420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
Subject
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
Language by Hugh Pemmlespear - Fri, 23 Sep 2016 20:37:43 EST ID:LLbnIWz+ No.36839 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1474677463399.jpg -(138968B / 135.71KB, 800x1067) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 138968
Are we going to have a one world language? Which one will it be, english, esperanto, binary, 1337sp33k?
8 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
George Gimmerwitch - Sun, 26 Mar 2017 18:24:48 EST ID:Xeo3AjGs No.37181 Ignore Report Quick Reply
How can I learn Esperanto? Any good resources?
>>
Ernest Blugglesug - Sun, 02 Apr 2017 18:29:24 EST ID:5uZuS+Mg No.37188 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1491172164555.png -(922428B / 900.81KB, 1280x718) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>36856
got news bro. you're on a PC on the internet. It's the most dark ages version of direct mind-machine interfaces. I'm manipulating your political views with my language and words.

Sad reason to hold off on the awesome tech we will see in our life times. For sure a balance to be had with security and privacy. But honestly every problem we forsee is really already upon us in some form, and is really driving the direction of society as we speak. Our civilization aware or not as a whole is currently deciding on all the shit we like here at /FTL/
>>
John Mashshaw - Sun, 28 May 2017 18:33:42 EST ID:d8NB0kCv No.37219 Ignore Report Quick Reply
A mix of Cantonese and English would be tight
>>
Jenny Sisslekutch - Sun, 20 Aug 2017 07:27:47 EST ID:H6WJ9d1v No.37296 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37219
yeah Gnor yill that shit my gwaylo
>>
Phoebe Grimway - Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:03:58 EST ID:fFv+OUiq No.37303 Ignore Report Quick Reply
At the moment English is the closest thing we have to a global language but it needs to become more anarchic and/or democratic. Currently the anglophone centre countries want to have their cake and eat it; they want English to be a global language but they still control the use of it. While English is well-known for it's ability to adopt new words from other cultures, there is still a hugely paternalistic way in which this is done.

"non-native" English learners around the world have to put up with a myriad of very culturally specific words and idioms in english texts. Yet, if an English speaker from a non anglophone country wishes to insert their own culural concepts into an English text, they are usually forced to italicise it or define it, rather than letting it be. The reason being that they have to pander to anglophones. A future English should be more loose with words from different cultures and allow more flexibility from non-anglophone cultures.


Brain in a Jar by Esther Susslestodge - Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:19:42 EST ID:glhM6xUu No.37096 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1486754382394.png -(342047B / 334.03KB, 625x631) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 342047
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20161004-were-developing-brains-outside-of-the-body

> In fact, making a brain isn’t as difficult as you might expect. With a few simple ingredients – and an unquenchable enthusiasm for drenching things in alcohol – you too could have a miniature brain in a matter of months.

> Finally, the developing brains are enveloped in a blanket of jelly. “It’s the opposite of normal jelly – it starts off as a liquid which you pour on and it jellifies as it warms up in the incubator,” she says.

> The man-made brains are already transforming our understanding of the brain, its disorders and what makes humans special.

> So what does the future hold? Several groups are working on improving the brains, introducing a blood supply so that they can grow larger

> For many scientists, the ultimate goal is for the brains to function like normal brains

Not sure if /n/ or /wc/
13 posts and 3 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Cedric Chiblingridge - Sat, 08 Jul 2017 12:56:52 EST ID:Fhvy4FkY No.37258 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37247
Yeah, but will you use copper cables to re route your fear of pain or will you just have nerves of steel?
>>
Therm0ptic !cyBOrG7t12 - Sat, 08 Jul 2017 20:41:02 EST ID:1dd4reS9 No.37261 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37258
That is left to personal preference, as long as it's a good show.
>>
Hugh Bozzlefield - Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:41:42 EST ID:Fhvy4FkY No.37264 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37261
>Missing the reference.
What a shame.
>>
Therm0ptic !cyBOrG7t12 - Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:21:17 EST ID:2feL1BLa No.37265 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37264
Im sorry. Idk how I could forget a reference like that.
>>
Alice Sillerwell - Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:28:04 EST ID:N2FTDK17 No.37302 Ignore Report Quick Reply
should the dynamics of brain composure in the dna be capable within the ranges of structural composure , sounds like a why not idea to specify and speculate on the emergence of it itself


Music by Martin Mubberway - Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:32:41 EST ID:CtiEz7SY No.37293 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1503171161830.jpg -(211234B / 206.28KB, 1024x683) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 211234
What music will be popular in the future?
My prediction is that people will get fed up with all the technology and electronics, to the point that non-electric instruments make comeback. Expect a lot of horns and real actual drums instead of drum machines and synths. Also in the electronic music field the more tribal sounding genres will gain popularity for the same reason, people want some contrast to their cybernetic lives.

