How do I run and get my license back View Thread Reply Hide Doris Buffingfene - Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:12:45 EST E7cvS0Pg No.46702 File: 1602079965903.jpg -(281774B / 275.17KB, 867x881) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. I got a lifelong probation sentence. I just want to go on the run and get my license back. If I wait for the suspension to be over can I get it back while running away >> Edwin Goddledere - Sat, 10 Oct 2020 08:19:38 EST mUXVAKXw No.46703 Reply Well how long are you actually on probation for? >> Matilda Blathergold - Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:31:05 EST RlW+WIrn No.46708 Reply >>46702Iwould imagine you would not be on lifelon probatioon. get your liscence recovered before anything
>> Edwin Goddledere - Sat, 10 Oct 2020 08:19:38 EST mUXVAKXw No.46703 Reply Well how long are you actually on probation for?
>> Matilda Blathergold - Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:31:05 EST RlW+WIrn No.46708 Reply >>46702Iwould imagine you would not be on lifelon probatioon. get your liscence recovered before anything
US Law, enthusiasm, and sex View Thread Reply Hide Molly Nenkinstidge - Mon, 12 Oct 2020 18:54:33 EST 987QG3rc No.46704 File: 1602543273728.png -(502995B / 491.21KB, 2667x2000) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. scenario:Two 18 year olds, one man and the other woman, agree to have sex in the privacy of the male's apartment. Both individuals are at the highest end of the enthusiasm spectrum. A neighbor overhears the enthusiastic couple having sex. The police are called, the enthusiastic man is arrested and charged with rape. The cops and neighbor argue that the enthusiastic girl in question does not have the intellectual capacity to consent to sex. The enthusiastic girl, tears streaming down her face, protests this declaration by the police and neighbor with the upmost vigor. the court case goes to the current 2020 Supreme Court of the United States. What does the court rule? Did the enthusiastic man in question commit the crime of rape? >> [name redacted] !h55/E7mIo6 - Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:19:12 EST CRMpFElT No.46705 Reply Probably not. If they're both disabled to the same level, and the woman is disabled to the point that she can't consent, then the man would also not have the capacity to understand what he's doing is wrong and be ineligible to stand trial or be charged. The neighbours opinion has no standing at all, except for maybe making noise complaints, but that's a different issue. This is just from an Australian perspective as well, but I'm sure America has similar procedures regarding the handling of those with a diminished intellectual capacity. >> John Weshbatch - Sat, 17 Oct 2020 23:31:48 EST gcr1U/2q No.46706 Reply >>46704Unless this happened on federal or tribal land, the only way that the Supreme Court could get involved is on appeal of something, probably some kind of constitutional violation.>>46705It is not unheard of for people who cannot consent to sex to be charged with rape. Statutory rape specifically is often a strict liability offense where diminished capacity is not a valid defense. I don't know how things work in Australia, but in the US prosecutors have a lot of discretion about whether to bring charges. Realistically, the whims of these prosecutors are often the only thing preventing legal travesty. >> [name redacted] !h55/E7mIo6 - Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:42:49 EST CRMpFElT No.46707 Reply >>46706Oh wow, didn't know you had stuff like that. Ours isn't so much a defense with diminished capacity, although it can be later, but it's more that it would be unfair to even conduct a trial where a person cannot understand what's going on. If I remember correctly, when the original plea occurs, you can put in the application for diminished capacity, and then there's sorta a pre-trial trial thing that gets decided within a year.I think with our statutory rape, diminished capacity can be used as a defence, in that you have to have been aware they were in a condition where they couldn't consent like underage or mental disability, Which in this case, would seem open and shut if she's that disabled that anybody could tell, but the question isn't if an average person can tell, it's if the disabled person was aware she couldn't consent, which I think would be unlikely if he's as disabled as her.It's an interesting situation for sure though.
>> [name redacted] !h55/E7mIo6 - Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:19:12 EST CRMpFElT No.46705 Reply Probably not. If they're both disabled to the same level, and the woman is disabled to the point that she can't consent, then the man would also not have the capacity to understand what he's doing is wrong and be ineligible to stand trial or be charged. The neighbours opinion has no standing at all, except for maybe making noise complaints, but that's a different issue. This is just from an Australian perspective as well, but I'm sure America has similar procedures regarding the handling of those with a diminished intellectual capacity.
