Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
You can leave this blank to post anonymously, or you can create a Tripcode by using the format Name#Password
[i]Italic Text[/i]
[b]Bold Text[/b]
[spoiler]Spoiler Text[/spoiler]
>Highlight/Quote Text
[pre]Preformatted & Monospace Text[/pre]
[super]Superset Text[/super]
[sub]Subset Text[/sub]
1. Numbered lists become ordered lists
* Bulleted lists become unordered lists



- Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:11:49 EST 4wLyXCg5 No.74934
File: 1536793909228.png -(679863B / 663.93KB, 720x1280) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size. Ghosts
R ghosts real?
Hannah Drundleshit - Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:39:21 EST 96eFyX9Z No.74935 Reply
Only the one that spits cold water on your butt when you're pooping is real.
Caroline Smallwill - Fri, 12 Oct 2018 16:15:42 EST A1WngM+f No.75005 Reply
My grandpa used to visit a lot after his death, was kinda sad because he was asking for help with his insulin and screamed and gasped for breath until I figured a way out of his pains.
Spongebob Squarepants. I told him to possess a talking spongebob squarepants toy and from there he learned to be a 2 dimensional being, and he led lots of people who were trapped in the Oceanic Abyss since thats where most diabetics go (Diabetes is a water/sugar balance issue)
After he led the dead to being 2 dimensional creatures to withstand the pressures of the Sea, he decided to lead other dead people to go kill Isis for a few months before passing on to a new life where he's searching my grandma.

I still get weirded out whenever that spongebob toy just starts laughing in the middle of the night...
Frederick Blangerbanks - Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:47:18 EST ERkOZaJg No.75075 Reply
Ghost can't be real or you would bump into them or talk to them. They are in a different form when they do that. So would be the time perception for them, in lighter form.
William Hagglewill - Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:46:13 EST Mhcjp69K No.75077 Reply

yo, this niga doesn't even get quantum mechanics pfft fucking dweeb, YO, AY, check it. Get this homes, like fucking Time... We got now? present, past, future so my nig get some paper and draw 3 dots where ever you want then like crunch up that paper so all the dots are touching, my nig... that's like all moment past future present exist at the same time, get out of that mind of a linear time... eventually it will click and you will understand. SO YO MY NIG, I LIVE IN THIS TOWN it's really old and shit. We got these haunted buildings, underground roads that are blocked off, cellars that lead into these tunnels, all over this joint my nig. It's a beautiful place and ive worked ina few of the old buildings over the years. Some used to be brothels, bars, restaurants, coffee houses, opium dens. YO YO FIGURE IT OUT MY NIG YO be in a place where something sketch happened you might happen to feel real out of place or clip into this point in time because yo reasons my nig look into it and shit dawg African's where Pharoe's n shit
Lydia Lightwill - Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:47:27 EST H/kXdE2I No.75078 Reply
If a ghost has sex with another ghost does it make a baby ghost
Barnaby Puckletitch - Wed, 14 Nov 2018 23:01:09 EST 8rPuDReq No.75079 Reply
wat if we re the ghosts
Isabella Bronningworth - Thu, 15 Nov 2018 09:53:48 EST lMZX1gLy No.75080 Reply
Do you not know that tee shirts, baseball caps, belts, HIGH-HEELED SHOES, SCARVES, and STOCKINGS ALL started out EXCLUSIVELY as menswear and that tee shirts and high-heeled shoes were specifically engineered as military wear for MEN ONLY? Do you realize that men's own PANTS began as UNDER-WEAR, the same as women's PANTALETTES and PANTALOONS in olden times (that apparently were not Scripturally-forbidden nor legally contested in early Europe/America)? Do you realize that men slowly began dis-ROBE-ing themselves (quite literally) and finally decided that they could just wear their undies in public and call them pants? (But somehow women are forbidden from doing the same thing--being conveniently brow-beaten by Deut. 22:5.) And do you realize that as far back as you can take the origin of pants (roughly 3,000+ years ago in the East), women wore them also as a norm? That the Roman soldiers wouldn't even wear them (they were wearing SKIRTS, remember?) because they considered them effeminate?

God NEVER created a bifurcated garment for men that was biblically designed to be worn outside of a modest, discreet OUTER covering. [And the priestly "breeches" only reached from the waist to the thigh, indicating underwear--not pants. Regardless of the actual length, they were still UNDER-wear.] He also NEVER declared that men and women should NOT wear the same "cut" of clothing. (Look it up in Hebrew. Deuteronomy 22:5 specifically forbids a woman from putting on a warrior's habiliments/armor or a warrior from wearing a woman's simlah [robe], and so feigning himself as a woman. This reportedly has more to do with the pagan worship of the day and/or women going to battle/men resisting battle (i.e. "dodging the draft") than it does the sexes wearing the same "cut" of clothing. Research it at length. The word for MAN in Hebrew in Deut. 22:5 is not
the usual word used for "man" but the word typically used for "warrior, strong man, war hero.") Men also wore simlahs of their own and LOOKED JUST LIKE WOMEN IN THEIR OUTER APPAREL in Bible days when they wore their simlahs! (As far as "cross dressing" is concerned. Color/embroidery may have been different, but both sexes wore dresses/robes.) What did GOD HIMSELF create for Adam when driving him and Eve out of the Garden? Blue jeans?? Slacks? Knickerbockers? Sweat pants? No. He put them BOTH in COATS of skins and they looked IDENTICAL in their attire from all we can assume--as dressed by GOD HIMSELF. We have no record of God dyeing Eve's coat pink or adding a touch of lace to distinguish.