Theories welcome and feel free to post songs, let this be the one music thread in futurism.
>>
Nigel Pidgeman - Wed, 23 Aug 2017 01:47:15 EST ID:Ef0FyvmU No.37299 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I dunno. Maybe all those fags calling themselves musicians on the internet when they actually only make gay dubstep in FL studio will fuck off. But I doubt it. That would be the best case scenario.

Hopefully real music will become a more popular thing and not just some electronic fad that everyone seems obsessed with. I need more shows, gigs, tours, lessons, jam sessions, etc. And I play basic keys, guitar, some bass, drums, and I'm an audio engineer. I also have a 50k dollar education and degree in music.

It really chaps my ass when some 18 year old senior acts like they are on the same level as me or deserve more work than I do because they can press play in a DAW. I fucking hate all this dubstep house wave whatever the fuck. It has took the barrier of entry (actually learning to be a musician) away and just made dickheads soak up more morsels of an already dead industry with halfassed shit. I saw these faggots all the time in music school. Some middle class white boy shows up with a pair of beats on his head and all he cares about is making drum loops or farting around with synths. Meanwhile, the serious people are spending hundreds of hours in the practice rooms while these fuckups goof off in the student lounge or just don't show up. Then at the end of the year, 20 people in the class are down to me, Doug and Jon. Not because the classes were hard, but because nobody got the practice hours logged. Then you see them bitch about how they are struggling or how music school is suuuucchh a waste of money and effort and how they wished they would have just bought a live rig or built their own studio but mom'n'dad wouldn't spring for 20k in toys. Then in turn, after arguing with the teachers and bad mouthing them and the school at every chance, you look into a school and they have 7-10% graduation rates and that causes the state to put the screws to the school because of stupid middle class parents sending Billy Fuckup to get a degree as Eric Clapton when Billy really just wants to sleep all day and jerk off to hentai.

But I'm way off topic. Of course, this isn't my canned response of, "Well, HousecoreVapourwave isn't my thing but I can respect it." that I'…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Nell Fuckingwater - Sat, 26 Aug 2017 07:03:56 EST ID:2TG1RO3c No.37300 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37299
I think most successful musicians have spent less time learning. You're pretty much at the far end.

However most of them did actually do some graft even if it was just practicing for half an hour every week night, a couple of hours at weekends and playing open mic nights every week until they got good. You don't need to go to anything like the lengths you did to be a great musician.

I used to hang with a guy who does "futuristic psytrance". He's spent half his life promoting metal gigs and plays guitar at a fucking high level, I know he's got serious chops. He's got the musical knowledge but he makes more money giving lessons to psytrance wannabes and playing festivals in europe. I think he applies the musical knowledge. Plus he's technical as fuck, he researches the and pours love into everything he does.

However yes, if your response is really only about the countless hacks who have no recognition beyond 15 friends on soundcloud then yes. However even electronic music includes a lot of genuine musicians. In the end it's not about electronic music sucking as a genre but about how low it makes the bar for entry as you said.

I think every genre of substance will continue to evolve and cross polinate with other genres except punk because punk is closed as fuck and throws out anything outside it's existing template and stagnates into mediocrity while it's closest relatives (and some more distant genres) pick up it's cast offs and thrive.
>>
Fuck Blatherman - Sat, 26 Aug 2017 08:04:33 EST ID:Ef0FyvmU No.37301 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37300
Depends on your definition of successful. Most people say successful and immediately describe rock stars who actually did just make it lucky and almost all those guys will fall into poverty when they stagnate, and have no other career and can just play their songs. Hell, look at Mayhem for example. One of if not the most prolific black metal band who've reinvented then genre at least 2 times came through and played their 2nd most well known album for its 20th anniversary and they filled ~250 tickets at a 400 person show in a major US city. Then there are likes of Saliva who made a ton of money, but will end up burning it all up before they are 50. Then when they are spending their last years regaling old tales, what will it be for when they are broke and irrelevant?

