LIGO Detects Gravitational Waves View Thread Reply Hide William Fowler - Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:18:29 EST y/fkgY/C No.56038 File: 1455207509740.jpg -(187125B / 182.74KB, 1200x999) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. http://www.ligo.org/news/detection-press-release.pdf>Based on the observed signals, LIGO scientists estimate that the black holes for this event were about 29 and 36 times the mass of the sun, and the event took place 1.3 billion years ago. About 3 times the mass of the sun was converted into gravitational waves in a fraction of a second — with a peak power output about 50 times that of the whole visible universe. By looking at the time of arrival of the signals — the detector in Livingston recorded the event 7 milliseconds before the detector in Hanford — scientists can say that the source was located in the Southern Hemisphere.Get hype! 11 posts and 1 images omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Cecelia Payne-Gaposchkin - Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:18:57 EST 415JX8nG No.56065 Reply >>56061I was thinking about that too brotha, but I guess electric cars are built with a multitude of systems to create redundancy; multiple brake systems in case the pressure gets lost it one, it just switches to another system for example.It really emphasizes how cheap mechanics have become >> William Herschel - Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:14:58 EST fDZ3h+Vd No.56072 Reply >>56065This, incase of malfunction the cars on the road today that have autonomous driving of some sort already have systems in place that bring the car to gentle stop and ofcourse they include/would include some kind of manual control. >> Carl Seyfert - Sun, 21 Feb 2016 04:51:26 EST Yyh+3hGH No.56073 Reply Inb4 assholes figure out that putting more mannequins in the path of an AI car than it's carrying passengers will cause it to decide to crash into a barrier rather than into the fake people on the road, and hackers reprogram your car for to deliver you and your valuables to a location conveniently absent of police and witnesses.
>> Cecelia Payne-Gaposchkin - Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:18:57 EST 415JX8nG No.56065 Reply >>56061I was thinking about that too brotha, but I guess electric cars are built with a multitude of systems to create redundancy; multiple brake systems in case the pressure gets lost it one, it just switches to another system for example.It really emphasizes how cheap mechanics have become
>> William Herschel - Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:14:58 EST fDZ3h+Vd No.56072 Reply >>56065This, incase of malfunction the cars on the road today that have autonomous driving of some sort already have systems in place that bring the car to gentle stop and ofcourse they include/would include some kind of manual control.
>> Carl Seyfert - Sun, 21 Feb 2016 04:51:26 EST Yyh+3hGH No.56073 Reply Inb4 assholes figure out that putting more mannequins in the path of an AI car than it's carrying passengers will cause it to decide to crash into a barrier rather than into the fake people on the road, and hackers reprogram your car for to deliver you and your valuables to a location conveniently absent of police and witnesses.
Pluto is a planet again View Thread Reply Hide George Herbig - Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:08:55 EST CLrN9E3V No.54501 File: 1413220135538.jpg -(56602B / 55.28KB, 600x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. as of oct 2nd 2014 pluto's a planet what are your thoughts /sagan/ 48 posts and 6 images omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Caroline Herschel - Sun, 07 Feb 2016 03:26:52 EST tQX5ylFX No.56020 Reply >>56014How does it turn? >> Henry Draper - Sun, 07 Feb 2016 04:00:14 EST YHjXylC8 No.56021 Reply 1454835614254.png -(168472B / 164.52KB, 740x697) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. >>56018Unless they were directly opposed, they'd collide or fling eachother into funny orbits eventually. Though smaller planets further out would take longer.There's a reason planets tend to fall into an orbital resonance. >> Thomas Henderson - Sun, 07 Feb 2016 19:40:58 EST +iTpAL43 No.56022 Reply I love you Pluto
>> Caroline Herschel - Sun, 07 Feb 2016 03:26:52 EST tQX5ylFX No.56020 Reply >>56014How does it turn?
>> Henry Draper - Sun, 07 Feb 2016 04:00:14 EST YHjXylC8 No.56021 Reply 1454835614254.png -(168472B / 164.52KB, 740x697) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. >>56018Unless they were directly opposed, they'd collide or fling eachother into funny orbits eventually. Though smaller planets further out would take longer.There's a reason planets tend to fall into an orbital resonance.
