Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the format Name#Password
[i]Italic Text[/i]
[b]Bold Text[/b]
[spoiler]Spoiler Text[/spoiler]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace Text[/pre]
[super]Superset Text[/super]
[sub]Subset Text[/sub]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists


420chan is Getting Overhauled - Changelog/Bug Report/Request Thread (Updated July 26)

Actual photo of earth ?

- Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:40:57 EST a9VttgPi No.55637
File: 1440628857139.jpg -(94020B / 91.82KB, 1280x720) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Actual photo of earth ?
Sry if this seems like tinfoil but i just cant get it.
So we have sattelites with further orbit than moon right?
Please give link to an actual photo of earth not some composed bull shit.
Something is going on and this might be the best brain wash ever. Not saying flat earth but hidden land or we just cant get further of some point. Also alot of the other NASA images ...you know, are fakes , there is documentation on this do your research. So a simple request , a photo of earth please :)

Have a nice day :) !
Russel Hulse - Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:21:29 EST YHjXylC8 No.55638 Reply
1440634889892.jpg -(425293B / 415.33KB, 3673x1740) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
At this very second, no, no satellites are orbiting higher than the moon.
Some have highly elliptical orbits which cross above the moon's orbit, but literally one minute before I posted this, the last one, NASA's WIND satellite moved under it.
It will be above it again in a few hours.

But here's an image from the magnetic tapes brought back by the Lunar Orbiter and decoded by a third party decades later.
You can see why it's silly to try to spot land masses from that far away.
Russel Hulse - Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:38:56 EST YHjXylC8 No.55639 Reply
1440635936892.jpg -(142122B / 138.79KB, 2048x1536) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
You can also look up the Chandrayaan (indian lunar orbiter/probe) and Chang'e (chinese lunar rovers) photos if you don't trust NASA.
Karl von Weizsacker - Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:45:07 EST P+fSJ1RL No.55641 Reply
diggin that semi star fleet logo top right.
Nicolaus Copernicus - Wed, 26 Aug 2015 20:50:11 EST 415JX8nG No.55642 Reply
1440636611358.jpg -(45465B / 44.40KB, 570x570) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Not true, nasa has a new satellite called the Deep Space Climate Observatory.

It stays in the L point between the earth and the sun, far from even the moon, so that it constantly stare at the day side of the planet and make measurements, pic related
Annie Cannon - Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:37:34 EST j3JUC08k No.55643 Reply

Cassini is orbiting Saturn. That's "higher" than the moon.
James Mother Fucking Randi !lwriJ94kMg - Thu, 27 Aug 2015 03:16:36 EST yA35CPLh No.55644 Reply
Open could you give us your "research" on faked NASA images?
Id love to read it.
James van Allen - Sun, 06 Sep 2015 11:17:05 EST D3+Ue8ko No.55656 Reply
1441552625365.jpg -(76309B / 74.52KB, 634x407) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Clearly a composed image again, look few threads below, same pic no moon.

Sry i didnt find the composed story but if you use google than you can get alot of information , water bubbles in space while shooting ISS footage, huge differences compearing 0 gravity in planes and their footage and so on. Something is going on and you dont have to be a tinfoil dude to see this... Just read some information on this topic, be open minded and ask questions.

If there is no actual picture of earth can anyone relate to a actual photo of a sattelite in orbit? Since there are thousends of them in orbit, there clearly should be atleast ONE image of a sattelite ? You dont think so ? Or a video of space rocket taking off to the actual orbit ? There is nothing like that out there, also the awesome HD photos of pluto , oh god.
Not to mention the space debris flying at high speeds but none of that could ofc hit ISS or other sattelites. All the repeares they do are lame show offs in a fucking pool . Look it up and once again doubt in NASA !!
Walter Adams - Sun, 06 Sep 2015 11:31:33 EST YHjXylC8 No.55657 Reply
1441553493631.png -(659326B / 643.87KB, 1004x468) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>Clearly a composed image again, look few threads below, same pic no moon.
Except they show different angles with different cloud cover?

