You would not even be able to determine when your projectile leaves orbit due to GPS restrictions.
>>
James Mother Fucking Randi !lwriJ94kMg - Tue, 06 Oct 2015 18:25:22 EST ID:3KDKAApy No.55742 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55741
Elaborate?

My method in my op is more for getting things into orbit not leaving earth orbit.
>>
John Wheeler - Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:18:27 EST ID:Y//WNNPR No.55743 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55742
I believe what they are saying is: this type of flight is not really possible from a simple rocket (unless you happen to have a strong AI laying around and the ability to get it to pilot your rocket, I guess). There are a lot of measurements that have to be taken throughout the flight for numerous different reasons, NASA, et al, have the ability to shine lasers at and from their rockets, along with all sorts of other atmospheric sensors both on the vehicle and on the ground to get very precise measurements which are used during the flight to make sure the vehicle is doing exactly what it needs to be doing at each moment.

A dumb rocket, even one that can generate the speed to get into orbit, is going to have a snowballs chance in hell of actually getting into orbit because it can't make any corrections mid flight; you'd have to get super lucky and have innumerable atmospheric factors be completely optimal for your rockets design for such to work.

Remote piloting or autonomous piloting could be possible if your ship also had the sensors to collect the needed data, but that's far outside of the hobbiest realm.
>>
James Mother Fucking Randi !lwriJ94kMg - Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:58:46 EST ID:3KDKAApy No.55744 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55743
Fuck all that I'll just let it dumb fire and land where it may, weather it's on an orphanage or an embassy. I don't care.

Jokes aside I guess you're right about all that stuff though.
I guess this would be really only useful for short sub orbital flights.
You know, like for sending a go pro or small rodent way up there for pictures and science.
>>
James Mother Fucking Randi !lwriJ94kMg - Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:52:47 EST ID:3KDKAApy No.55745 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55744
After thinking about this more, if I'm only doing sub orbital flights then GPS data should still be useful and viable since it would still be below all the sats.


Theoretic Astrophysics by John Bahcall - Wed, 30 Sep 2015 21:09:31 EST ID:5ViW/6q0 No.55720 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1443661771886.jpg -(61531B / 60.09KB, 500x333) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 61531
my new theories in the creation of, and ultimate fate, of our universe. As well as what dark energy really is; and POSSIBLY has something to do with where gravity is permeating into our universe from, since it is weaker than it should be compared to the other forces, even though that really wasn't intended to be included with the rest of the theories. I could be totally wrong on all accounts, but I do love the ideas.Here we go! (Keep in mind that we don't know what the inside of a black hole is like, certainly not a 4D black hole.. the 'polar ends' talked about here could give off gravity due to strange possibilities, like space within space... the 4D black hole that is theorized here to give us our 'spacial plane' could also be sitting inside a spacial plane itself, and it's so large that it reaches the maximum edge of its bending - on the outside of the 4D black hole)

BUT ANYWAY AGAIN, here we go.

Outside of our universe it is theorized that energy is being formed and popping out of existence continuously, at the planck scale. It's theorized this is where our quantum singularity came from. Through quantum tunneling, that tiniest of energy became the singularity that eventually birthed our universe. The problem is we don't know why it expanded in the first place, or why there was more matter than anti-matter as for us to have enough matter, a significant enough amount, as to form galaxies and the universe we know. They believe there are infinite universes, or a multiverse, with every possibility of physics realized. But I'm only concerned with our own, and the answers to these questions. Continue to read and you might agree that it is much easier for our exact universe to continuously be recreated with the exact same amount of matter as this one; which would be highly significant if true because that means the physics that produce life would also be eternally renewed, and without much time needed for it to happen in comparison to random universes. And what a pleasant thought that is.
It is my theory that not only does energy at the planck scale pop in and out of existence, but also multiple singularities constantly coming into existence as well. Keep in mind we do…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
8 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Bernard Burke - Sat, 03 Oct 2015 00:51:43 EST ID:5ViW/6q0 No.55732 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55731
That's your problem for not paying attention to the theoretic astrophysics community and how singularities come to be when there is nothing present, or the multiverse theories. Which is also why you don't understand that not all hypothesis of these people is always laid out by math. You have to create your own clues before going into the math. I don't expect everyone here to understand that.
>>
Bernard Burke - Sat, 03 Oct 2015 00:55:53 EST ID:5ViW/6q0 No.55733 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55731
Though yes you are correct, my biggest problem facing me starting out here is why the singularities would ever collide. The exotic properties within this multiverse sheet reacting with a singularity that mostly exists within nothingness, and before having the coined 'spacial plane', will be impossibly hard to flesh out further. I'd have to get the attention of someone within the field.
>>
Robert Dicke - Sat, 03 Oct 2015 16:22:31 EST ID:cTrnVs8H No.55735 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55733