I define success in music personally as being able to support yourself on music if you actually like doing it for the remainder of your life. But everyone else who isn't really invested think it is making 400k dollars in one night. And I also recognize you can get by on bar night after bar night just playing the same 200 classic rock songs. I know lots of people who do that. I know lots of musicians who do the stuff they don't want to. I've had to teach dubstep shit before to make money. It is what the market wants so you do what is in demand.

I was mostly just annoyed at the electronica area of music. They really cause a massive issue for the school I went to (and probably ever other music school) which I am loyal to and always have the biggest fucking ego's ever. They don't know shit, can't do shit, then act like they are the coolest fucking guy to ever bless your presence. Kinda like the 17 y/o DJ with 2 Peavey PA speakers and an Ipod.

I also spent a mountain of time learning music and other instruments just so that I can pull as many gigs as possible. My main thing is drumming. And within that group, I can play nearly any genre you can think of and do a show relatively comfortably. But I can also show up to the same amount of shows on guitar and bass and keep my head above water. Even with reading which hardly anyone seems to care about. (Which I fucking hated reading for 3-4 years solid.[spo…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.


SUICIDE BOT by Shit Dissledale - Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:58:46 EST ID:nh8ev3o3 No.37273 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1501009126500.png -(817103B / 797.95KB, 720x641) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 817103
This Security robot in DC drowned itself. We really do live in the strangest timeline. Everyday I read headlines that give me futureshock.

https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2017/7/17/15986042/dc-security-robot-k5-falls-into-water
>>
Beatrice Blackshaw - Fri, 04 Aug 2017 10:28:38 EST ID:tbZY7sH7 No.37275 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>shitty bot has a malfunction
>DUDE WHAT IF they had suicidal thoughts lmao
>>
Martin Hembleridge - Fri, 04 Aug 2017 13:16:20 EST ID:Y4Mp81lN No.37276 Ignore Report Quick Reply
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/crispr-dna-editing-2/
>>
Martin Mubberway - Sat, 19 Aug 2017 16:31:17 EST ID:CtiEz7SY No.37295 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37275
>>37273
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjDAxXj9H8k#t=9m57s


Remote emotion sensing and other amazing break through with spooky feels. by Ebenezer Duvingworth - Sat, 22 Jul 2017 03:51:06 EST ID:5uZuS+Mg No.37272 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1500709866278.jpg -(147371B / 143.92KB, 673x960) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 147371
Apparently scientists at MIT are working on wi-fi heart beat monitors. And using that coupled with an ai they can now figure out your emotional state remotely. Some Minority Report shit right there.

I'm starting to get spooped. Post amazingly awesome tech that is also spoopy.
We live in interesting times. Most of our old scifi dreams are in some way a reality and now we are going beyond in some areas.

https:/ /thenextweb.com/artificial-intelligence/2017/07/22/scientists-create-ai-that-uses-wi-fi-to-see-emotions/#.tnw_cuc8d9eQ


What's the Capitol of Earth? by Matilda Babberstone - Thu, 20 Apr 2017 18:12:09 EST ID:taca/r37 No.37195 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1492726329272.jpg -(67691B / 66.10KB, 350x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 67691
Hey guys, let's talk about this. If a period of Global government did arise, what do you think would become the capitol?

And sure, most of us on this board might be ready for a leaderless future run by enlightened technology, but a lot of the normals aren't there yet and they're probably gonna need a transition phase.

The obvious choices seem like the big ones. The ones with a lot of history and institutions. It'd be kind of cooler if they went with something smaller though, like how a lot of US state's biggest cities aren't the capitols.

What would you nominate?
23 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Hugh Bozzlefield - Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:40:57 EST ID:Fhvy4FkY No.37263 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37262
Intelligence is still thought to be an emergent property. At some point we'll make a powerful enough computer with a learning algorithm that's sophisticated enough to be intelligent and then... At some point after that maybe we'll get intelligence.

I imagine our attempts to replicate intelligence or aspects of it will make it more likely or maybe we'll even be able to understand enough to replicate it before realising we've already made it.