Cut and dry, Black and White (-Holes) View Thread Reply Hide Space Shimapanzee - Thu, 21 May 2015 17:47:06 EST KymFiCZg No.55338 File: 1432244826488.gif -(2682500B / 2.56MB, 350x195) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. I'm a layperson scurrying across the floor of /sagan/, please don't annihilate me.Is there any reason white holes would exist? From what I understand black holes just keep growing, gaining in mass and gravity magnitude in relation to their mass. Their ultra-compact density is what gives them their swag about the vacuum of space.If white holes were real, then how would black holes continue to grow and increase their gravity? Debris, planets, stars and other space stuff 'slows' as it reaches the center of the hole as I understand it. Would that mean filling a water balloon with a tiny leak in it is a good analogy for what's theoretically happening? 39 posts and 4 images omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Walter Baade - Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:10:45 EST x7oDvr/y No.55925 Reply >>55924Overly simplified version: Einstine's math allows for the opposite side of gravity, repellent gravity. Instead of pushing down on the fabric of space time and making a 'dent' it is pushing up and making a 'hill', kinda. Just like the gravity of a blackhole is strong enough to keep light from escaping, the gravity of a whitehole is repellent enough that light cannot breach it. >> Joseph von Fraunhofer - Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:22:46 EST fDZ3h+Vd No.55926 Reply >>55925Plus the fact that is one existed, the amount of energy it would be spewing out would basically make it unenterable, or even approachable. >> Paul Goldsmith - Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:38:57 EST O0Ehlx70 No.55927 Reply 1452746337678.jpg -(86689B / 84.66KB, 600x701) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. >>55338What if White Holes only exist for a fraction of a second and in the wake of their brief existence form entire universes in a multiverse.tl;dr the Big Bang was, in fact, a White Hole and we are all (entropy, spacetime) that endlessly falling 'hill' (as opposed to a black hole's infinite depth) that will eventually tear and fizzle. This old ass thread was very insightful. Time for another bowl.
>> Walter Baade - Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:10:45 EST x7oDvr/y No.55925 Reply >>55924Overly simplified version: Einstine's math allows for the opposite side of gravity, repellent gravity. Instead of pushing down on the fabric of space time and making a 'dent' it is pushing up and making a 'hill', kinda. Just like the gravity of a blackhole is strong enough to keep light from escaping, the gravity of a whitehole is repellent enough that light cannot breach it.
>> Joseph von Fraunhofer - Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:22:46 EST fDZ3h+Vd No.55926 Reply >>55925Plus the fact that is one existed, the amount of energy it would be spewing out would basically make it unenterable, or even approachable.
>> Paul Goldsmith - Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:38:57 EST O0Ehlx70 No.55927 Reply 1452746337678.jpg -(86689B / 84.66KB, 600x701) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. >>55338What if White Holes only exist for a fraction of a second and in the wake of their brief existence form entire universes in a multiverse.tl;dr the Big Bang was, in fact, a White Hole and we are all (entropy, spacetime) that endlessly falling 'hill' (as opposed to a black hole's infinite depth) that will eventually tear and fizzle. This old ass thread was very insightful. Time for another bowl.
