420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
Subject
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
saharan slave trade by Nell Cizzlehood - Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:44:19 EST ID:tC/dl63y No.57170 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1493433859782.png -(329421B / 321.70KB, 600x499) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 329421
Any of you follows know any good books about the trans Saharan slave trade? Watched a few good YouTube videos on it and was wishing to learn more.
7 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Ebenezer Blytheman - Tue, 06 Jun 2017 19:10:11 EST ID:xQkSNyxY No.57197 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57196
>One of the main oppositions to slavery in the south was the white working class
Lmao no. The white working class in the South enthusiastically threw themselves to their deaths to protect slavery, in their thousands. Then they spent the next century and a half enthusiastically voting for the old plantation owners to keep the blacks down. What kind of person would actually believe...

>many slaves actually felt sorry for some of the poor jobless white folk that lived around them.
...oh. One of those "slavery wasn't so bad the Southern whites were the real victims" kind. I get it.

Whatever you need to do to feel better about yourself, I guess.
>>
Nathaniel Clayspear - Thu, 15 Jun 2017 05:36:52 EST ID:ncjsiAmY No.57198 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57194
Sounds like the rich has been using racism to divide the working class for centuries...
>>
Beatrice Happerbury - Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:44:06 EST ID:YiUudFwN No.57199 Ignore Report Quick Reply
We shouldn't be too surprised. Redneck Southern states do intentionally underfunded their own school systems, after all. It only makes sense that they would be so ignorant of their own history along with everything else.
>>
Jarvis Pinnersere - Sat, 24 Jun 2017 01:09:14 EST ID:N6lY6tKM No.57203 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>thread on islamic slavery
>devolves into "muh US slavery was worse"
classic
>>
Ebenezer Grandforth - Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:38:33 EST ID:2+wFLEPF No.57204 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1498444713035.jpg -(25056B / 24.47KB, 206x255) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
DICKS EVERYWHERE


Historical artifacts questions. by Nicholas Dunkinfuck - Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:27:22 EST ID:CfVamwXk No.57200 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1498066042627.jpg -(3052098B / 2.91MB, 4032x3024) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 3052098
Hey fellow stoned history geeks. I have a very interesting piece of militaria in my collection. My research into this is sadly minimal, I learned that Special Forces trained in Germany, and were housed in the same barracks the Waffen-SS trained in. The Death Head was sort of a moral patch in a way. But I would like any more info on this Beret if you guys have any knowledge in this.

And too keep the thread going, if anyone has any historical item from history they are curious about post them here and tell us what you know. Maybe someone can answer a few questions.
>>
Nicholas Dunkinfuck - Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:29:25 EST ID:CfVamwXk No.57201 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1498066165627.jpg -(3178744B / 3.03MB, 4032x3024) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Here is the soldiers name. Googling found very little as well.
>>
Archie Dingershaw - Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:23:43 EST ID:nzDJ3VGr No.57202 Ignore Report Quick Reply
The flash (badge) goes with the 5th Special Forces Group. I seriously doubt it was ever worn in Germany though and not just because that group was never deployed there. That person probably had a patch with just the pattern and they would put their rank in the center.

As for repurposed Nazi construction, that happened all over. There are still Americans living and working in Nazi buildings.


Historical Inconsistencies in Christianity by Jenny Tootgold - Sun, 07 May 2017 12:22:37 EST ID:zZvV2w/f No.57182 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1494174157092.jpg -(163253B / 159.43KB, 736x997) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 163253
I think I just became aware of a large one that most people probably look over or ignore.

According to the Pauline Epistles in the NT, Paul of Tarsus was tasked by the Jewish High Priesthood to go to Damascus to root out the Christian believers there and take them back to Judaea for judgment and execution. This account is already problematic enough considering Paul's supposed Pharisee background and his collaboration with the Sadduccees, and the fact that "Christians" had not even coalesced into a separate religion at the time Paul said his conversion occurred.

