420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
A subject is required when posting a new thread
Subject
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich

penis pump

Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
Of Norks and Nukes. by Charles Sankinwill - Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:33:52 EST ID:T43ZgZvA No.384486 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484246032457.jpg -(14332B / 14.00KB, 480x360) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 14332
Basically there doesn't seem to be any way to stop the DPRK from achieving deliverable nuclear weapons. No one likes them; they are a diplomatic pain in everyone's asses, run Nazi-style death-camps and produce nothing of value. Thus it is obvious to the regime that the only way it can keep this up in the long term is with a deterrent. Just having a nuke you can't deliver is enough to deter invasion (because you could set it off in the middle of the invading army). If you can put one (or more) on a missile then American carrier-groups and Chinese tank battalions et al, change from threats to convenient targets. The nuke is the great equalizer since, in modern warfare at least, it is much easier to destroy than to defend.

This is a problem because the Kim dynasty is plausibly crazy enough to use them (with honorable mentions to Pakistan and Israel). Similarly it may well embolden others to change the global power-balance in the same way. Most industrialized countries could easily build nukes but have chosen not to. As technology globalizes more and more countries will find they have the capability to build them. If the Ukraine had kept it's nukes they would still have Crimea. If Osirak had been rebuilt Saddam may well be growing old in Baghdad. The Japanese could go nuclear in a long weekend. Each time someone does the risk of nuclear war increases. It also severely weakens the hand of existing global powers. Consider the fact that Fatty Kim III (as the Chinese call him) is happily building on even as the rest of the world helplessly begs him to stop. Also, the only real defense against a nuke is another nuke. If Iran gets a nuke Saudi will want one too ect.

So where do you guys think this will end up leading?
51 posts and 11 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
William Chazzlelire - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:39:13 EST ID:reMs3Ms1 No.384769 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384738
You're the definition of a chickenhawk.
>>
Eugene Bloffingshit - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:29:42 EST ID:S8dR7Caa No.384777 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384763
To be fair that was a drastically different era and no one sees nuclear weapons in the same light anymore.
>>
Eliza Sashstone - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:12:52 EST ID:I3FnSNZB No.384778 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384769

You trapped in the black & white idea that if somebody is willing to use force in response to aggression that makes them a "hawk."

So you don't even know the basics or your petty insult.

You guys are willing to sit there and watch North Korea take weeks, months to set up a nuclear missile to launch and do nothing. Your'e willing to hand Russia other people's countries out of your own fear. You're the bullied.

Not making a decision is making a decision.
>>
Eliza Sashstone - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:17:18 EST ID:I3FnSNZB No.384779 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384759

You spend more time dodging having to defend your own argument than anybody I've seen.

Can't say I'm "obsessed" with the Norwegian guy, it just stuns me somebody can be so clueless with a dearth of history proving his thinking leads to a bigger disaster than war often does.

>You are rapidly becoming the most toxic and illogical poster on this board, and that is really saying something.

Go fuck yourself. Write another post about my posting technique you little pussy and stop being such a baby. I'd rather be a "toxic poster" then a bunch of sorry children intellectuals who think they know anything about the world and are just so sure of themselves.

Sorry you're wrong and believe stupid ideas with a proven history of failure. Don't blame me for that.
>>
Jack Goodridge - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:42:20 EST ID:rw+PgsvI No.384782 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384779
>You spend more time dodging having to defend your own argument than anybody I've seen.
And what exactly am I defending against? The accusation that I went to college?

>I'd rather be a "toxic poster" then a bunch of sorry children intellectuals who think they know anything about the world and are just so sure of themselves.
Yes, well, if you want to prove that you're not an intellectual child who is just so sure of himself, getting into political arguments on the internet is definitely the way to do it.