>If there is no actual picture of earth can anyone relate to a actual photo of a sattelite in orbit? Since there are thousends of them in orbit, there clearly should be atleast ONE image of a sattelite ? You dont think so ? Or a video of space rocket taking off to the actual orbit ? There is nothing like that out there
Certainly if you don't look, but I've seen all of these things.
Walter Adams - Sun, 06 Sep 2015 11:44:31 EST YHjXylC8 No.55658 Reply
1441554271631.jpg -(40693B / 39.74KB, 400x300) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
You can see the ISS and the lenses of iridium satellites when the sun reflects off them (there's an app that tracks them) without a telescope.
Walter Adams - Sun, 06 Sep 2015 11:46:38 EST YHjXylC8 No.55659 Reply
1441554398631.jpg -(18347B / 17.92KB, 610x492) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
You can see the ISS and the lenses of iridium satellites when the sun reflects off them (there's an app that tracks them) without a telescope.
Thomas Gold - Sun, 06 Sep 2015 18:33:49 EST rNyjfuOJ No.55660 Reply
All digital photographs are composed, OP.

>Also alot of the other NASA images ...you know, are fakes , there is documentation on this do your research
I looked into it, did the research..and the problem is that you don't understand how cameras or photography work.
Hannes Alven - Mon, 07 Sep 2015 04:58:14 EST 415JX8nG No.55661 Reply
Haha what a dumb ass.
You can see satellites all the time in the night sky with binoculars. You can obviously tell if they're in circumpolar or equatorial orbits.
Just shut up and leave
Cecelia Payne-Gaposchkin - Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:19:18 EST TZ68JdMO No.55782 Reply
Oh god. A friend of mine of eight years started talking about all of this tinfoil bullshit the other night when were blazed. He literally said, "I mean, there's just as much evidence that the earth is flat as there is that it's round." He was also talking about demons, nephilim, and reptilian shape shifters. I ripped him a new one. Shame on him.
Alan Guth - Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:11:12 EST tQX5ylFX No.55783 Reply
Man how does any one argue that the Earth is flat? Have they never left their home town?

So many vehicles have circumnavigated the globe by now at all kinds of altitudes.

>person uses XM radio
>ignores the fact that there is a satalite hanging out in geo sync orbit feeding that music, a feat only possible orbiting a sphere with a gravitational pull.
Wilhelm Beer - Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:43:57 EST j3JUC08k No.55784 Reply
>Clearly a composed image again, look few threads below, same pic no moon.

That's because the satellite is orbiting in the Lagrange point between the Earth and the Sun. It's orbiting around the Earth much more slowly than the moon is, meaning that the moon can catch up to it easily. If the satellite took video, you would actually be able to see the moon slowly passing in front of the Earth.

Read and think about things before you post.
Vera Rubiin - Sun, 01 Nov 2015 13:05:48 EST pR7ilsU2 No.55786 Reply
>this might be the best brain wash ever
You did it! You cracked the code! Congratulations!
You're smarter than all 7 billion people on this planet.
I knew you could do it ;)
Kill yourself.
Vekzuul Ishvah !CRWxmni.Ck - Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:59:26 EST Y+TLwE2a No.55809 Reply
Stopped reading at
>Kill yourself.

*Sensible Chuckle*
Mike Brown - Tue, 01 Dec 2015 02:43:27 EST jeyaar+j No.55833 Reply
Has anyone ever been as far as proven we been in space actually?
Chushiro Hayashi - Sun, 06 Dec 2015 16:13:09 EST IwAsVtyx No.55847 Reply
1449436389836.gif -(169941B / 165.96KB, 1004x1004) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Japaneese Hayabusa 2 Spacecraft flyby of earth.

Chushiro Hayashi - Sun, 06 Dec 2015 16:19:07 EST IwAsVtyx No.55848 Reply
1449436747836.jpg -(10260B / 10.02KB, 600x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Here is an Earth-Moon system shot from the camera on the MASCOT lander riding along with the space robot Hayabusa2.

You see OP, what you call 'research', is you reading everything you want to agree with your retarded paranoia. Seems you don't know what 'research' really is.

If you did do research, you would realize that humans do cool things and you ARE NOT A PART OF ANY OF IT WHAT SO EVER BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOTHING TO CONTRIBUTE. I literally got this from JAXA's ( you know, Japan's fake space agency of lies) website,


You science deniers are holding all of us back.
Anders Angstrom - Thu, 07 Jan 2016 07:07:32 EST AZhYjTPv No.55918 Reply
It is in an Earth-Sun L point. Not in orbit of Earth.

As for the fellow saying it is composed, take a picture of a parking lot. Maybe a busy street. Then take a different photo of the same place.