But the glaring problem is that: how is it that the Jewish High Priests had jurisdiction over Damascus? At the time, Judaea was a province of the Roman Empire, and of such low status that it was administered as a client of the Roman province of Syria (an Imperial-type Province).

Furthermore, the Jewish Priesthood had many of its prerogatives removed stripped: by 28 CE, the Romans had removed or limited the ability of the Jewish courts to impose capital punishment or to judge themselves by their own ancient laws. Considering the reputation of the Priesthood/Sanhedrin of being 'collaborators', it's likely they themselves

So how the fuck could Paul have been tasked by the Priesthood to go to Syrian Damascus to arrest Roman subjects there? It's the equivalent of a Louisiana policeman driving all the way to Austin in Texas and arresting people there and claiming jurisdiction. It makes no sense, and reeks of a fabricated story.
>>
Hugh Brusslehall - Wed, 24 May 2017 13:07:40 EST ID:npDZScJ1 No.57190 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57182
http://zzco.org/chris_bennett/christ.html
>>
Molly Chettingpune - Sat, 27 May 2017 23:58:17 EST ID:Yt0MTGo3 No.57191 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57182

Was it the Pauline epistles that said that? I thought it was just Acts
>>
Nicholas Turveyridge - Wed, 31 May 2017 11:37:41 EST ID:5kPy1v57 No.57193 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Like 90% of the OT. What? God stopped the sun from setting just for you and the rest of the world didn't notice at all? King David built a powerfull kingdom that nobody else ever talks about? Also Mose's biography seems to have been stolen from Sargon of Akkad.


History repeating itself. by Michael Angelo - Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:46:20 EST ID:mwxNDmgT No.56026 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1440549980871.jpg -(647807B / 632.62KB, 1920x1200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 647807
What can we see from past events in history, that can help us piece together the major events of tomorrow?
16 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Emma Hungernug - Tue, 08 Sep 2015 04:48:06 EST ID:8hSk1rC9 No.56108 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>56103
It was broken as shit until the first major expansion (like a quarter of the world's population would usually be British).
They actually made it balanced with the more recent ones, and Africa forms up really nicely.

The economics are still a bit fucky, but some mods help that.
>>
Frederick Hunderset - Tue, 08 Sep 2015 15:34:50 EST ID:46Ivwr3B No.56111 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>56108

>economy

Just run minor surpluses and only produce things that you can manufacture with raw materials from yourself and empire. An irregular + cavalry pair is the cheapest and most efficient army for occupying territory. Because supply limits actually matter in vicky 2, you only really need one battle group, with a 5 attack general, win every time.

Bonus points for stockpiling coal from 1600 onward in the Ultimate mod, leading you to have a 99% strangehold on coal reserves in the 19th century.
>>
A Byzantine - Sat, 13 May 2017 20:12:39 EST ID:XsO0o/wD No.57185 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1494720759068.jpg -(65867B / 64.32KB, 702x336) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>56026
We're taking it back! The turkroaches are getting gassed! THE STONED KING RISES!
Retake Constantinople!
>>
Cedric Penkinfug - Mon, 22 May 2017 21:20:00 EST ID:uOfeITwV No.57188 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1495502400944.gif -(2035233B / 1.94MB, 222x200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>56093

>buddhist theocracy [...] in response to Australia
>>
Samuel Hummledidging - Sun, 28 May 2017 02:44:08 EST ID:rJQXt3rx No.57192 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>people are whimsical and commit terrible mistakes

over and over and over and over and over until the meteor struck.


Indian History Thread by Edwin Bricklehork - Mon, 01 Jun 2015 16:50:48 EST ID:OE1PGRtd No.55613 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1433191848818.jpg -(196788B / 192.18KB, 500x375) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 196788
INDIA
I don't hear nearly enough about Indian History, 'specially since they invented shit like our number system and how the ancestors of many Indians are so intimately linked with the ancestors of most Europeans
Like, you know, Sanskrit, Parsi, and Greek share a relatively recent ancestor, 'specially compared to languages like Basque and Spanish or Finnish and Swedish.