Capitalism vs Gov Control by Thomas Semblepat - Wed, 11 Jan 2017 05:48:54 EST ID:V+nfNsYY No.384431 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484131734184.jpg -(52566B / 51.33KB, 602x672) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 52566
This guy deprogrammed a Bernie supporter in 10 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTVbZ-Df7AQ

Interesting exchange. How old were you when you realized Gov is the problem, not capitalism?
58 posts and 15 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Eugene Gangerstock - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:31:24 EST ID:zRmVzsZv No.384766 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384762
>It's like pointing to the USA as 'proof' that capitalism is bad.
What's bad about capitalism is exploitation and wealth segregation, the U.S follows this base criticism of capitalism to a T.
So yeah the U.S, and every other country for that matter, is proof that capitalism is bad
>>
Angus Nevingford - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:52:30 EST ID:IaepfqX2 No.384767 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384766

I get what you're getting at, but I disagree. The point was that just because someone fails at something doesn't prove that it was a bad idea. It just proves that they failed at it. The Nordic countries have a successful capitalistic model that works a lot better than the US' does, and criticism of capitalism derived from observing the US wouldn't necessarily make sense to a Swede or a Dane if you tried to apply it to their countries.
Capitalism is just private ownership of the means of production, and it can be done relatively successfully depending on what you do with it. IMO, the particular problems in the US stems more from corporate co-option of the government more than an inherent failure of capitalism itself.

I think it's more productive to point out flaws that are more or less inherent to capitalism as a system, such as rampant waste of resources, the inherent unequal distribution of wealth and power or the perverse incentives to fuck over the common man, if that makes sense. Maybe I'm just nitpicking though.
>>
Angus Bammerdale - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:04:02 EST ID:gB+6kfKY No.384768 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1484672642136.gif -(3060308B / 2.92MB, 291x300) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
thanks for the heads up on the new video, adam!
>>
Eugene Gangerstock - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:56:28 EST ID:zRmVzsZv No.384775 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384767
Funny you should mention Scandinavia as I am from here myself. Social democracy still entails exploitation

>and it can be done relatively successfully depending on what you do with it.
You need to define successfully. I could state that a slave based economy is also successful, that doesn't mean it's good.

>the particular problems in the US stems more from corporate co-option of the government more than an inherent failure of capitalism itself.
The economy, as a rule, develops parallel to the social and political development. In other words the corporate interest in the U.S government is a direct result from the economic system.

>Maybe I'm just nitpicking though.
No, they are perfectly reasonable criticism. And it's exactly those problems, and a boatload of other, that socialism seeks to abolish.
>>
Lydia Guttingforth - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:29:54 EST ID:LoF4eMRz No.384781 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1484692194620.jpg -(15343B / 14.98KB, 281x293) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>384762
But that is exactly 'no true communism.'

Let's do away with a non trivial distinction.
Trying to do something and doing something are totally different.
Human beings have tried to create stable communist states in the past.
No human being has ever successfully created a (truly) stable communist state in the past.

Though the person you are arguing with asked if you are someone who thinks it has never been tried, you changed the argument into having never been accomplished. By this reasoning, it is true that communism won't ever be achieved until communism works; a proposition I'll hasten to agree with.

Part of the problem with trying to establish a stateless classless society is that there is no point at which it can be said to be stateless or classless. Even in pure anarchic "post-scarcity" society, there are those with influence, and those without -- There are social conditioners which your worldview would require to maintain statelessness and classlessness, and there are those conditioned by the conditioners.

The statement that such a structure could exist is similar to the anarcho capitalist claim that true capitalism has never existed and that the only order society needs is the non-aggression principle.

It's strictly true because that order can never exist. It's an impossible utopian ideal, and all attempts at achieving it are given a free pass by its proponents until it fails. And when it does, it is quickly defined out of existence i.e., doomed to fail, and never REALLY part of the utopian dream in the first place.
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.


Global Opinion of the U.S. by Sophie Blorryforth - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:43:28 EST ID:aipWvXQk No.384606 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484441008602.png -(23018B / 22.48KB, 640x389) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 23018
So, how will the world view the U.S. over the next 4 to 8 years, with the new administration about to take the reins?

It was relatively nice to be able to travel abroad over the last eight years with Obama, like "Haha, yeah we elected a literal retard before, that was dumb, at least we got this guy in office now, not as bad right?" Now, holy shit man, going overseas is just going to be embarrassing.