If one has a car that is not there, I suppose you conclude that it must be 'composed'?
Arthur Eddington - Thu, 07 Jan 2016 07:58:24 EST fDZ3h+Vd No.55919 Reply
Why did you have to bump this retarded thread? Everyone knows OP is beyond saving, nobody is getting through that much stupidity. I mean christ, he can't even spell right !

But since I'm posting, here OP, have 86 rockets that ARE GOING INTO ORBIT that you claim to have not seen before. These were all just in 2015, by the way.

And also, if you have a dslr YOU CAN JUST POINT THAT SHIT INTO THE SKY AT NIGHT, PUT 30 SECONDS EXPOSURE AND THERE WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY BE A SATELLITE STREAKING ACROSS THE PICTURE. It'll be faint, but definately noticable. I've seen them multiple times when photographing stars OUT OF MY FUCKING WINDOW !
No telescope even needed, shit in one photo I had 2 of the fuckers.
Charles Messier - Sun, 10 Jan 2016 02:27:25 EST eKHOYimM No.55923 Reply
Einsteins logic determined it is flat, and appears rounder the further you move away from it, because things move exponentially and "further" gets further the further it gets

This led onto other things like "the earth doesn't end at the north and south pole"

Any flat or hollow earth believers are just misunderstand that kind of logic.
Henry Russell - Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:16:00 EST gFH/k5bO No.56043 Reply
i want to see more of these please
Ejnar Hertzprung - Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:39:57 EST +eqmThO1 No.56049 Reply
If you want some empirical evidence that you can do yourself, you can look for Iridium flares. The Iridium series of communications satellites have these honking big solar panels like refrigerator doors, and often reflect sunlight that's visible from the ground. Because their orientation is known exactly, you can predict when one is due, and where.


And besides, really, just use some critical thought. Imagine for one minute that your theory is true and all space travel is fake. To maintain such a conspiracy would require America, Russia, Japan, China, Britain, India, all to work together in perfect harmony to maintain verisimilitude through the fifties onwards, all through the Cold War and the Space Race, and the Space Shuttle era without ever calling each other out on their rocket launches being fake, along with private corporations like Space X and Virgin...

It's like the chemtrails thing, either you honestly believe that the pilots and ground crew of every airline and air port in the world are some kind of punch-clock illuminatus, laying easily visible honking big mind-control vapours across the stratosphere, instead of in the water or the air conditioning where it'd make more sense, or you think for ten fucking seconds and concede that the simplest answer is the most likely one, and the people who talk like nuts are just nuts.
Caroline Herschel - Wed, 01 Jun 2016 19:29:07 EST 5WVQzTq7 No.56204 Reply
reminder that flat earth theory is just some dumb shit to make other conspiracy theories less credible
Mike Brown - Fri, 03 Jun 2016 04:12:03 EST YO0tXY16 No.56206 Reply
Are you saying that a conspiracy theory is a conspiracy?
(head explodes)
Allan Sandage - Fri, 03 Jun 2016 05:11:15 EST 3t/weoS/ No.56207 Reply

Nah, it's just a meta-conspiracy that /tinfoil/ers believe in order to make their other crazy shit seem legit.
Tadashi Nakajima - Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:00:24 EST YHjXylC8 No.56209 Reply
1464980424063.jpg -(260038B / 253.94KB, 660x1468) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Oh? Can you prove the earth is round?
All your other conspiracies are just dumb shit to conceal the shape of the earth.
Arthur Eddington - Mon, 06 Jun 2016 03:01:53 EST tQX5ylFX No.56217 Reply
When can we eliminate the stupid from the population?
Annie Cannon - Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:55:56 EST vB+y87GU No.56220 Reply
Stupid is too useful to the powers that be.
There is no hope for humanity.
Isaac Newton - Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:04:00 EST JvKl2Luz No.56264 Reply
1467950640134.jpg -(247685B / 241.88KB, 1680x1050) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>tfw no pale blue dot
Pierre-Simon Laplace - Sat, 09 Jul 2016 10:24:56 EST EopYGLSl No.56265 Reply
Also on a slightly related note

Hoe come you can never see stars in pictures taken from the moon
Johannes Kepler - Sat, 09 Jul 2016 15:59:54 EST tQX5ylFX No.56266 Reply
pics taken are on the day side. Do you see stars in the day time on Earth?

aside from the sun smart ass
Bernard-Ferdinand Lyot - Sun, 10 Jul 2016 06:21:29 EST 3t/weoS/ No.56267 Reply