What are WE going to see? View Thread Reply Hide Maximilian Wolf - Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:00:54 EST 1zawVaPa No.55910 File: 1451854854357.jpg -(77534B / 75.72KB, 750x545) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. What's the most advanced/coolest/most interesting space related thing our generation is going to witness?Primitive colonies? Asteroid mining? The development of a new form of space travel?Post your predictions. 3 posts and 1 images omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Russel Hulse - Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:53:11 EST oigSnnJc No.55915 Reply We'll probably see commercial asteroid mining by robots in our later years, most likely. Hopefully they dont fuck up and drop a rock on us though, would that suck or what? >> Walter Adams - Tue, 05 Jan 2016 09:43:18 EST fDZ3h+Vd No.55916 Reply >>55911There will always be shit to fix on Earth, that can't stop us from going outwards. We've got the resources to spare.We'll definately see atleast a man on Mars, probably the start of a colony too (never bet against Elon). Maybe a base on the moon, but my bet is that a race to Mars will be kicking off soon and the moon will be a sideshow, R&D for Mars colony tops.Maaaaaaaaybe Skylon, not holding my breath on that one though. Ion propulsion should get much better and if we get fusion knocked down in a decade or 2 that could feasibly take us to a nifty fraction of C. Alcuibierre drive seems like a pipedream, but you never know, would require something like a fucking anti-matter power source probably, though perhaps a large enough fusion reactor would do too...If Elon gets his MCT concept with the BFRs done & produced, space mining probably will be feasible then. 100 tons to Mars yo, could probably haul serious cargo from the asteroid belt too since it wouldn't have to fight the gravity well of Mars.AI most likely too, don't know if superintelligent AI, depends on how fast the AGI takes off, though looking at machine & deep learning these days it'll probably take off like a rocket.Humanity's technology is on an exponential rise, just think how much the world changed between 2005-2015 compared to 1995-2005. We probably can't even imagine the shit that will be around in 60 years. >> Heinrich Olbers - Sat, 23 Jan 2016 10:21:35 EST s6y07R4Z No.55964 Reply >>55910>What are we going to see?Corn.
>> Russel Hulse - Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:53:11 EST oigSnnJc No.55915 Reply We'll probably see commercial asteroid mining by robots in our later years, most likely. Hopefully they dont fuck up and drop a rock on us though, would that suck or what?
>> Walter Adams - Tue, 05 Jan 2016 09:43:18 EST fDZ3h+Vd No.55916 Reply >>55911There will always be shit to fix on Earth, that can't stop us from going outwards. We've got the resources to spare.We'll definately see atleast a man on Mars, probably the start of a colony too (never bet against Elon). Maybe a base on the moon, but my bet is that a race to Mars will be kicking off soon and the moon will be a sideshow, R&D for Mars colony tops.Maaaaaaaaybe Skylon, not holding my breath on that one though. Ion propulsion should get much better and if we get fusion knocked down in a decade or 2 that could feasibly take us to a nifty fraction of C. Alcuibierre drive seems like a pipedream, but you never know, would require something like a fucking anti-matter power source probably, though perhaps a large enough fusion reactor would do too...If Elon gets his MCT concept with the BFRs done & produced, space mining probably will be feasible then. 100 tons to Mars yo, could probably haul serious cargo from the asteroid belt too since it wouldn't have to fight the gravity well of Mars.AI most likely too, don't know if superintelligent AI, depends on how fast the AGI takes off, though looking at machine & deep learning these days it'll probably take off like a rocket.Humanity's technology is on an exponential rise, just think how much the world changed between 2005-2015 compared to 1995-2005. We probably can't even imagine the shit that will be around in 60 years.
>> Heinrich Olbers - Sat, 23 Jan 2016 10:21:35 EST s6y07R4Z No.55964 Reply >>55910>What are we going to see?Corn.
i don't believe in the moon View Thread Reply Hide Kiyotsugu Hirayama - Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:53:06 EST jKbCW6p+ No.55914 File: 1451951586784.jpg -(30069B / 29.36KB, 441x657) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. its just the back side of earth
Kill space rocks View Thread Reply Hide Joseph Lockyer - Mon, 20 Jul 2015 06:32:20 EST 5RO7Hywq No.55532 File: 1437388340188.jpg -(132314B / 129.21KB, 960x720) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. A huge rock is headed straight for earthWe wrap a tarp around it with a space craft Fill the tarp with a heavy gas Once the pressure is high enough inside the tarpWe turn on rockets compressing the gass as much as possable on one side of the tarpThen we blow up a nukeChanging the course of the rock enough not to kill everyone on earthNow you tell me how im wrong and feel better about the world 14 posts and 6 images omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Paul Goldsmith - Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:11:19 EST 415JX8nG No.55885 Reply If asteroid mining became a big enough enterprise, could we wind up disturbing the orbits of asteroids in the inner solar system, increasing the rate of potential impacts? >> Russel Hulse - Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:18:09 EST Y6cuAVAn No.55891 Reply >>55883i always love when someone HAS to mention no bumps. >> Chushiro Hayashi - Sun, 20 Dec 2015 19:27:29 EST vB+y87GU No.55892 Reply >>55885The asteroid belt is far more diffuse and spread out than we imagine it is.Then again, all that travel and disruption is bound to knock some rocks loose.