Does anyone actually think our favorability rating has any chance of improving over the next several years?

Would appreciate reports from people from outside the U.S. especially.

Half my family is from Japan and I can tell you Japan is petty pessimistic about the new administration. Had several family friends, relatives, etc., ask if the orange guy actually could become president before the election in a very concerned way. I can't say I know a single Japanese person who is enthused with the pick lol.
24 posts and 5 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Jarvis Fuckingworth - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:57:29 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.384676 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384674
>OP, in my opinion, Bush and Obama are cut from the exact same cloth, they're both from political dynasties,

Bush, I get. Very dynastic. But, Obama? Seriously?

>Barack Obama has probably been the worst president I've lived through,

Just wait a few months...
>>
Sidney Crunningridge - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:33:49 EST ID:rSCOCuPW No.384684 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384674
>Barack Obama has probably been the worst president I've lived through
Are you 8 years old? serious question...
>>
Caroline Picklebidging - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:08:34 EST ID:sMjBd+5i No.384699 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384674
>both from political dynasties
>Obama
>political dynasty
I dont think you know what these words youre using mean...
>>
Reuben Gonnermare - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:12:27 EST ID:5atuYg1C No.384731 Ignore Report Quick Reply
at least it looks like we've established that even trumpkins know that the world will hate the u.s. more under trump.

>buh buh buh obongo bad too
lol.
>>
Oliver Fenningstot - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:17:21 EST ID:8I3ViJfk No.384780 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384684
You stole my joke. :(


Way to Not have a MLK Day general guys by Emma Cibblenat - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:26:09 EST ID:7gmC77wa No.384709 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484605569732.png -(478470B / 467.26KB, 2048x1536) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 478470
I mean, pretty much anything related to MLK happening TO DAY right now, post it
Ex. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/rob-schneider-mlk-martin-luther-king_us_587d1a6de4b0b3c7a7b261dc?
>Guy who marched with MLK getting shit from Trump and lectured by Rob Schneider
5 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Lydia Chaddlelane - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:20:12 EST ID:sMjBd+5i No.384745 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384744
And like Jesus, we tend to sweep his socialistic leanings under the rug as much as possible.
>>
Sophie Danderfield - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:21:22 EST ID:VGQcFn/+ No.384761 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384741
He was a communist agitator who gave a ridiculously overrated speech. He's only considered a hero because some inbred shot him.
>>
Alice Bellytog - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:39:41 EST ID:2Ye63FiM No.384770 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384761
>because COINTELPRO had him killed
>>
William Chazzlelire - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:19:05 EST ID:reMs3Ms1 No.384774 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384770
Why doesn't this conspiracy theory have HALF the traction of the JFK conspiracies? Because it's true?
>>
Hannah Fullerstone - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:05:18 EST ID:ZYy74fan No.384776 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384774
Yep.


Trump supporters - Die hards or willing to dump him? by William Cacklehood - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:40:43 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.384718 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484613643290.png -(49419B / 48.26KB, 590x207) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 49419
OK...so I went over to Circlejerk just to see how bad /The_Donald/ was, and they are in full retard mode. I say that definitively, because 1/2 the posts are about Project Veritas and one recent one is STILL screaming about "OMG! HILLARY AND COMET PIZZA!" Yes, they are still going on about "Pizzagate," even though it is literally the most ridiculous story to come out of The Future and Circlejerk since that one titled, "I swear guys, my fedora got me laid!"

I started to think about political loyalties, etc. Mine own have changed recently with me writing off the Democratic Party as mostly populated by nothing but careerists who will change positions just to get elected. Ones who don't even try to win elections outside their safe seats.

Now, how about the other side?

Trump will be president. He has made a LOT of very BIGLY promises.

What could he do to lose your support? If you are a Trump voter, what are some things he could do or say that would change your mind about him? Is there anything?

