Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the format Name#Password
[i]Italic Text[/i]
[b]Bold Text[/b]
[spoiler]Spoiler Text[/spoiler]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace Text[/pre]
[super]Superset Text[/super]
[sub]Subset Text[/sub]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists



View Thread Reply
- Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:12:23 EST +4KamMvj No.56439
File: 1474380743780.jpg -(24054B / 23.49KB, 500x431) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Truth
>If the universe was born from a white hole it solves everything.
if black holes turn into white holes and birth new universes, that means holographic universe theory is real, multiverse is real (every black hole is its own universe), every single equation is solved, if science simply realized that it was not a singularity but rather a white hole.
>Our universe is inside a white hole, or event horizon.
>Looking at a star 90 million lightyears away is like looking at the star as it was 90 million years ago. is it possible we have not detected life, as we can only view stars in the past - and not as they currently exist?

For example, the big bang theory says the universe started as a singularity. But scientists have no satisfying explanation for how such a singularity might have formed in the first place.

If our universe was birthed by a white hole instead of a singularity, Poplawski said, "it would solve this problem of black hole singularities and also the big bang singularity."

Wormholes might also explain gamma ray bursts, the second most powerful explosions in the universe after the big bang.

Gamma ray bursts occur at the fringes of the known universe. They appear to be associated with supernovae, or star explosions, in faraway galaxies, but their exact sources are a mystery.

Poplawski proposes that the bursts may be discharges of matter from alternate universes. The matter, he says, might be escaping into our universe through supermassive black holes—wormholes—at the hearts of those galaxies, though it's not clear how that would be possible.

"It's kind of a crazy idea, but who knows?" he said.
7 posts omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Vesto Slipher - Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:56:14 EST KgKlYmGv No.56499 Reply
1475171774066.jpg -(37815B / 36.93KB, 400x367) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
I know you\re trolling but since it\s a chilled out night and im really laid back i'll take the bait cause reading them got me entertained.
While reading this got me thinking, do the people that write these up actually believe these "facts" or they just go with the thread for the kick of it. Or maybe they're just 15, eager to belong into some kind of social group and wanna feel special/entitled, with their mind not exactly made up what they're experiencing.

Basically the first 18 something disregard gravity (pic related).

19. is a funny one, based on a 16th century argument that stars in the sky should be visibly moving "back and forth" since we're on solar orbit and move somewhat closer and further to them.
20. says a cannon shot straight up should land slightly west because by the time the ball falls back the earth and the cannon should've moved east due to earth's spinning. except the atmosphere spins with the planet.

the rest just made no sense or were downright dumb and i got bored
Hannes Alven - Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:36:29 EST tQX5ylFX No.56500 Reply
Maybe some one should also tell them that gravity is non-shperical. but the planet is. Might cause some explosions of rage.
Maximilian Wolf - Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:47:26 EST f/Tl+D5o No.56524 Reply
it's centered on a couple, man and woman in space holding us together, there's a black hole that gets turned into white when there's enough gathered to break the threshold, the quantum dynamics are designed so that the people are part of the equation.

WTF is this thing?

View Thread Reply
- Sat, 01 Oct 2016 08:29:02 EST tQX5ylFX No.56502
File: 1475324942532.jpg -(77817B / 75.99KB, 1024x1024) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. WTF is this thing?

>inb4 UFO hurr durr.

It does smell of the classic shit writen science journalism click bait. can post the archive.is if you guys would rather not give it clicks.

But what is that thing? remember UFO does not mean ayyy lmaos. Kinda looks like voyager probe to me. I have no idea the perspective and sizes involved here.
7 posts and 2 images omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Viktor Ambartsumian - Tue, 04 Oct 2016 03:23:45 EST tQX5ylFX No.56511 Reply
no jolly african-american I was agreeing with you. calm your tits.
Daniel Kirkwood - Wed, 05 Oct 2016 16:45:02 EST SsVk1i6e No.56512 Reply
Whoever wrote that article should be shot.

It's a cosmic ray, if the author bothered to fucking Google it they would have known that. A cosmic ray is a charged particle which hits the detector exciting pixels when there is no light. The same thing as all the other little streaks in that image, the multiple lines are secondary particles. If you look though the SOHO archives you will find thousands. Notice their object turned up months later but was gone just an hour or two later when the next image was taken, because it's not the same thing and it's not a real object. YouTube is crammed with these videos of SOHO UFOs, of course NASA doesn't respond to the same idiots who have been ignoring the response for a decade.