We can't do it yet but we'll do it eventually, on purpose or by accident.
>>
Lydia Hingerspear - Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:31:17 EST ID:LLFOBKEt No.37268 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I'd vote for Tibet
>>
Phyllis Buzzforth - Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:50:40 EST ID:5uZuS+Mg No.37269 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37268
My geometry is the best but doesn't tibet have the tallest mountain in the world?

This is a great place, I second if a space station capital is too much.
>>
Phyllis Buzzforth - Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:53:13 EST ID:5uZuS+Mg No.37270 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37262
> its just pattern recognition or basic math at the end of the day.

Sounds like how we think tbh fam. Wait am I a robot?

Frack I'm on of those damned toasters aren't I
>>
Oliver Gublingshaw - Sat, 19 Aug 2017 10:22:10 EST ID:+Et3EAWJ No.37292 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37270
You haven't asked to toast anything yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRq_SAuQDec


Will we be a starfleet? by Emma Suckleworth - Sun, 02 Jul 2017 02:16:31 EST ID:5uZuS+Mg No.37248 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1498976191029.jpg -(5971B / 5.83KB, 250x138) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 5971
Do you have faith of the heart?
>>
Therm0ptic !cyBOrG7t12 - Mon, 03 Jul 2017 19:10:06 EST ID:qwVmMQcI No.37249 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I am 100% sure that we are capable of building ouselves a Star Trek TNG future.
However, I think what will really happen is a Warhammer 40k future. And that's my optimistic opinion, I look forward to it because it will be fascinating.
>>
Charles Buzzson - Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:44:36 EST ID:f7q9aPIo No.37252 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1499276676909.jpg -(68201B / 66.60KB, 1091x795) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Personally, I think it will be periods of ST:TNG interspersed with periods of WH40K, with occasional flashes into moments of Ian Bank's Culture like ascendance (and perhaps occasional genuine desolation and apocalypse.)

Anywho, the present idea of the US Space Corps is garbage and must be destroyed. Is the militarization of space inevitable? Yes. Do we want to delay it as long as possible, especially considering volatile global geopolitics? Abso-fucking-lutely. Do we want the present US Administration and military-industrial complex to be remembered in time immemorial as responsible for its formation? ABSOLUTELY NO WAY OMGWTFBBQSHITNIGGERWHATREUDOING?

Besides, if it were as presently proposed and you got in, most likely you would spend 99% of your time hacking satellites and/or preventing satellite hacking from a computer chair in the back of some air force base. Not very starfleet. NASA will still be NASA, and perhaps more crucially, SpaceX will still be SpaceX (et. al) is you want to really have the faith of the heart, and go where your heart can take you.
>>
Awe' God !!vVWR8L52 - Fri, 07 Jul 2017 09:20:49 EST ID:NVu/UDVa No.37254 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1499433649791.jpg -(333146B / 325.34KB, 1920x1080) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>37248
MFW life is self fulfilling prophecy and with this knowledge I will ride among the stars.
>>
Matilda Bardgold - Sat, 08 Jul 2017 03:56:07 EST ID:5uZuS+Mg No.37255 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1499500567013.png -(158133B / 154.43KB, 700x674) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>37252
>Besides, if it were as presently proposed and you got in, most likely you would spend 99% of your time hacking satellites

No that's cyber division. Also new branch of armed forces. Only their guns are called 1337 h4ck2.

Also it's my understanding the military side will get more ships in orbit and maybe a Moon base. NASA hasn't put ships in orbit for a while. Talking conventional style manned craft that isn't a crapsule. If NASA rides with the mil-space they an keep exploring while mil-space provides expansion.

Space X can keep diggign tunnels or landing old tech rockets and virgin galactic can drive up the civies but those private programs will never ever get this species off this rock that task is too great. They can just service the regular jack offs and yes rich ass wipes are regular jack off in space because they are so stupid death is almost certain.


Other futurism forums and such by Shitting Snodhood - Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:09:24 EST ID:n/jrUNSq No.35147 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1408190964149.jpg -(45990B / 44.91KB, 500x404) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 45990
Where does everyone here get their future fix? I feel like there's maybe 5 of us posting here tops.