Also, most stars are too faint to appear on photographs if I remember correctly. Astronauts have commented on this, claiming the pics from the ISS for example doesn't do the sky any justice.
Johan Galle - Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:23:01 EST tQX5ylFX No.56269 Reply
also true. it takes long exposure times in the night to get decent photos.
Christiaan Huygens - Mon, 11 Jul 2016 01:41:35 EST YHjXylC8 No.56270 Reply
1468215695981.jpg -(114563B / 111.88KB, 600x361) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
On earth, the sun's light is scattered by the atmosphere.
On the moon, if you were taking a photo from a shadow and kept the reflection from the surface out of view, why wouldn't you see stars?
Carl Seyfert - Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:40:05 EST oigSnnJc No.56271 Reply
Because film exposure is a thing. As is light level. As is shutter speed.

Do we really need to dive into photography theory?
Henry Russell - Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:16:49 EST tQX5ylFX No.56272 Reply
you would. that's what I'm saying. Plus all the photography stuff about exposure.

Like go out side and snap one form your 8mp phone and then get a real camera with real shutter options.
Bernard-Ferdinand Lyot - Wed, 13 Jul 2016 03:10:39 EST tQX5ylFX No.56273 Reply
Re read your post. Not on the day side. The shadow with out reflection is the night side.
John Wheeler - Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:39:26 EST YHjXylC8 No.56274 Reply
1468449566261.jpg -(3053701B / 2.91MB, 2151x2020) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
Shadow could be as simple as standing between the camera and sun or pointing the camera away from the sun.

But then if you can't have the moon, earth, or sun in the image, what's even the point of taking the photos from the moon?
Johan Galle - Sun, 17 Jul 2016 07:48:32 EST pjhpxsvC No.56276 Reply
Deport them all to the UK.

That's already the biggest pile of retards on the planet.
Pierre-Simon Laplace - Mon, 18 Jul 2016 01:49:30 EST tQX5ylFX No.56277 Reply
light bounces off the surface of moon and that blocks out those stars. Given the darkness on the night side of the moon and there being no atmosphere the point of taking photos there would be really good pics. shadows are simple but size matters.

I feel like I need to explain to you how light works but I honestly don't have the time or ability.
Fritz Zwicky - Tue, 19 Jul 2016 07:30:58 EST 7+M0DY+x No.56279 Reply
1468927858193.png -(487775B / 476.34KB, 858x564) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
NASA just make stuff up. The ISS is faked in a swimming pool.

Clues Forum has a lot of interesting stuff about this.
Fritz Zwicky - Tue, 19 Jul 2016 07:33:38 EST 7+M0DY+x No.56280 Reply
1468928018193.jpg -(593422B / 579.51KB, 1680x1050) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

See the greenscreen on the monitor? They just change the lighting in the NBL pool, and use digital compositing to insert the Earth.

It's all the Masons fault.
Bruon Rossi - Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:37:38 EST tQX5ylFX No.56281 Reply
you obviously haven't seen enough people in zero G
Bernard Burke - Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:29:10 EST Y/6ENAiP No.56296 Reply
I just want to add this addendum to the thread; I just found out one of my colleagues who works at NASA Goddard did the timing and command writing for that image of the Earth-Moon taken by Deep Space Climate Observatory. She stated that there was an anomaly that caused the spacecraft to go into safe mode a few hours before the image was to be taken. Spooky stuff.

And also, fuck this thread and the conspiracy bullshit. Go work in astrophysics or aerospace before making ridiculous accusations you fucking plebs. /rant
John Bahcall - Thu, 04 Aug 2016 20:21:13 EST nEPqqao+ No.56302 Reply
Einstein's a faggot who got some things right and now everyone's too scared to take down the legend to admit that General Relativity is flawed as fuck. Show me a reference frame in real life and then suck my dick and get me a sandwich.
George Gamow - Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:39:14 EST tQX5ylFX No.56303 Reply
doesn't showing that require near light speeds? we can't do that.... yet. wait till the hardon collider forms stable micro singularities we can use to power a warp core.
Grote Reuber - Fri, 05 Aug 2016 17:10:50 EST 3t/weoS/ No.56304 Reply

So you're claiming that spherical objects are in fact mathematically flat in our universe?

Not hanging you out here or anything, I'm genuinely curious as it's an interesting claim.

Report Post
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.