420chan now has a web-based IRC client available, right here
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the float Name#Password
Comment
[*]Italic Text[/*]
[**]Bold Text[/**]
[~]Taimapedia Article[/~]
[%]Spoiler Text[/%]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace text[/pre]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists
File

Sandwich


Community Updates

420chan now supports HTTPS! If you find any issues, you may report them in this thread
Bombardment balloons in WWII were the original U.S. Population control drones by Wesley Dongerham - Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:55:29 EST ID:e5ylW4jC No.72167 Ignore Report Quick Reply
File: 1476122129364.jpg -(750984B / 733.38KB, 1800x1144) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. 750984
The US government always claimed they were the Japs that sent the Balloons over the pacific to attack America but a closer analysis reveals that the locations the balloons would have had to come from could have been none other than our own carrier fleets, clearly our own government started the Chemtrails program using the confusion of WWII to cover it up.

This program was probably initially using radio frequencies but eventually would have had to switch to chemical compounds to properly effect mass population centers and rural areas. This was due in large part to the new steel skyscrapers acting as fariday cages to absorb the radiowaves.

What could have been the governments end goal initially? To increase the work force production by making the American public more mailable? Or perhaps to increase the America birth rate to have more soldiers?

It has long been a proven fact that the baby boomer generation was the successful implementation of government and Air Force chemtrail technology but many experts have questioned what the original sinister motivation for this was.

How could our grandparents have known they were living in the beginning of a trap.
>>
Fucking Clammernag - Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:43:44 EST ID:6H3OrTbn No.72184 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>72167
Isn't capitalism the first and only pop control?
>>
Charles Dorringsten - Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:59:17 EST ID:ugbDL05M No.72211 Ignore Report Quick Reply
Take your meds. The voices seem to be talking to you again.
>>
The Boat - Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:32:39 EST ID:3IEfdEa4 No.72375 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>72211
What is your issue man? Why don't you take your meds?
>>
Doris Pickson - Thu, 03 Nov 2016 17:17:05 EST ID:e5ylW4jC No.72401 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>72167
Are you fucked in the head motherfucker? Cool bomber pic. But you are as fucked as Swedish people
>>
Hugh Bramblemere - Fri, 04 Nov 2016 13:14:33 EST ID:6AkyGdGs No.72406 Ignore Report Quick Reply
1478279673397.jpg -(4080952B / 3.89MB, 5248x2952) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>perhaps to increase the America birth rate to have more soldiers?
Maybe the dumbest hypothesis I've ever heard.
>>
Alice Clayforth - Sat, 05 Nov 2016 20:40:04 EST ID:P0Sp2b8Z No.72411 Ignore Report Quick Reply
I bet it had something to do with why I get so many spider bites
>>
Henry Worringfet - Thu, 05 Jan 2017 01:00:20 EST ID:1OHn1hiL No.72749 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>72167
/tinfoil/
>>
Archie Penningville - Thu, 12 Jan 2017 02:25:16 EST ID:0RZX/Dwc No.72783 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>72167

"It has long been a proven fact"
>>
Charles Gammlegold - Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:25:30 EST ID:34vqitxA No.72784 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>It has long been a proven fact that the baby boomer generation was the successful implementation of government and Air Force chemtrail technology but many experts have questioned what the original sinister motivation for this was.
I need to see some proof of that. Cause that's not a commonly accepted argument.Now, do I think that there's something suspicious about the chemtrails in ww2? For sure. I also think that there's something off about chemtrails in general.

But it really could be something as basic as scientific testing/bug control. I'd rather be sensible here instead of just jumping straight to that something big and horrible is going on. It's a topic that deserves to be looked at. So where are your sources op?
>>
Ian Gungerchedge - Thu, 19 Jan 2017 20:03:30 EST ID:pRDOrqsE No.72817 Ignore Report Quick Reply
>>72406
what is that pic?


Report Post
Reason
Note
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.