William de Sitter - Thu, 06 Oct 2016 01:19:46 EST qkTsbYde No.56513 Reply
They're all hoaxes. The people who repeat them are either gullible morons or trolls. Now that the obvious has been stated, that's an interesting thing about the cosmic rays affecting the detectors. The Apollo astronauts experienced a similar effect with their own eyesight. After they left low earth orbit, they saw phantom flashes of light when they closed their eyes.

smoked weed and was thinking

View Thread Reply
- Sat, 10 Sep 2016 08:08:34 EST KRFHH0CT No.56414
File: 1473509314493.jpg -(71473B / 69.80KB, 768x1024) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. smoked weed and was thinking
If time and space are different forms of the same thing, and space is possibly infinite, is time infinite too?
23 posts and 3 images omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Stephen Hawking - Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:43:20 EST X4FAw0QG No.56478 Reply

Time remains as it will be currently occuring in its form and matter in the presence under which we have sense in understanding it through our correlation with what we perceive in this istance of moments amounted, though it will always be so in a way of saying perhaps , its difficult to say properly
Charles Messier - Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:49:47 EST Kz5Q207u No.56479 Reply
That was some of the most confusing shit I've ever read. Work on your wording nigga, took me like 3 reads to understand what you were saying.
William Hartmann - Tue, 27 Sep 2016 02:29:03 EST p24Ges2t No.56480 Reply

Nigga, it's Stephen Hawking. Give him a break

Submarines of Titan

View Thread Reply
- Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:23:12 EST Y3T9nNnZ No.56335
File: 1472394192191.gif -(872884B / 852.43KB, 200x100) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Submarines of Titan
Check it. NASA wants to send a submarine to Titan to go look for critters there.

Please please let this happen.
20 posts and 4 images omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Daniel Kirkwood - Mon, 05 Sep 2016 02:52:24 EST Jqf9zBFl No.56406 Reply
1473058344124.jpg -(134366B / 131.22KB, 800x1150) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Fred Whipple - Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:26:47 EST 3t/weoS/ No.56463 Reply
This is a pop-sci article I know, but the work it's based on seem very interesting and def relevant to this thread.


Essentially a team of chemical engineers and astronomers have theorized a template for an enclosed cell capable of thriving in liquid methane/ethane, rather than water as is the case for the lipid-based life on Earth. Pretty interesting read, and it offers insight into possible life on what we consider horribly cold worlds.
Friedrich Bessel - Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:52:57 EST 08CSyNx+ No.56468 Reply
1474660377624.jpg -(100318B / 97.97KB, 650x487) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
boy i shure do like critters

Osiris Rex

View Thread Reply
- Thu, 08 Sep 2016 22:02:04 EST Y3T9nNnZ No.56410
File: 1473386524051.gif -(775584B / 757.41KB, 200x137) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Osiris Rex
Well Osiris Rex launched today. It's supposed to scoop up some asteroid and bring it home to Earth. The mechanism is craziest thing since the skycrane. It's going to bounce off of the asteroid "Bennu" and grab a handful as it does it.

They're trying to bring back between 60g to 2kg of material. They're also going to survey Bennu for about 6 months before the pick their sample site. So it will just be riding along up there chilling with Bennu for a bit.

> the sample mechanism: https://youtu.be/T0FxDxs7lyw?t=126
> animated mission timeline: http://www.asteroidmission.org/mission/
> obligatory boring launch video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLjyLh77WNE

The intent, of course, it to learn more about asteroids to prevent future disasters
6 posts omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Edward Pickering - Sun, 18 Sep 2016 06:22:50 EST pjhpxsvC No.56436 Reply
Err, they'd shoot you down with a Patriot missile?
Henrietta Levitt - Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:07:55 EST YHjXylC8 No.56450 Reply
1474492075619.jpg -(79638B / 77.77KB, 700x480) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Depending on where you're launching from and your angle of inclination, I would be somewhat concerned about accidentally starting WWIII.
Space exploration is simply ICBM demonstrations with unique payloads.
Thomas Gold - Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:53:45 EST AKPGknBR No.56452 Reply
Space probes are so fucking efficient, what astounding machines

Space Race vol. II

View Thread Reply
- Fri, 02 Sep 2016 21:37:46 EST hdztUjP6 No.56357
File: 1472866666013.jpg -(363879B / 355.35KB, 1920x1200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Space Race vol. II
Some of you probably know about this already, but I was casually scrolling down the science section of Reuters, and I noticed that there seems to be some kind of race to the space going on these days. The hour is upon us.