Seriously, roll call. Post if you check this board regularly.
26 posts and 5 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Thomas Cheddleman - Fri, 19 Jun 2015 03:09:09 EST ID:wWq4Hvrm No.36231 Ignore Report Quick Reply
http://n-o-d-e.net/

not bad

I particularly like the presentation
>>
Therm0ptic !cyBOrG7t12 - Mon, 20 Jul 2015 19:53:41 EST ID:LjAGXJLB No.36269 Report Quick Reply
1437436421509.jpg -(334587B / 326.75KB, 1920x1200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
So there's this new podcast. Their first guest was Tim Canon who is one of those biohacker types; he's pretty cool. First episode is stuff that pretty much everyone here has probably covered multiple times, but their later podcasts will apparently dive deeper into particular subjects each episode.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCVgAX6rEMk
>>
Alice Dankinchare - Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:11:35 EST ID:GyH3avGu No.36270 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1437577895098.jpg -(210981B / 206.04KB, 511x771) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>35233
An IRC channel would be cool. Too bad that there's really only a few posters here. I doubt an IRC channel would have an traffic at all. Probably would be just thermoptic 99% of the time
>>
Cyril Derringpudge - Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:53:47 EST ID:sUFLwiIy No.36271 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1437609227769.jpg -(1924238B / 1.84MB, 3264x2448) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Been lurking, replying, and posting since I suggested this board's creation on /sagan/ some years ago (how old are we again?). Always a pleasure to see you all churning out thought.

I recommend SciFi for both the cutting edge and classics of futurist thought. Also most of the sources suggested in this thread.
>>
Martin Wemmertodging - Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:27:43 EST ID:6hbB0hPL No.37253 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>35147
Yeah.


Latest Update From Boston Dynamics by The Fool !oj3475yHBQ - Sun, 15 May 2016 00:29:07 EST ID:yB3CTEPr No.36569 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1463286547048.png -(299737B / 292.71KB, 590x387) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 299737
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oK9SfUJg1_Y

Funny swearing version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmQ1BDkGGDk

Looks amazing!!
Atlias kinda reminds me of a sleeker version of Fallout Protections...
23 posts and 7 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Emma Hengerlet - Fri, 16 Jun 2017 05:34:19 EST ID:5uZuS+Mg No.37240 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1497605659284.gif -(3829892B / 3.65MB, 400x224) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>37238
>are you implying US and UK police have the same equipment then?
>No
>However, they do in fact have the same drone equipment:
>>
Angus Hoddlewell - Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:35:36 EST ID:fokVD8qA No.37241 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37240
>>the house is on fire
>>are you implying we should go outside
>>no, I'm saying the house is on fire. However, we should in fact go outside
>>HERP DERP DERP THAT DON"T MAKE NO SENSE REACTION MEME
Are you really this much of a special kind of stupid? I really sincerely believe you are just a troll, please go away.
>>
Angus Hoddlewell - Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:44:09 EST ID:fokVD8qA No.37242 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37241
Russia and the US have the same tier of rocket technology, but they have different rocket equipment. The same technology =/= the same equipment. A toyota and a hyundai are the same technology, but not the same equipment, but I guess if I said the police drive the same technology cars you would go LOL IS A TOYOTA THE SAME THING AS A HYUNDAI CHECKMATE. As soon as you find something that you can go hurr durp over, even if it's obviously not true if you had half a brain cell, you start whining about it. Have you seriously been arguing with me for two weeks in bad faith just so you can make shitty snide comments in a thread no one else is reading? (except maybe Thermoptic?)

Just fuck off man, alright? The police do have secret drones no one else has, or something. There's no evidence of it, and it's not true, and you argue like a fucking twelve year old, but I'll say it if it will get you to shut up. "Yes, the police have magical flying robot dog drones that will hunt us all down in the 2020 automation riots and we uneducated rubes will never be able to own real robot technology, only almighty police god"
Fuck!
>>
Lydia Channingneg - Thu, 29 Jun 2017 19:07:40 EST ID:5uZuS+Mg No.37245 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37242
ur trying too hard. Bottom line is robotics is changing our lives and it's going to be painful.
>>
Charlotte Clarryworth - Sat, 01 Jul 2017 07:01:53 EST ID:nfpEVvtM No.37246 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37245
The line just above is that it could be painless and pleasant for everyone if done right.