Why don't you go to school to be a theoretical physicist and then YOU will be that somebody in the field.
>>
Pierre-Simon Laplace - Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:54:10 EST ID:N+uGi0dP No.55739 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55721
can I ask if this fits along with an idea I had where all the planets are mathematically "flat" but they bend away from you the further you go from them?

Like those old drawings of a series of flat disks on top of each other but there are 4D ways to transition from any disk to any other disk without having to go through them (going around planets after they appear sphere like due to distance bending)
>>
Pierre-Simon Laplace - Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:56:39 EST ID:N+uGi0dP No.55740 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55735
$$$$$$


I tried by Tadashi Nakajima - Sun, 27 Sep 2015 23:01:19 EST ID:NCcXgNdu No.55692 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1443409279643.jpg -(116934B / 114.19KB, 2592x1728) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 116934
✓ Overcast
✓ Too late to set up tracking
✓ Sensor needs cleaning
9 posts and 4 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Joseph Taylor Jr. - Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:34:50 EST ID:mfxeJeEW No.55719 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55718

I figured it was sunlight hitting the panels, I just haven't seen too many satellites personally, and I've never seen any get real bright and dim out twice within such a short time. Like I said, it could've been my brain playing tricks on me, but my girlfriend said she saw it change direction as well. It was like when you're going into an S-curve on a street. Just kinda veered west for a moment and then back to the original position heading south. Thanks for the explanation though. I'll keep that in mind.
>>
Viktor Ambartsumian - Thu, 01 Oct 2015 16:24:49 EST ID:9+WA5MM9 No.55724 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55717

that sounds like an iridium flare. But also could have just been a tumbling satellite that reflects sunlight, since you said the brightness arced more than once.
>>
Viktor Ambartsumian - Thu, 01 Oct 2015 16:29:43 EST ID:9+WA5MM9 No.55725 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1443731383998.jpg -(643705B / 628.62KB, 2000x1333) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
DICKS EVERYWHERE
>>
Margaret Burbidge - Sun, 04 Oct 2015 06:22:01 EST ID:UwTIku3P No.55737 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1443954121436.jpg -(116215B / 113.49KB, 500x661) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>55692
>Using ✓s instead of s
Ban this heretic
>>
George Gamow - Sun, 04 Oct 2015 12:53:54 EST ID:NCcXgNdu No.55738 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55717
Satellites would only appear to move in one direction. It was probably some high altitude aircraft or weather balloon.


In the year 2069 by G - Thu, 01 Oct 2015 01:09:01 EST ID:WHXsRUFD No.55722 Locked Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1443676141681.jpg -(77479B / 75.66KB, 800x425) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 77479
If humans are going to build a city on the moon this century it should definitely be done in 2069, if they do it in 2068 or 2070 instead it will go to waste.

It'll go down as a historical fact until the end of time that the City/Colony was founded in 2069. IMO Earth's Moon is the most romantic spot in our galaxy so it might as well be associated with 69ing.
Locked
Thread has been locked
Thread was locked by: C_Higgy
Reason: /wc/


Becoming a multiplanet species, breaking free from nations. by George Herbig - Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:52:15 EST ID:P+fSJ1RL No.55648 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1441054335956.gif -(2406963B / 2.30MB, 256x170) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 2406963
I want to start a discussion of becoming a multiplanet species. Weather that be on Mars, or one of the many Earth sized exo planets. for those let's assume a way to use the Alcubeirre equations has been invented To me moving out of our home planet is an inevitability. What I'm not so sure on is our penchant for clinging to imagined borders.