>> Paul Goldsmith - Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:11:19 EST 415JX8nG No.55885 Reply If asteroid mining became a big enough enterprise, could we wind up disturbing the orbits of asteroids in the inner solar system, increasing the rate of potential impacts?
>> Russel Hulse - Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:18:09 EST Y6cuAVAn No.55891 Reply >>55883i always love when someone HAS to mention no bumps.
>> Chushiro Hayashi - Sun, 20 Dec 2015 19:27:29 EST vB+y87GU No.55892 Reply >>55885The asteroid belt is far more diffuse and spread out than we imagine it is.Then again, all that travel and disruption is bound to knock some rocks loose.
You know what day it is... View Thread Reply Hide Bart Bok - Mon, 09 Nov 2015 15:06:18 EST X6E5uhNi No.55797 File: 1447099578162.gif -(522048B / 509.81KB, 200x150) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Let's have a party thread.Happy would-be 81st birthday, my friend 6 posts and 5 images omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Walter Baade - Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:42:53 EST X6E5uhNi No.55826 Reply >>558240/10 >> Riccardo Giacconi - Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:31:46 EST X6E5uhNi No.55830 Reply 1448501506338.gif -(597530B / 583.53KB, 175x175) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. DICKS EVERYWHERE >> Fred Whipple - Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:19:12 EST X6E5uhNi No.55874 Reply 1449623952866.jpg -(58715B / 57.34KB, 500x750) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. y'all are gaybow down to our lord
>> Riccardo Giacconi - Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:31:46 EST X6E5uhNi No.55830 Reply 1448501506338.gif -(597530B / 583.53KB, 175x175) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. DICKS EVERYWHERE
>> Fred Whipple - Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:19:12 EST X6E5uhNi No.55874 Reply 1449623952866.jpg -(58715B / 57.34KB, 500x750) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. y'all are gaybow down to our lord
420 View Thread Reply Hide Maximilian Wolf - Thu, 03 Dec 2015 04:55:36 EST wqEfwqpm No.55837 File: 1449136536989.jpg -(118941B / 116.15KB, 1538x924) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Whats in your sky tonight? >> Maximilian Wolf - Thu, 03 Dec 2015 06:58:43 EST wqEfwqpm No.55838 Reply 1449143923989.jpg -(1042253B / 1017.83KB, 1980x2978) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. we did it boys >> Johannes Kepler - Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:45:36 EST IwAsVtyx No.55870 Reply >>55838bing, band, boom, nice work!
>> Maximilian Wolf - Thu, 03 Dec 2015 06:58:43 EST wqEfwqpm No.55838 Reply 1449143923989.jpg -(1042253B / 1017.83KB, 1980x2978) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. we did it boys
>> Johannes Kepler - Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:45:36 EST IwAsVtyx No.55870 Reply >>55838bing, band, boom, nice work!
Ridiculously large coincidence View Thread Reply Hide Maximilian Wolf - Sun, 08 Nov 2015 16:45:55 EST D1mxUOc5 No.55796 File: 1447019155770.jpg -(333828B / 326.00KB, 2656x712) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. So I was playing around on SpaceEngine on my very mediocre PC and came across this view which I thought looked pretty cool so I screenshotted it (the image on the left). A day or so later I was watching SpaceEngine videos on YouTube and came across a video with the image on the right on it. I looked for the coordinates on the video but there was nothing there.What are the chances of this? I couldn't believe it when I saw it, it's undeniably the same view, the chances of this are miniscule right? Am I the only one absolutely amazed by this? 7 posts omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Galileo Galilei - Sat, 05 Dec 2015 22:45:27 EST N+uGi0dP No.55842 Reply >>55799lmao coincidences are fun man, see if you can follow a trail of them to some life changing event like Kermit Michael Riggs >> Chushiro Hayashi - Sun, 06 Dec 2015 16:09:47 EST IwAsVtyx No.55846 Reply >>55796It's almost like.....like.....there is a limited number of planetary bitmaps within the software. And....and....the algorithms used to generate new planetary systems aren't.....perfect?>Am I the only one absolutely amazed by this? Seems as if it isn't hard to amaze you, huh? >> Johannes Kepler - Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:43:27 EST IwAsVtyx No.55869 Reply >>55796OP, go ask /vg/. Its a game, coded by a human, with errors. hell, the project is freeware written by a handful of people. make a donation at the website and maybe you will get more of the awesome quality this software brings.