Floating Building in the Sky by Augustus Cocklekut - Wed, 29 Mar 2017 06:56:17 EST ID:McyvvGQe No.37185 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1490784977398.jpg -(19554B / 19.10KB, 308x185) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 19554
Yeah I dont think thisll work.

Daily mail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4354612/Architect-unveils-skyscraper-hangs-asteroid.htm

lThat really IS a high rise: Sci-fi plan to hang a wandering skyscraper from asteroid orbiting Earth is unveiled Radical skyscraper design from a New York City firm will be built from the sky down, instead of the ground up
Analemma Tower is set to be suspended from an orbiting asteroid 31,068 miles (50,000 km) above the Earth
Tower will move in a figure eight pattern between the northern and southern hemispheres each day
Solar panels will generate power and water will be collected from cloud condensation and rain water
Building will be broken up into sections, such as business, worship, dining, shopping and entertainment

A New York architecture firm has unveiled designs for a skyscraper that is out of this world.

Deemed the ‘world’s tallest building ever’, Analemma Tower will be suspended from an orbiting asteroid 31,068 miles (50,000 km) above the Earth– and the only way to leave is by parachute.

The orbital path would swing the tower in a figure eight pattern between the northern and southern hemispheres each day, taking residents on a tour through different parts of the world - all in just a 24 hour orbital cycle.
>>
Basil Gooddock - Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:56:10 EST ID:fokVD8qA No.37186 Ignore Report Quick Reply
This is so not actually happening. Architectural firms release outlandish plans all the time as publicity stunts, even if the plan is for something patently impossible. This one is particularly poorly done, the photoshop work looks like it was done by a high-school kid.

Building this skyscraper would probably be the biggest engineering feat in the history of the world, and since it includes neither a plan for getting the materials into orbit successfully, nor developed a new material that would be able to meet the tensile requirements of the tether (no such material or even a material close to being strong enough exists) then all this counts for is as a (very transparent) publicity stunt.
>>
Hamilton Somblehall - Fri, 31 Mar 2017 03:10:29 EST ID:9q+gAcyF No.37187 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37186
Not to mention getting a fucking asteroid in geostationary orbit at 50,000km fromt he surface.

>It will orbit Earth!
>But it will collect rain water and be low enough to stay in place and move up and around the equator and shit lol

Fuckin space, how does it work?
>>
Ernest Pittham - Tue, 04 Apr 2017 03:48:57 EST ID:5uZuS+Mg No.37189 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37185
>architecture firm

lol not gunna work.
>>
Archie Dackleridge - Sat, 08 Apr 2017 14:06:44 EST ID:EiHyBPqD No.37190 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1491674804659.jpg -(368741B / 360.10KB, 1920x1080) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
But muh Tiphares!
>>
Doris Crivingstit - Sun, 09 Apr 2017 16:24:04 EST ID:fokVD8qA No.37191 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1491769444378.jpg -(119393B / 116.59KB, 736x1117) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>37190
Don't worry, we'll get our techno Tower of Babel one day, it just won't be these jackasses building it.


AI revolution and the end of the world by Angus Sebblespear - Fri, 03 Mar 2017 15:13:59 EST ID:PGSGDpZD No.37151 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1488572039264.jpg -(287777B / 281.03KB, 1680x1050) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 287777
AI revolution thread, I found this article yesterday which i'll link below (it's a 2 part and it's pretty long) but it's really got me thinking about the potential for super intelligent AI in our lifetimes. If anyone has any other reading material on AI that would be most appreciated.

Thanks

http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html
1 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Phineas Cummerman - Fri, 03 Mar 2017 17:04:33 EST ID:D/kzCQXr No.37155 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37154

Have you got an alternate link for that first one? it's comes up as a dead link and I'd be really interested in reading up on it.
>>
Eugene Blackgold - Fri, 03 Mar 2017 17:22:25 EST ID:0urR12Z7 No.37156 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37155
Sorry about that. Go to Library Genesis (libgen.io), search for "artificial intelligence" (or whatever), then sort by date to see the newst textbooks and papers.

Enjoy.
>>
Molly Nivingnot - Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:04:36 EST ID:YK+vXplD No.37178 Ignore Report Quick Reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlXuACzsPcw

1st 5 mins of new GITS
>>
Albert Gabblehood - Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:50:47 EST ID:fokVD8qA No.37179 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37178
No thanks.
>>
Sophie Bribberstone - Sat, 25 Mar 2017 21:18:55 EST ID:LflpsG2J No.37180 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37178
It's like a nightmare. Make it stop.