>China to launch "core module" for space station around 2018


>China shows first images of Mars rover, aims for 2020 mission


"Advancing China's space program is a priority for Beijing, with President Xi Jinping calling for the country to establish itself as a space power."

>Luxembourg sets aside 200 million euros to fund space mining ventures


""Luxembourg's aims is to be in the top 10 space faring nations in the world," Schneider said."

>U.S. astronauts prepare station for commercial space taxis


Youtube link vaguely related: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPN-ec4FLWA
7 posts omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Fred Hoyle - Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:30:08 EST rszf0FN0 No.56433 Reply
People who care about advancing space technology.
Jocelyn Bell - Thu, 15 Sep 2016 21:57:09 EST YHjXylC8 No.56434 Reply
1473991029741.jpg -(56079B / 54.76KB, 650x409) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Because the vehicles can be reused.
Fuel only accounts for like 1% of a rocket launch.

The Space Shuttle was supposed to have a far lower cost per launch, but then they ended up with a bunch of extra requirements and the design when through a bunch of mutations, and the end result required so much work between launches that it would have been cheaper to stick with totally-disposable rockets.
Joseph-Louis Lagrange - Fri, 16 Sep 2016 02:53:13 EST tQX5ylFX No.56435 Reply
when it lands you don thave to buy another? sort of the key feature.

Proxima B

View Thread Reply
- Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:37:51 EST Y3T9nNnZ No.56342
File: 1472582271909.jpg -(375675B / 366.87KB, 1920x1247) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Proxima B
So it looks like Proxima Centauri has a planet in the habitable zone. It has an earth-like mass.

Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf that's about 4 light years away, and is as close as other stars get to us. We could maybe drive a small satelite there in about 25 years without scifi tech. http://www.popularmechanics.com/space/deep-space/a22567/interstellar-travel-proxima-b/

It will make an interesting target for upcoming telescoper.
8 posts and 1 images omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Tycho Brahe - Sun, 04 Sep 2016 01:39:15 EST rszf0FN0 No.56402 Reply
Yeah, but the ship isn't traveling at lightspeed. It takes 20 years to get there because it's only going ~20% the speed of light, Proxima is only 4 light years away.
Anders Angstrom - Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:24:16 EST tQX5ylFX No.56408 Reply
and it still takes a 5 second delay to talk to the moon and it's just right there.
I mean the delay alone isn't enough to derail the mission. Just look at all the Mars rovers. The delay is variable pending on the phase of the orbits of Earth and Mars yet they plan ahead and lay out a course only after surveying the area and doing at home tests. The same could be applied to this fight but the end delay is going to be huge both ways. Meaning it's going to take longer to plan and set course. But this time there is a time limit and that limit is a burn window. Miss it by even a second and the entire mission is fucked.

The challenges here are larger than any thing previously attempted. Not that it's impossible at this tech level it's just going to be really hard.
John Bahcall - Tue, 06 Sep 2016 20:26:01 EST rszf0FN0 No.56409 Reply
Breakthrough Starshot doesn't depend on probes with the kinds of capabilities you're talking about and doesn't have the same problems. The probes are a swarm of very tiny instruments propelled by laser pulses, so the problems of small errors in vector setting or micro collisions are negated by the size of the swarm; some will get through. Likewise being so small they will probably only be capable of the most limited telemetry and so there would be no need to wait for 8 year round trip control, it would probably just transmit until it lost power.

I think spaceflight in general falls under the category of things that are 'really hard to do', but thankfully it is a field where success or failure is an entirely technical matter, so sooner or later we will get it right.


View Thread Reply
- Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:50:46 EST rszf0FN0 No.56313
File: 1471485046285.gif -(869344B / 848.97KB, 200x200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. EP=EPR
Holy fucking shit guys, my mind is blown.
The unification of QM and GR is HERE!!?!?!


tl;dr: Susskind says spooky action at a distance IS wormholes and the Copenhagen Interpretation and Many-Worlds Interpretation were the same thing all along from different perspectives. HOLY FUCK
12 posts omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Johannes Kepler - Sun, 28 Aug 2016 00:08:42 EST rszf0FN0 No.56333 Reply
Fascinating (if a bit dry) talk. I wonder if he deliberately did not go into other properties of black holes that might negate the limitations he described, or doesn't think they are relevant. Specifically I mean that we know we ultimately can get (all of) the information out of a black hole ultimately as it evaporates due to hawking radiation, could we then not (especially if we are creating a black hole from scratch and thus can make it as small as we want) project entangled particles into the entangled black hole and thus receive information out of the entangled black hole partner in the form of the hawking radiation it emits?
Johannes Kepler - Sun, 28 Aug 2016 00:31:39 EST rszf0FN0 No.56334 Reply
Just thinking about it some more (nb for double post) wouldn't it even be possible to get information out without hawking radiation by manipulating the size of the black hole? If the two black holes share the same singularity then putting mass into one increases the mass of the other, and so if you dumped mass into one it would alter the rate of evaporation of the other which could then be measured.
Russel Hulse - Fri, 02 Sep 2016 23:49:51 EST d5o+epTm No.56363 Reply
1472874591251.gif -(2904316B / 2.77MB, 300x170) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