>> John Weshbatch - Sat, 17 Oct 2020 23:31:48 EST gcr1U/2q No.46706 Reply >>46704Unless this happened on federal or tribal land, the only way that the Supreme Court could get involved is on appeal of something, probably some kind of constitutional violation.>>46705It is not unheard of for people who cannot consent to sex to be charged with rape. Statutory rape specifically is often a strict liability offense where diminished capacity is not a valid defense. I don't know how things work in Australia, but in the US prosecutors have a lot of discretion about whether to bring charges. Realistically, the whims of these prosecutors are often the only thing preventing legal travesty.
>> [name redacted] !h55/E7mIo6 - Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:42:49 EST CRMpFElT No.46707 Reply >>46706Oh wow, didn't know you had stuff like that. Ours isn't so much a defense with diminished capacity, although it can be later, but it's more that it would be unfair to even conduct a trial where a person cannot understand what's going on. If I remember correctly, when the original plea occurs, you can put in the application for diminished capacity, and then there's sorta a pre-trial trial thing that gets decided within a year.I think with our statutory rape, diminished capacity can be used as a defence, in that you have to have been aware they were in a condition where they couldn't consent like underage or mental disability, Which in this case, would seem open and shut if she's that disabled that anybody could tell, but the question isn't if an average person can tell, it's if the disabled person was aware she couldn't consent, which I think would be unlikely if he's as disabled as her.It's an interesting situation for sure though.
How to avoid car insurance View Thread Reply Hide Nell Crobblefutch - Sat, 12 Sep 2020 00:30:09 EST eY0yM6Nj No.46694 File: 1599885009550.jpg -(40443B / 39.50KB, 720x762) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. I live in Ohio.While my electric rideables currently fulfill my transportation needs more than adequately, I seem to need a car to fuck gold digging hoes. I have enough money for a nice used car, but I want to avoid an insurance policy.I could get a surety bond, but that requires a deposit of more than zero dollars. How feasible would it be to register a car in another state that doesn't require insurance? I could go on vacation for a while to become a "resident" if need be. 2 posts omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Hugh Goodgold - Sun, 20 Sep 2020 23:56:44 EST sHvY59IB No.46699 Reply >>46698Hey are you that guy who posted here like eight years ago looking for advice on a stupid scheme for avoiding income taxes? >> Cornelius Sonnerfit - Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:59:16 EST eY0yM6Nj No.46700 Reply >>46699No, I like contributing to society even if I disagree with how my tax dollars are spent. >> Hugh Fommerfetch - Tue, 22 Sep 2020 22:28:25 EST sHvY59IB No.46701 Reply >>46700Do you realize that mandatory insurance is legally and morally a tax on drivers?
>> Hugh Goodgold - Sun, 20 Sep 2020 23:56:44 EST sHvY59IB No.46699 Reply >>46698Hey are you that guy who posted here like eight years ago looking for advice on a stupid scheme for avoiding income taxes?
>> Cornelius Sonnerfit - Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:59:16 EST eY0yM6Nj No.46700 Reply >>46699No, I like contributing to society even if I disagree with how my tax dollars are spent.
>> Hugh Fommerfetch - Tue, 22 Sep 2020 22:28:25 EST sHvY59IB No.46701 Reply >>46700Do you realize that mandatory insurance is legally and morally a tax on drivers?
llc hedge fund View Thread Reply Hide Edwin Cablingdack - Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:32:11 EST SOR3BRRG No.46695 File: 1600029131739.png -(27976B / 27.32KB, 950x529) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. I'm thinking of starting an LLC for a hedge fundCan someone explain to me how LLCs operate?Will my investors need to be members?Who should be the designator, or organizers?