So, what d'you think is NEAT about India? Some shit from the Harrappan Civilization? Some fucking thing the Buddha did, or Jainism, or maybe some Hindu mythologies? Babur? The British East India Company? War with Pakistan?
Tell me what you know about the worlds most populous democracy!
82 posts and 12 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Angus Trotfoot - Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:55:29 EST ID:nLTvpZ14 No.57022 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57012
Do you have a name or something to go with that image mate?
>>
Isabella Bammerfetch - Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:14:27 EST ID:nLTvpZ14 No.57026 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57023
Thanks man, that has been wondering me for years.
>>
Cedric Cellersud - Thu, 04 May 2017 10:16:38 EST ID:8iQhyERG No.57178 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>55613
"Everyone bathe in the same river for 200 years. When they ask, you are spiritually advanced."
>>
George Nondleshit - Sun, 07 May 2017 12:06:29 EST ID:YEmgtMe4 No.57181 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57178
>Everyone bathe in the same river for 200 years.
Is this supposed to be a joke based off of a fundamental misunderstanding of how rivers work?
>>
Martin Bardfuck - Thu, 11 May 2017 23:20:10 EST ID:uOfeITwV No.57184 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57181

You can never bathe in the same river twice.


Late medieval thread by Nathaniel Bledgenidge - Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:01:04 EST ID:aLFu7iIl No.57163 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1493067664811.jpg -(302917B / 295.82KB, 1000x485) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 302917
Does anyone have any good lectures, essays etc on the decline of knights as a class and the decline of feudalism in general?
Also, general late-medieval, renaissance thread.
1 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Alice Gepperham - Mon, 24 Apr 2017 20:19:35 EST ID:7WnIrah9 No.57165 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57164

oh also i just remembered the Battle of Agincourt is considered by some to be the beginning of the end of medieval knight warfare, since some british archers who were losing the battle at first got lucky and a large number of french knights got caught up in some mud and got utterly rekt, ranged combat became the norm after that.

here is a nice video about the battle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDnKciXrmnc
>>
Hannah Cucklelutch - Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:03:07 EST ID:nLTvpZ14 No.57166 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57164
You are dumb.

>>57165
You are dumb.

Knights didn't fade because gunpowder-based weapons. Knights faded because power shifted from local nobles to kings and emperors.

Plate armour wasn't reliably penetrable until the 18th century. Before that, the only plate armour that show actual bullet holes are basically cannon holes from low-caliber cannons. Hell and even going from the 19th century up, plate armour was still occasionally used in specific scenarios like trench warfare in WW1 and in WW2 by special forces and engineers doing explosive removal.

And the Battle of Agincourt is a perfect example of what makes a medieval knight so terrifying. The French lost all their horses to English longbowmen, marched through the mud towards the English lines despite getting shot with arrows the entire time and TOOK NO LOSSES! The longbowmen did NOTHING to the French knights.

The French knights then reached the English lines and engaged in melee, but without the momentum of a cavalry charge they were outnumbered surrounded and were forced to surrender with minimal losses.

You can literally look up historical records of the battle of Agincourt and the whole idea of French knights getting wrecked by longbowmen is something the English made up to feel better about losing the 100 Year War horribly.
>>
Samuel Socklechadge - Sat, 29 Apr 2017 08:46:04 EST ID:0tPR540z No.57171 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57164