>> Galileo Galilei - Sat, 05 Dec 2015 22:45:27 EST N+uGi0dP No.55842 Reply >>55799lmao coincidences are fun man, see if you can follow a trail of them to some life changing event like Kermit Michael Riggs
>> Chushiro Hayashi - Sun, 06 Dec 2015 16:09:47 EST IwAsVtyx No.55846 Reply >>55796It's almost like.....like.....there is a limited number of planetary bitmaps within the software. And....and....the algorithms used to generate new planetary systems aren't.....perfect?>Am I the only one absolutely amazed by this? Seems as if it isn't hard to amaze you, huh?
>> Johannes Kepler - Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:43:27 EST IwAsVtyx No.55869 Reply >>55796OP, go ask /vg/. Its a game, coded by a human, with errors. hell, the project is freeware written by a handful of people. make a donation at the website and maybe you will get more of the awesome quality this software brings.
"I WANT TO STOP THE EARTH FROM SPINNING" reply View Thread Reply Hide Urbain Le Verrier - Thu, 03 Dec 2015 14:40:23 EST zy6FIvhr No.55839 File: 1449171623083.jpg -(99285B / 96.96KB, 943x960) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. so... if you want to collapse the core your gonna need some VERY STRONG magnets, drills, charges (controlled as fuck as the crust isnt purely solid it has fractures & holes & allsorts which kill miners e.c.t). First, well need to friends up or kill & impersonate someone "high up", with funds we can become a private interest in the many 'space programmes'. With the severe lack of funding NASA are recieving, they are playing ball to a lot more private interests & with their brains & techonology the charges could easily be places in the least dangerous palces meaning you dont die & can continue your mission). To bore holes we will have to become frackers, we may need to relocate. The best places would either be the oil fields in asia as that has less crust & population to traverse or the American lands which are heavily fractured & drilled. If we impersonate or friends up the right people we will have access to underground networks, which go deeper than people think & are surprisingly stable. But once we have the licences for that, we will need similar minds to employ who hate things enough not to grass us up for depleting the polarity of the earth & reduction on key natural phases & fields.With the resources we now currently own, not only do we not have to bury down ourselves, we can send people who hate things more than us & dgaf more than us. Reward their families amply if they get fucked up. That & we have a secure network of illegal activities intent on felling the clouds & allowing our precious shields to wander off into the vacuums of space. Now you finally have the means to affect the polarity of the earth, you will need to connect the global power network, which there isnt yet. You would have to make one, but with our resources so far this will only take half a life time or so. Dw if you die or me there are plenty of other cunts we can trust. Now with the power, we can safely construct magnets at the entrance to the large bore holes & lower them near the crust before activating. Cables would need to be adamantium alloy as that stands up to even super heroes according to tv & comics so its pretty tough shit.Now all which remains is for our calculation wizzes to be correct, the hardware not to fault (well have to employ asians & pay them well as were lazy & require cyanide). You now have, as I currently see it, 3 choices... which will be more effective I have not enough time to consider, like ever in my life.... You I recommend you take a shot & flip a coin, yelling fuck yeah. A: Start both magnets at the same time in the hope this freezes the movement of molten materials & any magnetic materials will hopefully travel to the magnets, disrupting the orbital flow of the plasma & other materials. This could do nothing & just fuck every electronic ever up & stick us all to the ground via our belt buckles/tear things out of people bodies who have pins or heart tickers e.c.tB:Slowly start one magnet, so that instead of it just doing nothing but making the world uber magnetic, more... It will slowly start to split the contents of the plasma & magma. Making smooth transition in the orbital flow near impossible. One its up to enough power to start physically vibrating, slanting, fucking the earth. Start the opposite magnet up quick, which I must mention has to be made of a poly material or something stronger, so it dosent get broken by the first magnetic pulls. When the 2nd magnet gets stronger, it will effectively be holding the different magnetic & non magnetic elements of the core at either side, without motion except