Burglary View Thread Reply Hide Dextrolord - Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:54:15 EST t/5niU+5 No.45946 File: 1508284455032.png -(485934B / 474.54KB, 637x848) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. So here's how it is...I got caught breaking into some cars and in my state, NV, that is a burglary and a felony. So the official charges break down to 4 burglary felonies, 2 damage to property misdemeanors, and one unlawful possession of a debit card gross misdemeanor.Now I can't in any way afford a high powered attorney and my public defender isn't too enthusiastic about fighting my case.The current offer is plea no contest to one felony and the gross misdemeanor and the DA won't oppose diversion court and Ill pay restitution and do probation but have a felony on my record. The original plea offer was plea no contest to one felony and pay restitution and do probation with no mention of diversion court.One lawyer I spoke to said I have a good case to just argue for diversion court after taking the original plea offer and that sounds good to me cuz I want to keep my record clean in the long run but my appointed attorney said once a new deal is on the table the old one is now unavailable.Does anyone know anything about this? What do you guys think I should do? 26 posts and 6 images omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Phyllis Clunderchidge - Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:24:33 EST pIPKtC0X No.46515 Reply >>46511i am a druggie degenerate but not a thief. there is a difference between 'lel butthurt' and having some sort of principles >> Dextrolord - Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:10:35 EST vqPJ2tGS No.46516 Reply 1571425835068.gif -(365721B / 357.15KB, 256x270) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. >>46515meh I was high and read it like you guys were ignoring that I did do my time and keep atoning for the crime after I got released. And I was fucking baked and took it personal haha.Turns out I was the one overcome with feelings of butthurt my sincerest apologies. I am not quite as high now and find this all funny. Maybe later tonight I'll do a bunch of drugs and think differently, only time will tell. >> Fuck Clendlewill - Sat, 05 Sep 2020 19:53:37 EST 8DqV/gZG No.46693 Reply This was a very interesting read, thank you OP, best of luck to you
>> Phyllis Clunderchidge - Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:24:33 EST pIPKtC0X No.46515 Reply >>46511i am a druggie degenerate but not a thief. there is a difference between 'lel butthurt' and having some sort of principles
>> Dextrolord - Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:10:35 EST vqPJ2tGS No.46516 Reply 1571425835068.gif -(365721B / 357.15KB, 256x270) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. >>46515meh I was high and read it like you guys were ignoring that I did do my time and keep atoning for the crime after I got released. And I was fucking baked and took it personal haha.Turns out I was the one overcome with feelings of butthurt my sincerest apologies. I am not quite as high now and find this all funny. Maybe later tonight I'll do a bunch of drugs and think differently, only time will tell.
>> Fuck Clendlewill - Sat, 05 Sep 2020 19:53:37 EST 8DqV/gZG No.46693 Reply This was a very interesting read, thank you OP, best of luck to you
Legal Scenerio View Thread Reply Hide Oliver Shittinghood - Mon, 01 Jun 2020 21:35:24 EST QWxUGSHZ No.46627 File: 1591061724351.jpg -(5882B / 5.74KB, 225x225) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Here is a scenerio:>14 year old girl tells 20 year old man she wants to kill herself online>20 year old man brushes it off thinking its just teen angst>14 year old girl actually kills herself>police recover her account post death, find that she was talking with this person>On top of the suicide, often make sexual jokes about "dating" and "fucking" although its all purely joking, and the relationship is platonic>In the account includes his full name, picture of himself, and state within the US he resides in (not the town or adress)Should the 20 year old man be worried at all, could he be arrested for anything? 4 posts omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Cornelius Dushstore - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 04:41:31 EST SPLxxjsG No.46666 Reply >>46657this 20 year might deserve to get in trouble of the sexual jokes made to a child. joking or not its inappropriate . 20 year old men should not be talking to 14 year old girls about sex and dating >> [name redacted] !h55/E7mIo6 - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 06:42:19 EST 9USm8rWw No.46670 Reply >>46666While I agree it's stupid and inappropriate at best, inappropriate does not always mean illegal. The person also didn't give the state as well, so it'll be difficult to give a proper answer.In my state, we have a specific "grooming" crime this would fall under, but that was only made a crime in 2014, so it might not be where the OP lives. Also to be charged with it, it has to be proven that he surely was talking to her to lead to sex eventually. Obviously, talking about fucking her is a big red flag that this was the intention, so it's basically up to whether OP can convince a jury that he was talking to this 14 year old about fucking her, with no intent of fucking her at all, which would be pretty difficult.Funny fact about our grooming law as well, is that it only counts if it end result (fucking someone under 16, taking sexual videos, etc...) is an indictable offence. You could talk to a 14 yeah old and basically groom them for the sole purpose of looking up their skirt, and it wouldn't be grooming, because that's only a summary offence. >> :lime: - Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:43:27 EST +uGtlkEy No.46692 Reply your friend has nothing to worry about, cops are not at all about following up on leads like that.