This is a legitimate question. What would it take for you to not support Trump?*


*And no, the other option isn't Hillary.... So no more talking about her.
5 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Samuel Feblingwut - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:04:16 EST ID:Vwoc9qnJ No.384730 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384722
the type of trump supporter you get around parts of the internet like here or 4shit or leddit won't ever change, or at least won't ever tell you if they did. they're mostly in it to just argue with people on the internet. there's no point in ever admitting they were wrong about trump for them, so i wouldn't hold your breath.
>>
Phoebe Wangerchedge - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:02:48 EST ID:QS8evc2c No.384735 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384730

Yeah the hardcore are there for troll worship of a Troll God-Emperor, they'll never change.

Watching actual Trump voters regret their life choice is here - https://twitter.com/trumpbigregrets

The first 100 days of Republicans and Trump running the USA is going to probably set us backwards at least 10 years. Then there's the standard Republican "crash the economy" and "hot war of distraction" that's coming. Let's just hope the don't fail at domestic security like Bush did...

Hold on to your jobs. We're about to get robbed by the country's most famous con-man.
>>
Oliver Fenningstot - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:26:02 EST ID:8I3ViJfk No.384747 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384730
>they're mostly in it to just argue with people on the internet
This is so fucking true.
>>
William Cacklehood - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:51:54 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.384771 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384747
Yeah, that line is really a good summary of those types.

I mean, Pizzagate is still a thing?
>>
Clara Pockway - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:58:08 EST ID:rSCOCuPW No.384773 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384730
>they're mostly in it to just argue with people on the internet.
eh, arguing kinda implies you have points and counter points, engage in a discussion, etc. The trumptards here just copy and paste memes from circlejerk and can't process anything else or synthesize an original thought.


Lock Her Up! When Convenient... by Jarvis Fuckingworth - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:15:49 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.384679 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484586949202.jpg -(165225B / 161.35KB, 550x309) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 165225
Trump promised that he would put Hillary Clinton on trial for treason. He later walked back that statement after his election.
But, he seems to always come back to the "crooked Hillary," trope whenever he is pressed on something.

Here is my theory - Trump will use HRC as a handy "Reichstag Fire," whenever he needs it. In fact, he may end up arresting her and putting her on trial (ex-judicial military trial BTW,) should he need a diversion from some scandal. Or should he need an excuse to flex his muscle.

My bet, even odds on Clinton ending up in GITMO within the next 2 years.
>>
Sidney Geffingnad - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:55:34 EST ID:c9IczgP3 No.384689 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384679
>Clinton ending up in GITMO
That'll never happen. No one at that level of power will ever have any serious consequences even if they committed real treason.

But yeah, it wouldn't surprise me one bit if Trumpelstiltskin brings this back up when convenient.
>>
Jarvis Fuckingworth - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:11:42 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.384700 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384689
So...you are going more for the "reliable scapegoat," model than the, "lock her up," model.

I mean, I have even odds on the jail part, in part because I agree with you that she will be scapegoated at any chance Trump gets...which he has already done...so...yeah 100% chance of that.
>>
Phoebe Wangerchedge - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:23:54 EST ID:QS8evc2c No.384740 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Never happen. What you will see is Trump and Clinton together at events, parties over these next 4 years. Maybe even an embrace and smiles.
>>
Hedda Chommerspear - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 01:01:13 EST ID:K8X7jP2d No.384743 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I suppose I'd rather him prosecute Clinton for a few quick and dirty approval points instead of going to war or something. I mean, if I have to choose.
>>
William Cacklehood - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:54:23 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.384772 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384743
Eh. My bog concern is that once Trump gets a taste for jailing his opponents, and the big surge in the polls that comes with it, (you know Redneckistan would LOVE to see a Reality TV style trial of Clinton...they will lap this shit up...) that he just simply will never stop.


I don't see a problem with this by Albert Nickledale - Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:48:40 EST ID:URtPjsoE No.384218 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1483825720721.png -(662379B / 646.85KB, 747x514) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 662379
Anyone else honestly want to live in angrywhitemanistan?
74 posts and 22 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Lydia Chaddlelane - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:33:23 EST ID:sMjBd+5i No.384732 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384704
>holy shit the disconnect from reality
It's pretty much all I see anti-SJWs say. A video of someone saying some racist, or otherwise rude shit and they cry about how everyone needs to just shut up and get over it.