damn shit nigga thats some crazy shit, my mind is bending trying to get a full grasp on the implications

Forgive me but...

View Thread Reply
- Thu, 26 May 2016 21:42:57 EST VjH9pXwP No.56190
File: 1464313377750.jpg -(328323B / 320.63KB, 960x960) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Forgive me but...
...I was thinking about Dark Matter. My understanding is that in analyzing the universe, they detect there should be like 3-4 times as much matter as we can account for with stars and such. It just reeks of "luminiferous ether" to me

What if though, there's no invisible matter, but the universe is actually made up of 3-4x more stuff, stuff that is just accelerating away faster than we can see it (faster than the speed of light?). Or is that what is meant by dark matter?
10 posts and 2 images omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Paul Goldsmith - Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:41:20 EST rszf0FN0 No.56316 Reply
But the actual value is less than the expected value, not more.
Fred Hoyle - Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:10:47 EST qyc9lsem No.56324 Reply
There's no dark matter. It's just the opposite reaction to the universal constant.

Alan Guth - Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:20:11 EST rszf0FN0 No.56325 Reply
No, according to LCDM dark energy *is* the cosmological constant. Also if dark matter/energy comprise 97% of the universe, how could 3% of the universe generate an opposite reaction almost two orders of magnitude greater (and also where is the room for ordinary matter in this model?)


View Thread Reply
- Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:47:51 EST hnyGB63L No.56176
File: 1461941271509.jpg -(73000B / 71.29KB, 680x992) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. FIRST
Which crime will be the first to occur in a non-Earth environment, rape or murder?
9 posts and 2 images omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Johann Encke - Tue, 26 Jul 2016 20:52:13 EST YHjXylC8 No.56293 Reply
He's saying if you can achieve an erection on earth while doing a handstand, then you'll definitely be able to achieve an erection in space where you don't have gravity acting against your dick.
Clyde Tombaugh - Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:12:11 EST 3t/weoS/ No.56295 Reply

I'd assume you'd loose your hand-standing erection eventually as blood flows into your upper body, though you might pass out before that. Zero-gravity is known to cause a sizable reduction of blood pressure, which is the reasoning behind the claim that getting a boner in space is difficult.

Interestingly NASA sits on data like this but refuse to reveal it thanks to their policies on funny business.
Walter Adams - Sat, 13 Aug 2016 01:03:53 EST KgKlYmGv No.56309 Reply
It's because they send some old saggy cunts over there that have difficulty with getting a boner send me over there and show me some pussy it's gonna be the fastest space mission you'll see

Actual photo of earth ?

View Thread Reply
- Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:40:57 EST a9VttgPi No.55637
File: 1440628857139.jpg -(94020B / 91.82KB, 1280x720) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Actual photo of earth ?
Sry if this seems like tinfoil but i just cant get it.
So we have sattelites with further orbit than moon right?
Please give link to an actual photo of earth not some composed bull shit.
Something is going on and this might be the best brain wash ever. Not saying flat earth but hidden land or we just cant get further of some point. Also alot of the other NASA images ...you know, are fakes , there is documentation on this do your research. So a simple request , a photo of earth please :)

Have a nice day :) !
57 posts and 20 images omitted. Click View Thread to read.
George Gamow - Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:39:14 EST tQX5ylFX No.56303 Reply
doesn't showing that require near light speeds? we can't do that.... yet. wait till the hardon collider forms stable micro singularities we can use to power a warp core.
Grote Reuber - Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:10:50 EST 3t/weoS/ No.56304 Reply

So you're claiming that spherical objects are in fact mathematically flat in our universe?

Not hanging you out here or anything, I'm genuinely curious as it's an interesting claim.

