Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the format Name#Password
Comment
[i]Italic Text[/i]
[b]Bold Text[/b]
[spoiler]Spoiler Text[/spoiler]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace Text[/pre]
[super]Superset Text[/super]
[sub]Subset Text[/sub]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


420chan is Getting Overhauled - Changelog/Bug Report/Request Thread (Updated April 10)
MFW Ignore Report Reply
Joseph von Fraunhofer - Thu, 16 Jul 2015 05:52:22 EST ID:LD9WXxz6 No.55518
File: 1437040342119.jpg -(144755B / 141.36KB, 459x403) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 144755
I realize we will never set it for ourselves.
>>
Charles Bolton - Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:24:14 EST ID:v2I6+0VG No.55523 Ignore Report Reply
U wot m8?
>>
Alan Guth - Sat, 18 Jul 2015 03:50:49 EST ID:LD9WXxz6 No.55525 Ignore Report Reply
>>55523
All this cool shit in space, we will only ever see pictures.
>>
Walter Baade - Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:44:25 EST ID:p7xaMW8+ No.55526 Ignore Report Reply
>>55525
Because all those pictures aren't real pictures. They are taken with tons of filters. You see warmth, energy, etc. Those pictures aren't pictures of light. You couldn't possibly see it with your eyes. Space is pitch black.
>>
Chushiro Hayashi - Sat, 18 Jul 2015 13:58:21 EST ID:733VEGSK No.55527 Ignore Report Reply
>>55518
>>55525

ALL YOUR DREAMS=FALSE
>>
Antony Hewish - Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:46:47 EST ID:KCC23SOp No.55528 Ignore Report Reply
>>55526
Walter look — look with your cyborg eyes.
>>
Friedrich von Struve - Mon, 20 Jul 2015 06:09:47 EST ID:xn6fhuFR No.55531 Ignore Report Reply
>>55526
They are real pictures. Those pictures are of light, HST is an optical telescope. No space is not pitch black, the stars are even brighter outside the atmosphere.
>>
Daniel Kirkwood - Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:31:03 EST ID:oRPxFShw No.55533 Ignore Report Reply
1437467463276.jpg -(1916278B / 1.83MB, 2560x1440) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>55518
>>
Heinrich Olbers - Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:47:58 EST ID:301QhKfM No.55534 Ignore Report Reply
>>55531
iirc a lot of those photos are long exposures and that if you were to look with your fleshy man-eyes these things wouldn't be nearly so exciting to look at
>>
Alan Guth - Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:35:39 EST ID:YHjXylC8 No.55536 Ignore Report Reply
1437568539747.jpg -(1097252B / 1.05MB, 2400x2290) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>>55534
Yeah, but we're really far away too. If we were closer (and blocked out light from other sources, we see dim objects near very bright objects by covering up the bright object), some structures would be brighter, to an extent.
But nebulae are so big and diffuse they've be invisible up close. The face of OP's unicorn is about a light year long.

The IAU currently does not recognize space-unicorn as an alternative to light-year.
>>
William Huggins - Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:49:15 EST ID:rIYomINL No.55546 Ignore Report Reply
>>55534
That doesn't mean they aren't real or aren't visible light.
>>
Irwin Shapiro - Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:48:39 EST ID:OXINl/7g No.55549 Ignore Report Reply
>>55546
They're definitely *real*, but they're not as visible as the photos make them appear. Most of those awesome nebula photos are long exposures, yes, but they're also composites of infrared, x-ray, and visible light, with some coloration and hue/contrast added to make them "pop." It's a real thing in the photo, but it's not the "natural" way it looks.


Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.