GOD HIMSELF started both sexes out in a "ROBE" (which resembled a modern dress) and fully sanctioned men in DRESSES and SKIRTS, for all practical purposes. The Old Testament is REPLETE with evidence of men wearing skirts, robes,
tunics, dresses, etc. JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF NEVER WORE A PAIR OF PANTS IN HIS LIFE (certainly not outwardly!) and ALWAYS had His private region modestly covered with loose apparel--not anatomically-revealing pants that Every. Single. One of you men wear today. Sorry--just sayin'. We can see your stuff!! And that ain't biblical! It's rather offensive, if you ask me. (But women are "causing you to lust" when they wear pants??? And yet you've likely never once registered what we go
through day in and day out with your snugly-clad tushes and blatant "junk" bulges around us 24/7.)

Have you considered what Jesus will be returning in? Pants? I trow not. For He hath "on His VESTURE [Gr. #2440, "a dress"] and on His thigh . . . " What does the Almighty wear? Pants? No, "....His TRAIN filled the temple." And what does He dress EVERY overcomer in? Pants? No--ROBES of white.

I am not for "cross-dressing" as it relates to our culture; and by cross-dressing, I mean women wearing male suits/ties, grungy dude wear, etc. or men wearing lady-like dresses and looking like drag queens, etc. It is a mingling of the sexes per the norms of our culture and I find it disturbing. (But go ask them in Eastern countries if men are cross-dressing by wearing robes, dresses, and skirts. They look perfectly fine and are, quite frankly, in keeping with biblical standards.) But this does not mean that because European men decided several hundred years ago to defrock themselves of their cumbersome robes and parade around with anatomically-revealing pants (front and back!) that if women follow suit we are cross-dressing and are guilty of
the abomination described in Deut. 22:5. What were men doing before pants ever existed, pray tell? Personally, I find men more guilty of blatantly disrobing than I do women for following their lead. But I can't seriously believe that modern man shall be judged by God for how our society now dictates he dress. And if I must grant that clemency to men, then I'm going to have to do the same thing for women.

This is not an assault on all men who wear pants. This is an irony-revealing highlighter to emphasize that your publicly-worn pants aren't even biblical to start with, yet you'll wear them for your own comfort and convenience (and because it is now an established social norm). Then you'll tell women that they CAN'T do this (although it is also THEIR now-established norm) or they are biblically-inaccurate and guilty of abomination before God. Huh?

While we're at it, what about your beard? What about the fact that according to OT law, men were FORBIDDEN from trimming their beards/going beardless and were required by law to let them grow naturally? In fact, that whole beard thing was clumped in with the same group of Scriptures as warnings against enchantment and witchcraft, and to trim the beard was to MAR (destroy, ruin, pervert, corrupt) the beard. So if women are to keep the "no pants" thing in 2016 [even though pants was unheard of/did not apply to the Israelites] consistent with a misinterpreted mention from 3500+ years ago, what about your beard and your "Jewish" robes?

Young man, I applaud your faithfulness and your sincerity and your stance on many issues. But on this I vary. I spent years in a no-pants-for-women church that was legalistic in every way. Upon studying the Scriptures (per the original Hebrew) in depth, I realized that Deut. 22:5 is grossly misapplied and misinterpreted by our modern (religious) society. Such misinterpretation licenses men to wear near anything they please (specifically, pants!) and condemns women from doing the same thing--based on some "anti-cross-dressing" philosophy that couldn't be proven per Old Testament dressing habits if you bet your life on it. Deut. 22:5 forbids a woman from wearing a warrior's "k'liy" (utensils, jewelry, vessels, armor, etc.)--a word never otherwise associated with clothing--or from a man feigning himself as a woman, as these practices were common among idolators and worshippers of Ashtaroth. The idea was that either sex did not represent/feign itself as the other--not that the "mold" of their clothing be different. Again, tee shirts, high heels, baseball caps, scarves, stockings, hose, belts ....... Do your homework, good fellow. If your wife is wearing ANY of these, she is wearing articles that originated as men's clothing. (Belts might be questionable, but even Wikipedia reports that they were documented as male clothing since the Bronze Age.)
Charlotte Drunderworth - Thu, 15 Nov 2018 18:31:59 EST sI0TB1u6 No.75083 Reply
ok sure, but who cares? what even is his point? 'womens clothes used to be mens clothes'? so fucking what? society changes and adapts
Emma Gungerkutch - Fri, 16 Nov 2018 10:32:20 EST 35qwgn4d No.75084 Reply

read between the lines mate... It's actually really deep and hit's on so many points that are relevant to us in today's society.
James Billyhack - Sat, 17 Nov 2018 16:41:50 EST ERkOZaJg No.75086 Reply
well, what are you call a ghost anyway? You could be having the same through when your gone and both could be comparable.
Ebenezer Clidgehet - Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:11:13 EST C1K9ONay No.75118 Reply
.... The mind plays tricks.

Report Post
Please be descriptive with report notes,
this helps staff resolve issues quicker.