>> Cornelius Dushstore - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 04:41:31 EST SPLxxjsG No.46666 Reply >>46657this 20 year might deserve to get in trouble of the sexual jokes made to a child. joking or not its inappropriate . 20 year old men should not be talking to 14 year old girls about sex and dating
>> [name redacted] !h55/E7mIo6 - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 06:42:19 EST 9USm8rWw No.46670 Reply >>46666While I agree it's stupid and inappropriate at best, inappropriate does not always mean illegal. The person also didn't give the state as well, so it'll be difficult to give a proper answer.In my state, we have a specific "grooming" crime this would fall under, but that was only made a crime in 2014, so it might not be where the OP lives. Also to be charged with it, it has to be proven that he surely was talking to her to lead to sex eventually. Obviously, talking about fucking her is a big red flag that this was the intention, so it's basically up to whether OP can convince a jury that he was talking to this 14 year old about fucking her, with no intent of fucking her at all, which would be pretty difficult.Funny fact about our grooming law as well, is that it only counts if it end result (fucking someone under 16, taking sexual videos, etc...) is an indictable offence. You could talk to a 14 yeah old and basically groom them for the sole purpose of looking up their skirt, and it wouldn't be grooming, because that's only a summary offence.
>> :lime: - Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:43:27 EST +uGtlkEy No.46692 Reply your friend has nothing to worry about, cops are not at all about following up on leads like that.
Is this public defender giving my aunt false hope? View Thread Reply Hide Martha Blonningwad - Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:12:30 EST e4p1743r No.46686 File: 1597497150514.jpg -(710977B / 694.31KB, 1080x2340) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Hi all. My aunt has been with an abusive boyfriend for almost a decade now. This lifestyle and relationship is normal for her. But a month ago her boyfriend got into a heated argument with her pregnant daughter, grabbed a pistol (he is a convicted felon btw) and went outside and shot the gun into the ground 4 times. I'm assuming it was out of anger and to take control of the situation by force and fear. Well what happened was several neighbors called the police reporting that shots were fired and when the cops showed up my aunt's daughter actually told the cops that he did it and they arrested him. Even though he did not have the gun on him when he was arrested her being an eyewitness was enough to get him arrested for possession of a gun by a convicted felon. Well he plead not guilty and went to court and his public defender wanted to get him on house arrest so he could get out of jail until his case was over but the judge said absolutely not and instead sat another court hearing for next week for a "revocation hearing". The judge also said that if his probation is revoked he will have to serve both sentences consecutively, meaning he will have to serve the rest of his probation time in jail then if he is found guilty also serve the gun possession charge sentence right after. However he has been calling my aunt saying that his public defender said if he is not indicted on this gun charge then he will get out of jail and it will all be over with however bases upon the judge not allowing him out of jail and then having a "revocation hearing" it sounds as if this judge has made up his mind on the situation and will be sentencing him next week. Is this public defender just giving my aunt's boyfriend false hope? Based upon the details I have given does it sound like he is screwed? I live 300+ miles away so the information I receive is second-hand information and I come to you all to hopefully make some sense of it. My family wants him in jail but my aunt needs him to help pay bills without him she is struggling to keep the house hold above water. I am trying to help her as well and need to be prepared to help her long-term if her boyfriend is likely going to go away for awhile. Based upon what I know it sounds like he is but I would like to hear others who are more familiar with the law give insight. Thank you! 1 posts omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Esther Murdforth - Sat, 15 Aug 2020 13:19:47 EST +b/rGlec No.46688 Reply >>46687go back to leddit you epic frogposter >> [name redacted] !h55/E7mIo6 - Sat, 15 Aug 2020 14:19:57 EST 7XE+vugq No.46689 Reply >>46686It might help if you gave the state/country that the he's being charged in, otherwise it'll probably just be general information.Some probation orders have certain requirements, but this one looks like it's just "breaking the law" that he's broken. So yeah, if he is found