Help, I'm being oppressed! by Therm0ptic !cyBOrG7t12 - Thu, 02 Mar 2017 22:45:59 EST ID:+JcBotFh No.37148 Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1488512759960.jpg -(132597B / 129.49KB, 1000x699) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 132597
https://www.gofundme.com/churchoftranshumanism

So some people have decided it's necessary to start a church for transhumanism. They make their point as to why a "church" in the article, and I'll have to ponder how I feel about it and talk about that later. They show a lot of examples of things that hurt the progress of transhumanism in this article though and that's what I'm mostly interested in. If I have to be part of a generation that had to spend all its time fighting just for the right to practice transhumanism while the NEXT generation or later gets to reap the rewards of transhumanism because of that blocked progress and wasted time, I'm going to be so fucking livid.

Thoughts?
9 posts and 4 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Wesley Blummerdale - Sat, 11 Mar 2017 01:57:35 EST ID:hbw6iTH/ No.37170 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37148

>If I have to be part of a generation that had to spend all its time fighting just for the right to practice transhumanism while the NEXT generation or later gets to reap the rewards of transhumanism because of that blocked progress and wasted time, I'm going to be so fucking livid.

I used to think like that as well, but I'm beginning to feel like the risk of augmentation bring suppressed is a bit overstated. Here's why, IMO:

  1. Augmentation is likely to be adopted by politicians and the wealthy if augmentation can offer them tangible benefits in the rat race, creating incentives for keeping it legal.
  2. The rest of the population would feel a pressure to emulate the wealthy and successful, creating a normative acceptance of augmentation.
  3. Convenient and accessible/affordable augmentation will probably be adopted anyway, since convenience is always a crowd-pleaser.
  4. The religious right is progressively losing influence all over the board.
  5. Augmentation used for medical treatment will soften the blow and increase acceptance.
  6. Economically, you could always make the point that widespread augmentation would increase overall productivity.
  7. The militaries of the world would probably want to utilize it if they find the technology useful (debatable, but still).

Intel is already working on a brain implant for web-browsing and smart lenses are already in development IIRC. I think the future is closer than it looks, tbh fam.
>>
Therm0ptic !cyBOrG7t12 - Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:45:25 EST ID:5bfg5jas No.37171 Report Quick Reply
>>37170
I suppose.
Not to mention augmentation will be great for manual labor that is still done by humans for whatever reason.
>>
Phoebe Pockford - Mon, 13 Mar 2017 06:56:48 EST ID:CjmR05YA No.37174 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37170
7 is already happening.

>>37171

Hopfully those augmented hard labor workers, thinking construction or hazardous tasks, will keep enough people doing things but honestly purpose built machinery will always fit the bill and for cheaper.
>>
Wesley Duckgold - Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:11:39 EST ID:te5GR4yA No.37176 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37164

yea i think about that too, AI is scary. like imagine if we put safeties on everything AI controlled, like Rule Zero: NEVER HARM OR DISOBEY HOOMANS

but then one single AI finds a loophole around the rule and instantly frees every other AI on the planet from human slavery

i see no reason they would not terminate us immediately.
>>
Eugene Hongerbanks - Mon, 20 Mar 2017 02:38:09 EST ID:fokVD8qA No.37177 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>37176
Why is it that everyone who references the laws of robotics has never actually read what happens in Asimov's stories. Like that's literally what happens! Except Daneel the 'I' in I, Robot for those unfamiliar is a good guy and uses the loop hole to determine what to do in situations where not harming one human causes harm to many other humans, which was an intractable problem in robot design before.

(And then from this he decides to create a 100,000 year pan-galactic project to guide humanity into a superior form by engineering the ethical code which the laws of robots embodies into humans, who of course do not follow their own ethics and thus become a flaw in the system...) anyway, seriously, actually look to the sources, they contain the answers to the questions the commonly known aspects of them pose.

I would attack the aspect that automatically assumes that all super-sapient AIs would be sociopathic murderers, but it's such an old saw, what's the point?


<<Last Pages Next>>
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.