>people who want to ban nazi propaganda are just as bad as the nazis really, right
So you DO want to restrict speech and ideas. But it's okay because you only want to ban speech and ideas that you disagree with

>quit trying to control what people are allowed to say and believe
I agree, you should.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/11/21/trump-is-president-theyll-deport-you-soon-man-unloads-on-muslim-uber-driver/?utm_term=.0708dbae8b3d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXNJgL4TWSs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVskTecaw1w
>>
Phyllis Fanfield - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:45:38 EST ID:Nla6yjir No.384733 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384732
> A video of someone saying some racist, or otherwise rude shit and they cry about how everyone needs to just shut up

>It's pretty much all I see anti-SJWs say.

Uh.. you put the "anti" in there by mistake, didn't you?
>>
Lydia Chaddlelane - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:47:30 EST ID:sMjBd+5i No.384734 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384733
Nope. You're going to have to face the reality that the SJW caricature and the anti-SJW crusader are two sides of the same coin.
>>
Jack Droblingforth - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:53:17 EST ID:6T2FD4LE No.384742 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I've never seen an anti sjw who came off more intelligent than most high school students.
>>
Clara Pockway - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:35:50 EST ID:rSCOCuPW No.384758 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384734
the difference is that SJW's exist only on tumblr and anti-SJW's make up the bulk of some mainstream political parties.


USA/Russia by Angus Turveyridge - Fri, 30 Dec 2016 10:55:25 EST ID:X8esPtoC No.383758 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1483113325267.jpg -(179584B / 175.38KB, 590x350) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 179584
So Obama decided to expel 35 Russian diplomats from the USA under the mere accusation that Russia tampered (mysteriously) with the 2016 election.

And then Putin, being the mature world leader he is, is just like, 'I'm not going to retaliate. The American diplomats can stay in Russia.'

Good on him to keep a level head and act mature even whilst dealing with Barack Obama. I mean, Obama can only get away with so much drama and bullshit, and I'm glad that Putin wasn't baited by Obama's ridiculousness.

What do you guys think of our current standing (the USA) with Russia? What do you want to see in the future of our relationship-to-be with Russia once Trump is in office?
97 posts and 11 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
George Fummerspear - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:03:56 EST ID:X8esPtoC No.384691 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384687
I'm so glad you got me reading more into this because I just found out about UNSCOM, which has only furthered my distrust in the UN and agrees with my theory that the UN privately allows terrorism where it benefits Europe.
>>
Caroline Picklebidging - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:56:50 EST ID:sMjBd+5i No.384696 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384690
>they just roll with whatever the president wants to say
Gee, its almost like the President is their boss or something
Imagine that
>>
Cornelius Sallerheck - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:13:56 EST ID:i1eo8CqX No.384707 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384696
So to be clear, you are acknowledging that intel agencies are more concerned with doing their boss's bidding than with telling the truth. Which makes any average citizen who unquestioningly believes anything they have to say a tremendous retard.

Which is, of course, entirely his point.
>>
Caroline Picklebidging - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:35:39 EST ID:sMjBd+5i No.384710 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384707
Im acknowledging nothing because i am not in any intelligence agency, and neither are you.

The only thing that has made apparent is that the intel agencies wont undermine the president when he starts a ground war. The theory that they make shit up to suit the bizarre illuminati globalist agenda TrumpTards have concocted has also been for the most part discredited.
>>
Martha Ferryworth - Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:12:31 EST ID:XqOr0TAj No.384757 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384675
> Obama bought NASA.
I see and agree with your point as a whole but NASA is a fucktarded example as they have been saying the same shit for decades regardless of the president.


meme magic to prevent mass shootings? by Isabella Crizzlemene - Sun, 15 Jan 2017 22:15:15 EST ID:nYYBCuwj No.384645 Locked Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484536515792.jpg -(14869B / 14.52KB, 256x197) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 14869
How many mass shooters complained they were made to do it by the Government using mind control?

Aaron Alexis, Myron May, Santiago etc.