not guilty of this crime crime with whatever the gun was, then it is possible that he could get off free.Depending on where you are though, the burden of proof for a revocation hearing can differ from a normal criminal case. In a criminal case, you usually need to have been proven to have done the crime beyond reasonable doubt (99.9% sure). In certain areas though, the revocation case only has to be more likely than not (51% sure you did it), which seems pretty likely considering there are witnesses. In this case, it's entirely possible to not be found guilty of committing whatever the gun crime was because of the higher standard required, but he could still be found breaking his parole, and would have to serve whatever the probation was.Depending on the jurisdiction, it sounds to me like the guy asked his defender "is there a chance I don't go to jail" and the defender answered with yes and gave the situation I said above, and the guy has now taken that as a likely situation. Based on the limited info though, I'd say having a witness, as well as the neighbours call, was enough evidence to satisfy the 51% to break probation. With whatever the criminal charge is, I'd imagine they'd need the actual gun and fingerprint it or something to prove possession beyond reasonable doubt. >> Rebecca Chublingdock - Tue, 18 Aug 2020 03:11:10 EST 53hpeirC No.46691 Reply >>46686The probation officer he/she has will show up in court for the revocation hearing stating why the probation should be revoked. If he simply missed a supervised probation meeting, that is enough. There are basically witnesses to hearing shots, and statements The Probation simply has to show some infraction. He may drag this on. But the revocation is different matter. It is asy to revoke probation, or reinstate it for that matter. So the DA, may have a case to revoke his probation. If anybody has the gun, do show it to police, the cops should have somehow located it to begin with.It's not cool depending on somebody who is at least this abusive. She needs to deny conversations with him. Or if applicable, record conversations via, jail, by getting his-self to say what happened. Jails do record phone calls.
>> Esther Murdforth - Sat, 15 Aug 2020 13:19:47 EST +b/rGlec No.46688 Reply >>46687go back to leddit you epic frogposter
>> [name redacted] !h55/E7mIo6 - Sat, 15 Aug 2020 14:19:57 EST 7XE+vugq No.46689 Reply >>46686It might help if you gave the state/country that the he's being charged in, otherwise it'll probably just be general information.Some probation orders have certain requirements, but this one looks like it's just "breaking the law" that he's broken. So yeah, if he is found not guilty of this crime crime with whatever the gun was, then it is possible that he could get off free.Depending on where you are though, the burden of proof for a revocation hearing can differ from a normal criminal case. In a criminal case, you usually need to have been proven to have done the crime beyond reasonable doubt (99.9% sure). In certain areas though, the revocation case only has to be more likely than not (51% sure you did it), which seems pretty likely considering there are witnesses. In this case, it's entirely possible to not be found guilty of committing whatever the gun crime was because of the higher standard required, but he could still be found breaking his parole, and would have to serve whatever the probation was.Depending on the jurisdiction, it sounds to me like the guy asked his defender "is there a chance I don't go to jail" and the defender answered with yes and gave the situation I said above, and the guy has now taken that as a likely situation. Based on the limited info though, I'd say having a witness, as well as the neighbours call, was enough evidence to satisfy the 51% to break probation. With whatever the criminal charge is, I'd imagine they'd need the actual gun and fingerprint it or something to prove possession beyond reasonable doubt.
>> Rebecca Chublingdock - Tue, 18 Aug 2020 03:11:10 EST 53hpeirC No.46691 Reply >>46686The probation officer he/she has will show up in court for the revocation hearing stating why the probation should be revoked. If he simply missed a supervised probation meeting, that is enough. There are basically witnesses to hearing shots, and statements The Probation simply has to show some infraction. He may drag this on. But the revocation is different matter. It is asy to revoke probation, or reinstate it for that matter. So the DA, may have a case to revoke his probation. If anybody has the gun, do show it to police, the cops should have somehow located it to begin with.It's not cool depending on somebody who is at least this abusive. She needs to deny conversations with him. Or if applicable, record conversations via, jail, by getting his-self to say what happened. Jails do record phone calls.