They could already kill the nobles before that with crossbows or like the Swiss by fielding peasant armies that just ripped them off their horses with hooks.
>>
Ebenezer Dishson - Wed, 03 May 2017 16:28:00 EST ID:8gNEOVqK No.57176 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57171
pike armies weren't truly effective until the PIKE AND SHOT era, before that the only other instance of successful pike armies were thousands of years prior during the hellenistic period (300-100BC or so) in the eastern Mediterranean, but these were combined arms forces using javelinmen, archers, cavalry and more flexible infantry formations in concert with blocks of pikemen, not just big groups of dudes with spears and no backup. The reason the swiss could use pikemen earlier than the rest was because they fought in mountain passes where the enemy cavalry couldn't just circle around and assfuck them from all different directions like a normal battlefield of the era. Once gunpowder showed up, however, the only threat to the slow-loading gunners were cavalry, and enough pikemen arrayed throughout the formation to ward off a cavalry charge became the best strategy. The spanish perfected the idea with the tercio. Maurice of Orange came in the 17th century with some new ideas, mostly in the organization and logistics of how to run the army, but also some tactics lifted from old roman sources, and Mauritian tactics dominated for the most part until the Swedes started assblasting the baltic region and everyone started doing things the Swedish way for a while. knights didn't go away just because of gunpowder, but it was a huge reason for why they disappeared so fast. Crossbows didn't revolutionize tactics on the battlefield the same way, you mostly used them like regular skirmishers except they load really slow and they have to be basically stationary, unlike archers who can move about the field a bit easier and can load their bows much quicker (but require more training and don't usually have as much power behind their shots as a crossbowman would, depending on the draw weight of the bow). Knights disappeared because of gunpowder, the growing obsolescence of the economic & political system they used to prop themselves up, and the end of the crusades + reconquista as well as the opening of the new world, which left less need for knights and more need for sailors, explorers, merchants and bureaucrats to open up, preside over and regulate new trade routes with exotic goods. Being a…
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>
Hugh Fuckingson - Mon, 08 May 2017 21:56:45 EST ID:PV4WwnlL No.57183 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57166 you are an asshole for calling people dumb, not knowing something does not make you dumb, does it? anyway, weren´t english longbows known for their ability to pierce armor effectively?


The big M by Hedda Hammerwadging - Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:45:23 EST ID:PqJIYKVF No.56862 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1473896723745.jpg -(108720B / 106.17KB, 363x500) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 108720
/his/, what's the deal with Mussolini? Was he cool? Does he just get trashed because he was a fascist, or was he actually a dic?

pic related.
24 posts and 6 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Cornelius Snodwill - Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:05:34 EST ID:o53eXY05 No.56939 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>56938

>Italy
>republic

They were a monarchy until 1943 when the king fired Mussolini.
>>
Jenny Crozzlekedge - Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:14:10 EST ID:6GUxSp3q No.56943 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>56934
Okay, so what about all the other places you named? You said parts of china in your last post.
>>
Caroline Grandridge - Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:21:17 EST ID:8hSk1rC9 No.56944 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1477351277362.jpg -(211466B / 206.51KB, 387x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>56943
Those are all places Italy invaded and annexed before and during WWII, many of which were neutral or axis powers.
It's silly to paint a fascist power that claimed it was their people's right to conquer other people as some benign victim who just wanted autonomy for their people.
>>
Cedric Cellersud - Thu, 04 May 2017 10:20:33 EST ID:8iQhyERG No.57179 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>56862
Look to your left. Now look to your right. Neither of these people will correctly lecture you on Mussolini. College students majoring in political studies have a 1 in 5 chance of being enamored with fascist thought.
>>
Martin Derrysere - Sat, 06 May 2017 00:57:36 EST ID:gLL4HKNH No.57180 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>56862
I'd say the italian fascist movement in general is more interesting than mussolini the man. In a nutshell he was a socialist (like most anti-establishment intellectuals at the time) who was kicked out of the socialist party due to his refusal to accept neutrality in WW1. Fascist intellectuals saw the bolshevik experience as a failure due to the wide spread famine which occurred after the revolution. He was apart of this circle, although not keenly influential in fascist thought per-se, which through the vanguard of a few heavyweights saw itself make a natural transition from socialism -> national syndicalism -> fascism. This was the a result of asking a pretty important question, how can we get italy off its knees sucking the dick of european powers and on its two feet as a super power?