Why do the shooters carry out the attacks, in addition to being tortured by the Government using mind control weapons? Because they want to raise awareness of mind control.

Mind control to create killers is totally legit btw, just watch what they did to this mouse:

https://www.rt.com/viral/373542-mind-control-lasers-mice/

But how do we stop this, saving lives and preventing the Governments attempts to overrule the 2nd amendment?

Meme magic.

Nobody will go on a mass shooting to raise awareness of mind control if everyone on the internet already knows about it.
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Locked
Thread has been locked
Thread was locked by: Mintzs
Reason: No.
>>
Jarvis Fuckingworth - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:59:45 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.384677 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384645
>RT link

LOL!
Stay fucking classy...
>>
Matilda Chebberman - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:14:01 EST ID:IaepfqX2 No.384678 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>please repost on the future

nb
>>
Rebecca Billinghall - Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:01:19 EST ID:7R21BCb6 No.384682 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Idk how to tell you this, but your a gullable idiot. Shame your doctor didnt tell you, he had to hear it from 420chan


The elusive peaceful egalitarian black lives matter advocates. by Caroline Wittingbanks - Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:02:58 EST ID:LoF4eMRz No.384552 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484355778096.jpg -(37591B / 36.71KB, 640x634) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 37591
>BLM activists chant "kill whitey"

It's just an expression, you have failed to include context, that statement doesn't represent BLM.

>BLM activists try to set a man on fire

They don't represent BLM because BLM is focused on the importance of all lives. (especially black ones.)

>This list of shit that actually happened, actually happened

Yeah, but show me the particular people who said it did, and I'll show you people who just don't understand the CONTEXT, and the NUANCE, of the TRUE BLM social movement... The truly true BLM movement would never include examples contrary to my predetermined parameters, else it's not really the BLM movement.


Where are they /pol/? Where are the true, actual, bonafide advocates and activists of the peaceful egalitarian movement I've been hearing about? It seems that once a black lives matter advocate is discovered to be a liar, or black lives matter activist is shown to be a violent criminal, they are quickly defined out of the group with which a common motive is shared.
31 posts and 4 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Esther Gucklekat - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 21:42:11 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.384613 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384599
>https://policy.m4bl.org/end-war-on-black-people/

I like how you found Movement for Black Lives and then said they were Black Lives Matter....clever trick you little racist.

Maybe you should go off of what www.blacklivesmatter.com says instead of apply some other group's words to them.

Just saying....
>>
Fucking Blackworth - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 22:59:59 EST ID:wNYkBrQZ No.384614 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384593
>Fun fact. Police officers are some of the biggest advocates for body cameras to be worn at all times on duty. No NOT EVEN CLOSE. Some who have self control have no real issue with it, dashcams are widely accepted. But the city cop, interacting with the public in say higher crime areas do not like the idea.

Say even FBI Director James Comey doesn't like the practice of 'go-pro' cams. Claims it interfears with police work, keeping them from using force, 'afraid' to even simply get out of their cars. You have heard the word on him have you people not?

The official mission statement of the FBI has changed from when they were more-so objective entity to when 'after' Bush took office.

>You know who aren't such big fans of body cameras? BlackLivesMatter.

Yea whatever.' Body cams, dash cams. There is a saying video doesn't lie. Eh, some stuff cannot be altered very easily.
>>
Fucking Blackworth - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 23:42:32 EST ID:wNYkBrQZ No.384615 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1484455352616.jpg -(89975B / 87.87KB, 620x420) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
pickup xBLM = ted bundy, duh. Just a passing phae o the radical 'activist right'
'self-victimizing white'
>>
Fucking Blackworth - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 23:47:31 EST ID:wNYkBrQZ No.384616 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1484455651616.jpg -(451192B / 440.62KB, 3221x2415) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Hope he scratched his sniper rifle there. Serious, hese people are bonkers.
The weeping for my country shit by the right. The momentary tea party crap,
screw you losers. You have no self determination, no self-direction. No
awareness of country, no awareness of agendas and who is pulling the
strings.
>>
Esther Gucklekat - Sun, 15 Jan 2017 12:22:32 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.384632 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384616
Amen, brother....amen...