motion similar to that seen in a centrifuge where the contents of the bottle are forced to the side & the pressure helps mix the bottle. The earth will now have 0 protection from any foreign anything, waves, physicals & dark matters unknown reactions with events such as these.Also the earth now has no air, its moving towards the sun & we have no shields up (unless were far ahead in science as what were told, which is obviously true but the point where we can manipulate & shield the entire earth whilst the power is being directed to the magnets, its frankly beyond us as far as I can see. If we stick to primaeval warning logic were either fuqd or gonna be universe nazis, which is impossible as well be isolated by the current powers out there which are with the current evidence, more than entirely plausible. I mean if we learn how to not fuck ourselves constantly).Option C, similar to option B but instead of gradually increasing wattage & amps & w.e crazy new measurements we make/use, you just switch magnet 1 on, wait for it to start fucking shit up as described above but in a much more brutish fashion (VERY RISKY TO THE PLAN, this could end up saving the earth by decimating life but not removing it from orbit & leaving the atmosphere alone, effectively 'pressing the reset button' on planet earth to the time the core was still spilling out of the crust, if you can call it a core at that point. This is good but not for the people beyond even anarchy, saying "fuck you" to mother natures laws & the gods themselves. As we want to fuck shit up permanently, not give another possible but unlikely form of life a chance to actually do it right). But were saying fuck it in this situation, as I interpret. So fuck it, lets see if we have enough time after switching no1 on to switch no2 on before were expanded in a vaccum & pop. An isolated & pressurised control chamber would be good.Say we manage to get no 2 on & it instantaneously pulls the core to its magnetic & non magnetic plasmas & materials, it would be so forceful it would rip like an eggshell the very layers of the earth, spilling the heat & reactive radiation into the, what was an atmosphere, vacuum &… Comment too long. Click here to view the full text. >> Joseph von Fraunhofer - Thu, 03 Dec 2015 17:33:37 EST oigSnnJc No.55840 Reply What?
/THREAD. View Thread Reply Hide Tycho Brahe - Thu, 21 May 2015 16:45:28 EST eJc7PJV5 No.55333 File: 1432241128199.png -(2032459B / 1.94MB, 1350x1350) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. DICKS EVERYWHERE >> Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:51:05 EST Y+TLwE2a No.55813 Reply >>55333bumping to see no one respond to this gay thread >> Thomas Gold - Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:13:52 EST Z2XGH5kJ No.55831 Reply praise the great comet~comets be praised and comet us some comets sowe cancomet more comets.also,idig comets and you should too,praise comets!
>> Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:51:05 EST Y+TLwE2a No.55813 Reply >>55333bumping to see no one respond to this gay thread
>> Thomas Gold - Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:13:52 EST Z2XGH5kJ No.55831 Reply praise the great comet~comets be praised and comet us some comets sowe cancomet more comets.also,idig comets and you should too,praise comets!
Relativistic Quandary View Thread Reply Hide Isaac Newton - Mon, 27 Apr 2015 22:50:40 EST 4px0o/Io No.55260 File: 1430189440737.gif -(6064B / 5.92KB, 100x100) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. A field force propagates at the speed of light forever. Suppose this field force causes a quantum reaction when it encounters certain particles. This reaction releases a gamma ray burst in all directions. Now suppose an observer is sitting in the direction perpendicular to the asymptote of the gamma producing event. {pardon the unwieldiness here is a visual representation: )-> }Does he notice an increment between detecting the gamma ray, and detecting the field force? Or does he experience it all at once, as an event horizon? >> Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:00:52 EST Y+TLwE2a No.55814 Reply >>55260 PLEASE GIVE ME (ZACHARY) A THEORY OR YOUR 2 CENTS ON HOW THIS SCHIZO-AFFECTIVE DISORDER MAKES TELEPATHY POSSIBLE///////////////Thanks in advanced. >> Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:04:30 EST Y+TLwE2a No.55815 Reply >>55814You can't deny satanic magic either. >> Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:44:12 EST Y+TLwE2a No.55816 Reply >>55260i believe gamma radiation made Bruce Banner into the hulk. So to answer your question to the best of my ability i'd have to say "Rev up those dicks 'cause i sure am a huge faggot!"
>> Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:00:52 EST Y+TLwE2a No.55814 Reply >>55260 PLEASE GIVE ME (ZACHARY) A THEORY OR YOUR 2 CENTS ON HOW THIS SCHIZO-AFFECTIVE DISORDER MAKES TELEPATHY POSSIBLE///////////////Thanks in advanced.
>> Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:04:30 EST Y+TLwE2a No.55815 Reply >>55814You can't deny satanic magic either.
>> Fritz Zwicky - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:44:12 EST Y+TLwE2a No.55816 Reply >>55260i believe gamma radiation made Bruce Banner into the hulk. So to answer your question to the best of my ability i'd have to say "Rev up those dicks 'cause i sure am a huge faggot!"
Let us not forget... View Thread Reply Hide Pierre-Simon Laplace - Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:53:43 EST Z0dqdxc5 No.55789 File: 1446584023256.jpg -(149151B / 145.66KB, 630x900) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. ... who started it all. >> William Huggins - Tue, 03 Nov 2015 23:01:23 EST tQX5ylFX No.55790 Reply >>55789https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np-yQBK5GKkCome home Laika. >> George Airy - Fri, 06 Nov 2015 12:33:32 EST PH3oCvC7 No.55793 Reply 1446831212081.png -(419043B / 409.22KB, 848x480) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHp5mKArr9w >> Pierre-Simon Laplace - Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:49:07 EST gmBbIyqN No.55802 Reply 1447163347544.jpg -(246280B / 240.51KB, 600x900) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. http://www.mediafire.com/download/4i7b76tb8d37sgh/Laika+%28GN%29+%282007%29.cbrFictionalized comic account of the story of Laika and Sergei Korolevspasibo tovarish Laika
>> William Huggins - Tue, 03 Nov 2015 23:01:23 EST tQX5ylFX No.55790 Reply >>55789https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np-yQBK5GKkCome home Laika.
>> George Airy - Fri, 06 Nov 2015 12:33:32 EST PH3oCvC7 No.55793 Reply 1446831212081.png -(419043B / 409.22KB, 848x480) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHp5mKArr9w
>> Pierre-Simon Laplace - Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:49:07 EST gmBbIyqN No.55802 Reply 1447163347544.jpg -(246280B / 240.51KB, 600x900) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. http://www.mediafire.com/download/4i7b76tb8d37sgh/Laika+%28GN%29+%282007%29.cbrFictionalized comic account of the story of Laika and Sergei Korolevspasibo tovarish Laika
Star showing signs that could be (probably aren't) alien constructions. View Thread Reply Hide Giuseppe Piazzi - Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:00:07 EST ruKNVqHw No.55749 File: 1444842007788.jpg -(1059519B / 1.01MB, 1400x788) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2015/10/14/weird_star_strange_dips_in_brightness_are_a_bit_baffling.html> “Aliens should always be the very last hypothesis you consider," Penn State astronomer Jason Wright told The Atlantic, "but this looked like something you would expect an alien civilization to build.”Basically Kepler has observed a star with dips in it's luminosity exponentially larger than any planet would cause. Even a Jupiter-sized planet would only account for a 1% drop. But the object or objects observed by Kepler cause a drop of up to 22%, indicating an object or cluster of objects roughly half the width of the star itself. 19 posts and 2 images omitted. Click View Thread to read. >> Alan Guth - Sun, 25 Oct 2015 08:37:11 EST sky71Ye7 No.55777 Reply >>55776Source?!Man, if this turns out to be alien stellar engineering, it would be fucking nuts! >> Jan Hendrik Oort - Sun, 25 Oct 2015 09:09:54 EST ruKNVqHw No.55778 Reply >>55777Links below, but it's now moot. The statement from Gerald Harp of SETI about a repeated signal has been removed from the first link despite being present earlier yesterday. And the second link has another statement from Harp claiming his first statement wasn't accurate and there haven't been any signals at all. So we have two conflicting statements from the same man with the second statement confirming the first ones existence despite