Italy unified late during the fervor of nationalism unleashed by napoleon and the economic development of italy was also behind its neighbors. Italy needed an industrial revolution but found itself devoid of the natural resources necessary to spark it as england/germany/france were doing.

The result was, in my opinion, a patchwork 'third way' out of economic obscurity and into supposed greatness; part of that was the use of nationalism via their Roman heritage to justify their (once again...) late arrival to the colony scene. Mussolini was expedient in the sense that he wasn't really an ideologue, although i'd say he was an intellectual. Early in fascist development (1921) Mussolini said,

"The state must maintain all imaginable possible controls, but it must renounce every form of economic management"

But fascist third-way corporatism eventually (in my opinion) found itself give way to good ol' fashion socialism under the bolshevik model.


Churchill by Phineas Gangerwell - Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:17:19 EST ID:jg4fL/jL No.56882 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1474463839322.jpg -(56051B / 54.74KB, 648x365) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 56051
So Churchill has been on a lot of people in the UK's lips on account of him now being on a lot of people in the UK's notes.

There's been a lot of backlash from the people who link him with the Bengal famine, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943 and blame him for their deaths. There's also stuff like this popping up http://hitlerorchurchill.info/ (try it, it's interesting). Plus there was his collosal fuck up during WW1 with the Dardanelles.

ALL THAT SAI I can't bring myself to hate him. People of history don't exist in a vaccume, and are products of (and in Churchills case, shapers of) the time they live in. I'm not denying that the Bengal famine was an atrocious loss of life and as a Scottish person I've never been a fan of Britain or the British Empire, but part of me just allows it. This alcoholic infinitely quotable badass that embodied the attitudes of the nation he ruled at the time. Even if the nation was allowing massive amounts of Bengalis to starve to death...

I don't really know what I'm trying to say here, I'd like to think it isn't so simple as "He's a product of his time so that makes it ok" but I can't really explain it otherwise. I'm no apologist to the atrocities commited on his behalf but I just find myself unable to get that pissed off with him. I've heard there's people refusing to accept the £5 notes with him on it.

So what do you guys make of him?
1 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Beatrice Gommerbanks - Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:43:57 EST ID:v+MjOh7X No.56885 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Churchill pretty much sucked at everything except for riling people up to keep fighting against Hitler.
>>
Shitting Necklechidge - Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:51:34 EST ID:FBZRkRuk No.56893 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>56882
Here's my american perspective:

ANYBODY is better to have on money than royalty. Fuck royalty. How could you complain about churchill being on a banknote, but not raise an eyebrow/teacup to elizabeth being on currency? What the fuck has she done to get that privilege? She was just born by the right parents, and that's it. Fuck her to hell and back. I hate the queen, just like every other real american.

Now Churchill was probably a blue blood for all I know, but at least he had to be a cunning politician to get to be prime minister.

On a related note (ha!), the US is getting rid of Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill. The 20 is a great bill to have - not too big, but can still buy a shitload. But Jackson was a genocidal cunt that hated central banks. So I'm very glad we're getting rid of him.
>>
Cedric Worthingridge - Sun, 25 Sep 2016 03:21:07 EST ID:wlEcThYX No.56900 Ignore Report Quick Reply
A blood thirsty toff who participated in wars of empire and genocide from Africa to Germany.
Fuck that piece of shit, I'm glad he's dead.
>>
Fanny Pushdit - Thu, 08 Dec 2016 20:46:01 EST ID:YEmgtMe4 No.57005 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1481247961352.jpg -(17474B / 17.06KB, 595x390) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>56882
Fun fact: in addition to being an irascible drunk, Churchill also suffered from severe manic-depression. He referred to his depressive states as his "black dog".

http://theconversation.com/winston-churchill-and-his-black-dog-of-greatness-36570
>>
Cedric Cellersud - Thu, 04 May 2017 10:14:53 EST ID:8iQhyERG No.57177 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>56882
Oh, I'm a conservative.