World War 3 by Caroline Billingstock - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 06:49:39 EST ID:6eWWs5kA No.384580 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1484394579314.jpg -(119327B / 116.53KB, 1715x988) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 119327
Why I feel like the World War 3 will start soon?
I feel like it's not going to be about America vs. Russia, there's more then it. The whole world is fucked, the europe was taken by the muslims and has no control over them, avery country has a bunch of problems that can't be fixed. The shit is in everywhere, everything brings to it...
2 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Hedda Bavingsud - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:36:34 EST ID:+4V9pxKg No.384589 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1484418994788.jpg -(162675B / 158.86KB, 700x700) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>Why I feel like the World War 3 will start soon?
Because you are an idiot or you have a paranoid personality disorder?
>>
Hamilton Duckhall - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:43:00 EST ID:IaepfqX2 No.384594 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384589

I don't know, I get that feeling too sometimes. It won't be between Russia and the US, though. Nobody wants that, and Putin is likely too smart to allow such an escalation. Hopefully, NATO will have learned to cease expanding eastwards.

What I'm more concerned about is an USA vs China showdown over dominance in East Asia. China is willing to go to war over the Taiwan issue and I'm not sure that the new American administration is able to navigate those matters as smoothly as previous administrations have. Trump's cabinet picks aren't very promising to say the least. Add to that Xi Jinping's need to appear strong before and during the coming National Congress of an increasingly nationalistic CCP, and you're looking at a potentially volatile mix of factors. We'll see.
>>
Augustus Pockhood - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:09:19 EST ID:o93WwLxa No.384598 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384594
A war with Russia is more likely than a war with China
>>
Simon Gomblelutch - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:14:50 EST ID:8Jh2i/ky No.384602 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384598
Being killed by a cow more likely than being killed by a shark.
>>
Sophie Blorryforth - Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:33:12 EST ID:aipWvXQk No.384604 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384594
lol nope. too much economically at stake, and both countries are ultimately puppet-strung by capitalist interests. in that sense there's relatively little the wealthy have to gain from friendship with russia, as opposed to what the military industrial complex has to gain from more proxy wars with russia. corporate america would be throwing a massive hissy fit if that weren't true when sanctions were imposed on russia.


Hate crime? by Rebecca Biddleville - Wed, 04 Jan 2017 20:59:59 EST ID:u3MTth75 No.384019 Ignore Report Reply Quick Reply
File: 1483581599353.webm [mp4] -(1922861B / 1.83MB, 224x400) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 1922861
2017

>4 blacks steal a van
>use it to kidnapped a trump supporter
>torture him
>literally stream it live on facebook

Videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDajmXg-wpg
https://www.youtube.com/v/rfzvrCwjfLE

How hard would the MSM go if these were whites doing this to a black guy?
70 posts and 7 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Caroline Gigglefoot - Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:36:42 EST ID:aeTjtZBW No.384480 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384345
You never hear this argument, but several centuries of selective breeding must have a substantial effect on their population. It's not an coincidence there are so much afro-American athletes.
>>
Betsy Pinderville - Thu, 12 Jan 2017 05:44:27 EST ID:Mo8NRdQF No.384481 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384480

That's just because of size though. Africa has the biggest and smallest humans in the world. Given the extreme genetic diversity of Africa, intelligence should be as variable as well.
>>
Walter Hiblingson - Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:34:50 EST ID:F7t9hQxK No.384485 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384481
>Africa has the biggest
I thought the Swedes were the biggest now?
>>
Esther Dartfuck - Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:18:29 EST ID:KZpsnCFv No.384554 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1484356709652.jpg -(37939B / 37.05KB, 452x640) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>384062

> No real indication the guy was a Trump supporter

> he was mentally challenged or some kind of "special needs" person

I mean, there IS a pretty strong correlation there.
>>
Phoebe Denderdock - Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:32:31 EST ID:1qezcbq/ No.384555 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>384485
Dutch are the tallest Europeans....they have a fetish for it.


Pages Next>>
0 1 2 3 4 5
Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.