induced psychosis View Thread Reply Hide Cornelius Nicklebury - Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:42:34 EST gSvjobHh No.46658 File: 1595457754822.jpg -(670580B / 654.86KB, 1280x1137) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. if someone has a pychotic episode as a teen do to being over medicated on adderall and other psych meds can they get disability if the psychotic episode caused damage to themselves that resulted in minor disfigurement 3 posts omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Hamilton Subblefield - Sun, 26 Jul 2020 16:53:53 EST KKoPZMjs No.46665 Reply 1595796833248.jpg -(36689B / 35.83KB, 1316x866) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. >>46664thanksdoes ssDi apply to minor disfigurment ? >> Caroline Pickway - Sat, 01 Aug 2020 19:52:52 EST nHBmR+cR No.46672 Reply >>46665I am not an attorney, but if something interferes with your daily life, possibly you can have a case. Depending on what you seek to accomplish. >> Rebecca Chublingdock - Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:10:21 EST 53hpeirC No.46690 Reply >>46665If one was incapable to seek legal representation, due to mental imparment, if you will, one may be able to toll the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations is where one has a timeline to sue in a legal suit damages. It is a difficult path, one has to show why they were unable to seek legal representation. One could seek "damages' due to neglect, incompetence, pattern and practice. In civil, state, federal courts; personal injury due to Some of these. Seek a personal injury attorney that specializes in this field. The institution, one may google if the hospital have had issues. One may have a better chance to prevail in a case if the institution/hospital have had multiple complaints about staff, working in an atmosphere where adverse conditions have been noted. As a teen, one may stand a better chance to toll lilitations as an adult. Yea, only way is to seek competent legal representation. Have documents ready, if possibleseek documents. The hospitals, Drs. should readily be able to provide these at little or no cost, to provide to attorneys. Some attorneys are not working for ones best interests. Tread lightly, but be firm and organized. Use encryption if one can.
>> Hamilton Subblefield - Sun, 26 Jul 2020 16:53:53 EST KKoPZMjs No.46665 Reply 1595796833248.jpg -(36689B / 35.83KB, 1316x866) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. >>46664thanksdoes ssDi apply to minor disfigurment ?
>> Caroline Pickway - Sat, 01 Aug 2020 19:52:52 EST nHBmR+cR No.46672 Reply >>46665I am not an attorney, but if something interferes with your daily life, possibly you can have a case. Depending on what you seek to accomplish.
>> Rebecca Chublingdock - Tue, 18 Aug 2020 02:10:21 EST 53hpeirC No.46690 Reply >>46665If one was incapable to seek legal representation, due to mental imparment, if you will, one may be able to toll the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations is where one has a timeline to sue in a legal suit damages. It is a difficult path, one has to show why they were unable to seek legal representation. One could seek "damages' due to neglect, incompetence, pattern and practice. In civil, state, federal courts; personal injury due to Some of these. Seek a personal injury attorney that specializes in this field. The institution, one may google if the hospital have had issues. One may have a better chance to prevail in a case if the institution/hospital have had multiple complaints about staff, working in an atmosphere where adverse conditions have been noted. As a teen, one may stand a better chance to toll lilitations as an adult. Yea, only way is to seek competent legal representation. Have documents ready, if possibleseek documents. The hospitals, Drs. should readily be able to provide these at little or no cost, to provide to attorneys. Some attorneys are not working for ones best interests. Tread lightly, but be firm and organized. Use encryption if one can.