attempts to erase it.Probably just crappy reporting, but backpedaling of this nature happens so often in regards to aliens that a little tinfoil may be permitted. It's up to you what to take from this.http://www.universetoday.com/122971/seti-institute-undertakes-search-for-alien-signal-from-kepler-star-kic-8462852/http://www.grenzwissenschaft-aktuell.de/seti-empfaengt-periodische-signale-von-kic-8462852-20151022/ >> Alan Guth - Sun, 25 Oct 2015 09:32:39 EST sky71Ye7 No.55780 Reply >>55778>Awaiting more accurate information about the way the signal before, but from an interview by "UniverseToday.com" by Dr. Gerald Harp from the SETI Institute, shows that it is a "weird periodic signal", " which although potentially natural origin but there is clearly value to examine it more closely. " Besides the natural explanation, so stressed "Universe Today", prefer Harp but also "a distant intelligent source" into consideration.Google translated it, so sorry for the weird wording. It's interesting though, but a bit surprising that they'd discover a "weird periodic signal" so easily from 1500 light years away just like that. I'm no astronomer or anything though, so what do I know?About the back-pedaling: I work at a university communication department, and I'd say it's likely to be a journalistic citation error. The paper isn't peer-reviewed yet so there is probably an embargo on details from the SETI study results, which would explain Harp rescinding his earlier statements. As the comment came so early in the publishing cycle of the article they're likely to yet check for errors or anomalies in the study, so making a comment about a detected signal at this point would be very unwise.
>> Alan Guth - Sun, 25 Oct 2015 08:37:11 EST sky71Ye7 No.55777 Reply >>55776Source?!Man, if this turns out to be alien stellar engineering, it would be fucking nuts!
>> Jan Hendrik Oort - Sun, 25 Oct 2015 09:09:54 EST ruKNVqHw No.55778 Reply >>55777Links below, but it's now moot. The statement from Gerald Harp of SETI about a repeated signal has been removed from the first link despite being present earlier yesterday. And the second link has another statement from Harp claiming his first statement wasn't accurate and there haven't been any signals at all. So we have two conflicting statements from the same man with the second statement confirming the first ones existence despite attempts to erase it.Probably just crappy reporting, but backpedaling of this nature happens so often in regards to aliens that a little tinfoil may be permitted. It's up to you what to take from this.http://www.universetoday.com/122971/seti-institute-undertakes-search-for-alien-signal-from-kepler-star-kic-8462852/http://www.grenzwissenschaft-aktuell.de/seti-empfaengt-periodische-signale-von-kic-8462852-20151022/
>> Alan Guth - Sun, 25 Oct 2015 09:32:39 EST sky71Ye7 No.55780 Reply >>55778>Awaiting more accurate information about the way the signal before, but from an interview by "UniverseToday.com" by Dr. Gerald Harp from the SETI Institute, shows that it is a "weird periodic signal", " which although potentially natural origin but there is clearly value to examine it more closely. " Besides the natural explanation, so stressed "Universe Today", prefer Harp but also "a distant intelligent source" into consideration.Google translated it, so sorry for the weird wording. It's interesting though, but a bit surprising that they'd discover a "weird periodic signal" so easily from 1500 light years away just like that. I'm no astronomer or anything though, so what do I know?About the back-pedaling: I work at a university communication department, and I'd say it's likely to be a journalistic citation error. The paper isn't peer-reviewed yet so there is probably an embargo on details from the SETI study results, which would explain Harp rescinding his earlier statements. As the comment came so early in the publishing cycle of the article they're likely to yet check for errors or anomalies in the study, so making a comment about a detected signal at this point would be very unwise.