I love space

View Thread Reply
- Sat, 23 Jul 2016 05:42:59 EST p24Ges2t No.56286
File: 1469266979554.jpg -(3372909B / 3.22MB, 3069x3006) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. I love space
I first became interested in space exploration because of this website nearly eight years ago. Over that time space has piqued my curiosity enough that my dream is to work in a large observatory, or in a lab constructing instruments for spacecraft. I've spent a lot of time learning about the universe, and have simultaneously become interested in philosophy. I'm just really interested to learn new things about reality. It's such a marvelous and incredibly complex place, teeming with things to be discovered.

I want to know whatever is possible to know. Some things we might never be able to know, but I'm most certain that curiosity, as well as necessity, will drive our species towards distant planets in search of answers and new ways to survive as we go out. I really do hope that's how it plays out. Out of all of the possibilities, I think we'll always have a desire to travel into the next greatest frontier. We might travel inwards with digital worlds and biosynthetic machinery, but I believe the physical domain will continue to hold some deeper allure.
3 posts and 1 images omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Walter Baade - Thu, 28 Jul 2016 02:16:23 EST ma/jJXS2 No.56297 Reply
Terraforming isn't a thing yet. Besides, how can we even think about terraforming another planet when the one we were born with which already supports life is being killed by us.
Hannes Alven - Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:26:26 EST 73EoqW+9 No.56298 Reply
1469748386686.jpg -(365218B / 356.66KB, 540x2559) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Alright take it easy green peace, the earth is more than capable of supporting life indefinitely
William de Sitter - Sat, 30 Jul 2016 09:27:05 EST tQX5ylFX No.56299 Reply
But Venus is toted as the prime example of what could happen to our world if it got choked completely. Seems more likely a good idea to learn to live indefinitely in artificial environments like stations or Moon bases. In the long run that will be the most common living space moving forward into the cosmos.Terraforming is in the distant future and by the time we could do that we would already be able to live in orbit of every major body in this system if not leave it already.


View Thread Reply
- Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:11:01 EST FWszKHrA No.54647
File: 1415661061349.jpg -(225767B / 220.48KB, 1047x1572) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Interstellar
Thoughts on this fucking terrible movie?

its about space chill out mods
45 posts and 7 images omitted. Click View Thread to read.
Joseph Taylor Jr. - Sat, 06 Jun 2015 22:19:14 EST 9Jg5Dok5 No.55388 Reply
But it was marketed as "realistic" sci fi and people actually give it high notes on that merit alone

Edmond Halley - Wed, 27 Jul 2016 04:39:06 EST pjhpxsvC No.56294 Reply
>I guess I'm just not a big fan of Nolan himself. I couldn't sit through Inception even though I tried to watch it at least 3 times. These kind of movies rely too much on short, loud, shocking, and emotional scenes to keep the audience captivated and I can't stand that shit.

Wait what? Did we see the same Inception? Inception didn't have any emotional scenes. It only had scenes where people were being emotional.

The whole film was a dry emotionless philosophical stroll through a virtual reality hidden in a virtual reality hidden in a virtual reality hidden in a virtual reality...

microscopic telescope

View Thread Reply
- Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:11:48 EST nsJ3UhuK No.56285
File: 1469207508500.png -(11018B / 10.76KB, 798x294) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. microscopic telescope
I just wondered, I have never heard of a microscopic telescope. By this I mean a device along the lines of a large nature-style camera lens or traditional telecope that is able to zoom in to the target area of a physical item and produce a 3d environment of that area through the lens? Surely theres an infinite amount of detail from a physical item We have all this advanced astronomical technology these days to look at things that lie in the distance. What would happen if technology was put into microscopic telecopes thanks everyone

TLDR: a lens of intricately layered magnifying glasses that self multiply
Johann Bode - Sat, 23 Jul 2016 10:39:53 EST aZptiHhB No.56287 Reply
The resolution of a telescope can be limited by a few things, diffraction, the atmosphere, the quality of the optics and the sampling of the camera. You suggest adding a microscope, in optics that concept already exists as focal extenders which increase the effective focal length of the telescope increasing the magnification. The problem is more magnification will only improve the resolution of a telescope if it's resolution is sampling limited, that means the pixels are too big to capture the full resolution. The vast majority of telescopes are not sampling limited, generally they are limited by the atmosphere or by diffraction if they are in space or use adaptive optics. No matter how much you increase the magnification you will never beat those limits. There is not an infinite about of detail you can achieve, there are physical limits such as diffraction. A telescope like Hubble is diffraction limited what you suggest would not improve it's resolution. You can only improve on diffraction buy building a bigger telescope or using shorter wavelengths.

You can't use this to make a 3D map either.

Report Post
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.