Liberate this man please View Thread Reply Hide Wesley Smallfoot - Sun, 03 May 2020 06:32:37 EST aY9nZj+a No.46625 File: 1588501957183.jpg -(30158B / 29.45KB, 615x359) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. http://www.dcor.state.ga.us/GDC/Offender/QueryWrite to this gentleman or send him books from Amazon.CHRISTOPHER MCNABB #0001267403Hays State Prison777 Underwood RoadP.O. Box 668Trion, GA 30753https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4DIKoQrKugI got a email back from regarding post-conviction assistance. Please provide the name of the inmate, the State where they are located and a phone number and name of the person who would be paying the retainer. We are not a pro bono organization. Thank you.What should we do to free Chris?https://chattooga1180.com/hays-prison-inmate-wants-new-trial/-----A Newton County man, who is a prisoner at Hays State Prison in Trion, and his wife have filed motions for new trials, according to a report from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.Both Christopher Michael McNabb and Cortney Marie Bell were convicted of killing their baby Caliyah in May 2019. The two contend that there is no evidence they killed their child. In his motion filed Monday, McNabb says prosecutors were unable to prove he killed baby Caliyah and that his prior attorney was ineffective during the trial.In her motion for a new trial, filed in late January, Bell also says prosecutors did not prove she was responsible for Caliyah’s death. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text. >> Beatrice Cronderfuck - Wed, 01 Jul 2020 12:34:43 EST kdwltWA8 No.46647 Reply if you free chris mcnabb i wont make a video of don & god (cough) killing bombers ( cough cough)
>> Beatrice Cronderfuck - Wed, 01 Jul 2020 12:34:43 EST kdwltWA8 No.46647 Reply if you free chris mcnabb i wont make a video of don & god (cough) killing bombers ( cough cough)
Need help hitting the lottery View Thread Reply Hide Nigel Drennerman - Thu, 13 Aug 2020 03:43:59 EST gZMk95IT No.46683 File: 1597304639300.jpg -(77940B / 76.11KB, 455x451) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Hey /law/Don't really know where to ask thisBut I stumbled upon about 4$ million in stock certificatesThey have the transfer form on back.How do I go about cashing in on this?Are there black market banks willing to do this?Any advice would be appreciated, and if come thru on a milli or two I'll toss some bitcoins around. You have my word, anon. User is currently banned from all boards >> Nigel Drennerman - Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:23:01 EST gZMk95IT No.46684 Reply >>46683 bump User is currently banned from all boards
>> Nigel Drennerman - Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:23:01 EST gZMk95IT No.46684 Reply >>46683 bump User is currently banned from all boards
Friend busted View Thread Reply Hide Emma Blonnerchurk - Fri, 22 Nov 2019 17:08:14 EST iz/jHET8 No.46547 File: 1574460494544.jpg -(74352B / 72.61KB, 720x554) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. My friend needs advice. She bought ecstasy from an international vendor online, was visited by a customs officer, and admitted to having made the purchase under pressure. The authorities are currently obtaining a warrant to search her room.What are the right steps for her to face minimum penalty? How extensively will the authorities be investigating her? She lives in Florida if that helps. Any advice greatly appreciated >> Alice Sangerdale - Wed, 25 Dec 2019 11:27:57 EST puggTd3w No.46584 Reply >>46547How did that go?No florida does not help. <joke But, they know nothing, unless you say it's ok. >> Cornelius Dushstore - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:29:11 EST SPLxxjsG No.46669 Reply >>46547shes should not have talked! >> David Hosslegold - Sun, 02 Aug 2020 09:24:39 EST GPadwEXB No.46673 Reply >>46669i don't know the laws for buying drugs across borders and having them delievered using mail servicesbut this really should be a simple possession charge.. depending on the amount of drugs purchasedhopefully that is all it amounts toshe shoulda said she was being set up but i'm sure there were paper trails
>> Alice Sangerdale - Wed, 25 Dec 2019 11:27:57 EST puggTd3w No.46584 Reply >>46547How did that go?No florida does not help. <joke But, they know nothing, unless you say it's ok.
>> Cornelius Dushstore - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:29:11 EST SPLxxjsG No.46669 Reply >>46547shes should not have talked!
>> David Hosslegold - Sun, 02 Aug 2020 09:24:39 EST GPadwEXB No.46673 Reply >>46669i don't know the laws for buying drugs across borders and having them delievered using mail servicesbut this really should be a simple possession charge.. depending on the amount of drugs purchasedhopefully that is all it amounts toshe shoulda said she was being set up but i'm sure there were paper trails
Can a state school require you to film your own home? View Thread Reply Hide Phoebe Pigglelock - Wed, 29 May 2019 16:58:22 EST HKXisE6P No.46399 File: 1559163502641.jpg -(22407B / 21.88KB, 480x473) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Hey /law/, hoping I don't need to do anything with this info but I do need some helpI'm taking an online course this summer that uses the lockdown exam browser (https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=XuX8WoeAycs)Part of it says that an instructore might require you to use a webcam.My question is, there's no way a state funded school (U.S., Virginia) can require me to film footage of my residence right? This is a state school with a campus, they have to let me test there right? If they try to tell me "No you have to test from your home with a camera on" how would I even challenge that? What kind of lawyer would I need?Thank you 7 posts omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Sidney Snodhood - Fri, 19 Jul 2019 14:58:12 EST g5X+otvH No.46431 Reply >>46399interesting >> Lydia Dartwell - Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:08:13 EST sWjOdEuv No.46435 Reply >>46399If you like the idea of home schooling, then by all means do so. They aren't asking you to film your house. Just make it so you and your webcam are conversing.Surely the instructor would like yo converse with their students. There is online psychiatry that needs the client to actually appear in real time. The school must be approved and likely licensed to use remote teaching. >> Jack Herryhork - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 20:40:03 EST SPLxxjsG No.46671 Reply >>46399if its proctoru or honorlock ya its to make sure you dont have answers posted behind your computer
>> Lydia Dartwell - Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:08:13 EST sWjOdEuv No.46435 Reply >>46399If you like the idea of home schooling, then by all means do so. They aren't asking you to film your house. Just make it so you and your webcam are conversing.Surely the instructor would like yo converse with their students. There is online psychiatry that needs the client to actually appear in real time. The school must be approved and likely licensed to use remote teaching.