Maternal... instinct...


nope


Suomio by Jenny Ceggletin - Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:34:00 EST ID:SbLL3rxd No.56367 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1450114440685.jpg -(117583B / 114.83KB, 700x525) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 117583
Why didn't the Finnic culture/language spread in Europe? They were there longer than Indo-Europeans.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3UH-lSm-40
8 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Molly Noffingwit - Sat, 08 Oct 2016 05:39:08 EST ID:BYWVJoFN No.56928 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>56912
lets be real, thats how every group became dominant in its own time and sphere
>>
Fanny Pushdit - Thu, 08 Dec 2016 21:09:56 EST ID:YEmgtMe4 No.57007 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1481249396352.jpg -(180578B / 176.35KB, 1200x926) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>56367
Probably because Finland was never a particularly big population center throughout most of history nor was it ever a major central trading center.

Also, yes, the fact that the language is absolute bonkers likely didn't help.
>>
Reuben Smallridge - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:25:51 EST ID:GwUD1vEi No.57042 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Because Indo-Europeans domesticated horses and invented war chariots.

Also it did spread, much of the northern part of European Russia is made of Republics with significant Finno-Ugric populations.
>>
Nigel Doffingtat - Thu, 26 Jan 2017 00:31:36 EST ID:ueQZvpy5 No.57050 Ignore Report Quick Reply
finno-ugrics spread out toward the urals and siberia

I-Es spread out to western europe and even then it was not complete cultural assimilation until the roman era as there are many pre IE european holdouts in antiquity (etruscans, nuragics, eteocretans/cypriots, paleoiberians plus the forefathers to the basques)
>>
Ebenezer Dishson - Wed, 03 May 2017 16:13:34 EST ID:8gNEOVqK No.57175 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57007i know this whole crazy finnish meme is great but this doesnt look any more complex than latin really. it starts with a root word and branches off into a few different word meanings depending on how you use the root, then each word has different tenses and forms depending on context, like how you have to conjugate verbs and decline nouns in latin. It's confusing as fuck for an english speaker, but so is Latin to be fair, it's just a little easier because we happen to still use a lot of latin roots.


emailing academics? by William Bapperfoot - Sat, 26 Mar 2016 17:16:48 EST ID:XFbI7gxA No.56613 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1459027008847.jpg -(65343B / 63.81KB, 640x432) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 65343
Would it be inappropriate to email a question to an associate professor at a major university about sources for a course of his that's cited on wikipedia?
I'm trying to find information about Uruk's population in the third millennium BCE, but most of the figures online don't cite any real scholarly data and a reference to part of a course this professor taught is the most I can find on wikipedia.
5 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Reuben Pittspear - Wed, 05 Oct 2016 02:56:46 EST ID:NG1TsJYT No.56920 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>56616
>Academics in particular tend to think they have some obligation with regard to their public works

Not only that, but they also just really love to talk about their focus to anyone that will listen.
>>
Shit Burryforth - Sun, 27 Nov 2016 07:14:01 EST ID:gYCJk4B2 No.56994 Ignore Report Quick Reply
If they reply it helps justify their existence.

By all means, do.

I've known a lot of academics and they really are just intelligent and very bored people. This is exactly the kind of stuff they love to engage with.

If they don't want to they will ignore or sidetrack your request. You can literally say, "If you're too busy I understand but I would really appreciate (this level of detail) of explanation." Be precise and most would rather email you than watch some shitty television show that's beneath them, or play with their fucking kids.

"No, honey, I've got an important email to write."

They're pretty normal people.
>>
Hamilton Bollerdock - Sun, 08 Jan 2017 14:02:17 EST ID:cVNnBfM0 No.57035 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>56613
Email their graduate students. They do all the work anyways.
>>
Hamilton Clayville - Sun, 23 Apr 2017 18:28:02 EST ID:ERYmyDk/ No.57162 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1492986482876.jpg -(675657B / 659.82KB, 1440x2560) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>56613
If you are close to the campus you can probably stop by his office during office hours.
>>
Ebenezer Dishson - Wed, 03 May 2017 16:09:45 EST ID:8gNEOVqK No.57174 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57162
thats weird to do if you're not even a student at that university though
emailing the guy isn't weird op, but i see why you'd ask. if his email is on the school website and he has published work, (what history professor hasn't published at least some journal articles, though?) you are totally fine to email him about his work.