What is it going to take to break free from that? I could see Mars ending up being its own nationality so to speak. From a governance stand point I can see the practicallity, each planet will mostly be responsible for running it self. The alternative or events leading to that style would be akin to the Roman empire becoming too big to manage.

So yeah, general ideas, hopes, anticipation for how things will be. Discuss becoming a multiplanet species and the evolution of governance that will soon follow.
12 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Gerard Kuiper - Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:17:29 EST ID:BF8zYeiD No.55672 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55671
What would be the point? A corporation exists to make money. There's no profits in piling the resources it would take to own/run a planet that most of the human population would never visit. RIP Planet Starbucks.
>>
Antony Hewish - Mon, 14 Sep 2015 22:09:19 EST ID:P+fSJ1RL No.55673 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55672
Most likely it would be the larger industrial corporations. Not many of those exist with an interest in space, yet. Unless in the future a multicorp with industrial, exploration, and Scientific interests exists. It may end up being large enough to fund an employee colony. Though it will be results driven and may not be intended to include civies, perhaps family would be counted in rare cases.
>>
!qCv3kE3pMI - Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:27:37 EST ID:M7NMNbPp No.55675 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1442377657015.jpg -(389862B / 380.72KB, 1280x1024) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
gas vapor fed plants and printed meals, who wants to go there when being there is "there"?

p.s. nanana
>>
Daniel Kirkwood - Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:09:14 EST ID:P+fSJ1RL No.55676 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55675
It sounds like a dim prospect. But with enough off hours with allowances for extra activities and maybe even EVAs for no O2 worlds. Could be fun, might be covered by shitty mega corps, but those involved will have to know that they signed up to head a new place to live. They get to forge a new planetary culture, even one day claim sovereignty. The galaxy is a large place and likely hard to govern.
>>
Bernard-Ferdinand Lyot - Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:42:00 EST ID:AlxomEpB No.55698 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55673
Might not be a corporation though. It could be ideological or some psudeo religious movement.


First telescope by Michael Angelo - Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:34:55 EST ID:6SPuxxpR No.55682 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1443144895835.jpg -(728331B / 711.26KB, 1920x1080) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 728331
Hello, I'm looking for some advice for a first time telescope buyer. I was thinking about buying the Celestron 76mm Firstscope as its not to expensive and if I find that if astrology is not for me it's not really a big loss. Any advice or other telescopes would be great thanks.
>>
Allan Sandage - Sat, 26 Sep 2015 04:08:14 EST ID:NCcXgNdu No.55686 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Dobsonians are going to be the best bang per buck. The larger the aperture, the more light gathering capability it will have. Plan to spend several thousand dollars for astrophotography minus the SLR or CCD to take pictures with. The mount is almost more important than the scope here. A heavy GOTO mount (equatorial pref) with tracking capability is important for taking long exposures although you can take many shorter exposure images and stack them in Photoshop. Store bought refractors are generally garbage. If you really want to go that route Explore Scientific makes some nice refractors. Newtonians are a different story. My nephew's other pop bought him a store bought Celestron Astromaster, and although the mount could blow over like a leaf, the optics on the scope were pretty good. Dobsonians are Newtonians on a lazy Susan like bottom mount with two forks. You can get a large aperture here for comparatively very little cash. The only downside is that it doesn't really lock in place. Besides refractors and newtonians, there are catadioptric cassegrains. These are reflectors like the newtonian, but they are compact and expensive.

tldr: the AstroMaster 114EQ is $200 at opticsplanet.com
Eyepieces cost $50 dollars. Don't start off with a scope that costs the same as an eyepiece.


simply thowed by sure - Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:14:31 EST ID:j+4cQgXm No.55674 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1442376871693.jpg -(396674B / 387.38KB, 1280x1024) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 396674
a birthday will come


420Sagans by Joseph Taylor Jr. - Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:01:09 EST ID:1BegxnY+ No.55664 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1441807269900.png -(385493B / 376.46KB, 539x800) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 385493
Vote for naming the 51 pegasi star 'Carl' and it's 51 pegasi b planet 'Dot'

In honor of Carl Sagan

It's a bit further down on the page



http://nameexoworlds.iau.org/systems/114


<<Last Pages Next>>
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.