>> Jack Herryhork - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 20:40:03 EST SPLxxjsG No.46671 Reply >>46399if its proctoru or honorlock ya its to make sure you dont have answers posted behind your computer
Shamanism View Thread Reply Hide Reuben Wuttinggold - Sun, 28 Jul 2019 15:58:09 EST KA3ySLP+ No.46441 File: 1564343889445.png -(296500B / 289.55KB, 2000x898) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Some police officer actually forgot to tell me and forgot to tell everyone else that if you combine psychedelics (lsd, shooms, ...) with cannabis in high doses alone then it's actually not the same activity as drug use but belongs to a term considered shamanism and that HUMANITY WOULD NOT HAVE SURVIVED if people do not use this shamanism so they will not become a shithead and start a fight because they are bastards that also are assholes instead of being kind normal people that come along with eachother. 1 posts and 1 images omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Albert Cliddlewill - Tue, 03 Sep 2019 21:14:29 EST 8tjA55E3 No.46459 Reply >>46441apparently this shamanism thing is becoming a real problem with the kidshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fc9JzvuvNkA >> Rebecca Clottingsot - Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:12:38 EST gpSToKAT No.46478 Reply Following the shamanic path with psychedelic drugs so far has led me to Luciferianism. I'd love to talk about it >> Cornelius Dushstore - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:28:20 EST SPLxxjsG No.46668 Reply do tell i am interested in this myself>>46478
>> Albert Cliddlewill - Tue, 03 Sep 2019 21:14:29 EST 8tjA55E3 No.46459 Reply >>46441apparently this shamanism thing is becoming a real problem with the kidshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fc9JzvuvNkA
>> Rebecca Clottingsot - Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:12:38 EST gpSToKAT No.46478 Reply Following the shamanic path with psychedelic drugs so far has led me to Luciferianism. I'd love to talk about it
>> Cornelius Dushstore - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:28:20 EST SPLxxjsG No.46668 Reply do tell i am interested in this myself>>46478
Okay so hear me out View Thread Reply Hide Esther Suddleman - Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:38:20 EST c3gt6ezc No.46597 File: 1580071100195.png -(107194B / 104.68KB, 366x572) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. I. Improper use of a motor-vehicle is legally considered to be misuse of a deadly weapon. Provided.Ii. People revving their engines at pedestrians are essentially threatening them with a lethal weapon.IiI. It is hereby legal to shoot and kill a driver revving their engine at you with a firearm in self-defense.Any questions? >> Ian Dranningshit - Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:27:51 EST fG3UefMK No.46608 Reply are you possibly retarded for your job and the people around you any questions >> Cornelius Dushstore - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:01:55 EST SPLxxjsG No.46667 Reply >>46597dont shoot people for revving engines. also when you kill someone with a car its vehicular manslaughter not murder iwth a deadly weaponcars were not designed to kill people quite the opposite
>> Ian Dranningshit - Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:27:51 EST fG3UefMK No.46608 Reply are you possibly retarded for your job and the people around you any questions
>> Cornelius Dushstore - Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:01:55 EST SPLxxjsG No.46667 Reply >>46597dont shoot people for revving engines. also when you kill someone with a car its vehicular manslaughter not murder iwth a deadly weaponcars were not designed to kill people quite the opposite