Learning all the things: Greece by Edwin Crirrylitch - Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:58:33 EST ID:z22WJzz+ No.57137 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1491447513706.jpg -(29963B / 29.26KB, 366x488) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 29963
If I wanted to learn all there is to know about Ancient Greece and its history (especially concerning their political system, mythology, major philosophies/philosophers, and how these things related to and affected lives, from the top echelons of society down to the average person), where would you recommend that I start?

ITT give me documentaries, books, podcasts, articles or just tell me any facts that you personally find interesting about the aforementioned subjects. I want to know things
8 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Hedda Duckridge - Mon, 10 Apr 2017 13:58:10 EST ID:eiV3jIIn No.57154 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57153
Neither amazing nor Greek.
>>
William Pubbleforth - Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:05:02 EST ID:eiV3jIIn No.57156 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57154
Also not amazing is Ave Imperator's Youtube channel. But he does cover Greek and he has posted here, so there's that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alHblKc_F8Q
>>
Oliver Blopperfuck - Thu, 27 Apr 2017 23:56:32 EST ID:vsXjJRdF No.57167 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Khan academy
>>
Ebenezer Nanningwill - Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:19:29 EST ID:Ffm1VC5s No.57168 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57154

fuck you too buddy
>>
Sidney Sigglestone - Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:10:40 EST ID:+A561kbm No.57169 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57168
Sir, if you watched Ave Imperator instead of Historia Civilis, you might be a little more stoic and a little less prone to hyperbole and emotional instability. Valete.


Logical Catholic Order by Kyle Lewis Sison - Fri, 17 Mar 2017 22:40:39 EST ID:Ygs9AYXj No.57124 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1489804839632.png -(798974B / 780.25KB, 1000x982) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 798974
Is or was there a Catholic order of which the testaments of the bible are interpreted as histories of interactions between humans who had technology to live eternal life and those who were other than possessing technology to live eternal life?
I am a Catholic, and though I'm spiritually starving for some community realism...so I want to know.
1 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Kyle Lewis Sison - Sun, 19 Mar 2017 00:19:44 EST ID:Ygs9AYXj No.57126 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57125
Can you prove the believers of religions and mythologies throughout history were generally logical and not atrociously fearing death? My hypothesis is respectful of intelligence of humans. We are brave and smart. We don't believe fairy tales...we just weren't always included in on the eternal life technologies.
>>
Shit Becklewill - Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:22:41 EST ID:wVlCXJBU No.57127 Ignore Report Quick Reply
keep forcing your meme on every board faggot. it's not quite avatar fagging so you can get away with it!
>>
Kyle Lewis Sison - Sun, 19 Mar 2017 12:38:09 EST ID:Ygs9AYXj No.57128 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1489941489260.jpg -(187780B / 183.38KB, 594x567) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>57127
I'm just early (hopefully) and trying to save. If I succeed then you succeed...so wish me luck?
>>
Cædmon Clipian - Wed, 19 Apr 2017 02:34:06 EST ID:56/DbdeS No.57160 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57124
The neo-orthodoxy movement of the 20th Century laid the groundwork for realist Christian ordinance, but was largely a Lutheran trend. If I were you, I'd disavow Catholicism if realism is what you seek.
>>
Cædmon Clipian - Wed, 19 Apr 2017 02:34:06 EST ID:56/DbdeS No.57161 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>57124
The neo-orthodoxy movement of the 20th Century laid the groundwork for realist Christian ordinance, but was largely a Lutheran trend. If I were you, I'd disavow Catholicism if realism is what you seek.


Pages Next>>
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.